Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improving Model's Interpretability and Reliability using Biomarkers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.12394 v2 pith:YSYPQU5B submitted 2024-02-16 cs.HC cs.AIcs.LGeess.IV

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.LGeess.IV
keywords diagnosticbiomarkerscliniciansdecisionexplanationsimprovinginterpretabilitymedicine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurate and interpretable diagnostic models are crucial in the safety-critical field of medicine. We investigate the interpretability of our proposed biomarker-based lung ultrasound diagnostic pipeline to enhance clinicians' diagnostic capabilities. The objective of this study is to assess whether explanations from a decision tree classifier, utilizing biomarkers, can improve users' ability to identify inaccurate model predictions compared to conventional saliency maps. Our findings demonstrate that decision tree explanations, based on clinically established biomarkers, can assist clinicians in detecting false positives, thus improving the reliability of diagnostic models in medicine.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools