Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Lambert W-kink Solitons Arising from Higher-Order Nonlinearities of Lipid Membranes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that an extended Heimburg–Jackson membrane equation containing cubic and quartic nonlinearities admits exact Lambert W-kink travelling-wave solutions obtained by the factorization method.

desk verdict The Lambert W-kink claim in Eq. (33) fails on direct differentiation, so the paper's central novelty collapses; the standard kink section is okay but that doesn't rescue it. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17965 v1 pith:YVSLJDEQ submitted 2025-07-23 physics.bio-ph nlin.PSquant-ph

V. A. Mendoza-Millán , J. L. Larios-Ferrer , J. Samuel Millán , O. Pavón-Torres This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-phnlin.PSquant-ph MSC 34A0535C0735Q5192C05
keywords LambertWfunctionkinksolitonsHeimburg–Jacksonmodellipidmembranesnerveimpulsepropagationfactorizationmethodhigher-ordernonlinearitiestravellingwavesolutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives an extended Heimburg–Jackson equation for nerve-membrane density waves that includes cubic and quartic nonlinearities, then reduces it under a travelling-wave ansatz to a quintic Duffing-type ordinary differential equation. Its central claim is that the factorization method produces exact travelling-wave solutions to this equation, including a new family of Lambert W-kink solitons expressed through the Lambert W function. These profiles describe the transition between two membrane states and are put forward as more faithful analytic models of nerve-pulse behaviour than standard hyperbolic kinks, since their asymmetry offers a built-in picture of hysteresis or threshold excitation. If the construction is correct, the paper gives an exact, parameter-constrained family of solutions that can be used to calibrate the higher-order elastic coefficients of the membrane.

What carries the argument

The factorization method for second-order polynomial ODEs writes y''+γ̃y'+f(y)=0 as (d/dξ−φ2(y))(d/dξ−φ1(y))y=0, and coefficient matching gives φ1φ2=f(y)/y and φ1+φ2+(dφ1/dy)y=−γ̃. For the quintic case, choosing φ1=±√(s̃/3)(y²+Ey−õ) and φ2=±√(3/s̃)(−s̃y²+By+1) produces the compatibility equation (32). The Lambert W function, defined by W(z)$e^{{W(z)}}$=z, enters when that first-order equation is integrated into the closed form (33)–(34), with the real parameter ᾱ selected through a cubic equation and discriminant conditions.

