Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

A Comprehensive Data-centric Overview of Federated Graph Learning

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey proposes the first data-centric taxonomy for federated graph learning, organizing studies by data characteristics and data utilization.

desk verdict Useful data-centric FGL taxonomy, but the orthogonality claim is undercut by nested categories and inconsistent tables. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16541 v1 pith:YOBY3T5Q submitted 2025-07-22 cs.LG cs.AIcs.SI

Zhengyu Wu , Xunkai Li , Yinlin Zhu , Zekai Chen , Guochen Yan , Yanyu Yan , Hao Zhang , Yuming Ai
show 3 more authors
Xinmo Jin Rong-Hua Li Guoren Wang
This is my paper
classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.SI
keywords federatedgraphlearningdata-centricAIneuralnetworkstaxonomysurveydataheterogeneitypre-trainedlargemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Federated graph learning (FGL) trains graph models across decentralized data holders without sharing raw data, and most prior surveys organize the field by model architecture or deployment scenario. This survey argues that a data-centric organization is needed, because nearly all FGL challenges are data-related: heterogeneity, missing structure, imbalance, efficiency, and privacy. It claims to be the first to reorganize FGL studies through a two-level taxonomy, where each level is defined by three orthogonal criteria. If the placement of the 79 surveyed works into the resulting tables is correct, researchers gain a practical reference for locating methods by data format, decentralization, visibility, training phase, and the data-centric challenge they address. The survey also extends the data-centric lens to FGL's integration with pre-trained large models and to emerging directions like continual graph learning and graph unlearning.

What carries the argument

The central object is a two-level taxonomy with orthogonal criteria. The Data Characteristics level captures the structural and distributional properties of data: graph format, decentralization format, and visibility format. The Data Utilization level captures how methods use data during training: the motivational challenge, the positional dimension, and the sequential dimension. The taxonomy carries the argument by being the instrument through which all 79 surveyed FGL works are categorized and compared, and it is the survey's claimed novelty over earlier scenario- and methodology-based taxonomies.

What would settle it

Opening Tables II and III and checking for papers that appear in more than one configuration or under an undefined phase name would settle the taxonomy's claim to be fine-grained and unambiguous: FedGNN and FeSoG appear in multiple rows, FedHG+ is listed under both reference markers [113] and [116], and the sequential dimension names a 'Global Training' phase rather than the defined 'Global Aggregation' phase.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that every notable FGL study can be characterized by an orthogonal combination of three data-property criteria and three data-utilization criteria. The Data Characteristics level classifies works by graph format (homogeneous, heterogeneous, knowledge, or bipartite), decentralization format (horizontal or vertical), and client-side visibility (graph-oriented, subgraph-oriented, or ego-graph-oriented). The Data Utilization level classifies works by the data-centric challenge they target (quality, quantity, collaboration, efficiency, or privacy), the position of the innovation (client-side or server-side), and the training phase in which it acts (initialization, local training, global aggregation, or post-aggregation). The survey presents the resulting combinations as Tables II and III and claims these provide a fine-grained and unambiguous map of the field.

Load-bearing premise

The taxonomy is useful only if every surveyed paper can be assigned to exactly one configuration in Tables II and III, and if the cited references actually support those placements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A researcher can locate FGL methods by data format, partition type, visibility, challenge, client- or server-side focus, and training phase in a single reference.
  • The data-centric reframing aligns FGL with the broader data-centric graph machine learning movement, making methods comparable by the data problem they solve rather than by backbone architecture.
  • The survey identifies FGL's integration with pre-trained large models as an early-stage area with two paradigms: PLM-enhanced FGL and FGL-enhanced PLMs.
  • Future directions are mapped to continual graph learning, graph unlearning, open-world graph learning, multimodal graph learning, and explainable aggregation, each positioned as an underexplored FGL extension.
  • The taxonomy serves as a starting point for practitioners who want to map a real-world decentralized data problem to a specific class of FGL methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test of the taxonomy is whether the three criteria in each level are truly orthogonal; the tables suggest some correlation, since ego-graph visibility appears almost exclusively under horizontal decentralization.
  • The taxonomy's client-server framing leaves peer-to-peer and Euclidean-oriented FGL on the sidelines, so a further level or a separate section would be needed to integrate those settings into the same map.
  • A concrete extension would be a searchable decision tree built from Tables II and III, letting practitioners filter by data format plus challenge, which the paper does not itself provide.
  • If the identified table inconsistencies are corrected, the survey could serve as a shared benchmark reference for coverage of FGL methods by data-centric attributes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript surveys federated graph learning (FGL) from a data-centric viewpoint. It proposes a two-level taxonomy: Data Characteristics (data format, decentralization format, visibility) and Data Utilization (motivational challenge, positional dimension, sequential phase). The authors claim that the three criteria in each level are orthogonal and that the taxonomy categorizes all notable FGL studies in a fine-grained way. The survey additionally reviews FGL applications across six domains, discusses integration with pretrained large models, and outlines future directions. It covers 79 FGL works, a larger volume than the three earlier surveys it compares against (7, 37, and 61 works).

Significance. The data-centric reframing is timely, and a reliable taxonomy would be a genuinely useful reference for researchers who want to locate FGL methods by data format, decentralization, visibility, training phase, or data-centric challenge. The breadth of coverage, the application survey, and the PLM-FGL discussion are valuable. However, the paper's central contribution currently rests on an orthogonality claim that the paper's own definitions refute, and the catalog tables contain internal inconsistencies. There are no derivations, machine-checked proofs, or falsifiable predictions to assess; the value of the paper depends on the clarity, consistency, and verifiability of its taxonomy and survey entries.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. IV] The claim that the three criteria in each taxonomy level are 'orthogonal' is undercut by the paper's own definitions. Sec. IV-C states that ego-graph-oriented FGL is 'a specialized instance of subgraph-oriented FGL,' and Sec. IV-A defines a knowledge graph as 'a specialized heterogeneous graph.' Consequently, the Data Format and Visibility criteria are nested rather than orthogonal. Table II contains repeated entries that follow directly from this overlap: FedGNN [78] and FeSoG [34] appear in both the Heterogeneous/Horizontal/Subgraph row and the Bipartite/Horizontal/Ego-Graph row, and FL-GMT [87] appears in both the Knowledge-Graph/Horizontal/Subgraph row and the Bipartite/Horizontal/Subgraph row. Since Sec. IV-D states no priority rule and no multi-label convention, a reader cannot determine which configuration a repeated method belongs to; the claimed fine-grained categorization is therefore not reproducible.
  2. [Sec. IV-D and Table II] The paper claims in the abstract and in contribution (b) that the taxonomy categorizes 'all notable FGL studies in a fine-grained fashion,' and Sec. IV-D says Table II 'displays all categories.' Table II, however, realizes only 11 of the 4 x 2 x 3 = 24 possible combinations of data format, decentralization format, and visibility. Missing configurations include Heterogeneous/Graph-oriented, Knowledge-Graph/Vertical/Subgraph-oriented, and Bipartite/Vertical/Subgraph-oriented. The paper gives no explanation for these empty cells, and it does not state whether they are impossible, unpopulated, or out of scope. Without such a statement, the comprehensiveness claim of the first-level taxonomy is unsupported.
  3. [Sec. V and Table III] The positional and sequential dimensions are defined in Sec. V-A as 'Client-Side' and 'Server-Side' and in Sec. V-B as Initialization, Local Training, Global Aggregation, and Post-aggregation. Table III instead uses 'Global-side' in the Positional Dimensions column and introduces a phase called 'Global Training' in the Data Privacy row. Neither 'Global-side' nor 'Global Training' is defined in Sec. V. The undefined phase and renamed dimension mean that the three criteria cannot be applied consistently to classify methods, which undermines the second-level taxonomy's central claim.
  4. [Table III and Sec. V-D] Several reference and naming inconsistencies prevent verification of the catalog. FedHG+ is cited as [113] in Sec. V-D1 and as [116] in Sec. V-D6; FedHGN is cited as [74] in Sec. V-D8 but as [116] in Table III; FedHGL is cited as [118] in Sec. V-D2 and as [158] in Sec. VII-F; and the entry 'nFedGNN[106]' appears in Table III without appearing in the text. These entries need to be reconciled with the reference list and with the names used in the body before the survey's classifications can be checked by readers.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. I] The text contains several grammatical and typographical errors, including 'This survey propose,' 'remains unadapted to reorganize FGL research,' and 'reconcile the tradeoff.' A careful language edit would improve readability.
  2. [Sec. I] The 'Organization of the Survey' paragraph lists Secs. II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, and IX but omits Sec. III (Comparison with Other FGL Surveys).
  3. [Sec. IX-A3] The heading 'Open-wrold Graph Learning' contains a typo and should read 'Open-world Graph Learning.'
  4. [References] Several references are duplicated: [12] duplicates [3], [119] duplicates [52], and [117] duplicates [34] and [120]. These should be consolidated to a single citation each.
  5. [Sec. VI] The relationship of Sec. VI (Euclidean-oriented FGL) to the two-level taxonomy is not stated explicitly, so it remains unclear whether this section is an extension of the taxonomy or a separate dimension.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; self-citations appear only as surveyed entries and are not load-bearing.

