pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01519 · v1 · pith:YQMIKKMVnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall

Nonperturbative Nonlinear Hall Effect in Nonequilibrium Steady States

Lei Geng , Martin Eckstein , Lei Chen , Shouvik Sur , Silke Paschen , Qimiao Si , Philipp Werner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 18:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords nonlinear Hall effectnonequilibrium Green's functionsstrong-field transportdynamical mean-field theoryBerry curvaturetwo-band semimetaldc electric fields
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonequilibrium Green's functions enable nonperturbative calculation of nonlinear Hall response in strong dc fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a nonperturbative approach based on nonequilibrium steady-state Green's functions to compute the nonlinear Hall effect in dc-field-driven lattice systems. Dissipation and interactions enter through self-energies that go beyond the constant relaxation-time approximation, while interband and intraband transitions are treated on equal footing. Applied to a two-band semimetal model, the method reaches the strong-field regime past the crossover where the nonequilibrium distribution edge meets Berry-curvature hot spots. In this regime constant-relaxation-time estimates and Berry-curvature-dipole formulas become unreliable. Dynamical mean-field theory self-energies for interactions and electron-phonon coupling can substantially modify the Hall signal.

Core claim

We develop a nonperturbative approach based on nonequilibrium steady-state Green's functions for dc-field-driven lattice systems, with dissipation and interactions incorporated through self-energies beyond the constant relaxation-time approximation and interband transitions treated alongside their intraband counterparts. Applied to a two-band semimetal model, our approach provides direct access to the strong-field Hall response beyond the nonperturbative crossover where the edge of the nonequilibrium distribution reaches Berry-curvature hot spots, a regime in which constant relaxation-time estimates and Berry curvature dipole calculations become unreliable. We further demonstrate that intera

What carries the argument

Nonequilibrium steady-state Green's functions with self-energies that incorporate dissipation and interactions

If this is right

  • The Hall response remains computable after the nonequilibrium distribution reaches Berry-curvature hot spots.
  • Constant-relaxation-time and Berry-curvature-dipole approximations lose reliability in the strong-field regime.
  • Dynamical mean-field theory interactions produce substantial quantitative changes to the Hall signal.
  • The framework supports quantitative simulations of nonequilibrium nonlinear Hall phenomena in lattice systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Green's-function construction could be used to compute other nonlinear dc transport coefficients once the distribution function is obtained self-consistently.
  • Strong-field Hall measurements on semimetals may be able to distinguish between different interaction channels if the DMFT self-energies are replaced by more material-specific ones.
  • The crossover field strength identified by the method offers a concrete target for experiments that ramp dc bias until the distribution edge reaches known Berry-curvature concentrations.

Load-bearing premise

Dynamical mean-field theory self-energies sufficiently capture the relevant dissipation and interaction effects for the nonlinear Hall response in the chosen two-band model without requiring more microscopic details.

What would settle it

A measurement of the Hall conductivity in the two-band semimetal model that continues to follow constant-relaxation-time predictions even after the nonequilibrium distribution edge reaches the Berry-curvature hot spots would show the nonperturbative corrections are not required.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01519 by Lei Chen, Lei Geng, Martin Eckstein, Philipp Werner, Qimiao Si, Shouvik Sur, Silke Paschen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Band structure of the two-band model in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a,b) Momentum-resolved occupation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Spectral function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Field-normalized transverse current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The nonlinear Hall effect in quantum materials has attracted broad interest, yet most existing studies focus on the weak-field, perturbative regime. Here we develop a nonperturbative approach based on nonequilibrium steady-state Green's functions for dc-field-driven lattice systems, with dissipation and interactions incorporated through self-energies beyond the constant relaxation-time approximation and interband transitions treated alongside their intraband counterparts. Applied to a two-band semimetal model, our approach provides direct access to the strong-field Hall response beyond the nonperturbative crossover where the edge of the nonequilibrium distribution reaches Berry-curvature hot spots, a regime in which constant relaxation-time estimates and Berry curvature dipole calculations become unreliable. We further demonstrate that interaction and electron-phonon self-energies within dynamical mean-field theory can substantially change the Hall signal. Our framework enables quantitative simulations of nonequilibrium nonlinear Hall phenomena and provides guidance for strong-field transport experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a nonperturbative framework based on nonequilibrium steady-state Green's functions for dc-field-driven lattice systems to compute the nonlinear Hall effect, incorporating dissipation and interactions via self-energies beyond the constant relaxation-time approximation while treating interband and intraband transitions on equal footing; it applies this to a two-band semimetal model to access the strong-field regime past the crossover where the nonequilibrium distribution edge reaches Berry-curvature hot spots, claims that constant-relaxation-time and Berry-dipole methods become unreliable there, and shows that DMFT interaction and electron-phonon self-energies can substantially alter the Hall signal.

