Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Estimating the track-reconstruction efficiency in phenomenological proposals of long-lived-particle searches

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a simplified geometric hit-counting model, with a 20-hit requirement and two per-cell step thresholds, can reproduce Belle II's track-reconstruction efficiency and can estimate displaced-track efficiency from…

desk verdict TrackEff fills a real gap for LLP phenomenology, but the Fig. 2 agreement is calibration, not prediction, and the displaced-track use case remains unvalidated. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00857 v1 pith:YWPFOOYI submitted 2025-01-01 hep-ex hep-ph

Emilie Bertholet , Abner Soffer This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-exhep-ph PACS 29.40.Gx
keywords trackreconstructionefficiencylong-livedparticlesdisplacedverticesBelleIIcentraldriftchamberMonteCarlogeneratorsdetectorgeometryEff
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces TrackEff, a fast software tool that estimates whether a charged particle's track would be reconstructed in a drift-chamber detector by counting detector hits along the track's geometric path. The pitch is that phenomenologists proposing long-lived-particle searches can avoid full detector simulation and still get realistic tracking-efficiency estimates from generator-level Monte Carlo, even for tracks that originate away from the collision point. The paper validates the method by reproducing the Belle II tau-tau tracking-efficiency measurement with default thresholds of 20 hits and 2 or 10 steps per cell. If the geometric rule holds, efficiency estimates for displaced-vertex searches become cheap and transparent.

What carries the argument

The central object is TrackEff, a simplified drift-chamber model that divides the Belle II central drift chamber into nine radial superlayers of rectangular $(\Delta r, \Delta\phi)$ cells. The mechanism that carries the argument is helical step counting: a particle's trajectory is propagated as a helix in a uniform $B_z=1.5~\mathrm{T}$ field, sampled in $\Delta s=1~\mathrm{mm}$ arc-length steps, and a cell counts as a hit only if the number of steps inside it reaches a per-superlayer threshold (defaults: $n_s^{\rm inner}=2$ in the innermost superlayer, $n_s=10$ elsewhere). The final track decision is a user-chosen hit-count cut, with 20 hits used by default. This turns reconstruction efficiency into a purely geometric counting problem.

What would settle it

Simulate the same tau-tau events used in Ref. [27] but with track production points shifted to radii between 1 and 30 cm, compute TrackEff's predicted efficiencies, and compare them with full Belle II simulation; a large overprediction in that displaced regime would show the geometric hit-counting rule fails where it is meant to be used.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is that a track-reconstruction efficiency curve can be generated from a purely geometric count of drift-chamber cells, without modeling ionization, electronics, pattern recognition, or vertexing. TrackEff computes the helix of each charged particle in a uniform 1.5 T field, steps along it in 1 mm increments, and registers a hit only when a cell is traversed by enough steps; averaging over the pions of $e^+e^- \to \tau^+\tau^-$ events and requiring 20 hits, the predicted efficiency follows the Belle II measurement in Fig. 2 as a function of the lepton polar angle, with the closest match at $n_s^{\rm inner}=2$ and $n_s=10$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a charged track is reconstructed if and only if it produces at least 20 drift-chamber hits, with the per-cell step thresholds tuned to one tau-decay measurement; this rule has only been checked near the collision point, not for displaced tracks with large offsets and unusual angles.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phenomenological long-lived-particle search proposals can quote track-reconstruction efficiencies as a function of displaced production point and momentum, computed directly from generator-level events.
  • Scanning detector geometries becomes fast: changing layer radii, cell counts, or lengths in the simplified model gives approximate efficiency curves without building a full detector simulation.
  • Track-quality cuts such as a 20-hit requirement are built in as a user choice, so proposals can test how sensitive their expected sensitivity is to the hit requirement.
  • The same tool can be applied to other drift-chamber or solid-state tracker concepts by adjusting the geometry parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: the published validation covers only prompt tau-decay tracks near the interaction point, so the paper's intended LLP use extrapolates the geometric rule to large displacements and unusual angles without direct measurement.
  • Editorial: the paper explicitly assumes track-finding and vertexing losses are temporary limitations, so TrackEff estimates should be treated as an achievable upper bound rather than current-run performance.
  • Editorial: a direct extension would be to calibrate the two per-cell step thresholds against a small full-simulation sample for any new detector geometry, turning TrackEff into a general-purpose efficiency emulator.
  • Editorial: for soft or highly collimated displaced tracks, pattern-recognition inefficiencies that the hit count cannot see could matter; a concrete probe is to compare TrackEff-based signal predictions with existing experimental limits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents TrackEff, a Python package that estimates the charged-track reconstruction efficiency for Belle II from generator-level kinematics by counting hits in a simplified geometric model of the CDC. The model divides the CDC into superlayers and layers, steps along the helix trajectory in 1 mm arc-length increments, and requires a minimum number of steps per cell (defaults: 2 for the innermost superlayer, 10 for others) for a cell to register a hit. A track is considered reconstructed if it accumulates at least 20 such hits. The authors validate the model by comparing its efficiency with the Belle II tau-tau tracking efficiency from Ref. [27] and use this comparison to select the default step thresholds.

