Pith. sign in

REVIEW

MQG4AI Towards Responsible High-risk AI -- Illustrated for Transparency Focusing on Explainability Techniques

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11889 v1 pith:YZLUAR7S submitted 2025-02-17 cs.CY

MQG4AI Towards Responsible High-risk AI -- Illustrated for Transparency Focusing on Explainability Techniques

classification cs.CY
keywords lifecycledevelopmentmqg4aiqualityresponsibleapproachcontinuousplanning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly integrated into critical domains, ensuring their responsible design and continuous development is imperative. Effective AI quality management (QM) requires tools and methodologies that address the complexities of the AI lifecycle. In this paper, we propose an approach for AI lifecycle planning that bridges the gap between generic guidelines and use case-specific requirements (MQG4AI). Our work aims to contribute to the development of practical tools for implementing Responsible AI (RAI) by aligning lifecycle planning with technical, ethical and regulatory demands. Central to our approach is the introduction of a flexible and customizable Methodology based on Quality Gates, whose building blocks incorporate RAI knowledge through information linking along the AI lifecycle in a continuous manner, addressing AIs evolutionary character. For our present contribution, we put a particular emphasis on the Explanation stage during model development, and illustrate how to align a guideline to evaluate the quality of explanations with MQG4AI, contributing to overall Transparency.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.