Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

This paper claims that three wormhole geometries — the generalized Ellis–Bronnikov, an exponential-area, and a rational-area — admit exact analytic matter sources of a phantom k-essence scalar plus nonlinear electrodynamics, for both magnet

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 16:59 UTC pith:Z3RVNEQZ

load-bearing objection Solid n=1/2 k-essence source construction with a real new result, but the absent stability analysis and unhandled multivalued L(f) need fixing before the claims hold. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.11018 v2 pith:Z3RVNEQZ submitted 2025-12-11 gr-qc

Sources of matter for wormholes in a k-essence theory

Marcos V. de S. Silva , Carlos F. S. Pereira , Bruna Bragato , Manuel E. Rodrigues , J\'ulio C. Fabris , H. Belich This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords k-essencephantom scalar fieldwormholenonlinear electrodynamicsEllis-Bronnikov wormholeblack bounceenergy conditionsexact solutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that three traversable wormhole spacetimes—the generalized Ellis–Bronnikov model, an exponential-area model, and a rational-area model—are exact solutions of a k-essence theory with a phantom scalar field (kinetic power n=1/2) plus nonlinear electrodynamics. For each geometry and for both electrically and magnetically charged sources, the authors obtain closed-form expressions for the scalar field φ(x), its potential V(x), and the electromagnetic Lagrangian L(x) and derivative L_f(x). The central claim is that the electromagnetic sector depends only on the metric functions, not on the scalar kinetic power n, so the same EM sources work unaltered for any n. If correct, this provides a family of explicit, exact field-source realizations of non-canonical wormholes and a way to compute energy-condition violations and, in future work, observable signatures.

Core claim

We show that for the action S = ∫d⁴x√−g[R − F(X, φ) + L(f)] with F = F₀Xⁿ − 2V(φ) and n = 1/2, the generalized Ellis–Bronnikov, exponential-area, and rational-area wormholes are supported by a phantom scalar field and nonlinear electrodynamics. All functions of interest—φ(x), V(x), L_f(x), and L(x)—are derived analytically, for both magnetic and electric charges. The electromagnetic functions L_f and L do not depend on n; they are fixed entirely by the wormhole's area function Σ(x) and metric function A(x), which in the cases considered reduce to explicit hypergeometric expressions. Consequently, the three geometries are genuine solutions of the field equations (15)–(18) with the printed mat

What carries the argument

The key reduction is the pair of equations that follow from the Einstein equations in the quasi-global gauge ds² = A(x)dt² − dx²/A(x) − Σ²(x)dΩ²: 2A Σ''/Σ − X F_X = 0 and A'' Σ² − A(Σ²)'' + 2 − q_m² L_f/Σ² = 0, with an electric analogue. These decouple the nonlinear-electrodynamics Lagrangian L_f from the scalar sector, so L_f is determined purely by the geometry. The scalar field and potential are then obtained by solving the remaining equations with F(X) = F₀Xⁿ − 2V(φ), η = −1, leading to hypergeometric-function expressions that are analytic for n = 1/2.

Load-bearing premise

For the action (1) to define a field theory, the Lagrangian L(f) must be a single-valued function of the invariant f; for Models 2 and 3 the paper's own figures show f(x) has maxima and minima, so the inversion f → x → L(f) is multivalued, and no single-valued L(f) on the whole manifold is constructed.

