REVIEW 4 cited by
Robustness of AI-based weather forecasts in a changing climate
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Data-driven machine learning models for weather forecasting have made transformational progress in the last 1-2 years, with state-of-the-art ones now outperforming the best physics-based models for a wide range of skill scores. Given the strong links between weather and climate modelling, this raises the question whether machine learning models could also revolutionize climate science, for example by informing mitigation and adaptation to climate change or to generate larger ensembles for more robust uncertainty estimates. Here, we show that current state-of-the-art machine learning models trained for weather forecasting in present-day climate produce skillful forecasts across different climate states corresponding to pre-industrial, present-day, and future 2.9K warmer climates. This indicates that the dynamics shaping the weather on short timescales may not differ fundamentally in a changing climate. It also demonstrates out-of-distribution generalization capabilities of the machine learning models that are a critical prerequisite for climate applications. Nonetheless, two of the models show a global-mean cold bias in the forecasts for the future warmer climate state, i.e. they drift towards the colder present-day climate they have been trained for. A similar result is obtained for the pre-industrial case where two out of three models show a warming. We discuss possible remedies for these biases and analyze their spatial distribution, revealing complex warming and cooling patterns that are partly related to missing ocean-sea ice and land surface information in the training data. Despite these current limitations, our results suggest that data-driven machine learning models will provide powerful tools for climate science and transform established approaches by complementing conventional physics-based models.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Spatial Generalization Tests for Machine Learning-based Weather Models to Assess Physical Consistency
Rotating or reversing the simulated planet reveals that GraphCast and NeuralGCM encode present-day geography rather than spatially invariant physics, while a traditional GCM passes the same tests to numerical precision.
-
ACE2-SOM: Coupling an ML atmospheric emulator to a slab ocean and learning the sensitivity of climate to changed CO$_2$
ACE2-SOM, an ML atmospheric emulator with a slab ocean, accurately emulates equilibrium climate sensitivity to CO2 doubling, tripling, and quadrupling, but mishandles non-equilibrium transitions.
-
Prediction of steady states in a marine ecosystem model by a machine learning technique
A conditional variational autoencoder with mass correction maps ecosystem model parameters to near-steady tracer fields, and using these as spin-up initial values cuts required model years by 50 to 95%.
-
FengWu-W2S: A deep learning model for seamless weather-to-subseasonal forecast of global atmosphere
An AI model trained on ERA5 generates skillful 6-hourly global forecasts out to 42 days, matching or exceeding ECMWF on subseasonal indices like MJO and NAO.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.