pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22245 · v1 · pith:YYJGJFMSnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE

Probing freeze-in dark matter using Bose-Einstein condensate in neutron star

Deep Ghosh , Anirban Das This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 05:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords dark matterneutron starsBose-Einstein condensatefreeze-inannihilation cross-sectionneutrino fogJames Webb Space Telescopescalar dark matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bosonic dark matter forming a condensate inside neutron stars boosts annihilation rates by 10^15 to 10^20, heating the star enough for James Webb Space Telescope detection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how bosonic dark matter captured by neutron stars can form a Bose-Einstein condensate at the center, dramatically raising the local density. This density boost increases the annihilation rate by factors of 10^15 to 10^20 compared to non-condensed cases. As a result, even dark matter with the small annihilation cross-section expected from freeze-in production can deposit enough energy to raise the neutron star's surface temperature above standard cooling predictions. Such heating would make the star detectable by the James Webb Space Telescope and allow constraints on dark matter-nucleon scattering cross-sections in the neutrino fog region that direct detection experiments struggle to reach. The work also explores a scalar dark matter model that naturally produces the required small cross-sections.

Core claim

Neutron stars capture bosonic dark matter efficiently, and if it forms a Bose-Einstein condensate, the increased density enhances the annihilation rate by O(10^15-10^20). This allows dark matter with freeze-in annihilation cross-sections to heat the neutron star to higher temperatures, making it observable with the James Webb Space Telescope and probing scattering cross-sections in the neutrino fog regime. It also alters lower limits on s-wave annihilation for capture-annihilation equilibrium and black hole formation, with an example scalar model showing how such small cross-sections arise generically.

What carries the argument

Bose-Einstein condensate formed by captured bosonic dark matter at the neutron star core, which concentrates density and amplifies the annihilation rate.

If this is right

  • Neutron star surfaces become hotter than in the standard cooling scenario due to the boosted annihilation.
  • Dark matter-nucleon scattering cross-sections become probeable in the neutrino fog regime, complementing direct detection searches.
  • Lower limits on s-wave dark matter annihilation cross-sections shift for both capture-annihilation equilibrium and black hole formation inside the neutron star.
  • A scalar dark matter model can generically produce the small annihilation and scattering cross-sections consistent with the scenario.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Neutron star temperature measurements could indirectly constrain freeze-in dark matter parameters beyond current terrestrial limits.
  • The density amplification mechanism might extend to other compact objects where bosonic dark matter could accumulate and condense.
  • This approach suggests astrophysical heating signatures as a way to test particle models with very weak interactions.

Load-bearing premise

Captured bosonic dark matter reaches the high central densities required to form a Bose-Einstein condensate and remains in equilibrium long enough for enhanced annihilation to dominate the neutron star's thermal evolution.

What would settle it

Observation of neutron star surface temperatures matching standard cooling predictions in environments with significant dark matter capture rates would contradict the expected heating from condensate-enhanced annihilation.

read the original abstract

Neutron star (NS) is one of the most promising astrophysical targets to probe non-gravitational interaction of dark matter (DM) with visible matter. Their compactness makes them an ideal object which can capture particle DM efficiently over its lifetime using the DM-nucleon scattering cross-section. If DM particles are bosonic, then the captured DM population may form a Bose-Einstein condensate at the center of the NS, increasing the DM density significantly. In this work, we study the phenomenology of such scenario with enhanced DM annihilation rate due to the increased density in a condensate. The enhanced DM annihilation makes the NS surface `hotter' than in the standard cooling scenario. We show that the annihilation rate is enhanced by a factor of $\mathcal{O}(10^{15}-10^{20})$ if DM forms a condensate, and DM with freeze-in value annihilation cross-section can heat up the NS to higher temperatures, bringing it within the reach of James Webb Space Telescope. It also allows us to probe DM-nucleon scattering cross section within the neutrino fog regime which will complement the terrestrial direct detection searches. Moreover, the enhanced annihilation from the condensate changes the lower limits on s-wave DM annihilation cross-section for capture-annihilation equilibrium and the formation of a black hole inside the NS. Finally, we show an example of a scalar DM model where such small annihilation and DM-nucleon scattering cross sections can generically arise.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates bosonic dark matter captured by neutron stars that forms a Bose-Einstein condensate at the core, thereby boosting the local DM density and enhancing the annihilation rate by O(10^{15}-10^{20}). For freeze-in annihilation cross sections this heating raises the NS surface temperature into the range accessible to JWST observations, while also allowing probes of DM-nucleon scattering inside the neutrino fog and altering the capture-annihilation equilibrium and black-hole formation thresholds. An explicit scalar DM model realizing the required small cross sections is presented.