What would settle it

Take Model 2 with q_m = d = 1, c₃ = 3, b = 4 (the parameters of Fig. 4). The plotted f(x) has a maximum; inverting gives two distinct x values for each f below the maximum. If the two branches produce different L values, no global L(f) exists, and the construction fails as a field theory. One can check numerically whether L evaluated on the two branches agrees.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The three spacetimes are exact solutions of action (1) with the printed φ(x), V(x), L_f(x), and L(x), so the found sources are genuine field configurations in k-essence gravity, not mere geometric constructions.
  • For the magnetically charged generalized Ellis–Bronnikov wormhole, the electromagnetic Lagrangian is obtained in closed form for all m ≥ 2, allowing L(f) to be written as an explicit function of the field invariant f.
  • Because L_f depends only on metric functions, the NED sector is universal across k-essence powers: any change in n only re-routes the scalar field and potential, leaving the electromagnetic source unchanged.
  • For all three models, the null energy condition is violated at least locally by both the scalar and electromagnetic fields, so these wormholes necessarily require exotic matter, though its explicit distribution is now known.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because L_f is geometry-determined, the same 'geometric scaffold' idea could be applied to other area functions: pick any Σ(x), solve the field equations for the scalar sector, and the EM source follows without recomputation; this offers a shortcut for generating new wormhole solutions.
  • For the second and third models, f(x) has local extrema, so L(f) is multivalued; a necessary follow-up is to define L(f) piecewise on monotonic branches or restrict the spacetime to regions where f(x) is invertible—otherwise the constructed sources are not described by a single-valued field theory across the whole manifold.
  • The abstract announces a linear-stability study via WKB and time-domain evolution, but the body's Conclusion lists stability as future work; a reader should treat the stability claim as unverified in this version.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs matter sources for three static, spherically symmetric wormhole geometries in a k-essence theory minimally coupled to gravity and nonlinear electrodynamics, with the action given in Eq. (1). For the generalized Ellis-Bronnikov model (Model I) and for two area-function models taken from the black-bounce literature (Models II and III), the authors solve the field equations for the phantom scalar field, its potential, and the electromagnetic functions L_f(x) and L(x), in both magnetically and electrically charged versions. In Models II and III the k-essence power is fixed to n=1/2, while for Model I the parameter m is kept general. The paper also derives a general set of energy conditions for the class of metrics considered and concludes that the null energy condition is violated at least locally in all models, so all energy conditions are violated. A claimed extension is that the electromagnetic sector is independent of the k-essence parameter n, following from Eq. (16), and the abstract announces a stability analysis via WKB and time-domain evolution.

Significance. If the constructions were fully valid, the paper would be a useful addition to the black-bounce and wormhole literature: it provides explicit analytic expressions for scalar field, potential, and NED Lagrangian for several non-canonical scalar-field configurations, and it highlights a clean structural reason, Eq. (16), for the n-independence of the magnetic electromagnetic sector. The analytic inversion to L(f) in Model I is a concrete strength. The general reduction of the energy conditions to a small number of inequalities is also convenient. However, the global-validity problem for Models II and III, the absence of the advertised stability analysis, and several inaccuracies in the energy-conditions section prevent the paper from being acceptable in its present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV.A and Sec. V.B, Figs. 4, 5, 8] The central claim that Models II and III are genuine solutions of the action (1) is not supported. Action (1) requires L(f) to be a single-valued function of the invariant f, and the field equations (11)-(13) are derived from that action. The paper itself states in Sec. IV.A that 'it is not possible to write the Lagrangian L(f) analytically' and in Sec. V.B that extrema of f(x) 'prevent inversion to x(f) and thus to L(f)'. The printed L(x) and L_f(x) are coordinate-dependent; when f(x) is non-monotonic they define at best local reconstructions on intervals where f is monotonic. To make Models II and III global solutions, the authors must either impose parameter restrictions that make L(f) single-valued, provide a piecewise branch construction with matching conditions at the extrema of f, or explicitly state that only local solutions on monotonic intervals are claimed. As written, the Con
  2. [Abstract and Sec. VII] The abstract claims: 'we studied the linear stability of the models through the behavior of a test scalar field using both the WKB method and the time-domain evolution method.' No such study appears in the manuscript: there is no stability section, no perturbation equation, no WKB calculation, and no time-domain evolution plot. The Conclusion instead lists stability as future work. This internal inconsistency must be fixed by either adding the stability analysis or correcting the abstract.
  3. [Sec. VI, Eqs. (55)-(58) and the paragraph after Eq. (67)] The energy-conditions summary contains two technical inaccuracies. First, the chain NEC = WEC = SEC ⇔ ρ + p_i ≥ 0 in Eq. (55) is not a valid equivalence for the standard WEC and SEC, which contain additional inequalities beyond the NEC. Second, the statement that for all three models there are always regions with 2 - (Σ^2)'' < 0 is false for the GEB model with m=2, since then (Σ^2)'' = 2 and NEC_2^{EM} = 0 identically rather than being negative. The conclusion that both scalar and electromagnetic fields violate all energy conditions in all models therefore needs to be re-derived and restricted to the parameter ranges where it actually holds.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV.B header] 'Eletric case' should be 'Electric case'.
  2. [Eq. (35)] The expression for E(x) is typeset incompletely; the displayed formula appears to lose the denominator structure. Please check the rendered equation.
  3. [Eq. (20)] The electromagnetic invariant is denoted by both f and H in the same section; please use a single notation consistently.
  4. [Figs. 4, 5, 8 captions] The panels labeled L(f) plot multi-branched objects. State explicitly in the captions which branch is shown or that the curve is the coordinate-dependent L(x) evaluated for the corresponding f(x) values.
  5. [Secs. IV and V] In Models II and III the coefficient F_0 is set to 1 without a remark in the main text, although it appears in the general scalar-field expressions. Make this choice explicit at the point where the solutions are first presented.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: prescribed metrics are solved for their matter sources; self-citations are motivational and the claimed n-independence is re-derived from the equations.