What would settle it

Substitute y±=ᾱ(1−1/(1+W[φ(ξ)])) and φ(ξ)=exp(∓ᾱ²√(s̃/3)ξ−1) directly into the compatibility equation (32), expand both sides in powers of W, and compare coefficients. The identity forces õ=0 and E=0, which are not part of the paper's stated regime p<0, q>0; this check can be done in a few lines and settles whether the proposed branch is actually a solution of Eq. (19).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from the extended Heimburg–Jackson model with third- and fourth-order polynomial terms, the paper performs a travelling-wave reduction and integrates twice to obtain Eq. (5), a damped quintic oscillator. For the biomembrane regime p<0, q>0, it factorizes the resulting ODE as a product of two first-order factors and derives compatibility conditions that fix the damping coefficient and force the quartic coefficient to solve a cubic equation. The compatible first-order factor is then integrated to yield y±=ᾱ(1−1/(1+W[φ(ξ)])) with φ(ξ)=exp(∓ᾱ²√(s̃/3)ξ−1), where W is the Lambert W function. The paper claims these Lambert W-kink solutions satisfy the quintic equation and represent asymmetric transitions between membrane states, with the two branches of W interpreted as bistable or threshold phenomena.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing step is the integration of the first-order compatibility condition into the Lambert W profile; the whole new solution family depends on that integration being valid for the stated quadratic factor and parameter range.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Exact Lambert W-kink solutions give closed-form profiles for the transition between relaxed and excited membrane states, so numerical simulation of that transition is no longer required in the parameter regimes where the factorization applies.
  • The factorization fixes the quartic coefficient s̃ through a cubic equation, so the paper yields necessary algebraic conditions that the physical coefficient λ must satisfy for these solitons to exist.
  • Because the Lambert W-kink is asymmetric, it captures different behaviour on the leading and trailing edges of the pulse, which the symmetric tanh kink cannot represent.
  • In the undamped limit, the pseudo-potential criterion identifies parameter regions where solitary wave solutions exist, extending the existence analysis beyond the exact solutions.
  • The supersymmetric pairing of solutions with equal wavefront velocities but different equations offers a way to relate distinct membrane states to the same propagating pulse.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A measurable signature of the W-kink class is the skewness of a propagating density pulse: the parameter ᾱ controls how asymmetric the profile is, whereas the standard kink is symmetric, so pulse-shape data could select between the two.
  • The same factorization route should transfer to other double-dispersion Boussinesq-type equations with cubic-quintic nonlinearities, since the algebraic factorization only relies on the polynomial structure of the reduced ODE.
  • Although the paper emphasizes the p<0, q>0 membrane regime, the factorization itself is not tied to those signs, so the Lambert W-kink family may also describe transitions in regimes the paper does not discuss.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies a fifth-order polynomial extension of the Heimburg–Jackson model for lipid membranes. It derives a Duffing-type travelling-wave ODE, Eq. (5)/(19), and applies the factorization method to construct exact solutions. In Section 3.1 the authors reproduce standard kink solitons for the cubic case, and in Section 3.2 they claim a new family of Lambert W-kink solitons, Eq. (33), satisfying the quintic ODE via the compatibility condition Eq. (32). The paper interprets these solutions as asymmetric nerve-pulse solitons and compares them with classical kinks. The central mathematical claim is not correct: the proposed Lambert W-kink does not satisfy the stated compatibility equation, and the factorization used to derive that equation is incomplete.

