REVIEW 3 cited by
CLIPLoss and Norm-Based Data Selection Methods for Multimodal Contrastive Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Data selection has emerged as a core issue for large-scale visual-language model pretaining (e.g., CLIP), particularly with noisy web-curated datasets. Three main data selection approaches are: (1) leveraging external non-CLIP models to aid data selection, (2) training new CLIP-style embedding models that are more effective at selecting high-quality data than the original OpenAI CLIP model, and (3) designing better metrics or strategies universally applicable to any CLIP embedding without requiring specific model properties (e.g., CLIPScore is one popular metric). While the first two approaches have been extensively studied, the third remains under-explored. In this paper, we advance the third approach by proposing two new methods. Firstly, instead of classical CLIP scores that only consider the alignment between two modalities from a single sample, we introduce surrogate-CLIPLoss (s-CLIPLoss), a CLIP loss-inspired method that adds the alignment between one sample and its contrastive pairs as an extra normalization term for better quality measurement. Secondly, when downstream tasks are known, we propose a new norm-based metric, NormSim, to measure the similarity between pretraining data and target data. We test our methods on the data selection benchmark, DataComp~\cite{gadre2023datacomp}. Compared to the best baseline using only OpenAI's CLIP-L/14, our methods achieve a 5.3\% improvement on ImageNet-1k and a 2.8\% improvement on 38 downstream evaluation tasks. Moreover, both s-CLIPLoss and NormSim are compatible with existing techniques. By combining our methods with the current best methods DFN and HYPE, we can boost average performance on downstream tasks by 0.9\%, achieving a new state-of-the-art on the DataComp-medium benchmark.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Active Data Curation Effectively Distills Large-Scale Multimodal Models
Selecting training data by a reference model's loss acts as an implicit distillation, and combining it with explicit distillation yields more FLOP-efficient vision-language models that beat prior SoTA on 27 benchmarks.
-
Evaluating Sample Utility for Efficient Data Selection by Mimicking Model Weights
A gradient alignment score against a reference model's weights selects and reweights training samples, improving data efficiency in image classification and CLIP pretraining.
-
SCAN: Bootstrapping Contrastive Pre-training for Data Efficiency
SCAN dynamically prunes and regrows training data during contrastive pre-training, matching full-data accuracy within about 1% on average while using 30-35% less data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.