Significance. If independently validated, TrackEff would be a useful, lightweight tool for phenomenologists who need tracking-efficiency estimates for displaced-vertex searches without running full GEANT4 simulation. The paper's strengths include a clear geometric description of the CDC model, standard helix equations in the appendix, public code availability on Zenodo, and a tunable geometry that could be adapted to other trackers. However, the central validation is in-sample: the default thresholds are tuned to the same Belle II tau-tau efficiency curve that is then shown as the agreement in Fig. 2, and no independent or displaced-track validation is provided. The paper also acknowledges in Section 2.1 that track-finding, multiplicity, hard-scatter, and vertexing inefficiencies may reduce the efficiency below the TrackEff estimate, without quantifying this reduction for the intended LLP use case. These issues are load-bearing for the central claim that phenomenologists can obtain reasonable efficiency estimates from generator-level MC.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Fig. 2] The default step thresholds (n_s_inner=2, n_s=10) are selected by comparing TrackEff's efficiency to the Belle II tau-tau tracking efficiency from Ref. [27], and the same measurement is then shown as the validation curve in Fig. 2. The agreement is therefore an in-sample result and does not establish predictive power. No holdout sample, independent measurement, or cross-validation is presented, and no agreement metric (e.g., chi-square or coverage) is given. Please add an out-of-sample check, or explicitly reframe the figure as a tuning result and provide uncertainties on the tuned parameters.
  2. [Section 2.1, second paragraph] The paper states that 'additional considerations may reduce the efficiency to below the TrackEff estimate' and characterizes track-finding, multiplicity, hard-scatter, and vertexing inefficiencies as temporary limitations. For the intended LLP use case—tracks originating from displaced vertices—this is not a peripheral caveat: the geometric hit-counting rule has been validated only for prompt tau-decay products, and displaced tracks can enter the CDC at unusual angles, begin inside the tracking volume, or have truncated hit patterns. The assumption that these inefficiencies are 'temporary' or negligible is unquantified and unsupported. Either provide a displaced-track validation (e.g., using a GEANT4 sample with LLP decays) or explicitly restrict the claimed range of validity and treat the result as an upper bound with a quantitative discussion of how much the true efficiency may be lower.
  3. [Section 3] The comparison in Fig. 2 is made visually, with the statement that 'the best match is obtained' for n_s_inner=2, n_s=10. The paper does not specify how the TrackEff error bars are computed, what the statistical uncertainty of the Belle II measurement is, or what goodness-of-fit measure was used. Consequently, the choice of defaults is not reproducible, and the claim that the efficiency dependence on thresholds is 'not strong' is not quantified. Please include the statistical procedure (e.g., a defined chi-square over the shown bins) and state the sources of the error bars.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Ref. [3]] Ref. [3] is titled 'B2TrEst', while the text and abstract refer to the package as 'TrackEff'; this naming inconsistency may confuse readers who try to access the software.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The figure caption would benefit from stating explicitly that the 20-hit requirement is applied to the TrackEff points; currently the connection is made only in the body text.
  3. [Section 2.2] There are several typographical and grammatical errors: 'along thez-direction' should be 'along the z-direction', 'azimutual' should be 'azimuthal', and 'TrackEff take arc-length steps' should be 'TrackEff takes arc-length steps'.
  4. [Section 3] The sentence 'The tracking efficiency is the fraction of events in which all three pions were found' could be clarified to distinguish track-level efficiency from event-level efficiency, and it should be made explicit that the TrackEff estimate in Fig. 2 uses the same event-level definition as Ref. [27].
  5. [Section 2.2] The default arc-length step Δs=1 mm is introduced, but it is not listed among the user-tunable parameters; please state whether Δs is adjustable and whether the results depend on its value.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The per-cell thresholds are tuned to the same Belle II tau-tau curve shown as the Fig. 2 validation, making that agreement in-sample; the geometric hit-counting model itself is not reduced to the fit.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3, 'Validation and parameter tuning', Fig. 2]
    "To validate TrackEff and tune its default parameters, we compared its efficiency estimate to measurements performed on full Belle II Monte Carlo and on detector-collected data, published in Ref. [27]. ... Nonetheless, the best match is obtained with the values of ninner s = 2, ns = 10, which are, therefore, taken to be the default in TrackEff."