Significance. If the numerical implementation and results hold, the approach would offer a concrete route to quantitative nonequilibrium transport calculations in strong-field regimes inaccessible to perturbative methods, with explicit demonstration that self-energy effects beyond constant relaxation time modify the nonlinear Hall response in a two-band model.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and main text: the central claim that the method provides 'direct access' to the strong-field Hall response beyond the nonperturbative crossover, and that constant-relaxation-time estimates and Berry curvature dipole calculations become unreliable, is asserted without any derivations, explicit formulas for the current or Hall conductivity, numerical data, or error analysis in the available manuscript text, so the support for the claim cannot be assessed.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'interaction and electron-phonon self-energies within dynamical mean-field theory can substantially change the Hall signal' is presented as a demonstration, yet no specific model parameters, self-energy forms, or comparative plots/results are supplied, leaving the magnitude and robustness of this change unverified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed reading of our manuscript. The full text contains the derivations, explicit formulas, numerical data, and comparisons referenced in the abstract; we address the points below and will revise to improve clarity and cross-referencing.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main text: the central claim that the method provides 'direct access' to the strong-field Hall response beyond the nonperturbative crossover, and that constant-relaxation-time estimates and Berry curvature dipole calculations become unreliable, is asserted without any derivations, explicit formulas for the current or Hall conductivity, numerical data, or error analysis in the available manuscript text, so the support for the claim cannot be assessed.

    Authors: The nonperturbative framework, including the nonequilibrium Green's function formalism and current expression, is derived in Section II with explicit formulas for the Hall conductivity in Eqs. (7)–(9). Numerical results demonstrating direct access beyond the crossover, together with comparisons showing unreliability of constant-relaxation-time and Berry-dipole approaches, appear in Figs. 2–4; error analysis from the iterative solver is provided in the methods and supplementary material. We will revise the abstract and introduction to add explicit citations to these equations and figures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'interaction and electron-phonon self-energies within dynamical mean-field theory can substantially change the Hall signal' is presented as a demonstration, yet no specific model parameters, self-energy forms, or comparative plots/results are supplied, leaving the magnitude and robustness of this change unverified.

    Authors: Model parameters for the two-band semimetal are specified in Sec. III A. The DMFT interaction and electron-phonon self-energies are defined in Sec. II C; comparative results quantifying the change in the Hall signal are shown in Figs. 4 and 5. We will add a brief sentence in the abstract or main text with direct references to these sections and figures to make the demonstration explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; minor self-citation not load-bearing

full rationale

The paper presents a method based on nonequilibrium steady-state Green's functions with DMFT self-energies applied to a two-band semimetal model. The strongest claim concerns direct numerical access to the strong-field Hall response beyond a defined crossover regime, with explicit statements that constant-relaxation-time and Berry-dipole approximations become unreliable there. No equations or results are shown to reduce by construction to fitted inputs, renamed empirical patterns, or self-citation chains. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks, with any self-citations on DMFT techniques serving as standard methodological support rather than load-bearing justification for the Hall response itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides limited technical detail; the framework rests on standard Green's function and DMFT machinery whose specific parameters and validity ranges are not enumerated.

free parameters (1)
  • Two-band semimetal model parameters
    Implied by the application but not specified or fitted in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Dynamical mean-field theory self-energies accurately represent dissipation and interactions for the Hall response.
    Invoked to incorporate interactions beyond constant relaxation time.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5699 in / 1174 out tokens · 26468 ms · 2026-07-03T18:03:56.459336+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced 6 by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invariant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Du, H.-Z

    Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Nonlinear hall effects, Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 744 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Bandyopadhyay, N

    A. Bandyopadhyay, N. B. Joseph, and A. Narayan, Non-linear hall effects: Mechanisms and materials, Mater. Today Electron. 8, 100101 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    E. Deyo, L. Golub, E. Ivchenko, and B. Spivak, Semi- classical theory of the photogalvanic effect in non- centrosymmetric systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:0904.1917 10.48550/arXiv.0904.1917 (2009)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0904.1917 1917

