Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Knowledge-Augmented Language Model Verification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.12836 v1 pith:YR7TDEVN submitted 2023-10-19 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords knowledgeverifiermodeltextverificationerrorsfactuallygenerating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent Language Models (LMs) have shown impressive capabilities in generating texts with the knowledge internalized in parameters. Yet, LMs often generate the factually incorrect responses to the given queries, since their knowledge may be inaccurate, incomplete, and outdated. To address this problem, previous works propose to augment LMs with the knowledge retrieved from an external knowledge source. However, such approaches often show suboptimal text generation performance due to two reasons: 1) the model may fail to retrieve the knowledge relevant to the given query, or 2) the model may not faithfully reflect the retrieved knowledge in the generated text. To overcome these, we propose to verify the output and the knowledge of the knowledge-augmented LMs with a separate verifier, which is a small LM that is trained to detect those two types of errors through instruction-finetuning. Then, when the verifier recognizes an error, we can rectify it by either retrieving new knowledge or generating new text. Further, we use an ensemble of the outputs from different instructions with a single verifier to enhance the reliability of the verification processes. We validate the effectiveness of the proposed verification steps on multiple question answering benchmarks, whose results show that the proposed verifier effectively identifies retrieval and generation errors, allowing LMs to provide more factually correct outputs. Our code is available at https://github.com/JinheonBaek/KALMV.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Salience Induction against Multi-Hop RAG Agents: Threat and Defense

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new class of attack on retrieval-augmented AI: reordering and rephrasing true facts in documents flips an agent's reasoning steps, reaching 83.3% attack success with no false claims injected.

  2. Aligning Knowledge Graphs and Language Models for Factual Accuracy

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    ALIGNed-LLM aligns knowledge graph entity embeddings with language model text embeddings through a trainable projection layer, improving question answering accuracy on KG-derived datasets.

Pith tools