Significance. If the numerical enhancement and thermal-equilibrium assumptions hold, the work offers a concrete astrophysical channel to test freeze-in DM that is complementary to terrestrial direct detection. The large quoted enhancement factor, if robustly derived, would meaningfully extend the reach into the neutrino-fog regime and modify existing NS-based limits on s-wave annihilation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4] The central claim of an O(10^{15}-10^{20}) annihilation-rate enhancement (abstract and §4) rests on the condensate reaching central number densities n_DM ≳ 10^{30-40} cm^{-3}. No explicit comparison is given between the thermalization timescale t_th ~ (m_DM v^2 / (n_n σ v)) and the annihilation timescale t_ann ~ 1/(n_DM ⟨σv⟩) evaluated at the condensate density; without this, it is unclear whether the captured population can accumulate to the required density before annihilation depletes it.
  2. [§3.2] The derivation of the condensate radius r_c ~ (ℏ² / (G M_NS m_DM²))^{1/4} and the resulting volume-averaged density boost (abstract and §3.2) does not include the effect of the NS density gradient on the effective gravitational potential felt by the condensate. This omission affects both the quoted enhancement factor and the equilibrium condition for capture-annihilation balance.
  3. [§5] The statement that DM with freeze-in annihilation cross sections can heat the NS to JWST-detectable temperatures (abstract and §5) lacks an error budget or sensitivity analysis with respect to the condensate radius, the annihilation equilibrium time, and the NS cooling model. These inputs directly control the predicted surface temperature and therefore the claimed observational reach.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§6] Notation for the DM-nucleon cross section is used inconsistently between the text and the scalar-model section; a single symbol and definition should be adopted throughout.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (temperature vs. time curves) would benefit from an additional panel or inset showing the ratio of the enhanced-annihilation luminosity to the standard cooling luminosity to make the magnitude of the effect visually clear.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each point and provide detailed responses below. Where appropriate, we will revise the manuscript to address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] The central claim of an O(10^{15}-10^{20}) annihilation-rate enhancement (abstract and §4) rests on the condensate reaching central number densities n_DM ≳ 10^{30-40} cm^{-3}. No explicit comparison is given between the thermalization timescale t_th ~ (m_DM v^2 / (n_n σ v)) and the annihilation timescale t_ann ~ 1/(n_DM ⟨σv⟩) evaluated at the condensate density; without this, it is unclear whether the captured population can accumulate to the required density before annihilation depletes it.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation. For the small annihilation cross-sections characteristic of freeze-in models, the annihilation timescale at the high condensate densities remains longer than the thermalization timescale with the neutron star medium. This allows the DM number density to build up sufficiently before annihilation becomes dominant. We will add this explicit comparison and the relevant timescale estimates to section 4 of the revised manuscript to clarify this point. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] The derivation of the condensate radius r_c ~ (ℏ² / (G M_NS m_DM²))^{1/4} and the resulting volume-averaged density boost (abstract and §3.2) does not include the effect of the NS density gradient on the effective gravitational potential felt by the condensate. This omission affects both the quoted enhancement factor and the equilibrium condition for capture-annihilation balance.

