Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Directly probing existence of $\alpha$-cluster structure in $^{20}$Ne by relativistic heavy-ion collisions

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ultra-central 20Ne+20Ne collisions can expose α-cluster structure in 20Ne through a spectator yield ratio that drops by about 25% at LHC energy and about 20% at RHIC energy.

desk verdict Credible spectator-observable prediction for alpha clusters in 20Ne, but the headline effect rests on coalescence parameters that need a sensitivity test. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08057 v2 pith:YR5NQCAC submitted 2025-02-12 nucl-th hep-exnucl-ex

Lu-Meng Liu , Hai-Cheng Wang , Song-Jie Li , Chunjian Zhang , Jun Xu , Zhong-Zhou Ren , Jiangyong Jia , Xu-Guang Huang This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thhep-exnucl-ex PACS 25.75.-q21.60.Gx25.70.Pq
keywords alpha-clusterstructure20Nenucleusspectatornucleonsyieldratiorelativisticheavy-ioncollisionsnucleardeformationcoalescencemodelultra-central
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that relativistic heavy-ion collisions can reveal internal α-cluster structure, not just global nuclear shape. Using 20Ne as a test case, it compares two density distributions with the same size and deformation: one with a bowling-pin arrangement of five α clusters and one with a smooth deformed Woods-Saxon profile. Mid-rapidity flow and fluctuation observables cannot tell these two densities apart, but the spectator fragments emitted at forward and backward rapidity can: the clustered configuration produces fewer free spectator nucleons and more spectator light nuclei because nucleons inside each α cluster start out more compact in phase space. The paper therefore proposes measuring the ratio of free spectator neutrons to charged spectator light nuclei with $A/Z = 3$, $3/2$, and $2$, scaled by nucleon number, in ultra-central $^{20}$Ne+$^{20}$Ne collisions, predicting a reduction of about 25% at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 7$ TeV and about 20% at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 200$ GeV if α-cluster structure is present.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a ratio of spectator yields constructed to isolate the local phase-space effect of α clusters. Within each α cluster, nucleons sit closer together in coordinate and momentum space, so spectator coalescence groups them into light nuclei more readily and leaves fewer free nucleons. The paper tracks this with a minimum spanning tree for heavy clusters using $\Delta r_{\mathrm{max}}=3$ fm and $p_{\mathrm{max}}=300$ MeV/$c$, a Wigner-function coalescence for light clusters, and a deexcitation step for heavy clusters. The proposed observables are $N_n/(3N_t+6N_{^6\mathrm{He}})$, $N_n/(3N_{^3\mathrm{He}})$, and $N_n/(2N_d+4N_\alpha+6N_{^6\mathrm{Li}})$, each scaled by the constituent nucleon number of the charged fragments; the neutron yield in the numerator and the fragment yield in the denominator respond in opposite directions to clustering, so the ratio isolates the α-cluster effect and reduces theoretical uncertainty from the deexcitation process.