full rationale

This survey makes no empirical predictions and contains no fitted parameters. Its central product is a two-level taxonomy organizing existing FGL work, and the claims of comprehensiveness or orthogonality are assertions about category design, not conclusions derived from the cited methods. The authors' own prior works (AdaFGL, FedGTA, FedTAD, POWER, FedPG) appear in Tables II/III and in future-work examples, but the taxonomy does not depend on the correctness or uniqueness of those methods; removing them would not change any structural claim. The nested definitions of knowledge graphs as specialized heterogeneous graphs and ego-graphs as specialized subgraphs may undermine the stated orthogonality, but that is a consistency/classification concern, not a circular reduction. No step reduces an output to an input by construction, and no load-bearing argument is justified only by self-citation. Score 1 reflects the presence of self-citations without any circular dependency.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or invented entities appear in this survey. The cost of the central claim is carried by the taxonomy assumptions, especially the asserted orthogonality and completeness of the criteria, and by the unstated paper-selection and categorization procedure.

assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper The three criteria in each taxonomy level are orthogonal and jointly cover all notable FGL studies.
    Assumed in Secs. IV and V; the paper does not define or derive orthogonality, and Table II lists only 11 of the 24 possible combinations, with several methods appearing in multiple rows.
  • domain assumption Graph data in FGL is partitioned by four data formats: homogeneous, heterogeneous, knowledge, and bipartite graphs.
    Sec. IV-A introduces these categories and the survey maps all 79 works onto them, but other relevant formats such as temporal or hypergraphs appear only in future-work discussion.
  • domain assumption Most FGL challenges are data-related, so a data-centric perspective is the correct organizing lens.
    The introduction and Sec. II justify the survey by asserting that most FGL challenges are data-related; this motivates the taxonomy but is not established by a systematic comparison of challenge types.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Comprehensive Data-centric Overview of Federated Graph Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YOBY3T5Q

@misc{pith2026250716541,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Comprehensive Data-centric Overview of Federated Graph Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YOBY3T5Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16541}
}
read the original abstract

In the era of big data applications, Federated Graph Learning (FGL) has emerged as a prominent solution that reconcile the tradeoff between optimizing the collective intelligence between decentralized datasets holders and preserving sensitive information to maximum. Existing FGL surveys have contributed meaningfully but largely focus on integrating Federated Learning (FL) and Graph Machine Learning (GML), resulting in early stage taxonomies that emphasis on methodology and simulated scenarios. Notably, a data centric perspective, which systematically examines FGL methods through the lens of data properties and usage, remains unadapted to reorganize FGL research, yet it is critical to assess how FGL studies manage to tackle data centric constraints to enhance model performances. This survey propose a two-level data centric taxonomy: Data Characteristics, which categorizes studies based on the structural and distributional properties of datasets used in FGL, and Data Utilization, which analyzes the training procedures and techniques employed to overcome key data centric challenges. Each taxonomy level is defined by three orthogonal criteria, each representing a distinct data centric configuration. Beyond taxonomy, this survey examines FGL integration with Pretrained Large Models, showcases realistic applications, and highlights future direction aligned with emerging trends in GML.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16541 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A Multi-level Illustration of three criteria of Data Characteristics Taxonomy. (a) ii [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Visualizations of General FGL training architecture with representative FGL studies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. STAGE: Tackling Semantic Drift in Multimodal Federated Graph Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    STAGE builds a shared semantic space through feature translation and controlled graph propagation to reduce semantic drift in multimodal federated graph learning, delivering state-of-the-art results with lower communi...

  2. Towards Effective Federated Multimodal Graph Learning via Navigating Multifaceted Heterogeneity

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A federated multimodal graph-learning method that uses server-side routing of topology-aware prototypes to align clients across tasks, modalities, and topologies, outperforming baselines on 8 datasets.

  3. MMFGU: Multimodal Federated Graph Unlearning

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A target-carrier decoupling pipeline with probe-based residual repair and prototype-guided cross-client purge gives the strongest reported utility–unlearning trade-off for multimodal federated graph unlearning.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

224 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [113]

    Subgraph federated learning over heterogeneous graphs,

    K. Zhang, H. Xie, Z. Gu, X. Li, L. Sun, S. M. Yiu, Y . Yao, and C. Yang, “Subgraph federated learning over heterogeneous graphs,” Proc. FedGraph (CIKM), pp. 1–10, 2022

    2022

  2. [116]

    Subgraph federated learning over heterogeneous graphs keywords,

    K. Zhang, H. Xie, X. Li, S. Yiu, Y . Yao, C. Yang, Z. Gu, and L. Sun, “Subgraph federated learning over heterogeneous graphs keywords,”CIKM, vol. 22, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.cs.emory.edu/∼jyang71/files/fedhgn.pdf

    2022

  3. [78]

    Fedgnn: Federated graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommendation,

    C. Wu, F. Wu, Y . Cao, Y . Huang, and X. Xie, “Fedgnn: Federated graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommendation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04925, 2021

    arXiv 2021

  4. [87]

    Federated learning-based cross-enterprise recommendation with graph neural networks,

    Z. Li, M. Bilal, X. Xu, J. Jiang, and Y . Cui, “Federated learning-based cross-enterprise recommendation with graph neural networks,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 673–682, 2022

    2022

  5. [74]

    Fedhgn: A federated framework for heterogeneous graph neural networks,

    X. Fu and I. King, “Fedhgn: A federated framework for heterogeneous graph neural networks,” inIJCAI. ijcai.org, 2023, pp. 3705–3713

    2023

  6. [118]

    Fedhgl: Cross-institutional federated heterogeneous graph learning for iot,

    X. Wei, G. Chen, Y . Zhu, F. Hu, C. Zhang, Z. Han, and W. Wang, “Fedhgl: Cross-institutional federated heterogeneous graph learning for iot,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 15, pp. 25 590–25 599, 2024

    2024

  7. [158]

    Fedhgl: Cross-institutional federated heterogeneous graph learning for iot,

    X. Wei, G. Chen, Y . Zhu, F. Hu, C. Zhang, Z. Han, and W. Wang, “Fedhgl: Cross-institutional federated heterogeneous graph learning for iot,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 15, pp. 25 590–25 599, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2024.3368054

    arXiv 2024

  8. [106]

    One Node Per User: Node-Level Federated Learning for Graph Neural Networks

    Z. Gao, Y . Guo, and Y . Gong, “One node per user: Node-level federated learning for graph neural networks,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19513

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

Show all 224 references
  1. [1]

    Beyond i.i.d.: Non-iid thinking, informatics, and learning,

    L. Cao, “Beyond i.i.d.: Non-iid thinking, informatics, and learning,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 5–17, 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold,

    J. Jumper, R. Evans, A. Pritzel, T. Green, M. Figurnov, O. Ronneberger, K. Tunyasuvunakool, R. Bates, A. ˇZ´ıdek, A. Potapenko, A. Bridgland, C. Meyer, S. A. A. Kohl, A. J. Ballard, A. Cowie, B. Romera-Paredes, S. Nikolov, R. Jain, J. Adler, and T. Back, “Highly accurate prote...

    2021

  3. [3]

    Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,

    T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, “Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2017

    2017

  4. [4]

    Graph Attention Networks,

    P. Veliˇckovi´c, G. Cucurull, A. Casanova, A. Romero, P. Li `o, and Y . Bengio, “Graph Attention Networks,”International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018, accepted as poster. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJXMpikCZ

    2018

  5. [5]

    Data-centric graph learning: A survey,

    Y . Guo, D. Bo, C. Yang, Z. Lu, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Y . Peng, and C. Shi, “Data-centric graph learning: A survey,”IEEE Transactions on Big Data, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Federatedscope-llm: A comprehensive package for fine-tuning large language models in federated learning,

    W. Kuang, B. Qian, Z. Li, D. Chen, D. Gao, X. Pan, Y . Xie, Y . Li, B. Ding, and J. Zhou, “Federatedscope-llm: A comprehensive package for fine-tuning large language models in federated learning,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data ...

    2024

  7. [7]

    A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs,

    G. Karypis and V . Kumar, “A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs,”SIAM Journal on scientific Computing, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 359–392, 1998

    1998

  8. [8]

    Fast unfolding of communities in large networks,

    V . D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre, “Fast unfolding of communities in large networks,”Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, vol. 2008, no. 10, p. P10008, 2008

    2008

  9. [9]

    Adafgl: A new paradigm for federated node classification with topology heterogeneity,

    X. Li, Z. Wu, W. Zhang, H. Sun, R.-H. Li, and G. Wang, “Adafgl: A new paradigm for federated node classification with topology heterogeneity,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.11750, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  10. [10]

    Fedgta: Topology-aware averaging for federated graph learning,

    X. Li, Z. Wu, W. Zhang, Y . Zhu, R.-H. Li, and G. Wang, “Fedgta: Topology-aware averaging for federated graph learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.11755, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [11]

    Fedtad: Topology- aware data-free knowledge distillation for subgraph federated learning,

    Y . Zhu, X. Li, Z. Wu, D. Wu, M. Hu, and R.-H. Li, “Fedtad: Topology- aware data-free knowledge distillation for subgraph federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14061, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  12. [12]

    Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,

    T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, “Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR, 2017

    2017

  13. [13]

    Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,

    B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, “Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,”Artificial intelligence and statistics, pp. 1273–1282, 2017

    2017

  14. [14]

    Inductive representation learning on large graphs,

    W. Hamilton, Z. Ying, and J. Leskovec, “Inductive representation learning on large graphs,”Advances in neural information processing systems, NeurIPS, 2017

