REVIEW 2 cited by
ADoPT: LiDAR Spoofing Attack Detection Based on Point-Level Temporal Consistency
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ADoPT: LiDAR Spoofing Attack Detection Based on Point-Level Temporal Consistency
read the original abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are increasingly integrated into LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging)-based perception systems for autonomous vehicles (AVs), requiring robust performance under adversarial conditions. We aim to address the challenge of LiDAR spoofing attacks, where attackers inject fake objects into LiDAR data and fool AVs to misinterpret their environment and make erroneous decisions. However, current defense algorithms predominantly depend on perception outputs (i.e., bounding boxes) thus face limitations in detecting attackers given the bounding boxes are generated by imperfect perception models processing limited points, acquired based on the ego vehicle's viewpoint. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel framework, named ADoPT (Anomaly Detection based on Point-level Temporal consistency), which quantitatively measures temporal consistency across consecutive frames and identifies abnormal objects based on the coherency of point clusters. In our evaluation using the nuScenes dataset, our algorithm effectively counters various LiDAR spoofing attacks, achieving a low (< 10%) false positive ratio (FPR) and high (> 85%) true positive ratio (TPR), outperforming existing state-of-the-art defense methods, CARLO and 3D-TC2. Furthermore, our evaluation demonstrates the promising potential for accurate attack detection across various road environments.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses
The survey organizes over 400 papers on embodied AI safety into a multi-level taxonomy and flags overlooked issues such as fragile multimodal fusion and unstable planning under jailbreaks.
-
Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses
A multi-level taxonomy of risks, attacks, and defenses across the full embodied AI pipeline, synthesizing 500+ papers and flagging overlooked failure modes.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.