REVIEW 5 cited by
Repro Samples Method for Finite- and Large-Sample Inferences
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This article presents a novel, general, and effective simulation-inspired approach, called {\it repro samples method}, to conduct statistical inference. The approach studies the performance of artificial samples, referred to as {\it repro samples}, obtained by mimicking the true observed sample to achieve uncertainty quantification and construct confidence sets for parameters of interest with guaranteed coverage rates. Both exact and asymptotic inferences are developed. An attractive feature of the general framework developed is that it does not rely on the large sample central limit theorem and is likelihood-free. As such, it is thus effective for complicated inference problems which we can not solve using the large sample central limit theorem. The proposed method is applicable to a wide range of problems, including many open questions where solutions were previously unavailable, for example, those involving discrete or non-numerical parameters. To reduce the large computational cost of such inference problems, we develop a unique matching scheme to obtain a data-driven candidate set. Moreover, we show the advantages of the proposed framework over the classical Neyman-Pearson framework. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach on various models throughout the paper and provide a case study that addresses an open inference question on how to quantify the uncertainty for the unknown number of components in a normal mixture model. To evaluate the empirical performance of our repro samples method, we conduct simulations and study real data examples with comparisons to existing approaches. Although the development pertains to the settings where the large sample central limit theorem does not apply, it also has direct extensions to the cases where the central limit theorem does hold.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Efficient Inference for Time-to-Event Outcomes by Integrating Right-Censored and Current Status Data
A new semiparametric data fusion framework derives efficient and doubly robust estimators of survival probabilities by combining right-censored and current status data.
-
Flexible Selective Inference with Flow-based Transport Maps
A normalizing flow learns the post-selection conditional distribution through simulated selection events, then transforms inference back to the pre-selection distribution to correct selection bias.
-
Robust Simulation Based Inference
A robust SBI framework that provides valid frequentist inference under model misspecification by targeting projection parameters and expanding models through exponential tilting.
-
Fiducial Matching: Differentially Private Inference for Categorical Data
FIMA builds differentially private confidence intervals and hypothesis tests for categorical data by matching the released statistic to simulated noisy versions via a fiducial solution.
-
SoK: Stablecoins for Digital Transformation -- Design, Metrics, and Application with Real World Asset Tokenization as a Case Study
The paper presents a taxonomy, stakeholder-oriented evaluation framework, and an open-source benchmarking pipeline for stablecoin systems, illustrated with a real-world asset tokenization case study.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.