    2017

  15. [15]

    Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications,

    J. Zhou, G. Cui, S. Hu, Z. Zhang, C. Yang, Z. Liu, L. Wang, C. Li, and M. Sun, “Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications,”AI Open, vol. 1, pp. 57–81, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651021000012

    2020

  16. [16]

    A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks,

    Z. Wu, S. Pan, F. Chen, G. Long, C. Zhang, and P. S. Yu, “A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 4–24, 2021

    2021

  17. [17]

    Federated graph learning–a position paper,

    H. Zhang, T. Shen, F. Wu, M. Yin, H. Yang, and C. Wu, “Federated graph learning–a position paper,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.11099, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  18. [18]

    Federated graph machine learning: A survey of concepts, techniques, and applications,

    X. Fu, B. Zhang, Y . Dong, C. Chen, and J. Li, “Federated graph machine learning: A survey of concepts, techniques, and applications,”ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 32–47, 2022

    2022

  19. [19]

    Federated graph neural networks: Overview, techniques, and challenges,

    R. Liu, P. Xing, Z. Deng, A. Li, C. Guan, and H. Yu, “Federated graph neural networks: Overview, techniques, and challenges,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 4279–4295, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Semi-decentralized federated ego graph learning for recommendation,

    L. Qu, N. Tang, R. Zheng, Q. V . H. Nguyen, Z. Huang, Y . Shi, and H. Yin, “Semi-decentralized federated ego graph learning for recommendation,” inProceedings of the ACM web conference 2023, 2023, pp. 339–348

    2023

  21. [21]

    Link prediction based on graph neural networks,

    M. Zhang and Y . Chen, “Link prediction based on graph neural networks,”Advances in neural information processing systems, NeurIPS, 2018

    2018

  22. [22]

    Graph convolutional networks with eigenpooling,

    Y . Ma, S. Wang, C. C. Aggarwal, and J. Tang, “Graph convolutional networks with eigenpooling,” inProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, KDD, 2019, pp. 723–731

    2019

  23. [23]

    Federated node classification over graphs with latent link-type heterogeneity,

    H. Xie, L. Xiong, and C. Yang, “Federated node classification over graphs with latent link-type heterogeneity,” inProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023, ser. WWW ’23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3543507.3583471

    2023

  24. [24]

    Dynamic activation of clients and parameters for federated learning over het- erogeneous graphs,

    Z. Gu, K. Zhang, G. Bai, L. Chen, L. Zhao, and C. Yang, “Dynamic activation of clients and parameters for federated learning over het- erogeneous graphs,” inIEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1597–1610

    2023

  25. [25]

    Federated heterogeneous graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommen- dation,

    B. Yan, Y . Cao, H. Wang, W. Yang, J. Du, and C. Shi, “Federated heterogeneous graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommen- dation,” inProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference, 2024, pp. 3919–3929

    2024

  26. [26]

    A survey on knowledge graphs: Representation, acquisition, and applications,

    S. Ji, S. Pan, E. Cambria, P. Marttinen, and P. S. Yu, “A survey on knowledge graphs: Representation, acquisition, and applications,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 494–514, 2022

    2022

  27. [27]

    Knowledge graph embedding: A survey of approaches and applications,

    Q. Wang, Z. Mao, B. Wang, and L. Guo, “Knowledge graph embedding: A survey of approaches and applications,”IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2724–2743, 2017

    2017

  28. [28]

    Meta-learning based knowledge extrapolation for knowledge graphs in the federated setting,

    M. Chen, W. Zhang, Z. Yao, X. Chen, M. Ding, F. Huang, and H. Chen, “Meta-learning based knowledge extrapolation for knowledge graphs in the federated setting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.04692, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  29. [29]

    A federated graph to embedding approach for knowledge graph completion,

    H. Sun, X. Bi, D. Sui, and Z. Tu, “A federated graph to embedding approach for knowledge graph completion,” inIEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 11 691–11 695

    2024

  30. [30]

    Knowledge graph and knowledge reasoning: A systematic review,

    L. Tian, X. Zhou, Y .-P. Wu, W.-T. Zhou, J.-H. Zhang, and T.-S. Zhang, “Knowledge graph and knowledge reasoning: A systematic review,”Journal of Electronic Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 100159, 2022. [Online]. Available: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

    2022

  31. [32]

    Ensemble-gnn: federated ensemble learning with graph neural networks for disease module discovery and classification,

    B. Pfeifer, H. Chereda, R. Martin, A. Saranti, S. Clemens, A.-C. Hauschild, T. Beißbarth, A. Holzinger, and D. Heider, “Ensemble-gnn: federated ensemble learning with graph neural networks for disease module discovery and classification,”bioRxiv, pp. 2023–03, 2023

    2023

  32. [35]

    Enhancing federated learning-based social recommendations with graph attention networks,

    Z. Xu, B. Li, and W. Cao, “Enhancing federated learning-based social recommendations with graph attention networks,”Neurocomputing, p. 129045, 2024

    2024

  33. [36]

    Federated learning enabled graph convolutional autoencoder and factorization machine for potential friendship prediction in social networks,

    H.-x. Hu, C. Cao, Q. Hu, and Y . Zhang, “Federated learning enabled graph convolutional autoencoder and factorization machine for potential friendship prediction in social networks,”Information Fusion, vol. 102, p. 102042, 2024

    2024

  34. [37]

    Anti-money laundering in cryptocurrency via multi-relational graph neural network,

    W. Hyun, J. Lee, and B. Suh, “Anti-money laundering in cryptocurrency via multi-relational graph neural network,” inPacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Springer, 2023, pp. 118–130

    2023

  35. [38]

    Privacy-preserving graph convolution network for federated item recommendation,

    P. Hu, Z. Lin, W. Pan, Q. Yang, X. Peng, and Z. Ming, “Privacy-preserving graph convolution network for federated item recommendation,”Artificial Intelligence, vol. 324, p. 103996, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S000437022300142X

    2023

  36. [39]

    Fedego: privacy-preserving personalized federated graph learning with ego- graphs,

    T. Zhang, C. Mai, Y . Chang, C. Chen, L. Shu, and Z. Zheng, “Fedego: privacy-preserving personalized federated graph learning with ego- graphs,”ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–27, 2023

    2023

  37. [40]

    Federated graph classification over non-iid graphs,

    H. Xie, J. Ma, L. Xiong, and C. Yang, “Federated graph classification over non-iid graphs,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS, 2021

    2021

  38. [41]

    Federated learning on non-iid graphs via structural knowledge sharing,

    Y . Tan, Y . Liu, G. Long, J. Jiang, Q. Lu, and C. Zhang, “Federated learning on non-iid graphs via structural knowledge sharing,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 37, no. 8, 2023, pp. 9953–9961

    2023

  39. [42]

    Fedssp: Federated graph learning with spectral knowledge and personalized preference,

    Z. Tan, G. Wan, W. Huang, and M. Ye, “Fedssp: Federated graph learning with spectral knowledge and personalized preference,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20105, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  40. [43]

    Mitigating the performance sacrifice in dp-satisfied federated settings through graph contrastive learning,

    H. Yang, X. Zhao, M. Li, H. Chen, and G. Xu, “Mitigating the performance sacrifice in dp-satisfied federated settings through graph contrastive learning,”Information Sciences, vol. 648, p. 119552, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0...

    2023

  41. [44]

    Virtual nodes can help: Tackling distribution shifts in federated graph learning,

    X. Fu, Z. Chen, Y . He, S. Wang, B. Zhang, C. Chen, and J. Li, “Virtual nodes can help: Tackling distribution shifts in federated graph learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19229, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  42. [45]

    Distributed backdoor attacks on federated graph learning and certified defenses,

    Y . Yang, Q. Li, J. Jia, Y . Hong, and B. Wang, “Distributed backdoor attacks on federated graph learning and certified defenses,” inPro- ceedings of the 2024 on ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2024, pp. 2829–2843

    2024

  43. [46]

    Ni-gdba: Non-intrusive distributed backdoor attack based on adaptive perturbation on federated graph learning,

    K. Li, B. Shi, J. Wei, and B. Dong, “Ni-gdba: Non-intrusive distributed backdoor attack based on adaptive perturbation on federated graph learning,” inProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, 2025, pp. 852–862

    2025

  44. [47]

    Fedgmark: Certifiably robust watermarking for federated graph learning,

    Y . Yang, Q. Li, Y . Hong, and B. Wang, “Fedgmark: Certifiably robust watermarking for federated graph learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17533, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  45. [48]

    Fedgraph: Federated graph learning with intelligent sampling,

    F. Chen, P. Li, T. Miyazaki, and C. Wu, “Fedgraph: Federated graph learning with intelligent sampling,”IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1775–1786, 2021

    2021

  46. [49]

    Fedgcn: Convergence- communication tradeoffs in federated training of graph convolutional 18 networks,

    Y . Yao, W. Jin, S. Ravi, and C. Joe-Wong, “Fedgcn: Convergence- communication tradeoffs in federated training of graph convolutional 18 networks,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, A. Oh, T. Naumann, A. Globerson, K. Saenko, M. Hardt, and S. Levine, Eds., v...