    The same Belle II tau-tau efficiency curve from Ref. [27] both sets the per-cell thresholds (ninner_s=2, ns=10) and serves, in Fig. 2, as the reference curve overlaid with the TrackEff estimate. Because the thresholds are chosen to match that curve, the agreement in Fig. 2 is in-sample and forced by construction, not an independent validation. The geometric hit-counting model, trajectory propagation, and 20-hit requirement are not derived from the fitted curve, so the circularity is confined to the validation claim rather than making the whole package equivalent to its input. The paper's explicit note that real track-finding/vertexing inefficiencies can reduce the true efficiency is a limitation, not a circular step.

full rationale

The only load-bearing circularity is the in-sample character of Section 3's validation. The default per-cell step thresholds (ninner_s=2, ns=10) are explicitly chosen because they give the best match to the Belle II tau-tau tracking efficiency of Ref. [27]; the same curve is then reproduced in Fig. 2 as the comparison, so the displayed agreement is a fit-quality plot rather than a prediction. This reduces the quoted 'reproduction' of the Belle II efficiency curve by construction. The rest of the derivation is self-contained: the hit-counting principle is motivated by Belle II track-quality requirements (Refs. [9,22,23]), the CDC geometry comes from the Belle II TDR [4], and the trajectory equations are taken from the cited external references [29,30]. No load-bearing step relies on a self-citation: the authors' own LLP-search papers [1,10,11,12] are used only as motivation/context, not as evidence for TrackEff's validity. The paper's own limitation note in Sec. 2.1 - that track-finding and vertexing inefficiencies may reduce the efficiency below the TrackEff estimate - is a genuine caveat for the LLP use case but is not circular; it is weighed here as support for keeping the score moderate rather than high. Overall, the model is not equivalent to its input, but the headline validation is in-sample, so a moderate score is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of fitted thresholds, a standard track-propagation model, and a simplified detector geometry. The load-bearing assumptions are the 20-hit reconstruction criterion and the extrapolation of a tau-decay validation to displaced tracks. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • inner superlayer step threshold n_s_inner = 2
    Tuned in Section 3 so TrackEff best matches the Belle II track-efficiency curve; applies to innermost superlayer cells.
  • drift chamber step threshold n_s = 10
    Tuned in Section 3 together with n_s_inner to the same curve; applies to most CDC cells.
  • required number of CDC hits = 20
    Default detection criterion chosen from Belle II track-quality requirements (Refs [9,22]); not fitted but load-bearing.
  • arc-length step size delta_s = 1 mm
    Default step used to decide when a cell registers a hit; user-modifiable, with no sensitivity study shown.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A charged particle will be reconstructed if it leaves at least 20 hits in the CDC.
    Section 2.1 states this is the criterion, based on Belle II track-quality requirements.
  • ad hoc to paper A cell registers a hit only if the track traverses at least n_s steps inside it.
    Section 2.2 introduces this rule to model weak ionization near cell edges.
  • domain assumption Track propagation in a uniform 1.5 T magnetic field is described by the helicoidal equations from Refs [29,30].
    Appendix A uses these standard equations for all trajectory calculations.
  • domain assumption The simplified CDC geometry based on Belle II TDR preserves the hit-counting properties relevant for reconstruction.
    Section 2.2 models superlayers and cells as rectangular in r-phi space, ignoring stereo layers and detailed cell shapes.
  • ad hoc to paper Track-finding, combinatorial, and vertexing inefficiencies are either negligible or temporary and can be ignored.
    Section 2.1 argues these are temporary limitations and that TrackEff represents future achievable performance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Estimating the track-reconstruction efficiency in phenomenological proposals of long-lived-particle searches." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YWPFOOYI

