Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Carrollian limit of NS-NS and Heterotic Supergravity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The bosonic NS–NS and heterotic supergravity actions admit a finite Carrollian limit once the dilaton is scaled to cancel divergences, yielding a covariant spacetime effective theory for string backgrounds at zero speed of light.

desk verdict First full Carrollian limit of NS-NS/heterotic supergravity actions, with the dynamics section the main gap; worth serious refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09847 v2 pith:YPZ6CCRZ submitted 2026-07-10 hep-th gr-qc

Romina Ballesteros , Eric Lescano , Sergio Patiño-López This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc PACS 04.65.+e11.25.-w
keywords Carrolliangeometryultra-relativisticlimitNS-NSsupergravityheteroticGreen-Schwarzmechanismdilatonscalingalpha-primecorrectionsstringeffectiveaction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that string theory's low-energy field equations—not just pure gravity—survive the ultra-relativistic limit in which the speed of light goes to zero. The key move is to scale the dilaton as half the logarithm of the contraction parameter, so that the path-integral measure cancels the quadratic divergences that would otherwise kill the action. With this scaling, the bosonic NS–NS sector and, after adding non-Abelian gauge fields, the heterotic sector each have a finite, diffeomorphism-covariant Carrollian action, written in terms of a clock 1-form, a degenerate spatial metric, a Carrollian 1-form, and a spatial 2-form. The paper also shows the leading four-derivative (α′) correction is finite under a correlated rescaling, and it argues the resulting theory is a natural spacetime counterpart to Carrollian string theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the dilaton's large-w scaling, φ̂ = ½ ln w + φ, which makes the string-frame measure √(−ĝ)e^(−2φ̂) fall as w^(−2), exactly matching the w² growth of the Ricci scalar, the dilaton kinetic term, the Kalb–Ramond strength squared, and, in heterotic theory, the Yang–Mills curvature squared. Equally central is the Carrollian ansatz for the metric and B-field, which decomposes the relativistic fields into Carrollian data, and the affine connection defined as the O(1) part of the Levi–Civita connection, with the subleading w² and w^(−2) terms claimed to transform as tensors. These ingredients together convert the limiting action into the covariant expressions (2.40) and (3

What would settle it

Explicitly compute, for a non-trivial Carrollian geometry with non-constant τ and h, the diffeomorphism transformation of the O(w²) and O(w^(−2)) parts of the expanded Levi–Civita connection; if either piece contains non-tensorial terms, the O(1) connection is not intrinsic and the covariant actions are not well-defined.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the Carrollian limit of the bosonic NS–NS and heterotic supergravity actions is finite, not divergent, provided the dilaton is expanded as φ̂ = ½ ln w + φ. In this limit the measure √(−ĝ)e^(−2φ̂) scales as w^(−2)e^(−2φ), exactly canceling the w² terms in R̂, (∂φ̂)², Ĥ², and the heterotic F̂² contributions, leaving the explicit finite actions (2.40) and (3.17) built from Carrollian curvatures and non-metricities. The resulting geometry is Carrollian, with a clock 1-form, a degenerate spatial metric, a 1-form A_μ inherited from the Kalb–Ramond field, and a spatial 2-form b_μν. In the heterotic case the Green–Schwarz transformation of A_μ can be absorbed by