Significance. If the Lambert W-kink solutions were genuine, they would provide a new analytical family for an extended Heimburg–Jackson model and could be of interest to the biophysics community. The manuscript is transparent about its factorization ansatz, includes a comparison with the G'/G method, and explicitly states limitations in the footnote about the overdetermined algebraic system. These are honest features. However, the paper's central result is invalid as written: the claimed solution fails by direct differentiation, and the factorization does not satisfy the coefficient-matching condition. The physical interpretation built on Eq. (33) is therefore unsupported. The paper may contain useful expository material, but it does not establish the advertised exact solutions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (32)-(34)] The claimed Lambert W-kink does not satisfy the compatibility equation. Writing y = ᾱ W/(1+W) with φ = exp(∓ᾱ²√(s~/3)ξ − 1) and differentiating gives y′ = ∓√(s~/3)(y³ − 2ᾱy² + ᾱ²y). Equation (32) requires y′ = ∓√(s~/3)(y³ + Ey² − o~y). Matching coefficients requires E = −2ᾱ and o~ = −ᾱ². Neither condition is stated or derived; ᾱ is fixed by the cubic in Eqs. (35)–(38), while E and o~ are fixed by Eqs. (23) and (6). For the Fig. 5 parameter set (k = 0.5, v = 0.6, δ = 2.1, p = 4.5, r = 6, q = 2), solving Eq. (25) gives s~ ≈ 3.15, and then E ≈ 1.07, o~ ≈ 0.87, ᾱ ≈ −0.94, so E + 2ᾱ ≈ −0.81 and ᾱ² + o~ ≈ 1.75. Hence Eq. (33) does not solve Eq. (32) and consequently does not solve Eq. (19).
  2. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (20)-(25)] The factorization itself is incomplete. Expanding the product φ1φ2 from Eq. (21) gives a y³ coefficient of B − s~E. Matching Eq. (20) requires B − s~E = −r~. This condition is not derived or imposed in the manuscript; the definitions of B and E in Eqs. (22)–(23), together with the cubic (25) for s~, do not guarantee it. For the same Fig. 5 parameters, s~ ≈ 3.15 gives E ≈ 1.07 and B ≈ −2.26, so B − s~E ≈ −5.64, whereas −r~ ≈ 2.96. Thus Eq. (20) is not an identity, Eq. (9a) is violated, and Eq. (32) is not a valid compatibility condition for Eq. (19).
  3. [Figs. 5 and 6; Section 3.2; final paragraph] The plotted parameters are inconsistent with the stated biophysical regime. Section 3.2 introduces Eq. (19) under the condition p < 0, q > 0, and the final paragraph requires s~ > 0. Fig. 5 uses p = 4.5 and positive q values, while Fig. 6 uses p = 5, q = 15.3 and s = −12.8. Because p~ = p/[2(k² − δv²)] and q~ = q/[3(k² − δv²)] share the sign of the common denominator, no real k and v can produce p~ < 0 and q~ > 0 when p and q are both positive. Fig. 6 also omits k and v, so Eq. (40) cannot be evaluated from the caption data. These inconsistencies do not affect the algebraic failure of the central claim, but they undermine the physical interpretation presented in the figures.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (38)] In the denominator of ā₂ the symbol is written as ¯s, but it should presumably be s~; the bar notation appears to be applied to the wrong coefficient.
  2. [Throughout] The terminology is inconsistent: the abstract and Section 3.2 use 'Lambert W-Kink', while the introduction uses 'W-Lambert kink solitons'. Please choose one standard name.
  3. [Fig. 4] The comparison between the Lambert W-kink and the standard kink in Fig. 4 does not list the parameter values used, so the comparison cannot be reproduced.
  4. [References and prose] There are minor typographical issues, including 'erquations' in Ref. [48] and 'It worth to point it out' in Section 3.1; these should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; factorization constraints are derived solvability conditions and self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain consists of: (i) starting from the extended Heimburg-Jackson model, Eq. (1); (ii) reducing to the Duffing-type ODE, Eq. (19); (iii) imposing the factorization (8)-(9); (iv) deriving algebraic constraints on the tilde-parameters (Eqs. 21-31); and (v) integrating the compatibility condition (32) to obtain the Lambert W form (33)-(38). At no stage is a parameter fitted to a data subset and then renamed a prediction: the coefficients s~, p~, q~, r~, o~, E, B are either re-parametrizations of the original model constants (Eqs. 6, 23) or roots of algebraic conditions (Eqs. 25, 35) obtained from the factorization itself. The Lambert W-kink is therefore claimed as a conditional exact solution of the factored equation, not as an independent empirical fit. Self-citations to Refs. [27], [34], [41], [46], and [47] appear only in physical-interpretation or multi-scale contexts; the central factorization result does not rest on them. The paper explicitly acknowledges in a footnote that its factorization is 'a particular of' a more general quartic factorization, with C = D = 1 chosen, so no uniqueness theorem is invoked to forbid alternatives. The prior phi-6-theory discussion of the same Lambert W form is cited to an external reference [45]. The apparent tension noted by a reader, that Eq. (33) satisfies Eq. (32) only when E = -2 alpha and o~ = -alpha^2 while the manuscript does not state these equalities, is a mathematical-consistency defect in the claimed integration, not a circular reduction of the output to the input. Since no prediction reduces by construction to a fitted quantity and no load-bearing argument is a self-citation, the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or dimensions. The free parameters are the empirical membrane coefficients and the traveling wave constants, all hand-picked in the figures. The main load-bearing axioms are the extended HJ model, the traveling wave reduction with zero integration constants, and the specific factorization choice, which together restrict the solution space severely.

