REVIEW 1 cited by
Noise Correction on Subjective Datasets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Incorporating every annotator's perspective is crucial for unbiased data modeling. Annotator fatigue and changing opinions over time can distort dataset annotations. To combat this, we propose to learn a more accurate representation of diverse opinions by utilizing multitask learning in conjunction with loss-based label correction. We show that using our novel formulation, we can cleanly separate agreeing and disagreeing annotations. Furthermore, this method provides a controllable way to encourage or discourage disagreement. We demonstrate that this modification can improve prediction performance in a single or multi-annotator setting. Lastly, we show that this method remains robust to additional label noise that is applied to subjective data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
QuMAB: Query-based Multi-Annotator Behavior Modeling with Reliability under Sparse Labels
QuMAB models each annotator with a lightweight query in a cross-attention network, reconstructs missing labels, and reports accuracy gains over aggregation baselines on two new dense-label datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.