Load-bearing premise

The covariant form of everything depends on an assertion made without proof in §2.1.2: that the O(w²) and O(w^(−2)) pieces of the expanded Levi–Civita connection transform as tensors, so the O(1) piece alone defines the Carrollian connection; if that decoupling fails, the covariant actions (2.40) and (3.17) do not exist as stated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The bosonic NS–NS sector of string theory has a well-defined Carrollian effective action, so backreacted target-space geometries for Carrollian strings can be studied from a spacetime action rather than only from worldsheet models.
  • A consistent Carrollian heterotic sector exists with a non-Abelian gauge field; the Green–Schwarz mechanism splits, with the 1-form's transformation trivializable and the 2-form's fixed.
  • The leading α′ Riem² correction is finite under α′ ~ 1/w² (at least when H = 0), opening the way toward a full four-derivative Carrollian effective action.
  • The field content of the Carrollian limit coincides with the natural decomposition of the bosonic string multiplet, making the action a candidate low-energy description of the critical Carrollian string in D = 26.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One consequence the authors leave implicit: if the correspondence with the critical Carrollian bosonic string holds, then the worldsheet beta-function equations should reproduce the equations of motion obtained from the Carrollian action; checking this would tie the two formalisms together.
  • The trivialization of the 1-form Green–Schwarz transformation resembles what happens in some non-relativistic heterotic constructions; a natural test is whether this trivialization survives once fermions are included, since anomaly cancellation might force the unredefined A_μ to reappear.
  • The finiteness of Riem² at leading order suggests that higher-order α′ invariants, such as (H²)² and R³ terms, might also be rendered finite by the same measure factor; these are open cases flagged by the paper.
  • Because the near-horizon expansion of string worldsheets is Carrollian, the actions derived here could serve as a target-space framework for horizon-scale string physics; a direct application would be to compute the Carrollian field equations for a Schwarzschild-like background and compare with worldsheet results.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs the ultra-relativistic (Carrollian, w→∞) limit of the bosonic NS-NS and heterotic supergravity actions. Using the metric ansatz (2.1)-(2.2), the Kalb-Ramond decomposition (2.6), the dilaton scaling (2.7), and the gauge-field ansatz (3.1), it argues that the w^{-2} scaling of the measure compensates the positive powers of w in the Lagrangian, yielding the finite actions (2.40) and (3.17). The paper rewrites these actions in terms of a Carrollian affine connection and non-metricities, constructs the heterotic gauge sector with a partially trivialized Green-Schwarz mechanism, analyzes equations of motion by both expanding the relativistic equations and using a constrained variational principle, checks (in §5.2) the finiteness of the leading \hat{Riem}^2 α'-correction under α'→α'_c/w², and discusses possible worldsheet and near-horizon applications. The central technical claim is the existence of finite, covariant Carrollian NS-NS and heterotic actions.

Significance. If the construction is correct, it provides the first systematic Carrollian effective actions for string-theoretic NS-NS and heterotic sectors, thereby extending Carrollian gravity to include the Kalb-Ramond field, the dilaton, and non-Abelian gauge fields. The derivation is anchored to the known relativistic supergravity action: no parameters are fitted, and the displayed finite Lagrangians are explicitly traceable to the parent theory. The heterotic Green-Schwarz analysis, including the field redefinition (3.11), is a concrete and checkable contribution. The proposal to rescale α' as α'_c/w² is also a promising route toward higher-derivative Carrollian corrections. However, the paper's dynamical claims are currently tempered by the explicitly deferred equivalence between its two equations-of-motion derivations and by partially asserted α' computations; these gaps need to be closed before the theory can be regarded as a fully established dynamical system.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Conclusions] The equivalence between the expanded relativistic equations (4.5)–(4.22) and the variational principle of §4.2 is not established. The text explicitly states that the two approaches are 'expected to provide equivalent descriptions' and defers the comparison to future work [92]. Moreover, the variational derivation is restricted to the truncation A_μ=b_μν=a_μ^i=χ^i=0, and the Lagrange multipliers in (4.25) are never eliminated; Appendix A stops at the unconstrained variations. The 'geometric constraints' mentioned at the end of §4.1 are not specified. Thus the paper does not currently provide a demonstrated set of Carrollian field equations for the full NS-NS/heterotic actions. This is a load-bearing gap for the dynamical interpretation of the finite actions; please either prove the equivalence at least in the dilaton-gravity truncation or explicitly restrict the claims to the action-leve
  2. [§5.2, Eqs. (5.1)–(5.3)] The α'-finiteness statement rests on an unshown calculation: the text says 'After a long but straightforward computation we verify' that the w^10, w^8 and w^6 components of \hat{Riem}^2 vanish, but no intermediate cancellations are provided. Moreover, the conclusion that 'the bosonic supergravity is finite up to four-derivative terms' is stronger than checking the single invariant \hat{Riem}^2 with \hat H=0; other four-derivative structures and the standard field redefinitions are not discussed. Please supply the actual verification (or a supplementary file) and align the claims with what is actually checked.
  3. [§2.2 and §3.2] The claim that the action is finite requires controlling all positive powers of w in the parent Lagrangian, not only the O(w²) terms that become the finite action. The displayed results (2.35)–(2.40) and (3.15)–(3.17) give the finite pieces, but the paper does not show that the potential w^4 (and higher) contributions—for example the Γ^{(2)}Γ^{(2)} part of the Ricci scalar coming from (2.26)—vanish or cancel before the measure scaling. Please display the leading divergent-order cancellation explicitly or state the identities used.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2] After Eq. (3.16), the text reads 'taking the limit w→0'; this should be w→∞.
  2. [Eq. (3.10)] The notation '∂[μλ^i]' with a single free index is not well-formed; it should presumably be ∂_μλ^i or clarified with the correct antisymmetrization.
  3. [Eq. (2.17)] The index structure in the connection formula is ambiguous as printed (e.g., 'τ ρσ' should likely be τ^ρ τ_σ or a similar contraction). Please clarify.
  4. [§2.1.2] The assertion that the w^{±2} pieces of the Levi-Civita connection transform as tensors is stated without proof or reference. Although the claim is plausible, a one-line argument or a precise reference would make the covariance of the construction fully explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the finite Carrollian actions are a direct w-expansion of the known relativistic supergravity actions; the EOM-equivalence gap is an admitted open problem, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is a systematic large-w expansion of the standard relativistic NS-NS and heterotic supergravity actions, which are external benchmarks. The ansätze (2.1)-(2.2), (2.6), (2.7), (3.1) are explicit inputs, and the dilaton scaling α=1/2 is fixed by the measure condition (2.8); no parameter is fitted to data. The finite actions (2.40) and (3.17) are obtained by collecting the w^2 coefficients of the expanded Lagrangian, with every term traceable to the parent action. The α' rescaling in §5.2 is a bookkeeping choice, not a fitted value, and the claimed finiteness of the Riem^2 contribution is verified by explicit vanishing of the dangerous orders (5.1)-(5.3). The only plausible concern is the use of the self-citation [64] in §2.1.2 to justify discarding the w^{±2} connection pieces, but that assertion is elementary from the diffeomorphism transformation law and is not load-bearing: the covariant rewriting could be checked directly from the displayed expansion. The paper also explicitly states in §4.2 and the Conclusions that the two routes to the equations of motion are only 'expected' to coincide and defers the comparison to future work [92]; this is an admitted gap in the dynamical derivation, not a circular reduction. Accordingly, no step of the derivation is equivalent to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no genuinely new entities: every Carrollian variable (τ_μ, h_μν, b_μν, A_μ, a_μ^i, χ^i) is a component of the relativistic metric, Kalb–Ramond field, or gauge field in the w-expansion, and Ā_μ is a field redefinition. The load-bearing bookkeeping choices are the dilaton exponent α = 1/2 (fixed by the finiteness demand in (2.8)) and the α' rescaling constant α'_c (introduced ad hoc in §5.2). The covariance of the final actions further relies on an unproven tensor-transformation property of subleading connection coefficients (§2.1.2).