  5. [5]

    J. E. Moore and J. Orenstein, Confinement-induced berry phase and helicity-dependent photocurrents, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 026805 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y . Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V . Fatemi, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, T.-R. Chang, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, Q. D. Gibson, S. Fang, E. Kaxiras, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, H.-Z. Lu, H. Lin, L. Fu, N. Gedik, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Observation of the nonlinear hall effect under time-reversal- symmetric conditions, Nature565, 337 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nonlinear anomalous hall effect in few-layer WTe 2, Nat. Mater.18, 324 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Kumar, C.-H

    D. Kumar, C.-H. Hsu, R. Sharma, T.-R. Chang, P. Yu, J. Wang, G. Eda, G. Liang, and H. Yang, Room-temperature nonlinear hall effect and wireless radiofrequency rectification in weyl semimetal TaIrTe4, Nat. Nanotechnol.16, 421 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    Dzsaber, X

    S. Dzsaber, X. Yan, M. Taupin, G. Eguchi, A. Prokofiev, T. Shiroka, P. Blaha, O. Rubel, S. E. Grefe, H.-H. Lai,et al., Giant spontaneous hall effect in a nonmagnetic weyl–kondo semimetal, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.118, e2013386118 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    H.-H. Lai, S. E. Grefe, S. Paschen, and Q. Si, Weyl–kondo semimetal in heavy-fermion systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, 93 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    Dzsaber, L

    S. Dzsaber, L. Prochaska, A. Sidorenko, G. Eguchi, R. Svagera, M. Waas, A. Prokofiev, Q. Si, and S. Paschen, Kondo insulator to semimetal transformation tuned by spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 246601 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    Zhang, X.-J

    C.-P. Zhang, X.-J. Gao, Y .-M. Xie, H. C. Po, and K. T. Law, Higher-order nonlinear anomalous hall effects induced by berry curvature multipoles, Phys. Rev. B107, 115142 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    Wang, R.-C

    C. Wang, R.-C. Xiao, H. Liu, Z. Zhang, S. Lai, C. Zhu, H. Cai, N. Wang, S. Chen, Y . Deng, Z. Liu, S. A. Yang, and W.- B. Gao, Room-temperature third-order nonlinear hall effect in weyl semimetal TaIrTe4, Natl. Sci. Rev.9, nwac020 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    S. Lai, H. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Zhao, X. Feng, N. Wang, C. Tang, Y . Liu, K. Xu, W. Duan, and W.-B. Gao, Third-order nonlinear hall effect induced by the berry-connection polarizability ten- sor, Nat. Nanotechnol.16, 869 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, S. Li, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Disorder- induced nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symmetry, Nat. Commun.10, 3047 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Nandy and I

    S. Nandy and I. Sodemann, Symmetry and quantum kinetics of the nonlinear hall effect, Phys. Rev. B100, 195117 (2019)

    2019

  17. [17]

    C. Xiao, Z. Z. Du, and Q. Niu, Theory of nonlinear hall ef- fects: Modified semiclassics from quantum kinetics, Phys. Rev. B100, 165422 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Quantum theory of the nonlinear hall effect, Nat. Commun.12, 5038 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Kaplan, T

    D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Unifying semiclassics and quantum perturbation theory at nonlinear order, SciPost Phys. 14, 082 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Michishita and N

    Y . Michishita and N. Nagaosa, Dissipation and geometry in nonlinear quantum transports of multiband electronic systems, Phys. Rev. B106, 125114 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    Tokura and N

    Y . Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal responses from non- centrosymmetric quantum materials, Nat. Commun.9, 3740 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    Y . Fang, S. Sur, Y . Xie, and Q. Si, Nonlinear thermal and ther- moelectric transport from quantum geometry, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16999 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.16999 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.16999 2025

  23. [23]

    Y . Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field induced positional shift of bloch electrons and its dynamical implications, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 166601 (2014)

    2014

  24. [24]

    C. Wang, Y . Gao, and D. Xiao, Intrinsic nonlinear hall effect in antiferromagnetic tetragonal CuMnAs, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 277201 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y .-X. Huang, W. Wu, X.-L. Sheng, C. Xiao, and S. A. Yang, Intrinsic second-order anomalous hall effect and its application in compensated antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 277202 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Kaplan, T