full rationale

The paper's central construction is reverse-engineering: the wormhole metrics (25), (37), and (47) are prescribed inputs, and the field equations (15)-(18) are solved for phi, V, L_f, and L. This is not circular: the resulting electromagnetic functions are not assumed in the action; they are determined by independent Einstein equations. The n-independence of the electromagnetic sector is not merely imported from Refs. [53,54]: Eq. (16) contains only A, Sigma, and L_f, and the paper re-derives the explicit L(x) formulas (28)-(29), (40)-(41), and (51)-(52), which exhibit no n. The self-citations [51-54] motivating the F(X)=F0 X^n - 2V ansatz and the choice n=1/2 do not carry the derivation: the explicit V(phi) solutions can be checked by substitution, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked to forbid alternatives. The manuscript itself flags the genuine limitation that f(x) is not invertible for Models 2 and 3 ('it is not possible to write the Lagrangian L(f) analytically'; 'prevents inversion to x(f) and thus to L(f)'), so the constructed L(f) may be multivalued on the whole spacetime; this is a correctness and well-posedness concern, not a circularity. No data are fitted and no predicted quantity is statistically forced, so the fitted-input-called-prediction and self-definitional patterns do not apply.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a source-reconstruction paper. The central inputs are the assumed ultrastatic metrics and the chosen action ansatz; outputs are φ, V, and L. Most hand-set parameters are geometric/charge inputs from the prescribed spacetimes. The only special analytic-choice parameters are n=1/2 and F0=1.