free parameters (3)
  • p, q, r, s (nonlinear elastic coefficients) = not fitted; hand-chosen in figures (e.g., p=4.5, r=6, q=2..3.5 in Fig. 5)
    These empirical membrane coefficients are inputs to the model; their values determine whether the factorization constraints can be satisfied.
  • k, v, delta (wave number, velocity, dispersion ratio) = hand-chosen (e.g., k=0.5, v=0.6, delta=2.1 in Fig. 5)
    Traveling wave parameters selected for plotting.
  • a (amplitude parameter) = determined by cubic (35)
    Determined from the factorization solution; effectively constrained by the other parameters.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Extended Heimburg-Jackson model (Eq. 1) with higher-order nonlinearities
    The paper starts from a model that is itself an extension of HJ theory; the u^3 and u^4 terms are not derived from first principles nor fit to experimental data in this work.
  • domain assumption Traveling wave ansatz and vanishing integration constants C1=C2=0
    Reduction to Eq. (5) requires setting both integration constants to zero, which selects localized solutions and discards other branches.
  • ad hoc to paper Factorization ansatz with C=D=1 (footnote 1)
    The chosen factorization is a particular case of a more general one; this choice imposes the cubic constraint (25) on s~ and the constant-gamma~ condition, which restricts the parameter space for which solutions exist.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lambert W-kink Solitons Arising from Higher-Order Nonlinearities of Lipid Membranes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YVSLJDEQ

@misc{pith2026250717965,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lambert W-kink Solitons Arising from Higher-Order Nonlinearities of Lipid Membranes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YVSLJDEQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17965}
}
read the original abstract

Accurate modelling of nerve impulse propagation requires accounting for strong higher-order nonlinearities in membrane dynamics, as incorporated in the extended Heimburg-Jackson model. By introducing third- and fourth-order polynomial terms into the membrane density equation, we derive a generalized Duffing-type equation that better captures the complex biophysical states involved in signal transmission. Applying the factorization method, we construct exact travelling wave solutions, including a novel class of Lambert W-Kink-type solitons. These findings provide new analytical insight into the nonlinear electromechanical behaviour of nerve membranes and contribute to the theoretical foundation for understanding pulse propagation in biomembranes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17965 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of nerve axon. rarefaction, compositional heterogeneity in lipid–protein interactions, and large-scale deformations arising from compressive and tensile loading. The term associated with h1 reflects the elasticity of the biomembrane, while h2 accounts for the inertia of the lipid molecules within the membrane. The inclusion of the h2 term transforms the HJ equation into a double-dispersion m… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Kink solitons, and (b) anti-kink solitons, corresponding to Eq. (17) with chosen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) y+(ξ) and (b) y−(ξ) corresponding to Eq. (18) with chosen parameters k = 1, v = 0.7, δ = 0.1, p = 10 and q = 5 for y1, q = 10 for y2, q = 15 for y3 and q = 20 for y4. Appendix A, where we compare the solutions y±(ξ), for both ˜γ > 0 and ˜γ < 0, with those derived using the basic G′/G expansion method. Such methods are particularly effective for equations where the higher￾order dispersion term can be balanced by … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between the Lambert W-kink soliton (solid line) and the standard kink (dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) and (b) Lambert W-kink-type solitons, corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effective potential ϕef f (y) with p = 5, q = 15.3, r = 13.1, s = −12.8 and δ = 1.4. where the right side of Eq. (40) can be seen as a pseudo-potential. In the present case of lipid membranes, it is required that p < 0, q > 0, ˜s > 0. Under these conditions, solitary w…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kink propagation in the Articial Axon

    Xinyi Qi and Giovanni Zocchi. Kink propagation in the Articial Axon. EPL, 137 (2022) 12005

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Qian Y, Alhaskawi A, Dong Y, Ni J, Abdalbary S and Lu H (2024) Transforming medicine: artificial intelligence integration in the peripheral nervous system. Front. Neurol. 15:1332048

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    & Yusuf, A

    Alquran, M., Sulaiman, T.A. & Yusuf, A. Kink-soliton, singular-kink-soliton and singular-periodic solu- tions for a new two-mode version of the Burger–Huxley model: applications in nerve fibers and liquid crystals. Opt Quant Electron 53, 227 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Lin, Z., Deng, J., Chen, Z. et al. An efficient reservoir computing system based on 2D mask processing and dynamic memristor. Nonlinear Dyn (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Firing patterns and fast–slow dynamics in an N-type LAM-based FitzHugh–Nagumo circuit