    2023

  47. [50]

    Graphfl: A federated learning framework for semi-supervised node classification on graphs,

    B. Wang, A. Li, M. Pang, H. Li, and Y . Chen, “Graphfl: A federated learning framework for semi-supervised node classification on graphs,” in2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 2022, pp. 498–507

    2022

  48. [51]

    Fedgl: federated graph learning framework with global self-supervision,

    C. Chen, W. Hu, Z. Xu, and Z. Zheng, “Fedgl: federated graph learning framework with global self-supervision,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03170, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  49. [52]

    Personalized subgraph federated learning,

    J. Baek, W. Jeong, J. Jin, J. Yoon, and S. J. Hwang, “Personalized subgraph federated learning,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 1396–1415

    2023

  50. [53]

    Federated graph learning under domain shift with generalizable prototypes,

    G. Wan, W. Huang, and M. Ye, “Federated graph learning under domain shift with generalizable prototypes,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 14, 2024, pp. 15 429–15 437

    2024

  51. [54]

    Federated graph semantic and structural learning

    W. Huang, G. Wan, M. Ye, and B. Du, “Federated graph semantic and structural learning.”

  52. [55]

    Subgraph federated learning with missing neighbor generation,

    K. Zhang, C. Yang, X. Li, L. Sun, and S. M. Yiu, “Subgraph federated learning with missing neighbor generation,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS, 2021

    2021

  53. [56]

    Deep efficient private neighbor generation for subgraph federated learning,

    K. Zhang, L. Sun, B. Ding, S. M. Yiu, and C. Yang, “Deep efficient private neighbor generation for subgraph federated learning,” inPro- ceedings of the 2024 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM). SIAM, 2024, pp. 806–814

    2024

  54. [57]

    Model-heterogeneous federated graph learning with prototype propagation,

    Z. Liu, H. Zhou, X. He, H. Yuan, J. Du, M. Wang, G. Shen, F. Xia et al., “Model-heterogeneous federated graph learning with prototype propagation,”IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2024

    2024

  55. [58]

    Fedsg: A personalized subgraph federated learning framework on multiple non-iid graphs,

    Y . Wang, S. Guo, D. Qiao, G. Liu, and M. Li, “Fedsg: A personalized subgraph federated learning framework on multiple non-iid graphs,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2024

    2024

  56. [59]

    Federated graph learning with structure proxy alignment,

    X. Fu, Z. Chen, B. Zhang, C. Chen, and J. Li, “Federated graph learning with structure proxy alignment,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2024, pp. 827–838

    2024

  57. [60]

    Federated learning over coupled graphs,

    R. Lei, P. Wang, J. Zhao, L. Lan, J. Tao, C. Deng, J. Feng, X. Wang, and X. Guan, “Federated learning over coupled graphs,”IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1159–1172, 2023

    2023

  58. [61]

    Hifgl: A hierarchical framework for cross-silo cross-device federated graph learning,

    Z. Guo, D. Yao, Q. Yang, and H. Liu, “Hifgl: A hierarchical framework for cross-silo cross-device federated graph learning,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2024, pp. 968–979

    2024

  59. [62]

    Modeling inter-intra heterogeneity for graph federated learning,

    W. Yu, S. Chen, Y . Tong, T. Gu, and C. Gong, “Modeling inter-intra heterogeneity for graph federated learning,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 21, 2025, pp. 22 236– 22 244

    2025

  60. [63]

    Federated graph condensation with information bottleneck principles,

    B. Yan, S. He, C. Yang, S. Liu, Y . Cao, and C. Shi, “Federated graph condensation with information bottleneck principles,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 12, 2025, pp. 12 990–12 998

    2025

  61. [64]

    Locally private graph neural networks,

    S. Sajadmanesh and D. Gatica-Perez, “Locally private graph neural networks,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.05535

    2021 arXiv

  62. [65]

    Fedwalk: Communication efficient federated unsupervised node embedding with differential privacy,

    Q. Pan and Y . Zhu, “Fedwalk: Communication efficient federated unsupervised node embedding with differential privacy,” inProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2022, pp. 1317–1326

    2022

  63. [66]

    Lumos: Heterogeneity-aware federated graph learning over decentralized devices,

    Q. Pan, Y . Zhu, and L. Chu, “Lumos: Heterogeneity-aware federated graph learning over decentralized devices,” inIEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1914–1926

    2023

  64. [67]

    Federated node classification over distributed ego-networks with secure contrastive embedding sharing,

    H. Xie, L. Xiong, and C. Yang, “Federated node classification over distributed ego-networks with secure contrastive embedding sharing,” in Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ser. CIKM ’24. New York, NY , USA: Associati...

    2024

  65. [69]

    Glasu: A communication-efficient algorithm for federated learning with vertically distributed graph data,

    X. Zhang, M. Hong, and J. Chen, “Glasu: A communication-efficient algorithm for federated learning with vertically distributed graph data,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.09531, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  66. [70]

    Svfgnn: A privacy-preserving vertical federated graph neural network model training framework based on split learning,

    Y . Liu, H. Li, and M. Hao, “Svfgnn: A privacy-preserving vertical federated graph neural network model training framework based on split learning,”Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 246–260, 2024

    2024

  67. [71]

    Vertically federated graph neural network for privacy-preserving node classification,

    C. Chen, J. Zhou, L. Zheng, H. Wu, L. Lyu, J. Wu, B. Wu, Z. Liu, L. Wang, and X. Zheng, “Vertically federated graph neural network for privacy-preserving node classification,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.11903, 2020

    2005 arXiv

  68. [72]

    Embedding representation of academic heterogeneous information networks based on federated learning,

    J. Wang, Y . Li, M. Liang, and A. Li, “Embedding representation of academic heterogeneous information networks based on federated learning,” in2022 IEEE 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligent Systems (CCIS), 2022, pp. 516–520

    2022

  69. [73]

    Federated heterogeneous graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommen- dation,

    B. Yan, Y . Cao, H. Wang, W. Yang, J. Du, and C. Shi, “Federated heterogeneous graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommen- dation,” inProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, 2024, pp. 3919–3929

    2024

  70. [75]

    Self-simulation and meta-model aggregation based heterogeneous graph coupled federated learning,

    C. Yan, X. Lu, P. Lio, P. Hui, and D. He, “Self-simulation and meta-model aggregation based heterogeneous graph coupled federated learning,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024

    2024

  71. [76]

    Horizontal federated heterogeneous graph learning: A multi-scale adaptive solution to data distribution challenges,

    J. Wang, Y . Li, Z. Xue, Y . Shao, Z. Guan, and W. Li, “Horizontal federated heterogeneous graph learning: A multi-scale adaptive solution to data distribution challenges,” inProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, ser. WWW ’25. New York, NY , USA: Association for Compu...

    2025

  72. [77]

    Fedhgn: a federated framework for heterogeneous graph neural networks,

    X. Fu and I. King, “Fedhgn: a federated framework for heterogeneous graph neural networks,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Second Interna- tional Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2023, pp. 3705–3713

    2023

  73. [79]

    Splitgnn: Spectral graph neural network for fraud detection against heterophily,

    B. Wu, X. Yao, B. Zhang, K.-M. Chao, and Y . Li, “Splitgnn: Spectral graph neural network for fraud detection against heterophily,” in Proceedings of the 32nd ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, 2023, pp. 2737–2746

    2023

  74. [80]

    Vertical federated graph neural network for rec- ommender system,

    P. Mai and Y . Pang, “Vertical federated graph neural network for rec- ommender system,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 23 516–23 535

    2023

  75. [81]

    Meta-learning based knowledge extrapolation for knowledge graphs in the federated setting,

    M. Chen, W. Zhang, Z. Yao, X. Chen, M. Ding, F. Huang, and H. Chen, “Meta-learning based knowledge extrapolation for knowledge graphs in the federated setting,” inProceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2022, pp. 1966–1972

    2022

  76. [82]

    Federated knowledge graph completion via embedding-contrastive learning,

    M. Chen, W. Zhang, Z. Yuan, Y . Jia, and H. Chen, “Federated knowledge graph completion via embedding-contrastive learning,”Knowledge- Based Systems, vol. 252, p. 109459, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705122007316

    2022

  77. [83]

    Fedrule: Federated rule recommendation system with graph neural networks,

    Y . Yao, M. M. Kamani, Z. Cheng, L. Chen, C. Joe-Wong, and T. Liu, “Fedrule: Federated rule recommendation system with graph neural networks,” inProceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation, ser. IoTDI ’23. New York, NY , USA: Asso...

