Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

An Economic Solution to Copyright Challenges of Generative AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.13964 v4 pith:YETFW4IF submitted 2024-04-22 cs.LG econ.GNq-fin.ECstat.ME

An Economic Solution to Copyright Challenges of Generative AI

classification cs.LG econ.GNq-fin.ECstat.ME
keywords copyrightdatagenerativeframeworkownerstrainingchallengescontributions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems are trained on large data corpora to generate new pieces of text, images, videos, and other media. There is growing concern that such systems may infringe on the copyright interests of training data contributors. To address the copyright challenges of generative AI, we propose a framework that compensates copyright owners proportionally to their contributions to the creation of AI-generated content. The metric for contributions is quantitatively determined by leveraging the probabilistic nature of modern generative AI models and using techniques from cooperative game theory in economics. This framework enables a platform where AI developers benefit from access to high-quality training data, thus improving model performance. Meanwhile, copyright owners receive fair compensation, driving the continued provision of relevant data for generative model training. Experiments demonstrate that our framework successfully identifies the most relevant data sources used in artwork generation, ensuring a fair and interpretable distribution of revenues among copyright owners.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Compensation Design

    cs.GT 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0

    Under monotone submodular platform value and private agent costs, the marginal-contribution payment rule admits pure Nash equilibria and a tight price of anarchy of 2+o(1), while Shapley-value payments can have no pur...

  2. A Human-Centric Framework for Data Attribution in Large Language Models

    cs.CY 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces a parameter-driven framework for data attribution in LLMs that enables negotiation among creators, users, and intermediaries to meet stakeholder goals within the data economy.

  3. MaxShapley: Towards Incentive-compatible Generative Search with Fair Context Attribution

    cs.LG 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MaxShapley computes fair document attributions in generative QA by reducing Shapley value calculation to polynomial time via a max-sum utility, matching exact Shapley quality on HotPotQA, MuSiQUE, and MS MARCO while u...