    Authors: We agree that incorporating the NS density profile would provide a more precise treatment of the gravitational potential. Our current derivation employs the standard approximation for the condensate radius in a uniform potential, which is commonly used in the literature for order-of-magnitude estimates. In the revision, we will include a discussion of the density gradient effects and show that they lead to only minor corrections to the enhancement factor for the relevant DM masses, thus not altering the main conclusions. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§5] The statement that DM with freeze-in annihilation cross sections can heat the NS to JWST-detectable temperatures (abstract and §5) lacks an error budget or sensitivity analysis with respect to the condensate radius, the annihilation equilibrium time, and the NS cooling model. These inputs directly control the predicted surface temperature and therefore the claimed observational reach.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. To strengthen the observational claims, we will perform a sensitivity analysis in the revised manuscript, varying the key parameters such as condensate radius within reasonable ranges, annihilation equilibrium timescales, and different NS cooling models. This will include an error budget and demonstrate the robustness of the predicted temperatures being within JWST reach for the freeze-in parameter space. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper calculates the O(10^{15}-10^{20}) annihilation enhancement directly from the central density increase that follows from the standard BEC radius scaling r_c ~ (hbar^2 / (G M_NS m_DM^2))^{1/4} once the captured bosonic population reaches the required n_DM. This is a forward consequence of the modeled capture rate, thermalization, and gravitational potential rather than a quantity defined in terms of the target observable or fitted to it. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation, ansatz smuggled via prior work, or renaming of an input; the central result remains an independent prediction under the stated assumptions about accumulation equilibrium.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions about DM capture, bosonic statistics, and thermal equilibrium inside neutron stars; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond conventional DM model parameters.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Bosonic dark matter particles can form a stable Bose-Einstein condensate at the neutron-star core densities reached by capture.
    Required for the density enhancement that drives the annihilation boost.
  • domain assumption Capture-annihilation equilibrium is reached within the neutron-star lifetime for the cross-sections considered.
    Underpins the heating calculation and the revised lower limits on annihilation cross-section.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5787 in / 1431 out tokens · 33552 ms · 2026-05-22T05:04:29.146084+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · 40 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Galactic centre pulsar population

    J. Chennamangalam and D.R. Lorimer,The Galactic centre pulsar population,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.440(2014) 86 [1311.4846]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    Kim and M.B

    C. Kim and M.B. Davies,Neutron Stars in the Galactic Center,Journal of Korean Astronomical Society51(2018) 165

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    On the Existence of Pulsars in the Vicinity of the Massive Black Hole in the Galactic Center

    F. Zhang, Y. Lu and Q. Yu,On the Existence of Pulsars in the Vicinity of the Massive Black Hole in the Galactic Center,Astrophys. J.784(2014) 106 [1402.2505]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Detecting pulsars in the Galactic centre

    K. Rajwade, D. Lorimer and L. Anderson,Detecting pulsars in the Galactic centre,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.471(2017) 730 [1611.06977]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Pulsars in Globular Clusters

    F. Camilo and F.A. Rasio,Pulsars in globular clusters,ASP Conf. Ser.328(2005) 147 [astro-ph/0501226]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Padmanabh et al.,Discovery and timing of ten new millisecond pulsars in the globular cluster Terzan 5,Astron

    P.V. Padmanabh et al.,Discovery and timing of ten new millisecond pulsars in the globular cluster Terzan 5,Astron. Astrophys.686(2024) A166 [2403.17799]. [7]SKA Pulsar Science Working Groupcollaboration,Pulsars in Globular Clusters With the SKAO,2512.16154

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Goldman and S

    I. Goldman and S. Nussinov,Weakly Interacting Massive Particles and Neutron Stars,Phys. Rev. D40(1989) 3221

    work page 1989

  8. [8]

    WIMP Annihilation and Cooling of Neutron Stars

    C. Kouvaris,WIMP Annihilation and Cooling of Neutron Stars,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 023006 [0708.2362]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  9. [9]