    2023

  78. [84]

    Fedcomp: A federated learning compression framework for resource-constrained edge computing devices,

    D. Wu, W. Yang, H. Jin, X. Zou, W. Xia, and B. Fang, “Fedcomp: A federated learning compression framework for resource-constrained edge computing devices,”IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 230–243, 2023

    2023

  79. [85]

    Fedge: Break the scalability limitation of graph neural network with federated graph embedding,

    F. Chen and G. Long, “Fedge: Break the scalability limitation of graph neural network with federated graph embedding,”IEEE Transactions on Big Data, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 965–974, 2022

    2022

  80. [86]

    Gfedkg: Gnn-based federated embedding model for knowledge graph completion,

    Y . Wang, H. Wang, X. Liu, and Y . Yan, “Gfedkg: Gnn-based federated embedding model for knowledge graph completion,”Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 301, p. 112290, 2024

    2024

  81. [88]

    Fedrkg: A privacy-preserving federated recommendation framework via knowledge graph enhance- ment,

    D. Yao, T. Liu, Q. Cao, and H. Jin, “Fedrkg: A privacy-preserving federated recommendation framework via knowledge graph enhance- ment,” inInternational Conference on Green, Pervasive, and Cloud Computing. Springer, 2023, pp. 81–96

    2023

  82. [89]

    Fedkgrec: privacy- preserving federated knowledge graph aware recommender system,

    X. Ma, H. Zhang, J. Zeng, Y . Duan, and X. Wen, “Fedkgrec: privacy- preserving federated knowledge graph aware recommender system,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 54, no. 19, pp. 9028–9044, 2024

    2024

  83. [90]

    Fgc: Gcn-based federated learning approach for trust industrial service recommendation,

    Y . Yin, Y . Li, H. Gao, T. Liang, and Q. Pan, “Fgc: Gcn-based federated learning approach for trust industrial service recommendation,”IEEE 19 Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 3240–3250, 2022

    2022

  84. [91]

    Fdrs: Federated diversified recommender system based on heterogeneous graph convolutional network,

    N. Li, H. Liu, S. Meng, and Q. Li, “Fdrs: Federated diversified recommender system based on heterogeneous graph convolutional network,” inIEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing & Communications, Data Science & Systems, Smart City & Dependability in Sensor,...

    2023

  85. [92]

    Fedfast: Going beyond average for faster training of federated recommender systems,

    K. Muhammad, Q. Wang, D. O’Reilly-Morgan, E. Tragos, B. Smyth, N. Hurley, J. Geraci, and A. Lawlor, “Fedfast: Going beyond average for faster training of federated recommender systems,” inProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data...

    2020

  86. [93]

    Fedrec: Federated recommen- dation with explicit feedback,

    G. Lin, F. Liang, W. Pan, and Z. Ming, “Fedrec: Federated recommen- dation with explicit feedback,”IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 21–30, 2020

    2020

  87. [94]

    Communication-efficient federated recommendation model based on many-objective evolutionary algorithm,

    Z. Cui, J. Wen, Y . Lan, Z. Zhang, and J. Cai, “Communication-efficient federated recommendation model based on many-objective evolutionary algorithm,”Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 201, p. 116963, 2022

    2022

  88. [95]

    Edge- enabled federated sequential recommendation with knowledge-aware transformer,

    S. Wei, S. Meng, Q. Li, X. Zhou, L. Qi, and X. Xu, “Edge- enabled federated sequential recommendation with knowledge-aware transformer,”Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 148, pp. 610– 622, 2023

    2023

  89. [96]

    Fedpoirec: Privacy-preserving federated poi recommendation with social influence,

    V . Perifanis, G. Drosatos, G. Stamatelatos, and P. S. Efraimidis, “Fedpoirec: Privacy-preserving federated poi recommendation with social influence,”Information Sciences, vol. 623, pp. 767–790, 2023

    2023

  90. [97]

    Federated neural collaborative filtering,

    V . Perifanis and P. S. Efraimidis, “Federated neural collaborative filtering,”Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 242, p. 108441, 2022

    2022

  91. [98]

    Federated learning based driver recommendation for next generation transportation system,

    J. Vyas, D. Das, S. Chaudhuryet al., “Federated learning based driver recommendation for next generation transportation system,”Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 225, p. 119951, 2023

    2023

  92. [99]

    Personalized federated recommendation via joint representation learning, user clustering, and model adaptation,

    S. Luo, Y . Xiao, and L. Song, “Personalized federated recommendation via joint representation learning, user clustering, and model adaptation,” inProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 2022, pp. 4289–4293

    2022

  93. [100]

    Gpfedrec: Graph-guided personalization for federated recommendation,

    C. Zhang, G. Long, T. Zhou, Z. Zhang, P. Yan, and B. Yang, “Gpfedrec: Graph-guided personalization for federated recommendation,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2024, pp. 4131–4142

    2024

  94. [101]

    Perfedrec++: Enhancing personalized federated recommendation with self-supervised pre-training,

    S. Luo, Y . Xiao, X. Zhang, Y . Liu, W. Ding, and L. Song, “Perfedrec++: Enhancing personalized federated recommendation with self-supervised pre-training,”ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1–24, 2024

    2024

  95. [102]

    Hetefedrec: Federated recommender systems with model heterogeneity,

    W. Yuan, L. Qu, L. Cui, Y . Tong, X. Zhou, and H. Yin, “Hetefedrec: Federated recommender systems with model heterogeneity,” in2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1324–1337

    2024

  96. [103]

    Towards personalized privacy: User-governed data contribution for federated recommendation,

    L. Qu, W. Yuan, R. Zheng, L. Cui, Y . Shi, and H. Yin, “Towards personalized privacy: User-governed data contribution for federated recommendation,” inProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, ser. WWW ’24. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024, p. 39...

    2024

  97. [104]

    Federated graph learning for cross-domain recommendation,

    Z. Yang, Z. Peng, Z. Wang, J. Qi, C. Chen, W. Pan, C. Wen, C. Wang, and X. Fan, “Federated graph learning for cross-domain recommendation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08249, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  98. [105]

    Cluster-enhanced federated graph neural network for recommendation,

    H. Wang and Y . Yuan, “Cluster-enhanced federated graph neural network for recommendation,” in2024 China Automation Congress (CAC). IEEE, 2024, pp. 4636–4641

    2024

  99. [107]

    Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning,

    A. Carlson, J. Betteridge, B. Kisiel, B. Settles, E. Hruschka, and T. Mitchell, “Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 24, no. 1, 2010, pp. 1306–1313

    2010

  100. [108]

    Magnn: Metapath aggre- gated graph neural network for heterogeneous graph embedding,

    X. Fu, J. Zhang, Z. Meng, and I. King, “Magnn: Metapath aggre- gated graph neural network for heterogeneous graph embedding,” in Proceedings of the web conference 2020, 2020, pp. 2331–2341

    2020

  101. [109]

    Splitgnn: Splitting gnn for node classification with heterogeneous attention,

    X. Xu, L. Lyu, Y . Dong, Y . Lu, W. Wang, and H. Jin, “Splitgnn: Splitting gnn for node classification with heterogeneous attention,”

  102. [110]

    Mimic-iii, a freely accessible critical care database,

    A. E. Johnson, T. J. Pollard, L. Shen, L.-w. H. Lehman, M. Feng, M. Ghassemi, B. Moody, P. Szolovits, L. Anthony Celi, and R. G. Mark, “Mimic-iii, a freely accessible critical care database,”Scientific data, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2016

    2016

  103. [111]

    The eicu collaborative research database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research,

    T. J. Pollard, A. E. Johnson, J. D. Raffa, L. A. Celi, R. G. Mark, and O. Badawi, “The eicu collaborative research database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research,”Scientific data, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2018

    2018

  104. [112]

    Energy-based backdoor defense against federated graph learning,

    G. Wan, Z. Shi, W. Huang, G. Zhang, D. Tao, and M. Ye, “Energy-based backdoor defense against federated graph learning,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

    2025

  105. [114]

    Towards federated graph learning in one-shot communication,

    G. Yan, X. Li, L. Xie, W. Zhang, Q. Shen, Y . Fang, and Z. Wu, “Towards federated graph learning in one-shot communication,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11304, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  106. [115]

    Subgraph federated learning for local generalization,

    S. Kim, Y . Lee, Y . Oh, N. Lee, S. Yun, J. Lee, S. Kim, C. Yang, and C. Park, “Subgraph federated learning for local generalization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03995, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  107. [117]

    Federated social recommendation with graph neural network,

    Z. Liu, L. Yang, Z. Fan, H. Peng, and P. S. Yu, “Federated social recommendation with graph neural network,”ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–24, 2022

    2022

  108. [119]

    Personalized subgraph federated learning,

    J. Baek, W. Jeong, J. Jin, J. Yoon, and S. J. Hwang, “Personalized subgraph federated learning,” 2023

    2023

  109. [120]

    Federated social recommendation with graph neural network,

    Z. Liu, L. Yang, Z. Fan, H. Peng, and P. S. Yu, “Federated social recommendation with graph neural network,”ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., vol. 13, no. 4, Aug. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3501815

    2022 doi

  110. [121]

    Decentralized federated learning via sgd over wireless d2d networks,

    H. Xing, O. Simeone, and S. Bi, “Decentralized federated learning via sgd over wireless d2d networks,” in2020 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), 2020, pp. 1–5

    2020

  111. [122]

    A new look and convergence rate of federated multitask learning with laplacian regularization,

    C. T. Dinh, T. T. Vu, N. H. Tran, M. N. Dao, and H. Zhang, “A new look and convergence rate of federated multitask learning with laplacian regularization,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 8075–8085, 2024

    2024

  112. [123]

    Personalized federated learning with a graph,

    F. Chen, G. Long, Z. Wu, T. Zhou, and J. Jiang, “Personalized federated learning with a graph,” inProceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-22, L. D. Raedt, Ed. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Or...

