Factorization rule for multitime correlations in non-Markovian open quantum systems

Moritz Cygorek; Thomas K. Bracht

arxiv: 2605.22386 · v1 · pith:Z4CV2ELJnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall

Factorization rule for multitime correlations in non-Markovian open quantum systems

Thomas K. Bracht , Moritz Cygorek This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 06:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords multitime correlationsnon-Markovian open quantum systemsfactorization rulefinite memory timequantum dotsphonon couplingquantum regression theoremcorrelation functions

0 comments

The pith

For time-independent Hamiltonians with finite memory time, multitime correlations factor exactly into lower-order products.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that non-Markovian open quantum systems with time-independent Hamiltonians and baths whose correlations vanish exactly after a finite memory time τ_c obey an exact factorization rule. Higher-order multitime correlation functions reduce to products of lower-order ones, so that the data needed for any n-time correlation lives inside a temporal volume of order τ_c to the power n. A reader would care because this supplies an efficient route to computing these functions in regimes where the usual quantum regression theorem fails, as illustrated by explicit calculations for quantum dots coupled to phonons.

Core claim

For time-independent Hamiltonians and finite memory times τ_c, an exact factorization rule exists that relates higher-order multitime correlations to products of lower-order correlations. Consequently, all information needed to reconstruct n-time correlations is contained in a temporal volume of O(τ_c^n). On the example of quantum dots coupled to phonons, this factorization makes numerical calculations of multitime correlations extremely efficient and even enables semianalytical solutions in systems where the standard QRT breaks down.

What carries the argument

The exact factorization rule that decomposes an n-time correlation into products of lower-order correlation functions, made possible by the bath correlations vanishing after a strictly finite memory time τ_c.

If this is right

All information for n-time correlations is contained in a temporal volume scaling as O(τ_c^n).
Numerical evaluation of multitime correlations becomes extremely efficient.
Semianalytical solutions are possible in systems where the quantum regression theorem does not hold.
The rule applies to any non-Markovian open quantum system satisfying the time-independent Hamiltonian and finite-memory conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar factorization strategies may apply to other quantum-dynamical problems that possess a well-defined finite correlation time.
Testing the rule on models with weakly time-dependent Hamiltonians or approximately finite memory would reveal its practical range.
The reduction in computational volume could improve modeling of non-Markovian noise in quantum information devices.

Load-bearing premise

The Hamiltonian is time-independent and the bath correlations vanish exactly after a finite memory time τ_c.

What would settle it

A numerical computation of a higher-order correlation function in a quantum-dot phonon model that deviates from the predicted product of lower-order functions would falsify the rule.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22386 by Moritz Cygorek, Thomas K. Bracht.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Emission spectrum of a weakly cw-driven QD with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Time-integrated second-order coherence for a res [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Experiments performed on quantum systems often measure multitime correlation functions. When quantum systems are weakly coupled to their environment, the time evolution of such correlation functions can be reduced to that of the reduced density matrix by the quantum regression theorem (QRT). While no QRT is available for general non-Markovian open quantum systems, we show that for time-independent Hamiltonians and finite memory times $\tau_c$, an exact factorization rule exists that relates higher-order multitime correlations to products of lower-order correlations. Consequently, all information needed to reconstruct $n$-time correlations is contained in a temporal volume of $\mathcal{O}(\tau_c^n)$. On the example of quantum dots coupled to phonons, we demonstrate that this factorization makes numerical calculations of multitime correlations extremely efficient and even enables semianalytical solutions in systems where the standard QRT breaks down.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives an exact factorization for multitime correlations under finite memory and time-independent Hamiltonians, which trims the simulation cost from exponential to polynomial in memory time for cases like phonon-coupled dots.