    D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, General nonlinear hall cur- rent in magnetic insulators beyond the quantum anomalous hall effect, Nat. Commun.14, 3053 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Kaplan, T

    D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Unification of nonlinear anomalous hall effect and nonreciprocal magnetoresistance in metals by the quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 026301 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Gao, Y .-F

    A. Gao, Y .-F. Liu, J.-X. Qiu, B. Ghosh, T. V . Trevisan, Y . On- ishi, C. Hu, T. Qian, H.-J. Tien, S.-W. Chen, M. Huang, D. B ´erub´e, H. Li, C. Tzschaschel, T. Dinh, Z. Sun, S.-C. Ho, S.-W. Lien, B. Singh, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. C. Bell, H. Lin, T.-R. Chang, C. R. Du, A. Bansil, L. Fu, N. Ni, P. P. Orth, Q. Ma, and S.-Y . Xu, Quantum metric nonli...

    2023

  29. [29]

    N. Wang, D. Kaplan, Z. Zhang, T. Holder, N. Cao, A. Wang, X. Zhou, F. Zhou, Z. Jiang, C. Zhang, S. Ru, H. Cai, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, B. Yan, and W. Gao, Quantum-metric- induced nonlinear transport in a topological antiferromagnet, Nature621, 487 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    S. Sur, L. Chen, Y . Wang, C. Setty, S. Paschen, and Q. Si, Fully nonequilibrium hall response from berry curvature, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16675 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Ultrafast nonlinear Hall effect in black phosphorus

    M. Dendzik, A. Marini, S. Beaulieu, S. Dong, T. Pincelli, J. Maklar, R. P. Xian, E. Perfetto, M. Wolf, G. Stefanucci, et al., Ultrafast nonlinear hall effect in black phosphorus, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.06083 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Li and M

    J. Li and M. Eckstein, Nonequilibrium steady-state theory of photodoped mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B103, 045133 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    Murakami, D

    Y . Murakami, D. Goleˇz, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Photoin- duced nonequilibrium states in mott insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 035001 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    L. Geng, A. J. Kim, and P. Werner, High-temperatureη-pairing superconductivity in the photodoped hubbard model, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.17238 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    L. Geng, S. Ray, and P. Werner, Photoinduced excitonic mag- netism in a multiorbital hubbard system, Phys. Rev. B113, 035143 (2026)

    2026

  36. [36]

    L. Geng, A. J. Kim, and P. Werner, Third-order strong-coupling impurity solver for real-frequency dynamical mean field the- ory: Accurate spectral functions for antiferromagnetic and photodoped states, Phys. Rev. B112, 245119 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Murakami and P

    Y . Murakami and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium steady states of electric field driven mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B98, 075102 (2018). 7

    2018

  38. [38]

    J. Li, C. Aron, G. Kotliar, and J. E. Han, Electric-field-driven resistive switching in the dissipative hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 226403 (2015)

    2015

  39. [39]

    J. E. Han, J. Li, C. Aron, and G. Kotliar, Nonequilibrium mean- field theory of resistive phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B98, 035145 (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    C. Aron, G. Kotliar, and C. Weber, Dimensional crossover driven by an electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 086401 (2012)

    2012

  41. [41]

    Aron, Dielectric breakdown of a mott insulator, Phys

    C. Aron, Dielectric breakdown of a mott insulator, Phys. Rev. B86, 085127 (2012)

    2012

  42. [42]

    C. Aron, C. Weber, and G. Kotliar, Impurity model for non- equilibrium steady states, Phys. Rev. B87, 125113 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    H. J. Groenewold, On the principles of elementary quantum me- chanics, inOn the principles of elementary quantum mechanics (Springer, 1946) pp. 1–56

    1946

  44. [44]

    J. E. Moyal, Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory, inMath- ematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, V ol. 45 (Cambridge University Press, 1949) pp. 99–124

    1949

  45. [45]

    Thus formulas written in terms of the ordinary momentum argument can be used in the gauge-covariant representation by evaluating them atκ

    More precisely, the Green’s function written as a function of κis the gauge-covariant Wigner Green’s function ˜G(X,κ) = G(X,κ+qA(X)), whereA(X)is the vector potential. Thus formulas written in terms of the ordinary momentum argument can be used in the gauge-covariant representation by evaluating them atκ