free parameters (2)
  • dilaton scaling exponent α = 1/2
    Chosen in (2.7)-(2.8) so the measure √(-ĝ)e^{-2φ̂} is O(w⁻²); the entire finite-action mechanism depends on this value. It is fixed by the finiteness demand rather than derived from an independent principle.
  • Carrollian string length α'_c
    Introduced by the rescaling α' → α'_c/w² (§5.2) to render the leading R̂iem² correction finite. The physical value would have to come from a Carrollian string theory, which is not yet established.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption O(w²) and O(w⁻²) parts of the expanded Levi-Civita connection transform as tensors, so the O(1) part alone defines the Carrollian connection
    Stated in §2.1.2 (after eq. (2.18)) without proof; required for the covariant rewriting (2.35)-(2.40).
  • domain assumption The field ansätze (2.1), (2.2), (2.6), (2.7), (3.1) capture the correct ultra-relativistic degrees of freedom (τ, h, b, A, a, χ)
    Standard Carrollian metric expansion; the B-field and gauge-field splittings with the mixed 1-form A and shift χ are modeling choices whose uniqueness is not shown.
  • standard math The O(w²) pieces of R̂ + 4(∂φ̂)² - (1/12)Ĥ² give the complete finite action (no O(w⁰) or O(w⁻²) pieces survive in the measure-weighted action)
    Follows from √(-ĝ)e^{-2φ̂} ~ w⁻² and the displayed expansions; the paper asserts the computed O(w²) contributions are the only finite ones.
  • ad hoc to paper α' rescaling α'_c = w²α' is a valid way to take the Carrollian limit of the four-derivative effective action
    Introduced in §5.2 specifically to make the R̂iem² term finite; no independent derivation from string theory is given. The paper notes w⁶+ divergences may still arise.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Carrollian limit of NS-NS and Heterotic Supergravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YPZ6CCRZ

@misc{pith2026260709847,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Carrollian limit of NS-NS and Heterotic Supergravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YPZ6CCRZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09847}
}
abstract