    Quan Xu, Yujian Fang, Huagan Wu, Han Bao, Ning Wang. Firing patterns and fast–slow dynamics in an N-type LAM-based FitzHugh–Nagumo circuit. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 187 (2024) 115376

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    A memristive neuron with nonlinear membranes and network patterns

    Binchi Wang, Ya Wang, Xiaofeng Zhang, Zhigang, Zhu. A memristive neuron with nonlinear membranes and network patterns. Physics Letters A 540 (2025) 130390

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Kuate, P.D.K., Ito, H., Fossi, J.T. et al. From connectome to silicon: a biologically-inspired complex network of CMOS chaotic oscillators for analog brain emulation. Nonlinear Dyn (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Development of a novel artificial neural network-based approach for predicting entropy generation in electroosmotic flow of nanofluids

    Ishaq, M., Ashraf, M.B. Development of a novel artificial neural network-based approach for predicting entropy generation in electroosmotic flow of nanofluids. Nonlinear Dyn (2025)

    work page 2025

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Drukarch B, Wilhelmus M M M and Shrivastava S 2021 The thermodynamic theory of action potential propagation: a sound basis for unification of the physics of nerve impulses Reviews in the Neurosciences 33 285302

    2021

  2. [10]

    Schneider

    Matan Mussel, Matthias F. Schneider. Sound pulses in lipid membranes and their potential function in biology. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 162 (2021) 101e110

    2021

  3. [11]

    Heimburg T and Jackson A D 2005 On soliton propagation in biomembranes and nerves Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 97909795

    2005

  4. [12]

    Application of the Exp − φξ-Expansion Method to Find the Soliton Solutions in Biomembranes and Nerves

    Rani, A.; Shakeel, M.; Kbiri Alaoui, M.; Zidan, A.M.; Shah, N.A.; Junsawang, P. Application of the Exp − φξ-Expansion Method to Find the Soliton Solutions in Biomembranes and Nerves. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3372. 14

    2022

  5. [13]

    2022 Emergence of lump-like solitonic waves in Heimburg–Jackson biomembranes and nerves fractal model

    El-Nabulsi RA. 2022 Emergence of lump-like solitonic waves in Heimburg–Jackson biomembranes and nerves fractal model. J. R. Soc. Interface 19: 20220079

    2022

  6. [14]

    Razzaq, W., Akbulut, A., Zafar, A. et al. Solitary wave solutions of coupled nerve fibers model based on two analytical techniques. Opt Quant Electron 55, 591 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Solitons in Neurosciences by the Laplace–Adomian Decomposition Scheme

    Gonz´ alez-Gaxiola, O.; Biswas, A.; Moraru, L.; Alghamdi, A.A. Solitons in Neurosciences by the Laplace–Adomian Decomposition Scheme. Mathematics 2023, 11, 1080

    2023

  8. [16]

    Shahzad T, Baber M Z, Qasim M, Sulaiman T A, Yasin M W and Ahmed N 2024 Explicit solitary wave profiles and stability analysis of biomembranes and nerves Modern Physics Letters B 38

    2024

  9. [17]

    An anatomization of pulse solitons of nerve impulse model via phase portraits, chaos and sensitivity analysis

    Tahira Jamal, Adil Jhangeer, Malik Zawwar Hussain. An anatomization of pulse solitons of nerve impulse model via phase portraits, chaos and sensitivity analysis. Chinese Journal of Physics 87 (2024) 496–509

    2024

  10. [18]

    Ozsahin D U, Ceesay B, baber M Z, Ahmed N, Raza A, Rafiq M, Ahmad H, Awwad F A and Ismail E A A 2024 Multiwaves, breathers, lump and other solutions for the heimburg model in biomembranes and nerves Scientific Reports 14

    2024

  11. [19]