free parameters (7)
  • n (k-essence kinetic power) = 1/2
    Fixed by hand to make the source integrals analytic; all explicit formulas in Sections III–V use n=1/2.
  • F0 (kinetic coupling) = 1 (Models II and III; also a=F0=1 in plots)
    Set to 1; scales the scalar-field expressions and is not determined by the theory.
  • m (GEB area exponent) = m≥2; figures use 2, 4, 8, 12
    Parameter in the area function Σ=(x^m+a^m)^{1/m}; chosen freely; m=2 recovers Ellis-Bronnikov.
  • a (GEB throat radius) = 1 in figures
    Throat radius of the generalized Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole; input geometry parameter.
  • b, d, c3 (Model II area parameters) = Varied in figures; constraint d²−c3>0, c3≠0
    Parameters in Σ²=(d²+x²)e^{b²/(c3+x²)}; control throats/anti-throats and are inherited from ref. [70].
  • b, d, m (Model III area parameters) = m=1, F0=1; b,d varied; constraint 4d²−b²>0
    Parameters in Σ²=b²+x^{2m+2}/(d^{2m}+x^{2m}); m is fixed to 1 for analytic simplicity.
  • q_m, q_e (magnetic/electric charges) = 1 in figures
    Charge parameters of the NED sources; set to 1 in numerical plots.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Einstein equations and standard differential geometry for static spherically symmetric metrics
    Used to derive EOMs (2)–(13).
  • domain assumption Static spherically symmetric line element in quasi-global gauge with metric functions A(x), Σ(x)
    Assumed throughout; all three models are ultrastatic with A=1.
  • domain assumption k-essence Lagrangian takes the form F(X,φ)=F0 X^n −2V(φ)
    Powers of X only; stated before Eq. (15) and essential for solving for φ.
  • domain assumption Phantom scalar choice η=−1 makes X positive
    Needed for real square roots when n=1/2.
  • domain assumption NED sector is governed by a function L(f) depending only on invariant f (or P)
    Appears in action Eq. (1); the paper derives L(x), but a single-valued global L(f) is required for the action.
  • ad hoc to paper Single-valued invertibility of f(x) to define L(f) globally
    Only established explicitly for the magnetic GEB (Model I). For Models II and III, f(x) has extrema and L(f) is multivalued; the paper does not define branch cuts.
  • domain assumption Parameter constraints d²−c3>0, c3≠0 (Model II) and 4d²−b²>0 (Model III)
    Stated to avoid divergent scalar fields/potentials.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21197 in / 17011 out tokens · 158797 ms · 2026-08-03T16:59:06.652396+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we analyze some matter sources associated with wormhole models within a k-essence theory coupled to the gravitational sector through a phantom scalar field. We adopt a spherically symmetric background in (3+1) dimensions and consider two types of systems: electrically and magnetically charged. In the first case, we consider the generalized Ellis-Bronnikov model, in which we fix the power of the kinetic term in the k-essence Lagrangian function to $n=1/2$ and take the parameter $m\ge 2$, which acts as a generalization factor for the geometry of the wormhole area function. From this, we obtained the expression for the scalar field, the potential, and the associated electromagnetic functions for any values of the parameter $m\geq{2}$. In the second and third models, we consider the scenario of two wormholes that are structured according to the adjustment of the parameters that define the metric component associated with the area function $\Sigma^2$ (the $g_{22}$ component of the line element), and in both cases we adopt $n=1/2$. We show that the violation of the null energy conditions is conditioned by the parameters of the area function. Finally, we studied the linear stability of the models through the behavior of a test scalar field using both the WKB method and the time-domain evolution method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.11018 by Bruna Bragato, Carlos F. S. Pereira, H. Belich, J\'ulio C. Fabris, Manuel E. Rodrigues, Marcos V. de S. Silva.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: In the figures above the following values were set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: In the figures above the following values were set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: In the figures above the following values were set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In the figures above the following values were set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: In the figures above the following values were set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: In the figures above, the following values were defined: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: In the figures above, the following values were defined: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: In the figures above the following values were set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Embedding Wormholes and Dyonic Black Strings in Warped Braneworlds via Local Sum Rules

    gr-qc 2026-01 reject novelty 4.0

    Embedding of Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole and NED-sourced magnetic/dyonic black strings into RS braneworlds using Local Sum Rules; the dyonic q→0 limit is inconsistent as written.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R. M. Wald, General Relativity, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984)

    1984

  2. [2]

    D’Inverno, Introducing Einstein’s Relativity, Oxford University Press, New York (1998)

    R. D’Inverno, Introducing Einstein’s Relativity, Oxford University Press, New York (1998)

    1998

  3. [3]