@misc{pith2026250100857,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Estimating the track-reconstruction efficiency in phenomenological proposals of long-lived-particle searches},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YWPFOOYI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00857}
}
read the original abstract

Phenomenological proposals of searches for new, long-lived particles face a challenge when estimating the reconstruction efficiency of displaced charged-particle tracks. The efficiency depends not only on the charged-particle's momentum vector, but also on its production point in relation to the detector boundary and substructure elements. Phenomenological studies generally do not have access to GEANT4-based simulation, which is used for calculating the efficiency in experimental analyses. To address this need, we have developed TrackEff, a python software package for estimating the track-reconstruction efficiency. The default detector geometry within TrackEff is that of the Belle~II drift chamber. However, tunable parameters enable modification of the geometry to correspond to other tracker configurations. TrackEff uses a simplified model of the tracker to determine the number of detector hits associated with each track. The user can then decide whether the track would be detected based on the number of hits, potentially in association with any other information.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00857 by the authors.

Figure 6
Figure 6. of Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_6.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Searching for long-lived light neutralinos from $B$-meson decays with baryonic R-parity violation at Belle II

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Belle II could detect long-lived bino neutralinos produced in B-meson decays, with a new partial-reconstruction method sensitive to RPV couplings far beyond existing bounds.

  2. Potential for the discovery of the protophobic boson at the STCF

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Detector-level simulations indicate the proposed STCF drift chamber could discover the 17 MeV protophobic X17 boson through displaced electron-positron vertices if Standard Model backgrounds stay below about 10^4 even...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [27]

    Report No

    Belle II Collaboration: Measurement of the tracking efficiency and fake rate with e+e− → τ +τ − events. Report No. BELLE2-NOTE-PL-2020-014 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    Lee, L., Ohm, C., Soffer, A., Yu, T.-T.: Collider Searches for Long-Lived Particles Beyond the Standard Model. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 106, 210–255 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.02.006 arXiv:1810.12602 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  3. [2]

    Agostinelli, S., et al.: GEANT4 - A Simulation Toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250–303 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003

  4. [3]

    Zenodo (2024)

    Bertholet, E., Soffer, A.: B2TrEst: charged particle reconstruction efficiency esti- mator for the Belle II experiment (v1.1.0). Zenodo (2024). https://doi.org/10. 5281/zenodo.13831999 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13831999

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.13831999 2024

  5. [4]

    Abe, T., et al.: Belle II Technical Design Report (2010) arXiv:1011.0352 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2010

  6. [5]

    PTEP 2019(12), 123–01 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptz106 arXiv:1808.10567 [hep-ex]

    Altmannshofer, W., et al.: The Belle II Physics Book. PTEP 2019(12), 123–01 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptz106 arXiv:1808.10567 [hep-ex]. [Erra- tum: PTEP 2020, 029201 (2020)]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [6]

    Adachi, I., et al.: Search for a long-lived spin-0 mediator in b →s transitions at the Belle II experiment. Phys. Rev. D 108(11), 111104 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L111104 arXiv:2306.02830 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [7]

    Lees, J.P., et al.: Search for Long-Lived Particles in e+e− Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(17), 171801 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.171801 arXiv:1502.02580 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

Show all 30 references
  1. [8]

    Liventsev, D., et al.: Search for heavy neutrinos at Belle. Phys. Rev. D 87(7), 071102 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.071102 arXiv:1301.1105 [hep-ex]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 099903 (2017)]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Nayak, M., et al.: Search for a heavy neutral lepton that mixes predominantly with the tau neutrino (2024) arXiv:2402.02580 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    JHEP 02, 211 (2021) https://doi.org/10

    Dey, S., Dib, C.O., Carlos Helo, J., Nayak, M., Neill, N.A., Soffer, A., Wang, Z.S.: Long-lived light neutralinos at Belle II. JHEP 02, 211 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1007/JHEP02(2021)211 arXiv:2012.00438 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Bertholet, E., Chakraborty, S., Loladze, V., Okui, T., Soffer, A., Tobioka, K.: Heavy QCD axion at Belle II: Displaced and prompt signals. Phys. Rev. D105(7), 8 071701 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L071701 arXiv:2108.10331 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Dib, C.O., Helo, J.C., Nayak, M., Neill, N.A., Soffer, A., Zamora-Saa, J.: Search- ing for a sterile neutrino that mixes predominantly with ντ at B factories. Phys. Rev. D 101(9), 093003 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.093003 arXiv:1908.09719 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Ferber, T., Garcia-Cely, C., Schmidt-Hoberg, K.: BelleII sensitivity to long–lived dark photons. Phys. Lett. B 833, 137373 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physletb.2022.137373 arXiv:2202.03452 [hep-ph]