We construct the Carrollian limit of NS--NS and heterotic supergravity through an ultra-relativistic expansion of the fields. An appropriate scaling of the dilaton renders the measure finite and compensates the divergences arising from the NS-NS supergravity Lagrangian, giving a finite action as $w\rightarrow\infty$. We then extend the construction to heterotic supergravity (neglecting fermions) by incorporating the non-Abelian gauge field together with the Green--Schwarz (GS) mechanism. The resulting theory contains a finite gauge sector consistently coupled to gravity, and the GS mechanism for the Carrollian 1-form field can be trivialized imposing field redefinitions. Then, we investigate the Carrollian equations of motion by both expanding the relativistic equations and deriving them from a variational principle. We also show that the leading $\alpha'$-corrected $\hat{\rm Riem}^2$ contribution remains finite under a rescaling of the string parameter $\alpha'\rightarrow \frac{\alpha'_c}{w^2}$, opening further research towards the full four-derivative effective action. Finally, we discuss the potential connection with the worldsheet formalism of the Carrollian string theory.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational Memory Beyond Null Infinity through Finite-Distance Carrollian Screens

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Finite-distance null screens carry a Carrollian memory whose leading tracefree large-radius part reproduces the standard Bondi displacement memory in Robinson–Trautman spacetimes.

  2. Carrollian bosonic supergravity at order $\alpha'$ and the universal cancellation of higher-curvature divergences

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Four-derivative and higher pure-gravitational α' corrections to bosonic supergravity admit a finite Carrollian limit, with an explicit action and a universal finiteness criterion for Riem^N terms.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 59 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [92]

    Ballesteros, E

    R. Ballesteros, E. Lescano and S. Pati˜ no-L´ opez, work in progress. 38

  2. [1]

    On an Analogue of the Galileo Group,

    N. Sen Gupta, “On an Analogue of the Galileo Group,” Nuovo Cim. 54 (1966) 512, DOI: 10.1007/BF02740871

    doi:10.1007/bf02740871 1966

  3. [2]

    Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du group de Poincare,

    J. Levy-Leblond, “Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du group de Poincare,” Ann.Inst.Henri Poincare 3 (1965) 1

    1965

  4. [3]

    Near-horizon Carroll symmetry and black hole Love numbers,

    R. F. Penna, “Near-horizon Carroll symmetry and black hole Love numbers,” arXiv:1812.05643 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Carrollian Physics at the Black Hole Horizon,

    L. Donnay and C. Marteau, “Carrollian Physics at the Black Hole Horizon,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36 no. 16, (2019) 165002, arXiv:1903.09654 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [5]

    Carroll Expansion of General Relativity,

    D. Hansen, N. A. Obers, G. Oling, and B. T. Søgaard, “Carroll Expansion of General Relativity,” SciPost Phys. 13 no. 3, (2022) 055, arXiv:2112.12684 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [6]

    Asymptotic symmetries in Carrollian theories of gravity,

    A. P´ erez, “Asymptotic symmetries in Carrollian theories of gravity,” JHEP 12 (2021) 173, arXiv:2110.15834 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [7]

    Non-linear black hole dynamics and Carrollian flu- ids,

    J. Redondo-Yuste and L. Lehner, “Non-linear black hole dynamics and Carrollian flu- ids,” JHEP 02 (2023) 240, arXiv:2212.06175 [gr-qc]. [8] F. Ecker, D. Grumiller, J. Har- tong, A. P´ erez, S. Prohazka, and R. Troncoso, “Carroll black holes,” arXiv:2308.10947 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 92 references
  1. [8]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, J. Hartong, E. Have, K. S. Kolekar, ”Strings near black holes are Carrollian”, Phys.Rev.D 110 (2024) 8, 086009

    2024

  2. [9]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, J. Hartong, E. Have, K. S. Kolekar, ”Strings near black holes are Carrollian. Part II”, JHEP 11 (2024) 024

    2024

  3. [10]

    H¨ usn¨ ugil and Luis Lehner, ”Sourced Carrollian fluids dual to black hole horizons”, Phys.Rev.D 112 (2025) 10, 104043

    S. H¨ usn¨ ugil and Luis Lehner, ”Sourced Carrollian fluids dual to black hole horizons”, Phys.Rev.D 112 (2025) 10, 104043

    2025

  4. [11]

    Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrela- tivistic Conformal Field Theories,

    A. Bagchi, “Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrela- tivistic Conformal Field Theories,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 105 (2010) 171601. 31

    2010

  5. [12]

    The Flat limit of three dimen- sional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes,

    G. Barnich, A. Gomberoff, and H. A. Gonzalez, “The Flat limit of three dimen- sional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 024020, arXiv:1204.3288 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Holography of 3D Flat Cosmo- logical Horizons,