What would settle it

Measure the scaled neutron-to-charged-fragment ratio $N_n/(3N_t+6N_{^6\mathrm{He}})$, $N_n/(3N_{^3\mathrm{He}})$, or $N_n/(2N_d+4N_\alpha+6N_{^6\mathrm{Li}})$ in ultra-central $^{20}$Ne+$^{20}$Ne collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 200 GeV or 7 TeV; if the ratio shows no roughly 20–25% reduction relative to the deformed-Woods-Saxon baseline, the proposed probe is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the internal α-cluster structure of $^{20}$Ne, invisible to standard mid-rapidity flow and fluctuation observables, leaves a measurable imprint in the spectator region. Starting from two $^{20}$Ne density distributions that share the same radius and deformation—one a realistic bowling-pin arrangement of five α clusters and one a smooth deformed Woods-Saxon profile fitted to the same moments—the authors simulate ultra-central $^{20}$Ne+$^{20}$Ne collisions and find that the clustered density suppresses free spectator nucleon yields by about 5% while enhancing spectator light-nucleus yields by more than 15%. Because these opposite effects partially cancel common uncertainties, the paper proposes the scaled yield ratio of free spectator neutrons to charged spectator particles with $A/Z=3$, $3/2$, and $2$: $N_n/(3N_t+6N_{^6\mathrm{He}})$, $N_n/(3N_{^3\mathrm{He}})$, and $N_n/(2N_d+4N_\alpha+6N_{^6\mathrm{Li}})$. These ratios are reduced by about 25% at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=7$ TeV and about 20% at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=200$ GeV when α-cluster structure is present, and because the probe lives at forward and backward rapidity it is free from the uncertainties of mid-rapidity dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The spectator coalescence parameters $\Delta r_{\mathrm{max}} = 3$ fm and $p_{\mathrm{max}} = 300$ MeV/$c$ are calibrated on $^{197}$Au spectators and assumed to transfer unchanged to $^{20}$Ne spectators, with no light-nucleus spectator data to validate that transfer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the predicted ~25% reduction at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=7$ TeV is observed, forward neutron and fragment detectors at high-energy colliders can turn $^{20}$Ne+$^{20}$Ne runs into a direct test of α-cluster structure in $^{20}$Ne.
  • A null or much smaller reduction would indicate either that the bowling-pin cluster configuration is not realized in the $^{20}$Ne ground state or that spectator coalescence washes out the local phase-space effect.
  • Because the ratio cancels most deexcitation uncertainty, measurements with forward detectors that only record energy deposit, without full particle identification, could still carry the signal.
  • The same ratio logic extends to other light nuclei with α clusters, with the effect growing with the number of α clusters, so $^{12}$C, $^{16}$O, and $^{20}$Ne form an ordered sequence of tests.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A clean control experiment would be $^{16}$O+$^{16}$O: the tetrahedral four-α core contributes the same clustering effect in both nuclei, so subtracting the $^{16}$O signal from the $^{20}$Ne signal would isolate the fifth, bowling-pin α cluster and make the structure assignment more specific.
  • The probe's robustness could be mapped by re-running the spectator simulation with $\Delta r_{\mathrm{max}}$ and $p_{\mathrm{max}}$ varied around the $^{197}$Au-calibrated values; if the 20–25% reduction appears only for a narrow parameter window, the claim is weaker than presented.
  • One could extend the same spectator-ratio idea to isobaric or isotope pairs of light nuclei to cancel size effects, following the logic already used for neutron-skin measurements, though the paper does not perform that analysis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the internal α-cluster structure of 20Ne can be probed through spectator nucleon yields in ultra-central 20Ne+20Ne collisions at RHIC and LHC energies. The authors construct an event-by-event hybrid framework (AMPT for the collision, specCOAL+TestP+GEMINI for spectator fragmentation) using two 20Ne density distributions: a Bloch-Brink cluster-model density with a bowling-pin five-α configuration and a deformed Woods-Saxon fit matched to the same radial and multipole moments. They show that standard mid-rapidity observables (⟨pT⟩, ⟨v2⟩, ⟨δpT²⟩, ⟨v2δpT⟩) do not distinguish the two distributions, while the yield ratio of free spectator neutrons to charged spectator light clusters with A/Z = 3, 3/2, and 2 is reduced by about 20% at √s_NN = 200 GeV and about 25% at √s_NN = 7 TeV when the clustered density is used. They interpret this reduction as a direct and robust probe of α-cluster structure.