    Younas, U., Muhammad, J., Almutairi, D.K. et al. Analyzing the neural wave structures in the field of neuroscience. Sci Rep 15, 7181 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Seadawy, Asghar Ali, Ahmet Bekir

    Aly R. Seadawy, Asghar Ali, Ahmet Bekir. Solitary wave solutions of the nonlinear fractional soliton neuron model via application of five mathematical methods. Modern Physics Letters B (2025) 2550098 (20 pages)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Fedosejevs, & M.F

    C.S. Fedosejevs, & M.F. Schneider, Sharp, localized phase transitions in single neuronal cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119 (8) e2117521119 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    On mathematical modelling of solitary pulses in cylindrical biomembranes

    J¨ uri Engelbrecht, Kert Tamm, Tanel Peets. On mathematical modelling of solitary pulses in cylindrical biomembranes. Biomech Model Mechanobiol (2015) 14:159–167

    2015

  15. [23]

    On the role of nonlinearities in the Boussinesq-type wave equations

    Tanel Peets, Kert Tamm, J¨ uri Engelbrecht. On the role of nonlinearities in the Boussinesq-type wave equations. Wave Motion 71 (2017) 113–119

    2017

  16. [24]

    J¨ uri Engelbrecht, Kert Tamm & Tanel Peets (2017) On solutions of a Boussinesq-type equation with displacement-dependent nonlinearities: the case of biomembranes, Philosophical Magazine, 97:12, 967- 987

    2017

  17. [25]

    On solutions of a Boussinesq-type equation with displacement-dependent nonlinearity: A soliton doublet

    Tanel Peets, Kert Tamm, P¨ aivo Simson, J¨ uri Engelbrecht. On solutions of a Boussinesq-type equation with displacement-dependent nonlinearity: A soliton doublet. Wave Motion 85(2019) 10–17

    2019

  18. [26]

    J. A. Onana Inouga, S. E. Mkam Tchouobiap, M. Siewe Siewe, and F. M. Moukam Kakmeni. Action potential-like modes as modulated waves in an extended soliton model for biomembranes and nerves. AIP Advances 15, 015035 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Adiabatic evolution of solitons embedded in lipid membranes

    Pav´ on-Torres, M A Ag¨ uero-Granados and R Valencia-Torres. Adiabatic evolution of solitons embedded in lipid membranes. Phys. Scr. 99 125256 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    H. C. Rosu and O. Cornejo-P´ erez. Supersymmetric pairing of kinks for polynomial nonlinearities. Phys. Rev. E 71, 046607 (2005)

    2005

  21. [29]

    Cornejo-P´ erez and H

    O. Cornejo-P´ erez and H. C. Rosu. Nonlinear Second Order Ode’s -factorization and particular solutions- Progress of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 114, No. 3 (2005). 15

    2005

  22. [30]

    Gonz´ alez, H.C. Rosu, O. Cornejo-P´ erez, S.C. Mancas, Factorization conditions for nonlinear second- order differential equations, in: S. Manukure, W.-X. Ma (Eds.), Nonlinear and Modern Mathematical Physics-Proceedings 2022, Springer, USA, 2024, pp. 81–99

    2022

  23. [31]

    Gonz´ alez Contreras, Parametric factorization of nonlinear second order differential equations, Phys

    G. Gonz´ alez Contreras, Parametric factorization of nonlinear second order differential equations, Phys. Scr. 99 (2024) 055214

    2024

  24. [32]

    Cornejo-P´ erez, P

    O. Cornejo-P´ erez, P. Albares, J. Negro. Solutions of an extended Duffing–van der Pol equation with variable coefficients. Physica D 476 (2025), 134675

    2025

  25. [33]

    Lee, JI., Werginz, P., Kameneva, T. et al. Membrane depolarization mediates both the inhibition of neural activity and cell-type-differences in response to high-frequency stimulation. Commun Biol 7, 734 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Pav´ on-Torres O., Ag¨ uero-Granados M. A. and Magui˜ na-Palma M. E. 2024 Interaction and adiabatic evolution of orthodromic and antidromic impulses in the axoplasmic fluid Physics Letters A 521 129740