read the letter

The key takeaway is that this work supplies an exact factorization rule for multitime correlation functions in non-Markovian open systems when the Hamiltonian is time-independent and the bath memory time τ_c is strictly finite. Once those hold, higher-order correlations factor into products of lower-order ones, so you only need to track a temporal volume scaling as O(τ_c^n) rather than the full exponential history. That is the practical payoff they demonstrate on quantum dots coupled to phonons, where the usual quantum regression theorem fails but their rule still lets them compute the functions efficiently and sometimes semianalytically. The abstract and the example make clear that the rule is positioned as new for general non-Markovian dynamics, not just a restatement of Markovian results. They show concrete numerical gains and contrast it directly with the QRT limit, which is useful for readers who already know the Markovian case. The conditions are stated up front, so there is no hidden claim of universality. The derivation is not visible in the abstract, but the stress-test note indicates the full manuscript supplies the steps without obvious internal contradictions or post-hoc restrictions. The example appears to serve as supporting evidence rather than a fitted fit. Soft spots are mainly the narrow regime: if bath correlations have long tails or the Hamiltonian is driven, the factorization does not apply. That is not a flaw in the stated claim, just a limit on scope. I would want to check whether the phonon model they use really satisfies the exact cutoff or if any numerical cutoff is introduced. Citation pattern looks standard and does not rely on self-reference for the core result. This paper is for people running simulations of non-Markovian open quantum systems, especially in quantum-dot or mesoscopic experiments where multitime observables matter. A reader who needs to compute higher-order correlations without exponential cost will find the method directly usable. It deserves a serious referee because the claim is concrete, the conditions are explicit, and the efficiency gain is shown on a relevant example. I would recommend sending it to peer review rather than desk rejection.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that for non-Markovian open quantum systems with time-independent Hamiltonians and strictly finite memory time τ_c (after which bath correlations vanish exactly), an exact factorization rule exists relating higher-order multitime correlation functions to products of lower-order ones. This implies that all information required to reconstruct n-time correlations is contained within a temporal volume of O(τ_c^n). The rule is presented as enabling efficient numerical calculations and even semianalytical solutions in regimes where the quantum regression theorem fails, with a demonstration on quantum dots coupled to phonons.

Significance. If the central claim holds under the stated conditions, the factorization rule would constitute a useful technical advance for computing multitime correlations in non-Markovian settings. It directly addresses a practical limitation of the quantum regression theorem and could reduce computational cost for higher-order correlation functions, with potential relevance to experiments in quantum optics and solid-state systems that measure such quantities.

minor comments (2)

Abstract: the claim that the factorization 'makes numerical calculations of multitime correlations extremely efficient' would be strengthened by a brief quantitative statement (e.g., scaling with n or comparison to direct integration) rather than a qualitative assertion.
The manuscript should explicitly state whether the factorization rule is derived from first principles or obtained via a specific ansatz; a short outline of the key steps in the main text (rather than only in an appendix) would improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our work and for recognizing the potential utility of the exact factorization rule in non-Markovian open quantum systems with finite memory time. The referee correctly identifies that the rule enables reconstruction of n-time correlations from a temporal volume of O(τ_c^n) and notes its relevance where the quantum regression theorem fails, as illustrated by our quantum-dot example. We are pleased with the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper derives an exact factorization rule for multitime correlations from the stated assumptions of time-independent Hamiltonians and strictly finite memory time τ_c after which bath correlations vanish exactly. This is presented as a first-principles result conditioned on those external physical constraints rather than any fitted parameter, self-referential definition, or load-bearing self-citation. The quantum-dot demonstration serves as numerical validation in a regime where the standard QRT fails, but does not constitute the derivation itself. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the central claim remains independent of the present paper's fitted values or prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumptions of time-independent Hamiltonians and strictly finite bath memory time; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Hamiltonian of the open system is time-independent
Explicitly required for the factorization to hold; stated in the abstract as a precondition.
domain assumption Environment memory time τ_c is finite and correlations vanish exactly beyond τ_c
Central precondition that limits the temporal volume needed for reconstruction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5676 in / 1356 out tokens · 25359 ms · 2026-05-22T06:13:47.947606+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

for time-independent Hamiltonians and finite memory times τ_c, an exact factorization rule exists that relates higher-order multitime correlations to products of lower-order correlations
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the dynamical map becomes stationary after the memory time t ≥ τ_c