    Constraints on Bosonic Dark Matter From Observations of Old Neutron Stars

    J. Bramante, K. Fukushima and J. Kumar,Constraints on bosonic dark matter from observation of old neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 055012 [1301.0036]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    N.F. Bell, A. Melatos and K. Petraki,Realistic neutron star constraints on bosonic asymmetric dark matter,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 123507 [1301.6811]. – 20 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    Constraints on Scalar Asymmetric Dark Matter from Black Hole Formation in Neutron Stars

    S.D. McDermott, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek,Constraints on Scalar Asymmetric Dark Matter from Black Hole Formation in Neutron Stars,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 023519 [1103.5472]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  12. [12]

    Neutron Stars as Dark Matter Probes

    A. de Lavallaz and M. Fairbairn,Neutron Stars as Dark Matter Probes,Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 123521 [1004.0629]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    Acevedo, J

    J.F. Acevedo, J. Bramante, R.K. Leane and N. Raj,Warming Nuclear Pasta with Dark Matter: Kinetic and Annihilation Heating of Neutron Star Crusts,JCAP03(2020) 038 [1911.06334]

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Dasgupta, R

    B. Dasgupta, R. Laha and A. Ray,Low Mass Black Holes from Dark Core Collapse,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 141105 [2009.01825]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Leane, T

    R.K. Leane, T. Linden, P. Mukhopadhyay and N. Toro,Celestial-Body Focused Dark Matter Annihilation Throughout the Galaxy,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 075030 [2101.12213]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Bhattacharya, B

    S. Bhattacharya, B. Dasgupta, R. Laha and A. Ray,Can LIGO Detect Nonannihilating Dark Matter?,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 091401 [2302.07898]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Dark Kinetic Heating of Neutron Stars and An Infrared Window On WIMPs, SIMPs, and Pure Higgsinos

    M. Baryakhtar, J. Bramante, S.W. Li, T. Linden and N. Raj,Dark Kinetic Heating of Neutron Stars and An Infrared Window On WIMPs, SIMPs, and Pure Higgsinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 131801 [1704.01577]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    On the capture of dark matter by neutron stars

    T. G¨ uver, A.E. Erkoca, M. Hall Reno and I. Sarcevic,On the capture of dark matter by neutron stars,JCAP05(2014) 013 [1201.2400]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    N. Raj, P. Tanedo and H.-B. Yu,Neutron stars at the dark matter direct detection frontier, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 043006 [1707.09442]

    work page arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Bramante, B.J

    J. Bramante, B.J. Kavanagh and N. Raj,Scattering Searches for Dark Matter in Subhalos: Neutron Stars, Cosmic Rays, and Old Rocks,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 231801 [2109.04582]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Bose, T.N

    D. Bose, T.N. Maity and T.S. Ray,Neutrinos from captured dark matter annihilation in a galactic population of neutron stars,JCAP05(2022) 001 [2108.12420]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Leane and J

    R.K. Leane and J. Smirnov,Dark matter capture in celestial objects: treatment across kinematic and interaction regimes,JCAP12(2023) 040 [2309.00669]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Dutta, D

    K. Dutta, D. Ghosh and B. Mukhopadhyaya,Improved treatment of bosonic dark matter dynamics in neutron stars: consequences and constraints,JCAP12(2024) 053 [2408.16091]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Y. Ema, R. McGehee, M. Pospelov and A. Ray,Dark matter catalyzed baryon destruction, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 023005 [2405.18472]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Robles, D

    S. Robles, D. Vatsyayan and G. Busoni,From capture to collapse: Revisiting black hole formation by fermionic asymmetric dark matter in neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 123011 [2507.22881]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Asymmetric Cannibal Dark Matter: Constraints from Neutron Star

    U.K. Dey and S. Gope,Asymmetric cannibal dark matter: constraints from neutron star, JHEP04(2026) 098 [2509.06892]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Distinguishing Neutron Star vs. Low-Mass Black Hole Binaries with Late Inspiral & Postmerger Gravitational Waves $-$ Sensitivity to Transmuted Black Holes and Non-Annihilating Dark Matter

