Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Towards Responsible AI Music: an Investigation of Trustworthy Features for Creative Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.18814 v1 pith:YG2DKYWW submitted 2025-03-24 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords systemsgenerativeresponsiblemusicrequirementsacrosscollaborationcontextualised
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative AI is radically changing the creative arts, by fundamentally transforming the way we create and interact with cultural artefacts. While offering unprecedented opportunities for artistic expression and commercialisation, this technology also raises ethical, societal, and legal concerns. Key among these are the potential displacement of human creativity, copyright infringement stemming from vast training datasets, and the lack of transparency, explainability, and fairness mechanisms. As generative systems become pervasive in this domain, responsible design is crucial. Whilst previous work has tackled isolated aspects of generative systems (e.g., transparency, evaluation, data), we take a comprehensive approach, grounding these efforts within the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence produced by the High-Level Expert Group on AI appointed by the European Commission - a framework for designing responsible AI systems across seven macro requirements. Focusing on generative music AI, we illustrate how these requirements can be contextualised for the field, addressing trustworthiness across multiple dimensions and integrating insights from the existing literature. We further propose a roadmap for operationalising these contextualised requirements, emphasising interdisciplinary collaboration and stakeholder engagement. Our work provides a foundation for designing and evaluating responsible music generation systems, calling for collaboration among AI experts, ethicists, legal scholars, and artists. This manuscript is accompanied by a website: https://amresearchlab.github.io/raim-framework/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MixAssist: An Audio-Language Dataset for Co-Creative AI Assistance in Music Mixing

    cs.SD 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    MixAssist is the first audio-grounded, multi-turn conversational dataset for co-creative music mixing instruction, and fine-tuning Qwen-Audio on it yields human-comparable mixing advice.

  2. The Algorithmic Flattening of Sound: Computational Evidence and Justice Implications of AI Music Homogenization

    cs.CY 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An audit of Suno and Lyria 3 shows Lyria compresses music within genres while Suno blurs boundaries between genres, and both systems remain easily distinguishable from human-made music.

  3. Opening Musical Creativity? Embedded Ideologies in Generative-AI Music Systems

    cs.SD 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A mixed-method ethnographic study of four generative-AI music systems finds a shared 'total ideology' of individualist, techno-liberal rhetoric in company and user discourse.

Pith tools