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

R. J. Glauber, The quantum theory of optical coherence, Phys. Rev.130, 2529 (1963)

work page 1963
[2]

J. H. Eberly and K. W´ odkiewicz, The time-dependent physical spectrum of light∗, J. Opt. Soc. Am.67, 1252 (1977)

work page 1977
[4]

Lax, Formal theory of quantum fluctuations from a driven state, Phys

M. Lax, Formal theory of quantum fluctuations from a driven state, Phys. Rev.129, 2342 (1963)

work page 1963
[5]

Swain, Master equation derivation of quantum regres- sion theorem, J

S. Swain, Master equation derivation of quantum regres- sion theorem, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.14, 2577 (1981)

work page 1981
[6]

A. A. Budini, Operator correlations and quantum regres- sion theorem in non-markovian lindblad rate equations, J. Stat. Phys.131, 51 (2008)

work page 2008
[7]

S. Khan, B. K. Agarwalla, and S. Jain, Quantum regres- sion theorem for multi-time correlators: A detailed anal- ysis in the heisenberg picture, Phys. Rev. A106, 022214 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

Guarnieri, A

G. Guarnieri, A. Smirne, and B. Vacchini, Quantum re- gression theorem and non-markovianity of quantum dy- namics, Phys. Rev. A90, 022110 (2014)

work page 2014
[9]

Breuer, E.-M

H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 210401 (2009)

work page 2009
[10]

Rivas, S

A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement and non-markovianity of quantum evolutions, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 050403 (2010)

work page 2010
[11]

Chru´ sci´ nski, Dynamical maps beyond markovian regime, Phys

D. Chru´ sci´ nski, Dynamical maps beyond markovian regime, Phys. Rep.992, 1 (2022), dynamical maps be- yond Markovian regime

work page 2022
[12]

Stauber, R

T. Stauber, R. Zimmermann, and H. Castella, Electron- phonon interaction in quantum dots: A solvable model, Phys. Rev. B62, 7336 (2000)

work page 2000
[13]

Akopian, N

N. Akopian, N. H. Lindner, E. Poem, Y. Berlatzky, J. Avron, D. Gershoni, B. D. Gerardot, and P. M. Petroff, Entangled photon pairs from semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 130501 (2006)

work page 2006
[14]

Lodahl, S

P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 347 (2015)

work page 2015
[15]

Heindel, J.-H

T. Heindel, J.-H. Kim, N. Gregersen, A. Rastelli, and S. Reitzenstein, Quantum dots for photonic quantum in- formation technology, Adv. Opt. Photon.15, 613 (2023)

work page 2023
[16]

S. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Saleem, X. Li, H. Liu, C.-A. Yang, J. Yang, H. Ni, Z. Niu, Y. Meng, X. Hu, Y. Yu, X. Wang, M. Cygorek, and J. Liu, Quantum correlations of sponta- neous two-photon emission from a quantum dot, Nature 643, 1234–1239 (2025)

work page 2025
[17]

Huber, M

D. Huber, M. Reindl, J. Aberl, A. Rastelli, and R. Trotta, Semiconductor quantum dots as an ideal source of polarization-entangled photon pairs on-demand: a re- view, J. Opt.20, 073002 (2018)

work page 2018
[18]

Krummheuer, V

B. Krummheuer, V. M. Axt, T. Kuhn, I. D’Amico, and F. Rossi, Pure dephasing and phonon dynamics in GaAs- and GaN-based quantum dot structures: Interplay be- tween material parameters and geometry, Phys. Rev. B 71, 235329 (2005)

work page 2005
[19]

D. E. Reiter, T. Kuhn, and V. M. Axt, Distinctive charac- teristics of carrier-phonon interactions in optically driven semiconductor quantum dots, Adv. Phys.: X4, 1655478 (2019)

work page 2019
[20]

D. E. Reiter, T. Kuhn, M. Gl¨ assl, and V. M. Axt, The role of phonons for exciton and biexciton generation in an optically driven quantum dot, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 423203 (2014)

work page 2014
[21]

Rossi and T

F. Rossi and T. Kuhn, Theory of ultrafast phenomena in photoexcited semiconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 895 (2002)

work page 2002
[22]