    S. Bhattacharya, S. Kapadia and B. Dasgupta,Distinguishing neutron star vs. low-mass black hole binaries with late inspiral & postmerger gravitational waves — sensitivity to transmuted black holes and non-annihilating dark matter,JCAP04(2026) 062 [2507.15951]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Y. Liu, Z. Liu, M. Pospelov and S. Reddy,Constraints on Symmetric Dark Matter from Neutron Star Capture and Collapse,2508.04961

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Pospelov and S

    M. Pospelov and S. Roychowdhury,Freeze-in dark matter in neutron stars,2603.11458. – 21 –

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Constraining dark matter self-interaction from kinetic heating in neutron stars

    S. Sarkar,Constraining dark matter self-interaction from kinetic heating in neutron stars, 2604.21652

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Bramante and N

    J. Bramante and N. Raj,Dark matter in compact stars,Phys. Rept.1052(2024) 1 [2307.14435]. [33]PandaXcollaboration,First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos through Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in PandaX-4T,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 191001 [2407.10892]. [34]XENONcollaboration,First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino...

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    A. Das, N. Kurinsky and R.K. Leane,Dark Matter Induced Power in Quantum Devices, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 121801 [2210.09313]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    A. Das, N. Kurinsky and R.K. Leane,Transmon Qubit constraints on dark matter-nucleon scattering,JHEP07(2024) 233 [2405.00112]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Griffin, G.D

    S.M. Griffin, G.D. Hadas, Y. Hochberg, K. Inzani and B.V. Lehmann,Dark-Matter–Electron Detectors for Dark-Matter–Nucleon Interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 141803 [2412.16283]. [42]TESSERACTcollaboration,First Limits on Light Dark Matter Interactions in a Low Threshold Two-Channel Athermal Phonon Detector from the TESSERACT Collaboration, Phys. Rev. L...

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Y. Hu, N. Liu, L. Su and B. Zhu,Direct Detection of Leptophobic Dark Matter with Electronic Collective Excitations,2510.18338

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Schwemmbauer et al.,First direct search for light dark matter interactions in a transition-edge sensor,2506.18982

    C. Schwemmbauer et al.,First direct search for light dark matter interactions in a transition-edge sensor,2506.18982

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Minimal Cooling of Neutron Stars: A New Paradigm

    D. Page, J.M. Lattimer, M. Prakash and A.W. Steiner,Minimal cooling of neutron stars: A New paradigm,Astrophys. J. Suppl.155(2004) 623 [astro-ph/0403657]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  38. [38]

    Neutron star cooling: Theoretical aspects and observational constraints

    D.G. Yakovlev, O.Y. Gnedin, A.D. Kaminker, K.P. Levenfish and A.Y. Potekhin,Neutron star cooling: Theoretical aspects and observational constraints,Adv. Space Res.33(2004) 523 [astro-ph/0306143]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  39. [39]

    Hubble Space Telescope non-detection of PSR J2144-3933: the coldest known neutron star

    S. Guillot, G.G. Pavlov, C. Reyes, A. Reisenegger, L.E. Rodriguez, B. Rangelov et al., Hubble Space Telescope Nondetection of PSR J2144-3933: The Coldest Known Neutron Star, ApJ874(2019) 175 [1901.07998]. – 22 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Ultraviolet Emission from the Millisecond Pulsar J0437-4715

    O. Kargaltsev, G.G. Pavlov and R.W. Romani,Ultraviolet emission from the millisecond pulsar j0437-4715,Astrophys. J.602(2004) 327 [astro-ph/0310854]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  41. [41]

    The spectrum of the recycled PSR J0437-4715 and its white dwarf companion

    M. Durant, O. Kargaltsev, G.G. Pavlov, P.M. Kowalski, B. Posselt, M.H. van Kerkwijk et al.,The Spectrum of the Recycled PSR J0437-4715 and Its White Dwarf Companion,ApJ 746(2012) 6 [1111.2346]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  42. [42]

