Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Multimodal Prototyping for cancer survival prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.00224 v1 pith:YVOGNGIY submitted 2024-06-28 cs.CV stat.AP

classification cs.CVstat.AP
keywords tokensmultimodalanalysescancerinterpretabilitymethodsmorphologicalpatches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal survival methods combining gigapixel histology whole-slide images (WSIs) and transcriptomic profiles are particularly promising for patient prognostication and stratification. Current approaches involve tokenizing the WSIs into smaller patches (>10,000 patches) and transcriptomics into gene groups, which are then integrated using a Transformer for predicting outcomes. However, this process generates many tokens, which leads to high memory requirements for computing attention and complicates post-hoc interpretability analyses. Instead, we hypothesize that we can: (1) effectively summarize the morphological content of a WSI by condensing its constituting tokens using morphological prototypes, achieving more than 300x compression; and (2) accurately characterize cellular functions by encoding the transcriptomic profile with biological pathway prototypes, all in an unsupervised fashion. The resulting multimodal tokens are then processed by a fusion network, either with a Transformer or an optimal transport cross-alignment, which now operates with a small and fixed number of tokens without approximations. Extensive evaluation on six cancer types shows that our framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods with much less computation while unlocking new interpretability analyses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AdaSurvMamba: Dynamic Fusion and Semantic Scanning for Multimodal Survival Analysis

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An adaptive Mamba architecture with dynamic cross-modal weighting and semantic reordering of WSI patches reports ~2% C-Index gains over baselines on five TCGA datasets.

  2. How Effective Can Dropout Be in Multiple Instance Learning ?

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dropping the top-k most important instances in a bag regularizes MIL training and improves classification; the proposed MIL-Dropout applies this idea to existing MIL aggregators.

  3. Cracking Instance Jigsaw Puzzles: An Alternative to Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Analysis

    eess.IV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper introduces a shuffling-equivalence regularizer for MIL-based WSI analysis, claiming consistent gains over state-of-the-art methods.

  4. HeLo: Heterogeneous Multi-Modal Fusion with Label Correlation for Emotion Distribution Learning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HeLo fuses physiological and behavioral features with optimal transport and label-correlation-driven attention, reporting the best average rank on DMER and WESAD emotion distribution benchmarks.

  5. Multimodal Integration of Longitudinal Noninvasive Diagnostics for Survival Prediction in Immunotherapy Using Deep Learning

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A transformer-based temporal attention network that integrates longitudinal blood, imaging, and medication data predicts mortality in immunotherapy patients with AUCs around 0.81 to 0.84, slightly beating blood-only models.

  6. CIGTSurv: Clinical Information Guided Tri-modal Survival Prediction with Local Prototype Association and Global Feature Alignment

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CIGTSurv uses clinical text embeddings to guide cross-attention and distribution alignment between pathology and genomics, reaching an average C-index of 0.788 across five TCGA cohorts.

Pith tools