pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.08950 · v1 · pith:YIO6CA6Rnew · submitted 2024-03-13 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.AI

Exploring Prompt Engineering Practices in the Enterprise

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.AI
keywords promptengineeringpromptslanguagemodelpracticesbehaviordesign
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Interaction with Large Language Models (LLMs) is primarily carried out via prompting. A prompt is a natural language instruction designed to elicit certain behaviour or output from a model. In theory, natural language prompts enable non-experts to interact with and leverage LLMs. However, for complex tasks and tasks with specific requirements, prompt design is not trivial. Creating effective prompts requires skill and knowledge, as well as significant iteration in order to determine model behavior, and guide the model to accomplish a particular goal. We hypothesize that the way in which users iterate on their prompts can provide insight into how they think prompting and models work, as well as the kinds of support needed for more efficient prompt engineering. To better understand prompt engineering practices, we analyzed sessions of prompt editing behavior, categorizing the parts of prompts users iterated on and the types of changes they made. We discuss design implications and future directions based on these prompt engineering practices.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Strategy-Induct: Task-Level Strategy Induction for Instruction Generation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Strategy-Induct induces task-level instructions from question-only examples by generating reasoning strategies first, then using those pairs to create a guiding instruction.

  2. Alignment has a Fantasia Problem

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AI alignment must move beyond assuming users have fully formed goals and instead provide active cognitive support to help form and refine intent over time.

  3. Less Back-and-Forth: A Comparative Study of Structured Prompting

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Checklist-improved prompts achieve the highest mean rubric score (7.50/8) and best quality-effort tradeoff compared to raw prompts (5.67) and clarifying-question prompts (6.67) across four task types and three LLMs.

  4. Context-Mediated Domain Adaptation in Multi-Agent Sensemaking Systems

    cs.HC 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Context-mediated domain adaptation treats user modifications to AI artifacts as implicit domain specifications that reshape LLM-powered multi-agent reasoning, demonstrated via the Seedentia system which extracted 46 d...