    2022

  113. [124]

    Big-fed: Bilevel optimization enhanced graph-aided federated learning,

    P. Xing, S. Lu, L. Wu, and H. Yu, “Big-fed: Bilevel optimization enhanced graph-aided federated learning,”IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 2022

    2022

  114. [125]

    Molcfl: A personalized and privacy- preserving drug discovery framework based on generative clustered federated learning,

    Y . Guo, Y . Gao, and J. Song, “Molcfl: A personalized and privacy- preserving drug discovery framework based on generative clustered federated learning,”Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 157, p. 104712, 2024

    2024

  115. [126]

    Gfedkrl: Graph federated knowledge re-learning for effective molecular property prediction via privacy protection,

    Y . Ning, J. Wang, D. Li, D. Yan, and X. Li, “Gfedkrl: Graph federated knowledge re-learning for effective molecular property prediction via privacy protection,” inArtificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning - ICANN 2023: 32nd International Conference on Artificial Neural ...

    2023

  116. [127]

    Spreadgnn: Decentralized multi-task federated learning for graph neural networks on molecular data,

    C. He, E. Ceyani, K. Balasubramanian, M. Annavaram, and S. Aves- timehr, “Spreadgnn: Decentralized multi-task federated learning for graph neural networks on molecular data,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 36, no. 6, 2022, pp. 6865–6873

    2022

  117. [128]

    Federated learning of molecular properties with graph neural networks in a heterogeneous setting,

    W. Zhu, J. Luo, and A. D. White, “Federated learning of molecular properties with graph neural networks in a heterogeneous setting,” Patterns, vol. 3, no. 6, p. 100521, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100521

    2022

  118. [129]

    Federated learning of molecular properties with graph neural networks in a heterogeneous setting,

    ——, “Federated learning of molecular properties with graph neural networks in a heterogeneous setting,”Patterns, vol. 3, no. 6, 2022

    2022

  119. [130]

    Ensemble-gnn: federated ensemble learning with graph neural networks for disease 20 module discovery and classification,

    B. Pfeifer, H. Chereda, R. Martin, A. Saranti, S. Clemens, A.-C. Hauschild, T. Beißbarth, A. Holzinger, and D. Heider, “Ensemble-gnn: federated ensemble learning with graph neural networks for disease 20 module discovery and classification,”Bioinformatics, vol. 39, no. 11, p. ...

    2023

  120. [131]

    Collaborative weighting in federated graph neural networks for disease classification with the human-in-the-loop,

    C. Hausleitner, H. Mueller, A. Holzinger, and B. Pfeifer, “Collaborative weighting in federated graph neural networks for disease classification with the human-in-the-loop,”Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 21839, 2024

    2024

  121. [132]

    Decentralized federated graph neural networks,

    Y . Pei, R. Mao, Y . Liu, C. Chen, S. Xu, F. Qiang, and B. E. Tech, “Decentralized federated graph neural networks,” inInternational workshop on federated and transfer learning for data sparsity and confidentiality in conjunction with IJCAI, 2021

    2021

  122. [133]

    Fedgcn: Federated learning-based graph convolutional networks for non-euclidean spatial data,

    K. Hu, J. Wu, Y . Li, M. Lu, L. Weng, and M. Xia, “Fedgcn: Federated learning-based graph convolutional networks for non-euclidean spatial data,”Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 1000, 2022

    2022

  123. [134]

    Improving federated relational data modeling via basis alignment and weight penalty,

    Y . Lin, C. Chen, C. Chen, and L. Wang, “Improving federated relational data modeling via basis alignment and weight penalty,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.11369, 2020

    2011 arXiv

  124. [135]

    Fedgraph-kd: an effective federated graph learning scheme based on knowledge distillation,

    S. Wang, J. Xie, M. Lu, and N. N. Xiong, “Fedgraph-kd: an effective federated graph learning scheme based on knowledge distillation,” in2023 IEEE 9th Intl Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity), IEEE Intl Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing,(...

    2023

  125. [136]

    A federated graph neural network framework for privacy-preserving personalization,

    C. Wu, F. Wu, L. Lyu, T. Qi, Y . Huang, and X. Xie, “A federated graph neural network framework for privacy-preserving personalization,” Nature Communications, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 3091, 2022

    2022

  126. [137]

    Fedgr: Federated graph neural network for recommendation systems,

    C. Ma, X. Ren, G. Xu, and B. He, “Fedgr: Federated graph neural network for recommendation systems,”Axioms, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 170, 2023

    2023

  127. [138]

    Privacy-preserving cross-domain recommendation with federated graph learning,

    C. Tian, Y . Xie, X. Chen, Y . Li, and X. Zhao, “Privacy-preserving cross-domain recommendation with federated graph learning,”ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 135:1–135:29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3653448

    2024 doi

  128. [139]

    Subgraph-level federated graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommendation with meta-learning,

    Z. Han, C. Hu, T. Li, Q. Qi, P. Tang, and S. Guo, “Subgraph-level federated graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommendation with meta-learning,”Neural Networks, vol. 179, p. 106574, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106574

    2024

  129. [140]

    Towards federated graph learning for collaborative financial crimes detection,

    T. Suzumura, Y . Zhou, N. Baracaldo, G. Ye, K. Houck, R. Kawahara, A. Anwar, L. L. Stavarache, Y . Watanabe, P. Loyolaet al., “Towards federated graph learning for collaborative financial crimes detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.12946, 2019

    1909 arXiv

  130. [141]

    Credit card fraud detection based on federated graph learning,

    Y . Tang and Y . Liang, “Credit card fraud detection based on federated graph learning,”Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 256, p. 124979, 2024

    2024

  131. [142]

    Federated graph neural network for privacy-preserved supply chain data sharing,

    X. Tang, Y . Wang, X. Liu, X. Yuan, C. Fan, Y . Hu, and Q. Miao, “Federated graph neural network for privacy-preserved supply chain data sharing,”Applied Soft Computing, p. 112475, 2024

    2024

  132. [143]

    Fedee: A federated graph learning solution for extended enterprise collaboration,

    Z. Xie, Y . Huang, D. Yu, R. M. Parizi, Y . Zheng, and J. Pang, “Fedee: A federated graph learning solution for extended enterprise collaboration,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 8061– 8071, 2022

    2022

  133. [144]

    Privacy-preserving federated multi-task linear regression: A one-shot linear mixing ap- proach inspired by graph regularization,

    H. Lee, A. L. Bertozzi, J. Kova ˇcevi´c, and Y . Chi, “Privacy-preserving federated multi-task linear regression: A one-shot linear mixing ap- proach inspired by graph regularization,” inICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ...

    2022

  134. [145]

    Fedstn: Graph representation driven federated learning for edge computing enabled urban traffic flow prediction,

    X. Yuan, J. Chen, J. Yang, N. Zhang, T. Yang, T. Han, and A. Taherkordi, “Fedstn: Graph representation driven federated learning for edge computing enabled urban traffic flow prediction,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 8738–8748, 2022

    2022

  135. [146]

    Multilevel federated learning-based intelligent traffic flow forecasting for transportation network management,

    L. Liu, Y . Tian, C. Chakraborty, J. Feng, Q. Pei, L. Zhen, and K. Yu, “Multilevel federated learning-based intelligent traffic flow forecasting for transportation network management,”IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1446–1458, 2023

    2023

  136. [147]

    Federated graph learning for ev charging demand forecasting with personalization against cyberattacks,

    Y . Li, R. Xie, C. Li, Y . Wang, and Z. Dong, “Federated graph learning for ev charging demand forecasting with personalization against cyberattacks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.00742, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  137. [148]

    Fmgcn: Federated meta learning-augmented graph convolutional network for ev charging demand forecasting,

    L. You, Q. Chen, H. Qu, R. Zhu, J. Yan, P. Santi, and C. Ratti, “Fmgcn: Federated meta learning-augmented graph convolutional network for ev charging demand forecasting,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024

    2024

  138. [149]

    Multi-level federated graph learning and self-attention based personalized wi-fi indoor fingerprint localization,

    Z. Wu, X. Wu, and Y . Long, “Multi-level federated graph learning and self-attention based personalized wi-fi indoor fingerprint localization,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1794–1798, 2022

    2022

  139. [150]

    Federated dynamic graph neural networks with secure aggregation for video-based distributed surveillance,

    M. Jiang, T. Jung, R. Karl, and T. Zhao, “Federated dynamic graph neural networks with secure aggregation for video-based distributed surveillance,”ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–23, 2022

    2022

  140. [151]

    Cross-node federated graph neural network for spatio-temporal data modeling,

    C. Meng, S. Rambhatla, and Y . Liu, “Cross-node federated graph neural network for spatio-temporal data modeling,” inProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, 2021, pp. 1202–1211

    2021

  141. [152]

    Fastgnn: A topological information protected federated learning approach for traffic speed forecasting,

    C. Zhang, S. Zhang, J. James, and S. Yu, “Fastgnn: A topological information protected federated learning approach for traffic speed forecasting,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 8464–8474, 2021

    2021

  142. [153]

    Federated deep learning for smart city edge-based applications,

    Y . Djenouri, T. P. Michalak, and J. C.-W. Lin, “Federated deep learning for smart city edge-based applications,”Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 147, pp. 350–359, 2023

    2023

  143. [154]

    A privacy- preserving federated graph learning framework for threat detection in iot trigger-action programming,

    Y . Xing, L. Hu, X. Du, Z. Shen, J. Hu, and F. Wang, “A privacy- preserving federated graph learning framework for threat detection in iot trigger-action programming,”Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 255, p. 124724,

  144. [155]

    Graph sparsification-based secure federated learning for consumer- driven internet of things,

    J. Zhang, X. Li, P. Vijayakumar, W. Liang, V . Chang, and B. B. Gupta, “Graph sparsification-based secure federated learning for consumer- driven internet of things,”IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2024

    2024

  145. [156]

    Towards effective fed- erated graph anomaly detection via self-boosted knowledge distillation,

    J. Cai, Y . Zhan, Z. Lu, W. Guo, and S.-K. Ng, “Towards effective fed- erated graph anomaly detection via self-boosted knowledge distillation,” inProceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 5537–5546

    2024

  146. [157]

    Lg-fgad: An effective federated graph anomaly detection framework,

    J. Cai, Y . Zhang, J. Fan, and S.-K. Ng, “Lg-fgad: An effective federated graph anomaly detection framework,” inProceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, pp. 3760–3769

    2024

  147. [159]

    Trustworthy federated graph learning framework for wireless internet of things

    A. Z. Abualkishik, R. Almajed, and W. Thompson, “Trustworthy federated graph learning framework for wireless internet of things.” International Journal of Wireless & Ad Hoc Communication, vol. 6, no. 1, 2023

    2023

  148. [160]

    A federated multigraph integration approach for connectional brain template learning,

    H. C. Bayram and I. Rekik, “A federated multigraph integration approach for connectional brain template learning,” inMultimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support: 11th International Workshop, ML-CDS 2021, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2021, Strasbourg, France, October 1...