    A. Bagchi, S. Detournay, R. Fareghbal, and J. Simon, “Holography of 3D Flat Cosmo- logical Horizons,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 110 no. 14, (2013) 141302, arXiv:1208.4372 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  7. [14]

    BMS/GCA Redux: Towards Flatspace Holography from Non-Relativistic Symmetries,

    A. Bagchi and R. Fareghbal, “BMS/GCA Redux: Towards Flatspace Holography from Non-Relativistic Symmetries,” JHEP 1210 (2012) 092, arXiv:1203.5795 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Holographic Reconstruction of 3D Flat Space-Time,

    J. Hartong, “Holographic Reconstruction of 3D Flat Space-Time,” JHEP 10 (2016) 104, arXiv:1511.01387 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Carrollian approach to 1 + 3D flat holography,

    A. Saha, “Carrollian approach to 1 + 3D flat holography,” JHEP 06 (2023) 051, arXiv:2304.02696 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Holography in Flat Spacetimes: the case for Carroll,

    A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar, and S. Dutta, “Holography in Flat Spacetimes: the case for Carroll,” arXiv:2311.11246 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  11. [18]

    A Carroll Limit of AdS/CFT: A Triality with Flat Space Holography?,

    A. Fontanella and O. Payne, “A Carroll Limit of AdS/CFT: A Triality with Flat Space Holography?,” arXiv:2508.10085 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  12. [19]

    Arenas-Henriquez, L

    G. Arenas-Henriquez, L. Ciambelli, F. Diaz, W. Jia, D. Rivera-Betancour, ”Radiation in fluid/gravity and the flat limit”, JHEP 01 (2026) 086

    2026

  13. [20]

    Poulias and S

    G. Poulias and S. Vandoren, ”On Carroll partition functions and flat space hologra- phy”, JHEP 06 (2025) 232

    2025

  14. [21]

    Diaz, ”Nonperfect Carrollian Fluids Through Holography”, e-Print: 2602.00396 [hep-th]

    F. Diaz, ”Nonperfect Carrollian Fluids Through Holography”, e-Print: 2602.00396 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  15. [22]

    Fredenhagen, S

    S. Fredenhagen, S. Prohazka, R. Tiefenbacher, ”Carrollian quantum states and flat space holography”, e-Print: 2604.22745 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  16. [23]

    Carrollian and celestial spaces at infinity,

    J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, E. Have, S. Prohazka, and J. Salzer, “Carrollian and celestial spaces at infinity,” JHEP 09 (2022) 007, arXiv:2112.03319 [hep-th]. 32

    2022 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray, and R. Ruzziconi, “Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 7, (2022) 071602, arXiv:2202.04702 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian,

    A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu, and S. Dutta, “Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 24, (2022) 241601, arXiv:2202.08438 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray, and R. Ruzziconi, “Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 12, (2023) 126027, arXiv:2212.12553 [hep- th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Carrollian Amplitudes and Celestial Symmetries,

    L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Yelleshpur Srikant, “Carrollian Amplitudes and Celestial Symmetries,” arXiv:2312.10138 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  21. [28]

    Constructing Carrollian field theories from null reduction,

    B. Chen, R. Liu, H. Sun, and Y.-f. Zheng, “Constructing Carrollian field theories from null reduction,” JHEP 11 (2023) 170, arXiv:2301.06011 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Studies on Carrollian quantum field theories,

    A. Sharma, “Studies on Carrollian quantum field theories,” Class. Quant. Grav. 43 no. 4, (2026) 045006, arXiv:2502.00487 [hep-th]

    2026

  23. [30]

    Carroll theories from Lorentzian light-cone theories,

    S. Majumdar, “Carroll theories from Lorentzian light-cone theories,” JHEP 02 (2026) 258, arXiv:2507.03081 [hep-th]

    2026

  24. [31]

    Carroll fermions from null reduction: A case of good and bad fermions,

    S. Majumdar, A. Sharma, and S. Singha, “Carroll fermions from null reduction: A case of good and bad fermions,” arXiv:2605.05334 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Flat holography and Carrollian fluids,

    L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos, and K. Siampos, “Flat holography and Carrollian fluids,” JHEP 07 (2018) 165, arXiv:1802.06809 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Two- dimensional fluids and their holographic duals,

    A. Campoleoni, L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, P. M. Petropoulos, and K. Siampos, “Two- dimensional fluids and their holographic duals,” Nucl. Phys. B 946 (2019) 114692, arXiv:1812.04019 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Relativistic fluids, hydrodynamic frames and their Galilean versus Carrollian avatars,

