Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MindScope: Exploring cognitive biases in large language models through Multi-Agent Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.04452 v1 pith:YHEVTTOC submitted 2024-10-06 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords cognitivebiasesdetectionmodelslanguagemindscopemulti-agentbias
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Detecting cognitive biases in large language models (LLMs) is a fascinating task that aims to probe the existing cognitive biases within these models. Current methods for detecting cognitive biases in language models generally suffer from incomplete detection capabilities and a restricted range of detectable bias types. To address this issue, we introduced the 'MindScope' dataset, which distinctively integrates static and dynamic elements. The static component comprises 5,170 open-ended questions spanning 72 cognitive bias categories. The dynamic component leverages a rule-based, multi-agent communication framework to facilitate the generation of multi-round dialogues. This framework is flexible and readily adaptable for various psychological experiments involving LLMs. In addition, we introduce a multi-agent detection method applicable to a wide range of detection tasks, which integrates Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), competitive debate, and a reinforcement learning-based decision module. Demonstrating substantial effectiveness, this method has shown to improve detection accuracy by as much as 35.10% compared to GPT-4. Codes and appendix are available at https://github.com/2279072142/MindScope.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. More Parameters Than Populations: A Systematic Literature Review of Large Language Models within Survey Research

    cs.DL 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A work-in-progress systematic review finds LLM use in survey research clusters in instrument development, synthetic respondent modeling, and automated text classification, leaving interviewing and cross-lingual work thin.

Pith tools