    2021

  149. [161]

    Fedgraphmri-net: A federated graph neural network framework for robust mri reconstruction across non-iid data,

    S. Ahmed, F. Jinchao, M. A. Manan, M. Yaqub, M. U. Ali, and A. Raheem, “Fedgraphmri-net: A federated graph neural network framework for robust mri reconstruction across non-iid data,”Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 102, p. 107360, 2025

    2025

  150. [162]

    Heteroge- neous structured federated learning with graph convolutional aggregation for mri-based mental disorder diagnosis,

    Y . Hu, R. Liu, J. Zhang, Z.-A. Huang, L. Song, and K. C. Tan, “Heteroge- neous structured federated learning with graph convolutional aggregation for mri-based mental disorder diagnosis,” in2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–8

    2024

  151. [163]

    Hyper-graph attention based federated learning methods for use in mental health detection,

    U. Ahmed, J. C.-W. Lin, and G. Srivastava, “Hyper-graph attention based federated learning methods for use in mental health detection,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 768–777, 2022

    2022

  152. [164]

    Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records,

    T. S. Brisimi, R. Chen, T. Mela, A. Olshevsky, I. C. Paschalidis, and W. Shi, “Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records,”International journal of medical informatics, vol. 112, pp. 59–67, 2018

    2018

  153. [165]

    Fedni: Federated graph learning with network inpainting for population-based disease prediction,

    L. Peng, N. Wang, N. Dvornek, X. Zhu, and X. Li, “Fedni: Federated graph learning with network inpainting for population-based disease prediction,”IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 2032–2043, 2022

    2022

  154. [166]

    Personalized federated graph learning on non-iid electronic health records,

    T. Tang, Z. Han, Z. Cai, S. Yu, X. Zhou, T. Oseni, and S. K. Das, “Personalized federated graph learning on non-iid electronic health records,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2024

    2024

  155. [167]

    Privacy- preserving individual-level COVID-19 infection prediction via federated graph learning,

    W. Fu, H. Wang, C. Gao, G. Liu, Y . Li, and T. Jiang, “Privacy- preserving individual-level COVID-19 infection prediction via federated graph learning,”ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 82:1–82:29,

  156. [168]

    Feel: Federated learning framework for el- derly healthcare using edge-iomt,

    S. Ghosh and S. K. Ghosh, “Feel: Federated learning framework for el- derly healthcare using edge-iomt,”IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1800–1809, 2023

    2023

  157. [169]

    Grafehty: Graph neural network using federated learning for human activity recognition,

    A. Sarkar, T. Sen, and A. K. Roy, “Grafehty: Graph neural network using federated learning for human activity recognition,” in2021 20th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1124–1129

    2021

  158. [170]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3633202

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3633202

    doi

  159. [171]

    Federated learning for heterogeneous electronic health records utilising augmented temporal graph attention networks,

    S. Molaei, A. Thakur, G. Niknam, A. Soltan, H. Zare, and D. A. Clifton, “Federated learning for heterogeneous electronic health records utilising augmented temporal graph attention networks,” inInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 2024, pp....

    2024

  160. [172]

    Federated learning-based private medical knowledge graph for epidemic surveillance in internet of things,

    X. Wu, J. Gao, M. Bilal, F. Dai, X. Xu, L. Qi, and W. Dou, “Federated learning-based private medical knowledge graph for epidemic surveillance in internet of things,”Expert Systems, p. e13372, 2023

    2023

  161. [173]

    Stfl: A temporal-spatial federated learning framework for graph neural networks,

    G. Lou, Y . Liu, T. Zhang, and X. Zheng, “Stfl: A temporal-spatial federated learning framework for graph neural networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.06750, 2021. 21

    2021 arXiv

  162. [174]

    A review of graph neural networks in epidemic modeling,

    Z. Liu, G. Wan, B. A. Prakash, M. S. Lau, and W. Jin, “A review of graph neural networks in epidemic modeling,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2024, pp. 6577–6587

    2024

  163. [175]

    Graph representation federated learning for malware detection in internet of health things,

    M. Amjath, S. Henna, and U. Rathnayake, “Graph representation federated learning for malware detection in internet of health things,” Results in Engineering, vol. 25, p. 103651, 2025

    2025

  164. [176]

    Epidemiology-aware neural ode with continuous disease transmission graph,

    G. Wan, Z. Liu, X. Shan, M. S. Lau, B. A. Prakash, and W. Jin, “Epidemiology-aware neural ode with continuous disease transmission graph,” inForty-second International Conference on Machine Learning, 2025

    2025

  165. [177]

    Cluster-driven graph federated learning over multiple domains,

    D. Caldarola, M. Mancini, F. Galasso, M. Ciccone, E. Rodol `a, and B. Caputo, “Cluster-driven graph federated learning over multiple domains,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021, pp. 2749–2758

    2021

  166. [178]

    Hierarchical federated learning with local model embedding,

    Y . He, D. Yan, and F. Chen, “Hierarchical federated learning with local model embedding,”Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 123, p. 106148, 2023

    2023

  167. [179]

    Peer-to-peer federated learning on graphs,

    A. Lalitha, O. C. Kilinc, T. Javidi, and F. Koushanfar, “Peer-to-peer federated learning on graphs,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11173, 2019

    1901 arXiv

  168. [180]

    A new look and convergence rate of federated multitask learning with laplacian regularization,

    C. T. Dinh, T. T. Vu, N. H. Tran, M. N. Dao, and H. Zhang, “A new look and convergence rate of federated multitask learning with laplacian regularization,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022

    2022

  169. [181]

    The future of large language model pre-training is federated,

    L. Sani, A. Iacob, Z. Cao, B. Marino, Y . Gao, T. Paulik, W. Zhao, W. F. Shen, P. Aleksandrov, X. Qiu, and N. D. Lane, “The future of large language model pre-training is federated,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10853

    2024 arXiv

  170. [182]

    Federated learning with heterogeneous architectures using graph hypernetworks,

    O. Litany, H. Maron, D. Acuna, J. Kautz, G. Chechik, and S. Fidler, “Federated learning with heterogeneous architectures using graph hypernetworks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08459, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  171. [183]

    Fedbiot: Llm local fine-tuning in federated learning without full model,

    F. Wu, Z. Li, Y . Li, B. Ding, and J. Gao, “Fedbiot: Llm local fine-tuning in federated learning without full model,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ser. KDD ’24. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, ...

    2024

  172. [184]

    Fate-llm: A industrial grade federated learning framework for large language models,

    T. Fan, Y . Kang, G. Ma, W. Chen, W. Wei, L. Fan, and Q. Yang, “Fate-llm: A industrial grade federated learning framework for large language models,”Symposium on Advances and Open Problems in Large Language Models (LLM@IJCAI’23), 2023

    2023

  173. [185]

    Slora: Federated parameter efficient fine-tuning of language models,

    S. Babakniya, A. R. Elkordy, Y . H. Ezzeldin, Q. Liu, K.-B. Song, M. El-Khamy, and S. Avestimehr, “Slora: Federated parameter efficient fine-tuning of language models,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.06522

    2023 arXiv

  174. [186]

    Flower: A friendly federated learning research framework,

    D. J. Beutel, T. Topal, A. Mathur, X. Qiu, J. Fernandez-Marques, Y . Gao, L. Sani, H. L. Kwing, T. Parcollet, P. P. d. Gusm ˜ao, and N. D. Lane, “Flower: A friendly federated learning research framework,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.14390, 2020

    2007 arXiv

  175. [187]

    Graphgpt: Graph instruction tuning for large language models,

    J. Tang, Y . Yang, W. Wei, L. Shi, L. Su, S. Cheng, D. Yin, and C. Huang, “Graphgpt: Graph instruction tuning for large language models,” 2023

    2023

  176. [188]

    Federated learning of large language models with parameter- efficient prompt tuning and adaptive optimization,

    T. Che, J. Liu, Y . Zhou, J. Ren, J. Zhou, V . S. Sheng, H. Dai, and D. Dou, “Federated learning of large language models with parameter- efficient prompt tuning and adaptive optimization,” inConf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Singapore: Association for...