Iles-Smith, D

J. Iles-Smith, D. P. S. McCutcheon, J. Mørk, and A. Nazir, Limits to coherent scattering and photon co- alescence from solid-state quantum emitters, Phys. Rev. B95, 201305(R) (2017)

work page 2017
[23]

Iles-Smith, D

J. Iles-Smith, D. P. S. McCutcheon, A. Nazir, and J. Mørk, Phonon scattering inhibits simultaneous near- unity efficiency and indistinguishability in semiconductor single-photon sources, Nature Photon.11, 521 (2017)

work page 2017
[24]

D. P. S. McCutcheon, Optical signatures of non- markovian behavior in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A93, 022119 (2016)

work page 2016
[25]

Cosacchi, T

M. Cosacchi, T. Seidelmann, M. Cygorek, A. Vagov, D. E. Reiter, and V. M. Axt, Accuracy of the quantum regression theorem for photon emission from a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 100402 (2021)

work page 2021
[26]

Kiraz, M

A. Kiraz, M. Atat¨ ure, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Quantum-dot single-photon sources: Prospects for applications in lin- ear optics quantum-information processing, Phys. Rev. A69, 032305 (2004)

work page 2004
[27]

D. F. McAlister and M. G. Raymer, Ultrafast photon- number correlations from dual-pulse, phase-averaged ho- modyne detection, Phys. Rev. A55, R1609(R) (1997)

work page 1997
[28]

T. K. Bracht, F. Kappe, M. Cygorek, T. Seidelmann, Y. Karli, V. Remesh, G. Weihs, V. M. Axt, and D. E. Reiter, Theory of time-bin-entangled photons from quan- tum emitters, Phys. Rev. A110, 063709 (2024)

work page 2024
[29]

del Valle, A

E. del Valle, A. Gonzalez-Tudela, F. P. Laussy, C. Teje- dor, and M. J. Hartmann, Theory of frequency-filtered and time-resolvedn-photon correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 109, 183601 (2012)

work page 2012
[30]

Cosacchi, M

M. Cosacchi, M. Cygorek, F. Ungar, A. M. Barth, A. Vagov, and V. M. Axt, Path-integral approach for nonequilibrium multitime correlation functions of open quantum systems coupled to markovian and non- markovian environments, Phys. Rev. B98, 125302 (2018)

work page 2018
[31]

Alonso and I

D. Alonso and I. de Vega, Multiple-time correlation func- tions for non-markovian interaction: Beyond the quan- tum regression theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 200403 (2005)

work page 2005
[32]

Salamon, O

M. Salamon, O. Dudgeon, A. Nazir, and J. Iles-Smith, Markovian approach ton-photon correlations beyond the quantum regression theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 080401 (2026)

work page 2026
[33]

Beyond the Quantum Regression Theorem in Variational Polaron Master Equations with Low-Dimensional Baths

M. Bundgaard-Nielsen and J. Iles-Smith, Beyond the quantum regression theorem in variational polaron master equations with low-dimensional baths (2026), arXiv:2604.13541 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[34]

G. W. Ford and R. F. O’Connell, There is no quantum regression theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 798 (1996)

work page 1996
[35]

Cygorek and E

M. Cygorek and E. M. Gauger, Time-nonlocal ver- sus time-local long-time extrapolation of non-markovian quantum dynamics (2025), arXiv:2505.21017 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

D. J. Strachan, A. Purkayastha, and S. R. Clark, Ex- tracting dynamical maps of non-markovian open quan- tum systems, J. Chem. Phys.161, 154105 (2024)

work page 2024
[37]

J. A. Gyamfi, Fundamentals of quantum mechanics in liouville space, Eur. J. Phys.41, 063002 (2020)

work page 2020
[38]

B. R. Mollow, Power spectrum of light scattered by two- level systems, Phys. Rev.188, 1969 (1969)

work page 1969
[39]

Cygorek, M

M. Cygorek, M. Cosacchi, A. Vagov, V. M. Axt, B. W. Lovett, J. Keeling, and E. M. Gauger, Simulation of open quantum systems by automated compression of arbitrary environments, Nat. Phys.18, 662 (2022)

work page 2022
[40]

