Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Noise Correction on Subjective Datasets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.00619 v3 pith:YFL27DE6 submitted 2023-11-01 cs.LG cs.AIcs.HC

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.HC
keywords annotationsannotatorcorrectiondatalabelmethodnoiseopinions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Incorporating every annotator's perspective is crucial for unbiased data modeling. Annotator fatigue and changing opinions over time can distort dataset annotations. To combat this, we propose to learn a more accurate representation of diverse opinions by utilizing multitask learning in conjunction with loss-based label correction. We show that using our novel formulation, we can cleanly separate agreeing and disagreeing annotations. Furthermore, this method provides a controllable way to encourage or discourage disagreement. We demonstrate that this modification can improve prediction performance in a single or multi-annotator setting. Lastly, we show that this method remains robust to additional label noise that is applied to subjective data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. QuMAB: Query-based Multi-Annotator Behavior Modeling with Reliability under Sparse Labels

    cs.MM 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    QuMAB models each annotator with a lightweight query in a cross-attention network, reconstructs missing labels, and reports accuracy gains over aggregation baselines on two new dense-label datasets.

Pith tools