Significance. If confirmed, the result would open a new avenue for imaging nuclear structure in the forward/backward rapidity region, complementing recent mid-rapidity deformation probes, and it provides a concrete experimental prediction for current and planned light-nucleus runs at RHIC and the LHC. The paper is careful in constructing a controlled comparison (same moments for the two densities), propagates at least one important model uncertainty (the ±1 MeV/nucleon variation in heavy-cluster excitation energy), and presents a falsifiable, energy-dependent prediction. The main caveat is that the spectator coalescence parameters are calibrated on 197Au data and have not been shown to be transferable to a 20-nucleon spectator system; a sensitivity analysis is needed before the 'robust and direct probe' claim can be fully accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Framework] The quantitative predictions in Figs. 3 and 4 (the 20–25% reduction in the ratio Nn/∑A·Ni) are obtained with the minimum-spanning-tree coalescence parameters Δr_max = 3 fm and p_max = 300 MeV/c, which in Ref. [27] were tuned to reproduce free spectator neutron yields in ultra-central 197Au+197Au collisions. For 20Ne, the characteristic inter-α separation is of the same order as Δr_max, and the Fermi momentum inside an α cluster is close to p_max, so the grouping of spectator nucleons into heavy clusters is expected to be sensitive to these cuts. Because the predicted effect is itself a 20–25% change in the ratio, a parameter-induced shift of comparable size would invalidate the claim that the ratio is a robust direct probe of α-cluster structure. I request a sensitivity study (e.g., varying Δr_max by ±1 fm and p_max by ±100 MeV/c) or a validation against spectator data for light projectiles such as 16O or 20Ne.
  2. [Spectator probes] The claim that the observable is 'free from the uncertainty of mid-rapidity dynamics' is supported by the use of spectator particles, but the deexcitation of heavy clusters is modeled with GEMINI using excitation energies from a simplified Skyrme functional and test-particle densities from 200 parallel events; only a one-parameter uncertainty (±1 MeV per nucleon) is propagated. No equivalent uncertainty is propagated for the Wigner-function coalescence parameters for A ≤ 3 clusters, whose values are taken from intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions (Refs. [28,29]) without validation for relativistic spectator fragmentation. The central conclusion depends on the unquantified reliability of this transfer; I encourage the authors to state this limitation clearly and to provide a sensitivity estimate.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figs. 3 and 4] In the text, 'bars and symbols represent results with and without the deexcitation process,' while also 'the height of the bars indicates the uncertainty'; please clarify which visual element is the central value and which is the uncertainty, and state the numerical range of the ±1 MeV/nucleon deexcitation uncertainty in the figure caption or text.
  2. [Framework] The sentence 'The deexcitation process in the GEMINI model depends the angular momentum and the excitation energy' is missing the word 'on' after 'depends'.
  3. [Spectator probes] The statement that 'statistical errors are invisibly small' is informal; a quantitative bound (e.g., relative uncertainty below 1%) would be more precise.
  4. [Introduction] When stating that the 16O+α bicluster configuration 'could have the similar effect as the five-α configuration,' please clarify whether this is a speculation or based on a separate calculation, and if the latter, reference it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted spectator yield-ratio reduction is a computed consequence of two different input densities, not a fitted parameter or a self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a ratio of free spectator neutrons to charged spectator fragments in ultra-central 20Ne+20Ne collisions is about 20-25% smaller when the 20Ne density has an alpha-cluster (bowling-pin) structure than when it is described by a deformed Woods-Saxon form fitted to the same global moments. This is a direct model comparison: the two densities are constructed independently, the same AMPT+specCOAL+testP+GEMINI framework is applied to both, and the resulting yield ratio is an output, not an input. The deformed Woods-Saxon distribution is fitted to the same <r^2>, <r^4>, Q2, and Q3 moments as the cluster density, so the fact that mid-rapidity observables are similar is a controlled consequence of matching global shape, which the authors explicitly acknowledge; it is not presented as a prediction that secretly defines the observable. The spectator coalescence parameters (Delta_r_max = 3 fm, Delta_p_max = 300 MeV/c) are taken from Ref. [27] and were calibrated to reproduce free spectator neutron yields in 197Au+197Au collisions at 130 GeV. Although one author of the present paper also appears on Ref. [27], the calibration is anchored to external experimental data, not to the 20Ne ratio being predicted, so it is independent support rather than a circular input. The paper also reports a sensitivity estimate for the heavy-cluster deexcitation energy uncertainty, but does not use any output of the 20Ne simulation to fit or define the proposed probe. No equation in the paper reduces the claimed effect to its own assumptions by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The main caveat is model dependence of the coalescence parameters for a light system like 20Ne, but that is a correctness or robustness concern, not circularity. Therefore no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not introduce new particles or forces; it relies on standard nuclear structure and transport assumptions. The main unsupported inputs are the coalescence parameters and the cluster-model density, both borrowed from prior literature without new validation for 20Ne.