    2024

  27. [35]

    Drab M, Daniel M, Kralj-Iglic V and Iglic A 2022 Solitons in the heimburgjackson model of sound propagation in lipid bilayers are enabled by dispersion of a stiff membrane The European Physical Journal E 45

    2022

  28. [36]

    Nymeyer and H.-X

    H. Nymeyer and H.-X. Zhou, A method to determine dielectric constants in nonhomogeneous systems: Application to biological membranes, Biophys. J. 94, 1185 (2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    and Mandadapu, Kranthi K

    Row, Hyeongjoo and Fernandes, Joshua B. and Mandadapu, Kranthi K. and Shekhar, Karthik. Spa- tiotemporal dynamics of ionic reorganization near biological membrane interfaces. PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH7,013185(2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Lautrup, R

    B. Lautrup, R. Appali, A.D. Jackson, T. Heimburg, The stability of solitons in biomembranes and nerves, Eur. Phys. J. E. Soft Matter 34 (6) (2011) 1–9

    2011

  31. [39]

    Perez-Camacho, J

    M.I. Perez-Camacho, J. Ruiz-Suarez, Propagation of a thermo-mechanical perturbation on a lipid membrane, Soft Matter 13 (2017) 6555–6561

    2017

  32. [40]

    Freist¨ uhler, J.H

    H.F. Freist¨ uhler, J.H. H¨ owing, An analytical proof for the stability of Heimburg-Jackson pulses, 2013, arXiv:1303.5941 (math.AP)

    2013 arXiv

  33. [41]

    and Aguero M

    Contreras F., Ongay F., Pav´ on O. and Aguero M. 2013 Non-topological solitons as travelling pulses along the nerve International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application 02 195200

    2013

  34. [42]

    Abdelhalim Ebaid, Emad H. Aly. Exact solutions for the transformed reduced Ostrovsky equation via the F -expansion method in terms of Weierstrass-elliptic and Jacobian-elliptic functions. Wave Motion 49 (2012) 296-308

    2012

  35. [43]

    Fongang Achu G, Mkam Tchouobiap S E, Moukam Kakmeni F M and Tchawoua C 2018 Periodic soliton trains and informational code structures in an improved soliton model for biomembranes and nerves Physical Review E 98

    2018

  36. [44]

    Nisha, Neetu Maan, Amit Goyal, Thokala Soloman Raju, C.N. Kumar. Chirped Lambert W-kink soli- tons of the complex cubic-quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation with intrapulse Raman scattering. Physics Letters A 384 (2020) 126675

    2020

  37. [45]

    A ϕ6 soliton with a long-range tail

    Amado, A., Mohammadi, A. A ϕ6 soliton with a long-range tail. Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 576 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Pav´ on-Torres O, Aguero M A, Belyaeva T L, Ramirez A and Serkin V N 2019 Unusual self-spreading or self-compression of the cubic-quintic nlse solitons owing to amplification or absorption Optik 184 446456. 16

    2019

  39. [47]

    & Ag¨ uero-Granados, M.A

    Pav´ on-Torres, O., Collantes-Collantes, J.R. & Ag¨ uero-Granados, M.A. Quasi-stationary Evolution of Cubic-quintic NLSE Drop-like Solitons in DNA-protein Systems. Int J Theor Phys 64, 88 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    Wang M.L., Li X., Zhang J., The G′/G - expansion method and evolution erquations in mathematical physics. Phys. Lett. A, 372 (2008) 417 – 421

    2008

  41. [49]

    14 (2009) 3507 – 3529

    Kudryashov N.A., Seven common errors in finding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations, Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat. 14 (2009) 3507 – 3529

    2009

  42. [50]

    Kudryashov

    Nikolai A. Kudryashov. A note on the G′/G method. Applied Mathematics and Computation 217 (2010) 1755–1758. 17

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.