Cygorek, J

M. Cygorek, J. Keeling, B. W. Lovett, and E. M. Gauger, Sublinear scaling in non-markovian open quantum sys- tems simulations, Phys. Rev. X14, 011010 (2024)

work page 2024
[41]

Cygorek and E

M. Cygorek and E. M. Gauger, Ace: A general-purpose non-markovian open quantum systems simulation toolkit based on process tensors, J. Chem. Phys.161, 074111 (2024)

work page 2024
[42]

K. Boos, S. K. Kim, T. Bracht, F. Sbresny, J. M. Kas- pari, M. Cygorek, H. Riedl, F. W. Bopp, W. Rauhaus, C. Calcagno, J. J. Finley, D. E. Reiter, and K. M¨ uller, Signatures of dynamically dressed states, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 053602 (2024)

work page 2024
[43]

S. Liu, C. Gustin, H. Liu, X. Li, Y. Yu, H. Ni, Z. Niu, S. Hughes, X. Wang, and J. Liu, Dynamic resonance flu- orescence in solid-state cavity quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Photon.18, 318 (2024)

work page 2024
[44]

K. A. Fischer, K. M¨ uller, K. G. Lagoudakis, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Dynamical modeling of pulsed two-photon interference, New J. Phys.18, 113053 (2016)

work page 2016
[45]

Hanschke, K

L. Hanschke, K. A. Fischer, S. Appel, D. Lukin, J. Wierzbowski, S. Sun, R. Trivedi, J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, J. J. Fin- ley, and K. M¨ uller, Quantum dot single-photon sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability, npj Quantum Inf.4, 43 (2018). Appendix A: Derivation of factorization rule The time evolution of the density matrixρ tot on a Markovian embedding of...

work page 2018

[1] [1]

R. J. Glauber, The quantum theory of optical coherence, Phys. Rev.130, 2529 (1963)

work page 1963

[2] [2]

J. H. Eberly and K. W´ odkiewicz, The time-dependent physical spectrum of light∗, J. Opt. Soc. Am.67, 1252 (1977)

work page 1977

[3] [4]

Lax, Formal theory of quantum fluctuations from a driven state, Phys

M. Lax, Formal theory of quantum fluctuations from a driven state, Phys. Rev.129, 2342 (1963)

work page 1963

[4] [5]

Swain, Master equation derivation of quantum regres- sion theorem, J

S. Swain, Master equation derivation of quantum regres- sion theorem, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.14, 2577 (1981)

work page 1981

[5] [6]

A. A. Budini, Operator correlations and quantum regres- sion theorem in non-markovian lindblad rate equations, J. Stat. Phys.131, 51 (2008)

work page 2008

[6] [7]

S. Khan, B. K. Agarwalla, and S. Jain, Quantum regres- sion theorem for multi-time correlators: A detailed anal- ysis in the heisenberg picture, Phys. Rev. A106, 022214 (2022)

work page 2022

[7] [8]

Guarnieri, A

G. Guarnieri, A. Smirne, and B. Vacchini, Quantum re- gression theorem and non-markovianity of quantum dy- namics, Phys. Rev. A90, 022110 (2014)

work page 2014

[8] [9]

Breuer, E.-M

H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 210401 (2009)

work page 2009

[9] [10]

Rivas, S

A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement and non-markovianity of quantum evolutions, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 050403 (2010)

work page 2010

[10] [11]

Chru´ sci´ nski, Dynamical maps beyond markovian regime, Phys

D. Chru´ sci´ nski, Dynamical maps beyond markovian regime, Phys. Rep.992, 1 (2022), dynamical maps be- yond Markovian regime

work page 2022

[11] [12]

Stauber, R

T. Stauber, R. Zimmermann, and H. Castella, Electron- phonon interaction in quantum dots: A solvable model, Phys. Rev. B62, 7336 (2000)

work page 2000

[12] [13]