free parameters (3)
  • Coalescence spatial cut Delta_r_max = 3 fm
    Taken from Ref. [27], calibrated to 197Au spectator data. The predicted ratio reduction depends on how tightly nucleons are grouped into clusters in the MST algorithm.
  • Coalescence momentum cut p_max = 300 MeV/c
    Also from Ref. [27], used in the MST clustering. Together with Delta_r_max, it controls the free-nucleon versus cluster balance that drives the proposed observable.
  • Heavy-cluster excitation energy uncertainty = ±1 MeV per nucleon
    Used to estimate the systematic bars on spectator yields from GEMINI de-excitation. The paper argues the effect largely cancels in the scaled yield ratios, especially in ultra-central collisions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Bloch-Brink cluster model with Volkov No.2 force and spin-orbit interaction provides a realistic ground-state density for 20Ne with a bowling-pin five-alpha configuration.
    This density is the baseline for the 'realistic' initial condition. It relies on prior nuclear structure modeling (Refs. [13,25]) and is not independently verified in this paper.
  • domain assumption The deformed Woods-Saxon parameterization can represent the global shape of the cluster density distribution when matched to the same radial moments and multipole moments.
    The deformed WS distribution is fit to <r^2>, <r^4>, Q2, and Q3 of the cluster density. The validity of this representation for a clustered nucleus is assumed.
  • domain assumption The AMPT string-melting model with the specified initial Fermi-momentum sampling gives a valid description of mid-rapidity dynamics in 20Ne+20Ne collisions.
    The framework is taken from prior work (Refs. [13,26]) and is assumed to produce reliable mid-rapidity observables for these collisions.
  • domain assumption The spectator multifragmentation model (specCOAL+TestP+GEMINI) converts the spectator nucleon phase space into final yields of free nucleons and light nuclei.
    The entire spectator prediction depends on this model chain, which includes coalescence, Wigner-function light-cluster formation, and GEMINI de-excitation. Its accuracy for 20Ne is not directly validated.
  • domain assumption The MST clustering algorithm with the chosen parameters maps initial phase-space proximity to final heavy clusters (A >= 4).
    This is the mechanism that produces the reduced free-nucleon yield in the clustered case. The parameters are calibrated on 197Au, not 20Ne.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Directly probing existence of $\alpha$-cluster structure in $^{20}$Ne by relativistic heavy-ion collisions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YR5NQCAC

@misc{pith2026250208057,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Directly probing existence of $\alpha$-cluster structure in $^20$Ne by relativistic heavy-ion collisions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YR5NQCAC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08057}
}
abstract

Can relativistic heavy-ion collisions only probe the global shape of colliding nuclei, or their detailed internal structure as well? Taking $^{20}$Ne as an example, we attempt to directly probe its internal $\alpha$-cluster structure, by comparing experimentally measured observables in collisions at relativistic energies from density distributions of $^{20}$Ne with and without $\alpha$-cluster structure. Since the two density distributions give the same nucleus size and deformation, they lead to similar mid-rapidity observables. However, the $\alpha$-cluster structure may considerably reduce the free spectator nucleon yield and enhance the spectator light nuclei yield, as a result of more compact initial phase-space distribution of nucleons inside $\alpha$ clusters. We propose to measure the scaled yield ratio of free spectator neutrons to charged particles with mass-to-charge ratio $A/Z = 3$, 3/2, and 2 in ultra-central $^{20}$Ne+$^{20}$Ne collisions, which is found to be reduced by about $25\%$ at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 7$ TeV and about $20\%$ at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 200$ GeV with $\alpha$-cluster structure in $^{20}$Ne. This scaled yield ratio thus serves as a robust and direct probe of the existence of $\alpha$-cluster structure in $^{20}$Ne free from the uncertainty of mid-rapidity dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08057 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a): Bowling-pin configuration of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Mid-rapidity observables ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Yield of spectator neutrons (a), protons (b), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Investigating $^{238}$U Deformation via Dilepton Production in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

    nucl-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a transport-model study of U+U collisions at 193 GeV, dilepton yields normalized by charged multiplicity are shown to scale linearly with the square of the nuclear quadrupole deformation beta_2, with stronger sensi...

