REVIEW 3 cited by
AQuaMuSe: Automatically Generating Datasets for Query-Based Multi-Document Summarization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
AQuaMuSe: Automatically Generating Datasets for Query-Based Multi-Document Summarization
read the original abstract
Summarization is the task of compressing source document(s) into coherent and succinct passages. This is a valuable tool to present users with concise and accurate sketch of the top ranked documents related to their queries. Query-based multi-document summarization (qMDS) addresses this pervasive need, but the research is severely limited due to lack of training and evaluation datasets as existing single-document and multi-document summarization datasets are inadequate in form and scale. We propose a scalable approach called AQuaMuSe to automatically mine qMDS examples from question answering datasets and large document corpora. Our approach is unique in the sense that it can general a dual dataset -- for extractive and abstractive summaries both. We publicly release a specific instance of an AQuaMuSe dataset with 5,519 query-based summaries, each associated with an average of 6 input documents selected from an index of 355M documents from Common Crawl. Extensive evaluation of the dataset along with baseline summarization model experiments are provided.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Query-Focused Event Summarization: A Dataset and Benchmark
QFESum provides a large event-oriented QFS benchmark; RAT adaptive retrieval plus SHC hierarchical event clustering beat baselines on lexical, semantic, LLM-event-match and human metrics.
-
Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models
Chain-of-Verification reduces hallucinations in large language models by drafting responses, planning independent verification questions, answering them separately, and generating a final verified output.
-
Compare: A Framework for Scientific Comparisons
Compare is a RAG-based system that generates qualitative, citation-supported comparisons of scientific contributions at institution and publication granularity.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.