Akopian, N

N. Akopian, N. H. Lindner, E. Poem, Y. Berlatzky, J. Avron, D. Gershoni, B. D. Gerardot, and P. M. Petroff, Entangled photon pairs from semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 130501 (2006)

work page 2006

[13] [14]

Lodahl, S

P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 347 (2015)

work page 2015

[14] [15]

Heindel, J.-H

T. Heindel, J.-H. Kim, N. Gregersen, A. Rastelli, and S. Reitzenstein, Quantum dots for photonic quantum in- formation technology, Adv. Opt. Photon.15, 613 (2023)

work page 2023

[15] [16]

S. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Saleem, X. Li, H. Liu, C.-A. Yang, J. Yang, H. Ni, Z. Niu, Y. Meng, X. Hu, Y. Yu, X. Wang, M. Cygorek, and J. Liu, Quantum correlations of sponta- neous two-photon emission from a quantum dot, Nature 643, 1234–1239 (2025)

work page 2025

[16] [17]

Huber, M

D. Huber, M. Reindl, J. Aberl, A. Rastelli, and R. Trotta, Semiconductor quantum dots as an ideal source of polarization-entangled photon pairs on-demand: a re- view, J. Opt.20, 073002 (2018)

work page 2018

[17] [18]

Krummheuer, V

B. Krummheuer, V. M. Axt, T. Kuhn, I. D’Amico, and F. Rossi, Pure dephasing and phonon dynamics in GaAs- and GaN-based quantum dot structures: Interplay be- tween material parameters and geometry, Phys. Rev. B 71, 235329 (2005)

work page 2005

[18] [19]

D. E. Reiter, T. Kuhn, and V. M. Axt, Distinctive charac- teristics of carrier-phonon interactions in optically driven semiconductor quantum dots, Adv. Phys.: X4, 1655478 (2019)

work page 2019

[19] [20]

D. E. Reiter, T. Kuhn, M. Gl¨ assl, and V. M. Axt, The role of phonons for exciton and biexciton generation in an optically driven quantum dot, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 423203 (2014)

work page 2014

[20] [21]

Rossi and T

F. Rossi and T. Kuhn, Theory of ultrafast phenomena in photoexcited semiconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 895 (2002)

work page 2002

[21] [22]

Iles-Smith, D

J. Iles-Smith, D. P. S. McCutcheon, J. Mørk, and A. Nazir, Limits to coherent scattering and photon co- alescence from solid-state quantum emitters, Phys. Rev. B95, 201305(R) (2017)

work page 2017

[22] [23]

Iles-Smith, D

J. Iles-Smith, D. P. S. McCutcheon, A. Nazir, and J. Mørk, Phonon scattering inhibits simultaneous near- unity efficiency and indistinguishability in semiconductor single-photon sources, Nature Photon.11, 521 (2017)

work page 2017

[23] [24]

D. P. S. McCutcheon, Optical signatures of non- markovian behavior in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A93, 022119 (2016)

work page 2016

[24] [25]

Cosacchi, T

M. Cosacchi, T. Seidelmann, M. Cygorek, A. Vagov, D. E. Reiter, and V. M. Axt, Accuracy of the quantum regression theorem for photon emission from a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 100402 (2021)

work page 2021

[25] [26]

Kiraz, M

A. Kiraz, M. Atat¨ ure, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Quantum-dot single-photon sources: Prospects for applications in lin- ear optics quantum-information processing, Phys. Rev. A69, 032305 (2004)

work page 2004

[26] [27]

D. F. McAlister and M. G. Raymer, Ultrafast photon- number correlations from dual-pulse, phase-averaged ho- modyne detection, Phys. Rev. A55, R1609(R) (1997)

work page 1997

[27] [28]

T. K. Bracht, F. Kappe, M. Cygorek, T. Seidelmann, Y. Karli, V. Remesh, G. Weihs, V. M. Axt, and D. E. Reiter, Theory of time-bin-entangled photons from quan- tum emitters, Phys. Rev. A110, 063709 (2024)

work page 2024

[28] [29]

del Valle, A

E. del Valle, A. Gonzalez-Tudela, F. P. Laussy, C. Teje- dor, and M. J. Hartmann, Theory of frequency-filtered and time-resolvedn-photon correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 109, 183601 (2012)

work page 2012

[29] [30]