    Penrose, Phys

    R. Penrose, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 57-59 (1965); S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, Cambridge University Press, 2023

    1965

  4. [4]

    Bardeen J M 1968 Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse Proc. Int. Conf. GR5 (Tbilisi, U.S.S.R)

    1968

  5. [5]

    Ayon-Beato E and Garcia A 2000 The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole Phys. Lett. B493149–152

    2000

  6. [6]

    Rodrigues M E and Silva M V d 2018 Bardeen regular black hole with an electric source J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.6 025

    2018

  7. [7]

    M. E. Rodrigues, E. L. B. Junior and M. V. de S. Silva, Using dominant and weak energy conditions for build new classe of regular black holes, JCAP02, 059 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Ayon-Beato and A

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, New regular black hole solution from nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B464, 25 (1999)

    1999

  9. [9]

    Ayon-Beato and A

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5056-5059 (1998)

    1998

  10. [10]

    K. A. Bronnikov, Comment on ‘Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics’, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 4641 (2000)

    2000

  11. [11]

    Ayon-Beato and A

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, Four parametric regular black hole solution, Gen. Rel. Grav.37, 635 (2005)

    2005

  12. [12]

    K. A. Bronnikov, Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D63, 044005 (2001)

    2001

  13. [13]

    Dymnikova, Regular electrically charged structures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general relativity, Class

    I. Dymnikova, Regular electrically charged structures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 4417-4429 (2004)

    2004

  14. [14]

    Balart and E

    L. Balart and E. C. Vagenas, Regular black holes with a nonlinear electrodynamics source, Phys. Rev. D90, no.12, 124045 (2014)

    2014

  15. [15]

    Balart and E

    L. Balart and E. C. Vagenas, Regular black hole metrics and the weak energy condition, Phys. Lett. B730, 14-17 (2014)

    2014

  16. [16]

    Uchikata, S

    N. Uchikata, S. Yoshida and T. Futamase, New solutions of charged regular black holes and their stability, Phys. Rev. D 86, 084025 (2012)

    2012

  17. [17]

    Ponce de Leon, Regular Reissner-Nordström black hole solutions from linear electrodynamics, Phys

    J. Ponce de Leon, Regular Reissner-Nordström black hole solutions from linear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D95, no.12, 124015 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    S. A. Hayward, Formation and evaporation of regular black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 031103 (2006)

    2006

  19. [19]

    Black-bounce to traversable wormhole,

    A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Black-bounce to traversable wormhole,” JCAP02(2019), 042

    2019

  20. [20]

    K. A. Bronnikov and R. K. Walia, Field sources for Simpson-Visser spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D105, no.4, 044039 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    Cañate, Black bounces as magnetically charged phantom regular black holes in Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics gravity coupled to a self-interacting scalar field, Phys

    P. Cañate, Black bounces as magnetically charged phantom regular black holes in Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics gravity coupled to a self-interacting scalar field, Phys. Rev. D106, no.2, 024031 (2022). 19

    2022

  22. [22]

    M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. de S. Silva, Source of black bounces in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D107, no.4, 044064 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    On black bounce space-times in non-linear electrodynamics,

    G. Alencar, K. A. Bronnikov, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Sáez-Chillón Gómez and M. V. de S. Silva, “On black bounce space-times in non-linear electrodynamics,” Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) no.7, 745

    2024

  24. [24]

    A. Lima, G. Alencar, R. N. Costa Filho and R. R. Landim, Charged black string bounce and its field source, General Relativity and Gravitation55, 108 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Lima, G Alencar, D

    A. Lima, G Alencar, D. S. C. Gómez, Regularizing rotating black strings with a new black-bounce solution, Physical Review D109, 064038 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    A. M. Lima, G. M. de Alencar Filho and J. S. Furtado Neto, Black String Bounce to Traversable Wormhole, Symmetry 15, 150 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Bronnikov, Manuel E Rodrigues and Marcos V de S Silva, Cylindrical black bounces and their field sources, Physical Review D,108024065 (2023)

    Kirill A. Bronnikov, Manuel E Rodrigues and Marcos V de S Silva, Cylindrical black bounces and their field sources, Physical Review D,108024065 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    J. C. Fabris, E. L. B. Junior and M. E. Rodrigues, Generalized models for black-bounce solutions inf(R)gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C83: 884 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Junior, E.L.B., Junior, J.T.S.S., Lobo, F.S.N. et al. Black bounces in Cotton gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1190 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Generalized black-bounces solutions in f(R) gravity and their field sources,

    M. V. d. S. Silva, T. M. Crispim, G. Alencar, R. R. Landim and M. E. Rodrigues, “Generalized black-bounces solutions in f(R) gravity and their field sources,” [arXiv:2502.19186 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  31. [31]

    Field sources for f(R,Rµν) black-bounce solutions: The case of K-gravity,

    G. Alencar, M. Nilton, M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. de S. Silva, “Field sources for f(R,Rµν) black-bounce solutions: The case of K-gravity,” Phys. Dark Univ.49(2025), 102060

    2025

  32. [32]

    Franzin, S

    E. Franzin, S. Liberati, J. Mazza, A. Simpson and M. Visser, Charged black-bounce spacetimes, JCAP07, 036 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    Mazza, E

    J. Mazza, E. Franzin and S. Liberati, A novel family of rotating black hole mimickers, JCAP04, 082 (2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    E. L. B. Junior and M. E. Rodrigues, Black-bounce inf(T)gravity Gen. Rel. Grav.55, 8 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    and Rodrigues, M.E

    Junior, J.T.S.S., Lobo, F.S.N. and Rodrigues, M.E. Black bounces in conformal Killing gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C84, 557 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Nascimento, A.Y

    J.R. Nascimento, A.Y. Petrov, P.J. Porfírio and A.R. Soares, Gravitational lensing in black-bounce spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D102044021 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    Tsukamoto, Gravitational lensing by two photon spheres in a black-bounce spacetime in strong deflection limits, Phys

    N. Tsukamoto, Gravitational lensing by two photon spheres in a black-bounce spacetime in strong deflection limits, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 064022

    2021

  38. [38]

    Tsukamoto, Gravitational lensing in the Simpson-Visser black-bounce spacetime in a strong deflection limit, Phys

    N. Tsukamoto, Gravitational lensing in the Simpson-Visser black-bounce spacetime in a strong deflection limit, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 024033

    2021

  39. [39]

    Tsukamoto, Retrolensing by two photon spheres of a black-bounce spacetime, Phys

    N. Tsukamoto, Retrolensing by two photon spheres of a black-bounce spacetime, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 084036

    2022

  40. [40]

    Ghosh and A

    S. Ghosh and A. Bhattacharyya, Analytical study of gravitational lensing in Kerr-Newman black-bounce spacetime, JCAP 11(2022) 006

    2022

  41. [41]

    Gravitational lensing of massive particles by a black-bounce-Schwarzschild black hole,

    G. He, Y. Xie, C. Jiang and W. Lin, “Gravitational lensing of massive particles by a black-bounce-Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.6, 064008

    2024

  42. [42]

    Light deflection and gravitational lensing effects inspired by loop quantum gravity,

    A. R. Soares, C. F. S. Pereira, R. L. L. Vitória, M. V. d. S. Silva and H. Belich, “Light deflection and gravitational lensing effects inspired by loop quantum gravity,” JCAP06(2025), 034

    2025

  43. [43]

    Light deflection and gravitational lensing effects in acoustic black-bounce spacetime,

    C. F. S. Pereira, A. R. Soares, M. V. d. S. Silva, R. L. L. Vitória and H. Belich, “Light deflection and gravitational lensing effects in acoustic black-bounce spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.6, 064012

    2025

  44. [44]

    Scalar scattering by black holes and wormholes,

    H. C. D. Lima, Junior, C. L. Benone and L. C. B. Crispino, “Scalar scattering by black holes and wormholes,” Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) no.7, 638

    2022

  45. [45]

    Quasinormal modes and echoes of general- ized black hole bounces and their correspondence with shadows,

    Albert Duran-Cabacés, Diego Rubiera-Garcia and Diego Sáez-Chillón Gómez, “Quasinormal modes and echoes of general- ized black hole bounces and their correspondence with shadows,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.4, 044016

    2025

  46. [46]

    k - inflation,

    C. Armendariz-Picon, T. Damour and V. Mukhanov, “k - inflation,” Phys. Lett. B458(1999), 209-218

    1999

  47. [47]

    A Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late time cosmic acceleration,

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, “A Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late time cosmic acceleration,” Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000), 4438-4441

    2000

  48. [48]

    Non-stationary wormholes with the presence of scalar fields and modified gravity,

    G. Alencar, R. Dárlla, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and D. Sáez-Chillón Gómez, “Non-stationary wormholes with the presence of scalar fields and modified gravity,” [arXiv:2508.05536 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Bronnikov, K.A., Barcellos, V.A.G., de Carvalho, L.P. et al. The simplest wormhole in Rastall and k-essence theories. Eur. Phys. J. C81, 395 (2021)

    2021

  50. [50]

    On horizons and wormholes in k-essence theories,

    K. A. Bronnikov, J. C. Fabris, and D. C. Rodrigues,“On horizons and wormholes in k-essence theories,” Grav. Cosmol.22 (2016) no.1, 26-31

    2016

  51. [51]

    Black-bounce solution in k-essence theories,

    C. F. S. Pereira, D. C. Rodrigues, J. C. Fabris and M. E. Rodrigues, “Black-bounce solution in k-essence theories,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.4, 044011 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    New sources of ghost fields in k-essence theories for black-bounce solutions,

    C. F. S. Pereira, D. C. Rodrigues, É. L. Martins, J. C. Fabris and M. E. Rodrigues,“New sources of ghost fields in k-essence theories for black-bounce solutions,” Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) no.1, 015001

    2025

  53. [53]

    Magnetically charged black-bounce solution via nonlinear electrodynamics in a k-essence theory,

    C. F. S. Pereira, D. C. Rodrigues, M. V. S. Silva, J. C. Fabris, M. E. Rodrigues and H. Belich, “Magnetically charged black-bounce solution via nonlinear electrodynamics in a k-essence theory,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.8, 084025

    2025

  54. [54]

    Black-bounce solutions in a k-essence theory under the effects of bumblebee gravity,

    Carlos F. S. Pereira, Marcos V. de S. Silva, H. Belich, Denis C. Rodrigues, Júlio C. Fabris and Manuel E. Rodrigues, “Black-bounce solutions in a k-essence theory under the effects of bumblebee gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.12, 124005

    2025

  55. [55]

    Ether flow through a drainhole - a particle model in general relativity,

    H. G. Ellis, “Ether flow through a drainhole - a particle model in general relativity,” J. Math. Phys.14, 104-118 (1973)

    1973

  56. [56]

    Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge,

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge,” Acta Phys. Polon. B4, 251-266 (1973)

    1973

  57. [57]

    Quantum cosmology with k-Essence theory,

    C. R. Almeida, J. C. Fabris, F. Sbisá and Y. Tavakoli, “Quantum cosmology with k-Essence theory,” [arXiv:1604.00624 20 [gr-qc]]. To appear in the proceedings of the 31st International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Duality between k-essence and Rastall gravity,

    K. A. Bronnikov, J. C. Fabris, O. F. Piattella, D. C. Rodrigues and E. C. Santos, “Duality between k-essence and Rastall gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C77, no.6, 409 (2017)

    2017

  59. [59]

    On horizons and wormholes in k-essence theories,

    K. A. Bronnikov, J. C. Fabris and D. C. Rodrigues, “On horizons and wormholes in k-essence theories,” Grav. Cosmol.22, no.1, 26-31 (2016)

    2016

  60. [60]

    Regular phantom black holes,

    K. A. Bronnikov and J. C. Fabris, “Regular phantom black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 251101 (2006)

    2006

  61. [61]

    Field Sources for Generalized Ellis-Bronnikov Wormhole,

    T. M. Crispim, G. Alencar, and C. R. Muniz, “Field Sources for Generalized Ellis-Bronnikov Wormhole,” [arXiv:2410.11147 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Dynamics of a particle in the generalised Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole on the rotating Archimede’s spiral,

    N Giorgadze and Z N Osmanov, “Dynamics of a particle in the generalised Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole on the rotating Archimede’s spiral,” Phys. Scripta99(2024) no.2, 025001

    2024

  63. [63]

    Sokoliuk, O., Mandal, S., Sahoo, P.K. et al. Generalised Ellis–Bronnikov wormholes in f(R) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C82, 280 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    T. F. de Souza, A. C. A. Ramos, R. N. Costa Filho and J. Furtado, Generalized Ellis-Bronnikov graphene wormhole, [arXiv:2208.06869 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    GravitationalLensingandDeflectionAnglebygeneralisedEllis-Bronnikov wormhole Embedded in Warped Braneworld Background,

    SoumyaJana, VivekSharmaandSumanGhosh, “GravitationalLensingandDeflectionAnglebygeneralisedEllis-Bronnikov wormhole Embedded in Warped Braneworld Background,” [arXiv:2411.10804 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Scalar field and deflection of light under the effects of topologically charged Ellis–Bronnikov-type wormhole spacetime,

    H. Aounallah , A.R. Soares and R.L.L. Vitória, “Scalar field and deflection of light under the effects of topologically charged Ellis–Bronnikov-type wormhole spacetime,” Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) no.5, 447

    2020

  67. [67]

    On the Klein–Gordon oscillator in topologically charged Ellis–Bronnikov-type wormhole spacetime

    Soares, A.R., Vitória, R.L.L., Aounallah, H. On the Klein–Gordon oscillator in topologically charged Ellis–Bronnikov-type wormhole spacetime. Eur. Phys. J. Plus136, 966 (2021)

    2021

  68. [68]

    Klein–Gordon oscillator under gravitational effects in a topologically charged Ellis–Bronnikov wormhole,

    C. F. S. Pereira, R. L. L. Vitória, A. R, Soares and H Belich, “Klein–Gordon oscillator under gravitational effects in a topologically charged Ellis–Bronnikov wormhole,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A38(2023) no.28n29, 2350133

    2023

  69. [69]

    Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure,

    Francisco S. N. Lobo, Manuel E. Rodrigues, Marcos V. de S. Silva, Alex Simpson and Matt Visser,“Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.8, 084052

    2021

  70. [70]

    Black-bounces with multiple throats and anti-throats,

    Manuel E Rodrigues and Marcos V de S Silva, “Black-bounces with multiple throats and anti-throats,” Class. Quant. Grav. 40(2023) no.22, 225011

    2023

  71. [71]

    Example of a stable wormhole in general relativity,

    K. A. Bronnikov, L. N. Lipatova, I. D. Novikov and A. A. Shatskiy, “Example of a stable wormhole in general relativity,” Grav. Cosmol.19(2013)

    2013

  72. [72]

    Stability and instability of Ellis and phantom wormholes: Are there ghosts?,

    K. K. Nandi, A. A. Potapov, R. N. Izmailov, A. Tamang and J. C. Evans, “Stability and instability of Ellis and phantom wormholes: Are there ghosts?,” Phys. Rev. D93(2016) no.10, 104044

    2016