Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Small Language Models are Good Too: An Empirical Study of Zero-Shot Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.11122 v1 pith:YKCRLFO4 submitted 2024-04-17 cs.AI

Small Language Models are Good Too: An Empirical Study of Zero-Shot Classification

classification cs.AI
keywords modelssmallclassificationlanguagelargetextzero-shotacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study is part of the debate on the efficiency of large versus small language models for text classification by prompting.We assess the performance of small language models in zero-shot text classification, challenging the prevailing dominance of large models.Across 15 datasets, our investigation benchmarks language models from 77M to 40B parameters using different architectures and scoring functions. Our findings reveal that small models can effectively classify texts, getting on par with or surpassing their larger counterparts.We developed and shared a comprehensive open-source repository that encapsulates our methodologies. This research underscores the notion that bigger isn't always better, suggesting that resource-efficient small models may offer viable solutions for specific data classification challenges.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SLMs as Multi-Agent Routers: A Progressive SFT and Reinforcement Learning Approach

    cs.CL 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0

    A 0.6B router trained by SFT+RL on retrieval-quality rewards reaches 0.771 NDCG@10 across 11 agents, beating intent-prompted LLMs and cutting latency by 82%.