Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Open Problems in DAOs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.19201 v2 pith:YS2O5TMP submitted 2023-10-29 cs.CY

Joshua Tan , Tara Merk , Sarah Hubbard , Eliza R. Oak , Helena Rong , Joni Pirovich , Ellie Rennie , Rolf Hoefer
show 21 more authors
Michael Zargham Jason Potts Chris Berg Reuben Youngblom Primavera De Filippi Seth Frey Jeff Strnad Morshed Mannan Kelsie Nabben Silke Noa Elrifai Jake Hartnell Benjamin Mako Hill Tobin South Ryan L. Thomas Jonathan Dotan Ariana Spring Alexia Maddox Woojin Lim Kevin Owocki Ari Juels Dan Boneh
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CY
keywords organizationssciencedaosresearchexistingproblemsapplyingautonomous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are a new, rapidly-growing class of organizations governed by smart contracts. Here we describe how researchers can contribute to the emerging science of DAOs and other digitally-constituted organizations. From granular privacy primitives to mechanism designs to model laws, we identify high-impact problems in the DAO ecosystem where existing gaps might be tackled through a new data set or by applying tools and ideas from existing research fields such as political science, computer science, economics, law, and organizational science. Our recommendations encompass exciting research questions as well as promising business opportunities. We call on the wider research community to join the global effort to invent the next generation of organizations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Exercising Governance Power in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An analysis of 48 Ethereum DAO governance contracts maps design choices across a referendum lifecycle and flags 7 DAOs as open to vote-buying and vote-sniping "governance attacks".

  2. Social Dynamics of DAOs: Power, Onboarding, and Inclusivity

    cs.CY 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DAOs reproduce financial and cultural barriers to participation, so decentralization is a social process, not just a technical feature.

  3. Cybernetic Governance in a Coliving House

    cs.CY 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A nine-bedroom coliving house sustained 98% occupancy and below-market rents for 18 months using a points-based chore auction, a peer 'hearts' ledger, and shared purchasing, all without a manager.

  4. Crypto-Economic Analysis of Web3 Funding Programs Using the Grant Maturity Framework

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new composite framework ranks Web3 grant maturity, placing Arbitrum LTIPP and Optimism in the developmental stage, Mantle in the foundational stage, and Taiko in the experimental stage.

  5. Decentralization in PoS Blockchain Consensus: Quantification and Advancement

    cs.DC 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Square-root and logarithmic stake-weighting functions raise decentralization metrics by about 51% and 132% respectively across ten PoS blockchains, but the claims depend on an unresolved Sybil-cost assumption.

Pith tools