    2023

  177. [189]

    Unigraph: Learning a unified cross-domain foundation model for text-attributed graphs,

    Y . He, Y . Sui, X. He, and B. Hooi, “Unigraph: Learning a unified cross-domain foundation model for text-attributed graphs,” in Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V .1, ser. KDD ’25. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computi...

    2025

  178. [190]

    Graphllm: Boosting graph reasoning ability of large language model,

    Z. Chai, T. Zhang, L. Wu, K. Han, X. Hu, X. Huang, and Y . Yang, “Graphllm: Boosting graph reasoning ability of large language model,”

  179. [191]

    Higpt: Heterogeneous graph language model,

    J. Tang, Y . Yang, W. Wei, L. Shi, L. Xia, D. Yin, and C. Huang, “Higpt: Heterogeneous graph language model,” 2024

    2024

  180. [192]

    Prompt-based node feature extractor for few-shot learning on text-attributed graphs,

    X. Huang, K. Han, D. Bao, Q. Tao, Z. Zhang, Y . Yang, and Q. Zhu, “Prompt-based node feature extractor for few-shot learning on text-attributed graphs,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02848

    2023 arXiv

  181. [193]

    One for all: Towards training one graph model for all classification tasks,

    H. Liu, J. Feng, L. Kong, N. Liang, D. Tao, Y . Chen, and M. Zhang, “One for all: Towards training one graph model for all classification tasks,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00149

    2024 arXiv

  182. [194]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05845

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05845

    arXiv

  183. [195]

    Instructmol: Multi-modal integration for building a versatile and reliable molecular assistant in drug discovery,

    H. Cao, Z. Liu, X. Lu, Y . Yao, and Y . Li, “Instructmol: Multi-modal integration for building a versatile and reliable molecular assistant in drug discovery,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16208

    2024 arXiv

  184. [196]

    Representation learning with large language models for recommendation,

    X. Ren, W. Wei, L. Xia, L. Su, S. Cheng, J. Wang, D. Yin, and C. Huang, “Representation learning with large language models for recommendation,” inProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024, 2024, pp. 3464–3475

    2024

  185. [197]

    Few-shot learning on graphs: From meta-learning to llm-empowered pre-training and beyond,

    Y . Fang, Y . Wu, X. Yu, and S. Pan, “Few-shot learning on graphs: From meta-learning to llm-empowered pre-training and beyond,” inCompanion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, ser. WWW ’25. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2025, p. 9–12. [On...

    2025

  186. [198]

    Harnessing explanations: LLM-to-LM interpreter for enhanced text- attributed graph representation learning,

    X. He, X. Bresson, T. Laurent, A. Perold, Y . LeCun, and B. Hooi, “Harnessing explanations: LLM-to-LM interpreter for enhanced text- attributed graph representation learning,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. [Online]. Available: https:...

    2024

  187. [199]

    Opengraph: Towards open graph foundation models,

    L. Xia, B. Kao, and C. Huang, “Opengraph: Towards open graph foundation models,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2403.01121

    2024 arXiv

  188. [200]

    Towards effective federated graph foundation model via mitigating knowledge entanglement,

    Y . Zhu, X. Li, J. Jia, M. Hu, D. Wu, and M. Qiu, “Towards effective federated graph foundation model via mitigating knowledge entanglement,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505. 12684

    2025

  189. [201]

    Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem,

    M. McCloskey and N. J. Cohen, “Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem,” in Psychology of Learning and Motivation, G. H. Bower, Ed. Academic Press, 1989, vol. 24, pp. 109–165. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scien...

    1989

  190. [202]

    Llms as zero-shot graph learners: Alignment of gnn representations with llm token embeddings,

    D. Wang, Y . Zuo, F. Li, and J. Wu, “Llms as zero-shot graph learners: Alignment of gnn representations with llm token embeddings,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14512

    2024 arXiv

  191. [203]

    Data-centric federated graph learning with large language models,

    B. Yan, Z. Zhang, H. Sun, M. Zhang, Y . Cao, and C. Shi, “Data-centric federated graph learning with large language models,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19455

    2025 arXiv

  192. [204]

    Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in graph neural networks with experience replay,

    F. Zhou and C. Cao, “Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in graph neural networks with experience replay,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.09908

    2021 arXiv

  193. [205]

    Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in graph neural networks,

    H. Liu, Y . Yang, and X. Wang, “Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in graph neural networks,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06002

    2020 arXiv

  194. [206]

    Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory

    J. L. McClelland, B. L. McNaughton, and R. C. O’Reilly, “Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory.”Psychological Review, vol. 102, no. 3, p. 419–457, Jul 1995

    1995

  195. [207]

    Packnet: Adding multiple tasks to a single network by iterative pruning,

    A. Mallya and S. Lazebnik, “Packnet: Adding multiple tasks to a single network by iterative pruning,” in2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018, pp. 7765–7773

    2018

  196. [208]

    The california consumer privacy act: Towards a european-style privacy regime in the united states?

    S. L. Pardau, “The california consumer privacy act: Towards a european-style privacy regime in the united states?” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/jtlp/vol23/iss1/2/

    2018

  197. [209]

    Towards effective and general graph unlearning via mutual evolution,

    X. Li, Y . Zhao, Z. Wu, W. Zhang, R.-H. Li, and G. Wang, “Towards effective and general graph unlearning via mutual evolution,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 13 682–13 690, Mar. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ojs.aaai.o...

    2024

  198. [210]

    Federated continual graph learning,

    Y . Zhu, X. Li, M. Hu, and D. Wu, “Federated continual graph learning,”

  199. [211]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18919

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18919

    arXiv

  200. [212]

    General data protection regulation (gdpr),

    GDPR, “General data protection regulation (gdpr),” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://gdpr-info.eu

    2018

  201. [213]

    Heterogeneous federated knowledge graph embedding learning and unlearning,

    X. Zhu, G. Li, and W. Hu, “Heterogeneous federated knowledge graph embedding learning and unlearning,” inProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023, ser. WWW ’23. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, p. 2444–2454. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/...

    2023

  202. [214]

    Openwgl: Open-world graph learning,

    M. Wu, S. Pan, and X. Zhu, “Openwgl: Open-world graph learning,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 2020, pp. 681–690

    2020

  203. [215]

    GNNDelete: A general unlearning strategy for graph neural networks,

    J. Cheng, G. Dasoulas, H. He, C. Agarwal, and M. Zitnik, “GNNDelete: A general unlearning strategy for graph neural networks,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=X9yCkmT5Qrl

    2023

  204. [216]

    Certified graph unlearning,

    E. Chien, C. Pan, and O. Milenkovic, “Certified graph unlearning,”

  205. [217]

    Decentralized federated graph learning with lightweight zero trust architecture for next-generation networking security,

    X. Zhou, W. Liang, K. I.-K. Wang, K. Yada, L. T. Yang, J. Ma, and Q. Jin, “Decentralized federated graph learning with lightweight zero trust architecture for next-generation networking security,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1908–1922, 2025

    1908

  206. [218]

    Subgraph federated unlearning,

    F. Liu and H. Liu, “Subgraph federated unlearning,” inProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, ser. WWW ’25. New York, 22 NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2025, p. 1205–1215. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3696410.3714821

    2025

  207. [219]

    Graph-based gossiping for communication efficiency in decentralized federated learning,

    H. Nguyen, H.-T. Nguyen, P. K. Donta, S. Pirttikangas, and L. Lov ´en, “Graph-based gossiping for communication efficiency in decentralized federated learning,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10607

    2025 arXiv

  208. [220]

    Federated xai ids: An explainable and safeguarding privacy approach to detect intrusion combining federated learning and shap,

    K. Fatema, S. K. Dey, M. Anannya, R. T. Khan, M. M. Rashid, C. Su, and R. Mazumder, “Federated xai ids: An explainable and safeguarding privacy approach to detect intrusion combining federated learning and shap,”Future Internet, vol. 17, no. 6, 2025. [Online]. Available: https...

    2025

  209. [221]

    Multimodal learning with graphs,

    Y . Ektefaie, G. Dasoulas, A. Noori, M. Farhat, and M. Zitnik, “Multimodal learning with graphs,”nature machine intelligence, 2023

    2023

  210. [222]

    Federated prototype graph learning,

    Z. Wu, X. Li, Y . Zhu, R.-H. Li, G. Wang, and C. Zhou, “Federated prototype graph learning,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09493

    2025 arXiv

  211. [224]

    Graph-enhanced explainable asyn- chronous federated learning for internet of vehicles,

    H. Zhou, Y . Zhou, and W. Yang, “Graph-enhanced explainable asyn- chronous federated learning for internet of vehicles,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 12, no. 13, pp. 24 834–24 852, 2025

    2025

  212. [227]

    An in-depth analysis of recommender systems for integration of knowledge graphs utilising federated xai model,

    C. Kumar and M. Alam, “An in-depth analysis of recommender systems for integration of knowledge graphs utilising federated xai model,” International Journal of Information Technology, 2025

    2025

  213. [228]

    Leveraging game theory and xai for data quality-driven sample and client selection in trustworthy split federated learning,

    A. Tariq, F. Sallabi, M. A. Serhani, T. Qayyum, and E. S. Barka, “Leveraging game theory and xai for data quality-driven sample and client selection in trustworthy split federated learning,”IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2025

    2025

  214. [2022]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.09140

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.09140

    arXiv

  215. [2023]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12885

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12885

    arXiv

  216. [2024]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124724

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124724

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.