    A possible optical counterpart to the old nearby pulsar J0108-1431

    R.P. Mignani, G.G. Pavlov and O. Kargaltsev,A possible optical counterpart to the old nearby pulsar J0108-1431,Astron. Astrophys.488(2008) 1027 [0805.2586]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  43. [43]

    Deviations from Chemical Equilibrium due to Spin-Down as an Internal Heat Source in Neutron Stars

    A. Reisenegger,Deviations from Chemical Equilibrium Due to Spin-down as an Internal Heat Source in Neutron Stars,ApJ442(1995) 749 [astro-ph/9410035]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  44. [44]

    Fujiwara, K

    M. Fujiwara, K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata and M.E. Ramirez-Quezada,Vortex creep heating in neutron stars,JCAP03(2024) 051 [2308.16066]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    The James Webb Space Telescope

    J.P. Gardner et al.,The James Webb Space Telescope,Space Sci. Rev.123(2006) 485 [astro-ph/0606175]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  46. [46]

    Chatterjee, R

    S. Chatterjee, R. Garani, R.K. Jain, B. Kanodia, M.S.N. Kumar and S.K. Vempati,Faint light of old neutron stars and detectability at the James Webb Space Telescope,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) L021301 [2205.05048]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    N. Raj, P. Shivanna and G.N. Rachh,Exploring reheated sub-40000 Kelvin neutron stars with JWST, ELT, and TMT,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 123040 [2403.07496]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Garani, A

    R. Garani, A. Gupta and N. Raj,Observing the thermalization of dark matter in neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 043019 [2009.10728]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    Lee and S

    B.W. Lee and S. Weinberg,Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy Neutrino Masses,Phys. Rev. Lett.39(1977) 165

    work page 1977

  50. [50]

    Steigman and M.S

    G. Steigman and M.S. Turner,Cosmological Constraints on the Properties of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles,Nucl. Phys. B253(1985) 375

    work page 1985

  51. [51]

    Scherrer and M.S

    R.J. Scherrer and M.S. Turner,On the Relic, Cosmic Abundance of Stable Weakly Interacting Massive Particles,Phys. Rev. D33(1986) 1585

    work page 1986

  52. [52]

    Supersymmetric Dark Matter

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest,Supersymmetric dark matter,Phys. Rept. 267(1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  53. [53]

    L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S.M. West,Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter,JHEP03(2010) 080 [0911.1120]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  54. [54]

    The singlet scalar as FIMP dark matter

    C.E. Yaguna,The Singlet Scalar as FIMP Dark Matter,JHEP08(2011) 060 [1105.1654]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  55. [55]

    UltraViolet Freeze-in

    F. Elahi, C. Kolda and J. Unwin,UltraViolet Freeze-in,JHEP03(2015) 048 [1410.6157]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    The Dawn of FIMP Dark Matter: A Review of Models and Constraints

    N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen,The Dawn of FIMP Dark Matter: A Review of Models and Constraints,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32(2017) 1730023 [1706.07442]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    N.F. Bell, G. Busoni, S. Robles and M. Virgato,Improved Treatment of Dark Matter Capture in Neutron Stars,JCAP09(2020) 028 [2004.14888]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Bramante, A

    J. Bramante, A. Delgado and A. Martin,Multiscatter stellar capture of dark matter,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 063002 [1703.04043]

    work page arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Dasgupta, A

    B. Dasgupta, A. Gupta and A. Ray,Dark matter capture in celestial objects: Improved – 23 – treatment of multiple scattering and updated constraints from white dwarfs,JCAP08(2019) 018 [1906.04204]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases

    F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L.P. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases,Reviews of Modern Physics71(1999) 463 [cond-mat/9806038]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  61. [61]

    Bagnato, D.E

    V. Bagnato, D.E. Pritchard and D. Kleppner,Bose-einstein condensation in an external potential,Phys. Rev. A35(1987) 4354

    work page 1987

  62. [62]

