Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

T-RAG: Lessons from the LLM Trenches

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.07483 v2 pith:YSYBOEND submitted 2024-02-12 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords applicationbuildingapplicationsansweringdocumentsexperienceslanguagelessons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLM) have shown remarkable language capabilities fueling attempts to integrate them into applications across a wide range of domains. An important application area is question answering over private enterprise documents where the main considerations are data security, which necessitates applications that can be deployed on-prem, limited computational resources and the need for a robust application that correctly responds to queries. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as the most prominent framework for building LLM-based applications. While building a RAG is relatively straightforward, making it robust and a reliable application requires extensive customization and relatively deep knowledge of the application domain. We share our experiences building and deploying an LLM application for question answering over private organizational documents. Our application combines the use of RAG with a finetuned open-source LLM. Additionally, our system, which we call Tree-RAG (T-RAG), uses a tree structure to represent entity hierarchies within the organization. This is used to generate a textual description to augment the context when responding to user queries pertaining to entities within the organization's hierarchy. Our evaluations, including a Needle in a Haystack test, show that this combination performs better than a simple RAG or finetuning implementation. Finally, we share some lessons learned based on our experiences building an LLM application for real-world use.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HGMEM: Hypergraph-based Working Memory to Improve Multi-step RAG for Long-Context Complex Relational Modeling

    cs.CL 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A working memory represented as a hypergraph, whose hyperedges are updated, inserted, and progressively merged by the LLM, improves multi-step RAG on long-context sense-making benchmarks.

  2. Collaborative Inference and Learning between Edge SLMs and Cloud LLMs: A Survey of Algorithms, Execution, and Open Challenges

    cs.DC 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that builds a taxonomy of edge-cloud LLM-SLM collaboration for inference and training, claiming to be the first to unify both phases.

  3. Bridge-RAG: An Abstract Bridge Tree Based Retrieval Augmented Generation Algorithm

    cs.IR 2026-01 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Bridge-RAG organizes document chunks into a deterministic abstract tree with O(1) entity lookup via a Cuckoo Filter, claiming accuracy and latency improvements over structured RAG baselines.

Pith tools