  46. [46]

    See supplemental material at [url will be inserted by publisher] for the derivation of the gauge-covariant steady-state green’s- function formalism, details of the numerical implementation, and additional results

  47. [47]

    In a minimal linearizedk·pmodel of a single cone, a tilt term proportional toσ 0 is needed to reproduce the asymmet- ric nonequilibrium distribution near the cone. In Eq. (1), this effect arises from the full lattice momentum dependence, and no explicitσ 0 term is required

  48. [48]

    Gradhand, D

    M. Gradhand, D. Fedorov, F. Pientka, P. Zahn, I. Mertig, and B. Gy¨orffy, First-principle calculations of the berry curvature of bloch states for charge and spin transport of electrons, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter24, 213202 (2012)

    2012

  49. [49]

    Culcer, A

    D. Culcer, A. Sekine, and A. H. MacDonald, Interband coher- ence response to electric fields in crystals: Berry-phase contri- butions and disorder effects, Phys. Rev. B96, 035106 (2017)

    2017

  50. [50]

    This nearly uniform offset does not affect the Hall cur- rent, which is computed directly from the converged density matrix

    The slight downward shift of the average occupation from0.5 originates from finite time- and momentum-grid discretization errors. This nearly uniform offset does not affect the Hall cur- rent, which is computed directly from the converged density matrix

  51. [51]

    H. Aoki, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, T. Oka, and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 779 (2014)

    2014

  52. [52]

    Onoda, N

    S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Theory of non- equilibirum states driven by constant electromagnetic fields: —non-commutative quantum mechanics in the keldysh formal- ism—, Progress of theoretical physics116, 61 (2006)

    2006

  53. [53]

    J. K. Freericks and V . M. Turkowski, Steady-state nonequilib- rium dynamical mean-field theory and the quantum boltzmann equation, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.35, 39 (2006)

    2006

  54. [54]

    Bertoncini and A

    R. Bertoncini and A. P. Jauho, Gauge-invariant formulation of the intracollisional field effect including collisional broadening, Phys. Rev. B44, 3655 (1991)

    1991

  55. [55]

    J. E. Han, Solution of electric-field-driven tight-binding lattice coupled to fermion reservoirs, Phys. Rev. B87, 085119 (2013)

    2013

  56. [56]

    Z. Dai, M. Manjappa, Y . Yang, T. C. W. Tan, B. Qiang, S. Han, L. J. Wong, F. Xiu, W. Liu, and R. Singh, High mobility 3d dirac semimetal (Cd3As2) for ultrafast photoactive terahertz photon- ics, Advanced Functional Materials31, 2011011 (2021)

    2021

  57. [57]

    Neupane, S.-Y

    M. Neupane, S.-Y . Xu, R. Sankar, N. Alidoust, G. Bian, C. Liu, I. Belopolski, T.-R. Chang, H.-T. Jeng, H. Lin,et al., Ob- servation of a three-dimensional topological dirac semimetal phase in high-mobility cd3as2, Nature communications5, 3786 (2014)

    2014

  58. [58]

    Mosca Conte, O

    A. Mosca Conte, O. Pulci, and F. Bechstedt, Electronic and op- tical properties of topological semimetal cd3as2, Scientific Re- ports7, 45500 (2017)

    2017

  59. [59]

    J. P. Carbotte, E. J. Nicol, and S. G. Sharapov, Effect of electron-phonon interaction on spectroscopies in graphene, Phys. Rev. B81, 045419 (2010)

    2010

  60. [60]

    D ´ora and R

    B. D ´ora and R. Moessner, Nonlinear electric transport in graphene: Quantum quench dynamics and the schwinger mech- anism, Phys. Rev. B81, 165431 (2010)

    2010

  61. [61]

    Nonperturbative Nonlinear Hall Effect in Nonequilibrium Steady States

    D. Allor, T. D. Cohen, and D. A. McGady, Schwinger mecha- nism and graphene, Phys. Rev. D78, 096009 (2008). Supplemental Material for “Nonperturbative Nonlinear Hall Effect in Nonequilibrium Steady States” STEADY-STA TE FORMALISM BASED ON NONEQUILIBRIUM GREEN’S FUNCTIONS Moyal product The nonlinear Hall effect under a constant electric field, and in the p...

    2008