  2. Nonlinear collective flow reveals the breakdown of quadrupole--hexadecapole scaling in heavy ion collisions

    nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The nonlinear flow coefficient ξ6,222 in simulated U+U collisions separates the four (β2, β4) nuclear topology classes, making the sign of the hexadecapole deformation β4 experimentally accessible.

  3. A comparison study of collisions at relativistic energies involving light nuclei

    nucl-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The elliptic-to-triangular flow ratio near target rapidity in lead-light nucleus collisions is the most sensitive model-level probe of light-nucleus deformation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [27]

    Equation of state of asymmetric nuclear matter and collisions of neutron-rich nuclei

    Bao-An Li, C. M. Ko, and Zhong-zhou Ren, “Equation 6 of state of asymmetric nuclear matter and collisions of neutron rich nuclei,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1644 (1997), arXiv:nucl-th/9701048

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  2. [1]

    Imaging the initial condition of heavy-ion collisions and nuclear structure across the nuclide chart,

    Jiangyong Jia et al. , “Imaging the initial condition of heavy-ion collisions and nuclear structure across the nuclide chart,” Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 220 (2024), arXiv:2209.11042 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [2]

    Shape of atomic nuclei in heavy ion collisions,

    Jiangyong Jia, “Shape of atomic nuclei in heavy ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 105, 014905 (2022), arXiv:2106.08768 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [3]

    Probing triaxial deformation of atomic nuclei in high-energy heavy ion collisions,

    Jiangyong Jia, “Probing triaxial deformation of atomic nuclei in high-energy heavy ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 105, 044905 (2022), arXiv:2109.00604 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [4]

    Impact of Nuclear Deformation on Relativistic Heavy- Ion Collisions: Assessing Consistency in Nuclear Physics across Energy Scales,

    Giuliano Giacalone, Jiangyong Jia, and Chunjian Zhang, “Impact of Nuclear Deformation on Relativistic Heavy- Ion Collisions: Assessing Consistency in Nuclear Physics across Energy Scales,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 242301 (2021), arXiv:2105.01638 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [5]

    Evidence of Quadrupole and Octupole Deformations in Zr96+Zr96 and Ru96+Ru96 Collisions at Ultrarelativistic Energies,

    Chunjian Zhang and Jiangyong Jia, “Evidence of Quadrupole and Octupole Deformations in Zr96+Zr96 and Ru96+Ru96 Collisions at Ultrarelativistic Energies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 022301 (2022), arXiv:2109.01631 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [6]

    Imaging shapes of atomic nuclei in high-energy nuclear collisions,

    M. I. Abdulhamid et al. (STAR), “Imaging shapes of atomic nuclei in high-energy nuclear collisions,” Nature 635, 67–72 (2024), arXiv:2401.06625 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [7]

    Microscopic Clustering in Light Nuclei,

    Martin Freer, Hisashi Horiuchi, Yoshiko Kanada-En’yo, Dean Lee, and Ulf-G. Meißner, “Microscopic Clustering in Light Nuclei,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035004 (2018), arXiv:1705.06192 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    Cluster structure of light nuclei,

    R. Bijker and F. Iachello, “Cluster structure of light nuclei,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 110, 103735 (2020)

    2020

  2. [9]

    Status of α-particle condensate structure of the Hoyle state,

    Akihiro Tohsaki, Hisashi Horiuchi, Peter Schuck, and Gerd Roepke, “Status of α-particle condensate structure of the Hoyle state,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 011002 (2017), arXiv:1702.04591 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [10]

    The 5α condensate state in 20Ne,

    Bo Zhou, Yasuro Funaki, Hisashi Horiuchi, Yu-Gang Ma, Gerd R¨ opke, Peter Schuck, Akihiro Tohsaki, and Tai- ichi Yamada, “The 5α condensate state in 20Ne,” Nature Commun. 14, 8206 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    Ab initio calculations of the isotopic dependence of nuclear clustering,

    Serdar Elhatisari, Evgeny Epelbaum, Hermann Krebs, Timo A. L¨ ahde, Dean Lee, Ning Li, Bing-nan Lu, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Gautam Rupak, “Ab initio calculations of the isotopic dependence of nuclear clustering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 222505 (2017)

    2017

  5. [12]

