Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Localization vs. Semantics: Visual Representations in Unimodal and Multimodal Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.00281 v2 pith:YI3DPXPK submitted 2022-12-01 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords modelsvisualpredictionrepresentationstasksvision-and-languageempiricallearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the impressive advancements achieved through vision-and-language pretraining, it remains unclear whether this joint learning paradigm can help understand each individual modality. In this work, we conduct a comparative analysis of the visual representations in existing vision-and-language models and vision-only models by probing a broad range of tasks, aiming to assess the quality of the learned representations in a nuanced manner. Interestingly, our empirical observations suggest that vision-and-language models are better at label prediction tasks like object and attribute prediction, while vision-only models are stronger at dense prediction tasks that require more localized information. We hope our study sheds light on the role of language in visual learning, and serves as an empirical guide for various pretrained models. Code will be released at https://github.com/Lizw14/visual_probing

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools