Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SoK: How Robust is Audio Watermarking in Generative AI models?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.19176 v2 pith:YFPST6DA submitted 2025-03-24 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords attackswatermarkingschemesaudioremovalevaluationrobustnessai-generated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Audio watermarking is increasingly used to verify the provenance of AI-generated content, enabling applications such as detecting AI-generated speech, protecting music IP, and defending against voice cloning. To be effective, audio watermarks must resist removal attacks that distort signals to evade detection. While many schemes claim robustness, these claims are typically tested in isolation and against a limited set of attacks. A systematic evaluation against diverse removal attacks is lacking, hindering practical deployment. In this paper, we investigate whether recent watermarking schemes that claim robustness can withstand a broad range of removal attacks. First, we introduce a taxonomy covering 22 audio watermarking schemes. Next, we summarize their underlying technologies and potential vulnerabilities. We then present a large-scale empirical study to assess their robustness. To support this, we build an evaluation framework encompassing 22 types of removal attacks (109 configurations) including signal-level, physical-level, and AI-induced distortions. We reproduce 9 watermarking schemes using open-source code, identify 8 new highly effective attacks, and highlight 11 key findings that expose the fundamental limitations of these methods across 3 public datasets. Our results reveal that none of the surveyed schemes can withstand all tested distortions. This evaluation offers a comprehensive view of how current watermarking methods perform under real-world threats. Our demo and code are available at https://sokaudiowm.github.io/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MusicMark: A Robust Generative Watermarking Framework for Music Generation

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Embedding watermark bits into diffusion semantic latents via a frozen-backbone adapter yields far more robust music provenance than post-hoc watermarking under codecs and cover-song attacks.

  2. Who Gets Flagged? The Pluralistic Evaluation Gap in AI Content Watermarking

    cs.CY 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Major watermarking benchmarks omit cross-lingual, cultural, and demographic reporting, creating a pluralistic evaluation gap that current governance mandates ignore.

  3. WaveVerify: A Novel Audio Watermarking Framework for Media Authentication and Combatting Deepfakes

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    WaveVerify embeds audio watermarks with a FiLM-based generator and extracts them with a Mixture-of-Experts detector, reporting zero bit error and high localization under common distortions.

Pith tools