    Emergent ge- ometry and duality in the carbon nucleus,

    Shihang Shen, Serdar Elhatisari, Timo A. L¨ ahde, Dean Lee, Bing-Nan Lu, and Ulf-G. Meißner, “Emergent ge- ometry and duality in the carbon nucleus,” Nature Com- mun. 14, 2777 (2023), arXiv:2202.13596 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Deformation probes for light nu- clei in their collisions at relativistic energies,

    Hai-Cheng Wang, Song-Jie Li, Lu-Meng Liu, Jun Xu, and Zhong-Zhou Ren, “Deformation probes for light nu- clei in their collisions at relativistic energies,” Phys. Rev. C 110, 034909 (2024), arXiv:2409.02452 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Probing neutron-skin thickness with free spectator neutrons in ultracentral high-energy isobaric collisions,

    Lu-Meng Liu, Chun-Jian Zhang, Jia Zhou, Jun Xu, Jiangyong Jia, and Guang-Xiong Peng, “Probing neutron-skin thickness with free spectator neutrons in ultracentral high-energy isobaric collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 834, 137441 (2022), arXiv:2203.09924 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Free spectator nucleons in ultracentral relativistic heavy-ion collisions as a probe of neutron skin,

    Lu-Meng Liu, Chun-Jian Zhang, Jun Xu, Jiangyong Jia, and Guang-Xiong Peng, “Free spectator nucleons in ultracentral relativistic heavy-ion collisions as a probe of neutron skin,” Phys. Rev. C 106, 034913 (2022), arXiv:2209.03106 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Measur- ing deformed neutron skin with free spectator nucleons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

    Lu-Meng Liu, Jun Xu, and Guang-Xiong Peng, “Measur- ing deformed neutron skin with free spectator nucleons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 838, 137701 (2023), arXiv:2301.07893 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Col- lision geometry effect on free spectator nucleons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

    Lu-Meng Liu, Jun Xu, and Guang-Xiong Peng, “Col- lision geometry effect on free spectator nucleons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Nucl. Phys. Rev. 40, 2022095 (2023), arXiv:2301.08251 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Centrality dependence of charged particle multiplicity in Au - Au collisions at S(NN)**(1/2) = 130-GeV,

    K. Adcox et al. (PHENIX), “Centrality dependence of charged particle multiplicity in Au - Au collisions at S(NN)**(1/2) = 130-GeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3500– 3505 (2001), arXiv:nucl-ex/0012008

    2001 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Centrality determination of Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N= 2.76 TeV with ALICE,

    Betty Abelev et al. (ALICE), “Centrality determination of Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N= 2.76 TeV with ALICE,” Phys. Rev. C 88, 044909 (2013), arXiv:1301.4361 [nucl- ex]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [20]

    A Centrality Detector Concept,

    Sourav Tarafdar, Zvi Citron, and Alexander Milov, “A Centrality Detector Concept,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 768, 170–178 (2014), arXiv:1405.4555 [nucl-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Probing configura- tion of α clusters with spectator particles in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

    Lu-Meng Liu, Song-Jie Li, Zhen Wang, Jun Xu, Zhong- Zhou Ren, and Xu-Guang Huang, “Probing configura- tion of α clusters with spectator particles in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 854, 138724 (2024), arXiv:2312.13572 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Measurements of azimuthal anisotropies in 16o+16o and γ+au collisions from star,

    Shengli Huang, “Measurements of azimuthal anisotropies in 16o+16o and γ+au collisions from star,” (2023), arXiv:2312.12167 [nucl-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Opportunities of oo and po collisions at the lhc,

    Jasmine Brewer, Aleksas Mazeliauskas, and Wilke van der Schee, “Opportunities of oo and po collisions at the lhc,” (2021), arXiv:2103.01939 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Equilibrium deformation calculations of the ground state energies of 1 p shell nuclei,

    A.B. Volkov, “Equilibrium deformation calculations of the ground state energies of 1 p shell nuclei,” Nuclear Physics 74, 33–58 (1965)

    1965

  18. [25]

    Evidence of bicluster structure in the ground state of Ne20,

    Y. Yamaguchi, W. Horiuchi, and N. Itagaki, “Evidence of bicluster structure in the ground state of Ne20,” Phys. Rev. C 108, 014322 (2023), arXiv:2305.09182 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    A Multi-phase transport model for rela- tivistic heavy ion collisions,