    A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos, D. R. Betancour, and K. Siampos, “Relativistic fluids, hydrodynamic frames and their Galilean versus Carrollian avatars,” JHEP 09 (2022) 162, arXiv:2205.09142 [hep-th]. 33

    2022 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Carrollian hydrodynamics from symmetries,

    L. Freidel and P. Jai-akson, “Carrollian hydrodynamics from symmetries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 40 no. 5, (2023) 055009, arXiv:2209.03328 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Carroll stories,

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma, and S. Vandoren, “Carroll stories,” arXiv:2307.06827 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  30. [37]

    Carrollian fluids and spontaneous breaking of boost symme- try,

    J. Armas and E. Have, “Carrollian fluids and spontaneous breaking of boost symme- try,” arXiv:2308.10594 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  31. [38]

    E. A. Bergshoeff, P. Concha, O. Fierro, E. Rodr ´ ıguez, J. Rosseel, ”A conformal approach to Carroll gravity”, JHEP 07 (2025) 075

    2025

  32. [39]

    Argando˜ na, A

    A. Argando˜ na, A. Guijosa, S. Pati˜ no-L´ opez, ”De Sitter Holography and Carrollian brane theories”, JHEP 10 (2025) 133, e-Print: 2507.06147 [hep-th]

    2025

  33. [40]

    Ciambelli and P

    L. Ciambelli and P. Jai-akson, ”Foundations of Carrollian geometry”, Phys.Rept. 1188 (2026) 1-51

    2026

  34. [41]

    Afshar and M

    H. Afshar and M. Ahmadi-Jahmani, ”Scaling Symmetry and Carrollian Gravity”, e-Print: 2512.20736 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  35. [42]

    ¨Ozer and Ayt¨ ul Filiz, ”Holonomies and Boundary Symmetries in the Discrete BF Formulation of Carroll Dilaton Gravity”, e-Print: 2606.25499 [hep-th]

    H.T. ¨Ozer and Ayt¨ ul Filiz, ”Holonomies and Boundary Symmetries in the Discrete BF Formulation of Carroll Dilaton Gravity”, e-Print: 2606.25499 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  36. [43]

    IIA/B, wound and wrapped,

    U. H. Danielsson, A. Guijosa, and M. Kruczenski, “IIA/B, wound and wrapped,” JHEP 10 (2000) 020, arXiv:hep-th/0009182

    2000 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Nonrelativistic closed string theory,

    J. Gomis and H. Ooguri, “Nonrelativistic closed string theory,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 42, pp. 3127–3151, 2001

    2001

  38. [45]

    Newtonian gravitons and D- brane collective coordinates in wound string theory,

    U. H. Danielsson, A. Guijosa, and M. Kruczenski, “Newtonian gravitons and D- brane collective coordinates in wound string theory,” JHEP 03 (2001) 041, arXiv:hep- th/0012183

    2001

  39. [46]

    An Action for Extended String Newton-Cartan Gravity,

    E. A. Bergshoeff, K. T. Grosvenor, C. Simsek, and Z. Yan, “An Action for Extended String Newton-Cartan Gravity,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 178, 2019. 34

    2019

  40. [47]

    Relating non- relativistic string theories,

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, L. Menculini, N. A. Obers, and G. Oling, “Relating non- relativistic string theories,” JHEP, vol. 11, p. 071, 2019

    2019

  41. [48]

    String Theory and String Newton-Cartan Geometry,

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, J. Rosseel, C. Simsek, and Z. Yan, “String Theory and String Newton-Cartan Geometry,” J. Phys. A, vol. 53, no. 1, p. 014001, 2020

    2020

  42. [49]

    Background Field Method for Nonlinear Sigma Models in Non- relativistic String Theory,

    Z. Yan and M. Yu, “Background Field Method for Nonlinear Sigma Models in Non- relativistic String Theory,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 181, 2020

    2020

  43. [50]

    Null-killing vector dimensional reduction and galilean ge- ometrodynamics,

    B. Julia and H. Nicolai, “Null-killing vector dimensional reduction and galilean ge- ometrodynamics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 439, no. 1, pp. 291 – 323, 1995

    1995

  44. [51]

    Nonrelativistic String Theory and T-Duality,

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, and Z. Yan, “Nonrelativistic String Theory and T-Duality,” JHEP, vol. 11, p. 133, 2018

    2018

  45. [52]

    Remark About Non-Relativistic String in Newton-Cartan Background and Null Reduction,

    J. Kluson, “Remark About Non-Relativistic String in Newton-Cartan Background and Null Reduction,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 041, 2018

    2018

  46. [53]

