Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MindGames: Targeting Theory of Mind in Large Language Models with Dynamic Epistemic Modal Logic

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.03353 v2 pith:YS56DGK5 submitted 2023-05-05 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords languageepistemiccomponentdatasetsdynamichttpslogicmind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) is a critical component of intelligence but its assessment remains the subject of heated debates. Prior research applied human ToM assessments to natural language processing models using either human-created standardized tests or rule-based templates. However, these methods primarily focus on simplistic reasoning and require further validation. Here, we leverage dynamic epistemic logic to isolate a particular component of ToM and to generate controlled problems. We also introduce new verbalization techniques to express these problems in English natural language. Our findings indicate that some language model scaling (from 70M to 6B and 350M to 174B) does not consistently yield results better than random chance. While GPT-4 demonstrates superior epistemic reasoning capabilities, there is still room for improvement. Our code and datasets are publicly available (https://huggingface.co/datasets/sileod/mindgames , https://github.com/sileod/llm-theory-of-mind )

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing Zero-shot Chain of Thought Prompting via Uncertainty-Guided Strategy Selection

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ZEUS selects chain-of-thought demonstrations by measuring answer uncertainty under perturbations, outperforming prior zero-shot prompting methods on four reasoning benchmarks.

Pith tools