    2022

  7. [14]

    JHEP 04, 057 (2022) https://doi

    Zhou, G., G¨ unther, J.Y., Wang, Z.S., Vries, J., Dreiner, H.K.: Long-lived sterile neutrinos at Belle II in effective field theory. JHEP 04, 057 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1007/JHEP04(2022)057 arXiv:2111.04403 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [15]

    JHEP 04, 269 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/JHEP04(2021)269 arXiv:2101.02503 [hep-ph]

    Kang, D.W., Ko, P., Lu, C.-T.: Exploring properties of long-lived particles in inelastic dark matter models at Belle II. JHEP 04, 269 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/JHEP04(2021)269 arXiv:2101.02503 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [16]

    JHEP 04, 146 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)146 arXiv:2012.08595 [hep-ph]

    Duerr, M., Ferber, T., Garcia-Cely, C., Hearty, C., Schmidt-Hoberg, K.: Long- lived Dark Higgs and Inelastic Dark Matter at Belle II. JHEP 04, 146 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)146 arXiv:2012.08595 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [17]

    JHEP 02, 039 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2020)039 arXiv:1911.03176 [hep-ph]

    Duerr, M., Ferber, T., Hearty, C., Kahlhoefer, F., Schmidt-Hoberg, K., Tunney, P.: Invisible and displaced dark matter signatures at Belle II. JHEP 02, 039 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2020)039 arXiv:1911.03176 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Filimonova, A., Sch¨ afer, R., Westhoff, S.: Probing dark sectors with long-lived particles at BELLE II. Phys. Rev. D 101(9), 095006 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.101.095006 arXiv:1911.03490 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Jaeckel, J., Phan, A.V.: Searching Dark Photons using displaced vertices at Belle II – with backgrounds (2023) arXiv:2312.12522 [hep-ph]

    2023

  13. [20]

    JHEP 05, 141 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP05(2022)141 arXiv:2203.03280 [hep-ph]

    Bandyopadhyay, T., Chakraborty, S., Trifinopoulos, S.: Displaced searches for light vector bosons at Belle II. JHEP 05, 141 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP05(2022)141 arXiv:2203.03280 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [21]

    JHEP 04, 131 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP04(2023)131 arXiv:2201.06580 [hep-ph]

    Ferber, T., Filimonova, A., Sch¨ afer, R., Westhoff, S.: Displaced or invisible? ALPs from B decays at Belle II. JHEP 04, 131 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP04(2023)131 arXiv:2201.06580 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Adachi, I., et al.: Measurement of branching fractions and direct CP asymmetries for B →Kπ and B →ππ decays at Belle II. Phys. Rev. D 109(1), 012001 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.012001 arXiv:2310.06381 [hep-ex] 9

    2024 arXiv

  16. [23]

    : Track finding at Belle II

    Bertacchi, V., et al. : Track finding at Belle II. Comput. Phys. Commun. 259, 107610 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107610 arXiv:2003.12466 [physics.ins-det]

    2021

  17. [24]

    Reuter, L., et al.: End-to-End Multi-Track Reconstruction using Graph Neural Networks at Belle II (2024) arXiv:2411.13596 [physics.ins-det]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [25]

    JHEP 05, 026 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026 arXiv:hep-ph/0603175

    Sjostrand, T., Mrenna, S., Skands, P.Z.: PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Man- ual. JHEP 05, 026 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026 arXiv:hep-ph/0603175

    2006 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Lange, D.J.: The EvtGen particle decay simulation package. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462, 152–155 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00089-4

    2001 doi

  20. [28]

    Allmendinger, T., et al.: Track Finding Efficiency in BaBar. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 704, 44–59 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.11.184 arXiv:1207.2849 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Alcaraz Maestre, J.: Tracking charged particles in the zero curvature limit (2021) arXiv:2109.00845 [physics.ins-det]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    : Global decay chain vertex fitting at Belle II

    Krohn, J.-F., et al. : Global decay chain vertex fitting at Belle II. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 976, 164269 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020. 164269 arXiv:1901.11198 [hep-ex] 10

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.