    Nonrelativistic String Theory in Background Fields,

    J. Gomis, J. Oh, and Z. Yan, “Nonrelativistic String Theory in Background Fields,” JHEP 10 (2019) 101, arXiv:hep-th/1905.07315

    2019 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Torsional Newton Cartan gravity from non-relativistic strings,

    A. D. Gallegos, U. Gursoy, and N. Zinnato, “Torsional Newton Cartan gravity from non-relativistic strings,” JHEP 09 (2020) 172, arXiv:hep-th/1906.01607

    2020 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Bidussi, T

    L. Bidussi, T. Harmark, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, and G. Oling, Torsional string Newton-Cartan geometry for non-relativistic strings, JHEP02(2022) 116, arXiv:hep- th/2107.00642

    2022 arXiv

  49. [56]

    E. A. Bergshoeff, L. Romano, J. Rosseel, E. Sim´ on-F´ elix, S. Zeko, ”From Galilei to Euclidean Carroll and the Alice Particle: The Times They Are a-Changin’”, e-Print: 2607.05115 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  50. [57]

    F. Ali, L. Ravera, ”N-extended Chern-Simons Carrollian supergravities in 2+1 space- time dimensions”, JHEP 02 (2020) 128

    2020

  51. [58]

    Ravera, U

    L. Ravera, U. Zorba, ”Carrollian and non-relativistic Jackiw–Teitelboim supergrav- ity”, Eur.Phys.J.C 83 (2023) 2, 107. 35

    2023

  52. [59]

    Grumiller, L

    D. Grumiller, L. Montecchio, M. Shams Nejati, ”Carroll dilaton supergravity in two dimensions”, JHEP 12 (2024) 005

    2024

  53. [60]

    Chen and Z

    B. Chen and Z. Hu, ”Carrollian superstring in the flipped vacuum”, Phys.Rev.D 112 (2025) 4, 046005

    2025

  54. [61]

    Bulunur, O

    I. Bulunur, O. Ergec, O. Kasikci, M. Ozkan, M. Salih Zog, ”A Twisted Origin for Magnetic Carroll Supersymmetry”, e-Print: 2603.28269 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  55. [62]

    Henneaux, ”Carroll supergravities”, e-Print: 2607.08329 [hep-th]

    M. Henneaux, ”Carroll supergravities”, e-Print: 2607.08329 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  56. [63]

    Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory,

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory,” Phys. Lett. B149(1984) 117

    1984

  57. [64]

    Lescano, ”Curvatures and Non-metricities in the Non-Relativistic Limit of Bosonic Supergravity”, e-Print: 2601.03342 [hep-th]

    E. Lescano, ”Curvatures and Non-metricities in the Non-Relativistic Limit of Bosonic Supergravity”, e-Print: 2601.03342 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  58. [65]

    A Non-Relativistic Limit for Heterotic Supergravity and its Gauge Lagrangian

    E. Lescano, “A Non-Relativistic Limit for Heterotic Supergravity and its Gauge Lagrangian”, Nucl.Phys.B 1028 2026, 117487, 2502.08711 [hep-th]

    2026 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Bergshoeff, J

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, B. Rollier, J. Rosseel, T. ter Veldhuis, ”Carroll versus Galilei Gravity”, JHEP 03 (2017) 165

    2017

  60. [67]

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Lahnsteiner, L. Romano, J. Rosseel and C.Simsek,´´A non- relativistic limit of NS-NS gravity´´, JHEP06(2021) 021, arXiv:hep-th/2102.06974

    2021 arXiv

  61. [68]

    E. A. Bergshoeff and L. Romano, Non-relativistic heterotic string theory, JHEP 01 (2024) 146, arXiv:hep-th/2310.19716

    2024 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Lescano and D

    E. Lescano and D. Osten, Non-relativistic limits of bosonic and heterotic Double Field Theory, JHEP 07 (2024) 286, arXiv:hep-th/2405.10362

    2024 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Sheikh-Jabbari, H

    M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, H. Yavartanoo, ”On the Consistency of Null Strings Literature: The Tale of an Overlooked Symmetry”, 2605.12414 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  64. [71]

    Sheikh-Jabbari, H

    M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, H. Yavartanoo, ”Null Strings Gauged and Reloaded, I: Null Strings Have Carroll-Weyl Gauge Symmetry”, 2605.25817 [hep-th]. 36

    arXiv

  65. [72]

    Sheikh-Jabbari, H

    M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, H. Yavartanoo, ”Null Strings Gauged and Reloaded, II: Con- sistent Classical Treatment of the Null Strings”, 2605.26822 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  66. [73]