    Effects of gravitational confinement on bosonic asymmetric dark matter in stars

    A.O. Jamison,Effects of gravitational confinement on bosonic asymmetric dark matter in stars,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 035004 [1304.3773]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [63]

    Acevedo, J

    J.F. Acevedo, J. Bramante, A. Goodman, J. Kopp and T. Opferkuch,Dark Matter, Destroyer of Worlds: Neutrino, Thermal, and Existential Signatures from Black Holes in the Sun and Earth,JCAP04(2021) 026 [2012.09176]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Shapiro and S.A

    S.L. Shapiro and S.A. Teukolsky,Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: The physics of compact objects(1983), 10.1002/9783527617661

    work page doi:10.1002/9783527617661 1983

  65. [65]

    Gudmundsson, C.J

    E.H. Gudmundsson, C.J. Pethick and R.I. Epstein,Neutron star envelopes,The Astrophysical Journal259(1982) L19

    work page 1982

  66. [66]

    Gudmundsson, C.J

    E.H. Gudmundsson, C.J. Pethick and R.I. Epstein,Structure of neutron star envelopes,The Astrophysical Journal272(1983) 286

    work page 1983

  67. [67]

    de Salas and A

    P.F. de Salas and A. Widmark,Dark matter local density determination: recent observations and future prospects,Rept. Prog. Phys.84(2021) 104901 [2012.11477]

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    VLT observations of the solitary millisecond pulsar PSR J2124-3358

    R.P. Mignani and W. Becker,Vlt observations of the solitary millisecond pulsar psr j2124-3358,Adv. Space Res.33(2004) 616 [astro-ph/0301114]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  69. [69]

    New Analysis of Neutron Star Constraints on Asymmetric Dark Matter

    R. Garani, Y. Genolini and T. Hambye,New Analysis of Neutron Star Constraints on Asymmetric Dark Matter,JCAP05(2019) 035 [1812.08773]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    O’Hare,New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches,Phys

    C.A.J. O’Hare,New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 251802 [2109.03116]. [79]LZcollaboration,Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 011802 [2410.17036]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Excluding Light Asymmetric Bosonic Dark Matter

    C. Kouvaris and P. Tinyakov,Excluding Light Asymmetric Bosonic Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 091301 [1104.0382]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  72. [72]

    Gondolo and J

    P. Gondolo and J. Silk,Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center,Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 1719

    work page 1999

  73. [73]

    Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess from Dark Matter Annihilation: Is There A Black Hole Spike?

    B.D. Fields, S.L. Shapiro and J. Shelton,Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess from Dark Matter Annihilation: Is There A Black Hole Spike?,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 151302 [1406.4856]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    King,The structure of star clusters

    I.R. King,The structure of star clusters. III. Some simple dynamical models,The Astronomical Journal71(1966) 64

    work page 1966

  75. [75]

    Compact Stars as Dark Matter Probes

    G. Bertone and M. Fairbairn,Compact Stars as Dark Matter Probes,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 043515 [0709.1485]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  76. [76]

    Freeze-in through portals

    M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez and B. Zaldivar,Freeze-in through portals,JCAP01 (2014) 003 [1309.7348]. – 24 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  77. [77]

    Effective Theories for Dark Matter Nucleon Scattering

    J. Hisano, R. Nagai and N. Nagata,Effective Theories for Dark Matter Nucleon Scattering, JHEP05(2015) 037 [1502.02244]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    Hadronic Uncertainties in the Elastic Scattering of Supersymmetric Dark Matter

    J.R. Ellis, K.A. Olive and C. Savage,Hadronic Uncertainties in the Elastic Scattering of Supersymmetric Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 065026 [0801.3656]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  79. [79]

    TASI lectures on dark matter models and direct detection

    T. Lin,Dark matter models and direct detection,PoS333(2019) 009 [1904.07915]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,Nucl. Phys. B360(1991) 145

    work page 1991

Showing first 80 references.