    Zi-Wei Lin, Che Ming Ko, Bao-An Li, Bin Zhang, and Subrata Pal, “A Multi-phase transport model for rela- tivistic heavy ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 72, 064901 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0411110

    2005 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Light clus- ter production in intermediate-energy heavy ion collisions induced by neutron rich nuclei,

    Lie-Wen Chen, C. M. Ko, and Bao-An Li, “Light clus- ter production in intermediate-energy heavy ion collisions induced by neutron rich nuclei,” Nucl. Phys. A729, 809– 834 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0306032

    2003 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Analytical coales- cence formula for particle production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

    Kai-Jia Sun and Lie-Wen Chen, “Analytical coales- cence formula for particle production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 95, 044905 (2017), arXiv:1701.01935 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Systematics of complex fragment emission in niobium-induced reactions,

    R. J. Charity et al., “Systematics of complex fragment emission in niobium-induced reactions,” Nucl. Phys. A 483, 371–405 (1988)

    1988

  23. [31]

    A Systematic description of evaporation spectra for light and heavy compound nuclei,

    R. J. Charity, “A Systematic description of evaporation spectra for light and heavy compound nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C 82, 014610 (2010), arXiv:1006.5018 [nucl-th]

    2010 arXiv

  24. [32]

    The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references,

    Meng Wang, W. J. Huang, F. G. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi, “The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references,” Chin. Phys. C45, 030003 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Sur- face diffuseness correction in global mass formula,

    Ning Wang, Min Liu, Xizhen Wu, and Jie Meng, “Sur- face diffuseness correction in global mass formula,” Phys. Lett. B 734, 215–219 (2014), arXiv:1405.2616 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Density slope of the nuclear symmetry energy from the neutron skin thickness of heavy nuclei,

    Lie-Wen Chen, Che Ming Ko, Bao-An Li, and Jun Xu, “Density slope of the nuclear symmetry energy from the neutron skin thickness of heavy nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C82, 024321 (2010), arXiv:1004.4672 [nucl-th]

    2010 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Dynamics of nuclear fluid. VIII. Time-dependent Hartree-Fock approximation from a classical point of view,

    Cheuk-Yin Wong, “Dynamics of nuclear fluid. VIII. Time-dependent Hartree-Fock approximation from a classical point of view,” Phys. Rev. C 25, 1460–1475 (1982)

    1982

  28. [36]

    A Guide to micro- scopic models for intermediate-energy heavy ion colli- sions,

    G. F. Bertsch and S. Das Gupta, “A Guide to micro- scopic models for intermediate-energy heavy ion colli- sions,” Phys. Rept. 160, 189–233 (1988)

    1988

  29. [37]

    Probing QCD critical fluctuations from light nu- clei production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

    Kai-Jia Sun, Lie-Wen Chen, Che Ming Ko, and Zhangbu Xu, “Probing QCD critical fluctuations from light nu- clei production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 774, 103–107 (2017), arXiv:1702.07620 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Search for the QCD Critical Point with Fluctuations of Conserved Quantities in Rel- ativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC : An Overview,

    Xiaofeng Luo and Nu Xu, “Search for the QCD Critical Point with Fluctuations of Conserved Quantities in Rel- ativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC : An Overview,” Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 112 (2017), arXiv:1701.02105 [nucl- ex]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    The unexpected uses of a bowling pin: anisotropic flow in fixed-target 208Pb+20Ne collisions as a probe of quark-gluon plasma,

    Giuliano Giacalone et al., “The unexpected uses of a bowling pin: anisotropic flow in fixed-target 208Pb+20Ne collisions as a probe of quark-gluon plasma,” (2024), arXiv:2405.20210 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    The unexpected uses of a bowling pin: exploiting 20Ne isotopes for precision char- acterizations of collectivity in small systems,

    Giuliano Giacalone et al., “The unexpected uses of a bowling pin: exploiting 20Ne isotopes for precision char- acterizations of collectivity in small systems,” (2024), arXiv:2402.05995 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.