    Lindstrom, ”Symmetries of tensionless strings”, 2605.26185 [hep-th]

    U. Lindstrom, ”Symmetries of tensionless strings”, 2605.26185 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  67. [74]

    Duary, S

    S. Duary, S. Maji, ”Path integral quantization of null bosonic strings with Carroll- Weyl ghosts”, 2606.04999 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  68. [75]

    Lindstrom, ”The conformal null string in d+2 and d dimensions”, 2606.22498 [hep-th]

    U. Lindstrom, ”The conformal null string in d+2 and d dimensions”, 2606.22498 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  69. [76]

    Rasulian, M.M

    Ida M. Rasulian, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, H. Yavartanoo, ”Null-strings Gauged, Reloaded and Quantized, I: Canonical Quantization in the Light-Cone Gauge”, 2607.02970 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  70. [77]

    Dynamics of Perturba- tions in Double Field Theory & Non-Relativistic String Theory

    S. M. Ko, C. Melby-Thompson, R. Meyer, and J.-H. Park, “Dynamics of Perturba- tions in Double Field Theory & Non-Relativistic String Theory”, JHEP12(2015) 144, [arXiv:1508.01121]

    2015 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Classification of non-Riemannian doubled-yet-gauged spacetime

    K. Morand and J.-H. Park, “Classification of non-Riemannian doubled-yet-gauged spacetime”, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017), no. 10 685, [arXiv:1707.03713]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 78, 901 (2018)]

    2017 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Remarks on the non-Riemannian sector in Double Field Theory

    K. Cho and J.-H. Park, “Remarks on the non-Riemannian sector in Double Field Theory”, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020), no. 2 101, [arXiv:1909.10711]

    2020 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Non-Riemannian gravity actions from double field theory

    A. D. Gallegos, U. Gursoy, S. Verma, and N. Zinnato, “Non-Riemannian gravity actions from double field theory”, JHEP06(2021) 173, [arXiv:2012.07765]

    2021 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Non-Riemannian isometries from double field theory

    C. D. A. Blair, G. Oling, and J.-H. Park, “Non-Riemannian isometries from double field theory”, JHEP04(2021) 072, [arXiv:2012.07766]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Double Field Theory,

    C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “Double Field Theory,” JHEP0909(2009) 099 [arXiv:0904.4664 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  76. [83]

    The Gauge algebra of double field theory and Courant brackets,

    C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “The Gauge algebra of double field theory and Courant brackets,” JHEP0909(2009) 090 [arXiv:0908.1792 [hep-th]]. 37

    2009 arXiv

  77. [84]

    Background independent action for double field theory,

    O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “Background independent action for double field theory,” JHEP1007(2010) 016 [arXiv:1003.5027 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Generalized metric formulation of double field theory,

    O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “Generalized metric formulation of double field theory,” JHEP1008(2010) 008 [arXiv:1006.4823 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Double Field Theory: A Pedagogical Review,

    G. Aldazabal, D. Marques and C. Nunez, “Double Field Theory: A Pedagogical Review,” Class. Quant. Grav.30, 163001 (2013) [arXiv:1305.1907 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  80. [87]

    The Spacetime of Double Field Theory: Review, Remarks, and Outlook,

    O. Hohm, D. L¨ ust and B. Zwiebach, “The Spacetime of Double Field Theory: Review, Remarks, and Outlook,” Fortsch. Phys.61, 926 (2013) [arXiv:1309.2977 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Gravitational Core of Double Field Theory: Lecture Notes

    J-H.Park, “Gravitational Core of Double Field Theory: Lecture Notes”, e-Print: 2505.10163

  82. [89]

    Lescano, ”Trivialization of the gravitational Green-Schwarz transformation in the nonrelativistic limit of string theory”, Phys.Rev.D 113 (2026) 4, L041902

    E. Lescano, ”Trivialization of the gravitational Green-Schwarz transformation in the nonrelativistic limit of string theory”, Phys.Rev.D 113 (2026) 4, L041902

    2026

  83. [90]

    Lescano, ”Gravitational four-derivative corrections in non-relativistic heterotic supergravity and the SO(8) Green-Schwarz mechanism”, e-Print: 2508.09250 [hep-th]

    E. Lescano, ”Gravitational four-derivative corrections in non-relativistic heterotic supergravity and the SO(8) Green-Schwarz mechanism”, e-Print: 2508.09250 [hep-th]

  84. [91]

    Figueroa-O’Farrill, E

    J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, E. Have, N. A. Obers, e-Print: 2509.04397 [hep-th]

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.