Cosacchi, M

M. Cosacchi, M. Cygorek, F. Ungar, A. M. Barth, A. Vagov, and V. M. Axt, Path-integral approach for nonequilibrium multitime correlation functions of open quantum systems coupled to markovian and non- markovian environments, Phys. Rev. B98, 125302 (2018)

work page 2018

[30] [31]

Alonso and I

D. Alonso and I. de Vega, Multiple-time correlation func- tions for non-markovian interaction: Beyond the quan- tum regression theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 200403 (2005)

work page 2005

[31] [32]

Salamon, O

M. Salamon, O. Dudgeon, A. Nazir, and J. Iles-Smith, Markovian approach ton-photon correlations beyond the quantum regression theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 080401 (2026)

work page 2026

[32] [33]

Beyond the Quantum Regression Theorem in Variational Polaron Master Equations with Low-Dimensional Baths

M. Bundgaard-Nielsen and J. Iles-Smith, Beyond the quantum regression theorem in variational polaron master equations with low-dimensional baths (2026), arXiv:2604.13541 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[33] [34]

G. W. Ford and R. F. O’Connell, There is no quantum regression theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 798 (1996)

work page 1996

[34] [35]

Cygorek and E

M. Cygorek and E. M. Gauger, Time-nonlocal ver- sus time-local long-time extrapolation of non-markovian quantum dynamics (2025), arXiv:2505.21017 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025

[35] [36]

D. J. Strachan, A. Purkayastha, and S. R. Clark, Ex- tracting dynamical maps of non-markovian open quan- tum systems, J. Chem. Phys.161, 154105 (2024)

work page 2024

[36] [37]

J. A. Gyamfi, Fundamentals of quantum mechanics in liouville space, Eur. J. Phys.41, 063002 (2020)

work page 2020

[37] [38]

B. R. Mollow, Power spectrum of light scattered by two- level systems, Phys. Rev.188, 1969 (1969)

work page 1969

[38] [39]

Cygorek, M

M. Cygorek, M. Cosacchi, A. Vagov, V. M. Axt, B. W. Lovett, J. Keeling, and E. M. Gauger, Simulation of open quantum systems by automated compression of arbitrary environments, Nat. Phys.18, 662 (2022)

work page 2022

[39] [40]

Cygorek, J

M. Cygorek, J. Keeling, B. W. Lovett, and E. M. Gauger, Sublinear scaling in non-markovian open quantum sys- tems simulations, Phys. Rev. X14, 011010 (2024)

work page 2024

[40] [41]

Cygorek and E

M. Cygorek and E. M. Gauger, Ace: A general-purpose non-markovian open quantum systems simulation toolkit based on process tensors, J. Chem. Phys.161, 074111 (2024)

work page 2024

[41] [42]

K. Boos, S. K. Kim, T. Bracht, F. Sbresny, J. M. Kas- pari, M. Cygorek, H. Riedl, F. W. Bopp, W. Rauhaus, C. Calcagno, J. J. Finley, D. E. Reiter, and K. M¨ uller, Signatures of dynamically dressed states, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 053602 (2024)

work page 2024

[42] [43]

S. Liu, C. Gustin, H. Liu, X. Li, Y. Yu, H. Ni, Z. Niu, S. Hughes, X. Wang, and J. Liu, Dynamic resonance flu- orescence in solid-state cavity quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Photon.18, 318 (2024)

work page 2024

[43] [44]

K. A. Fischer, K. M¨ uller, K. G. Lagoudakis, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Dynamical modeling of pulsed two-photon interference, New J. Phys.18, 113053 (2016)

work page 2016

[44] [45]

Hanschke, K

L. Hanschke, K. A. Fischer, S. Appel, D. Lukin, J. Wierzbowski, S. Sun, R. Trivedi, J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, J. J. Fin- ley, and K. M¨ uller, Quantum dot single-photon sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability, npj Quantum Inf.4, 43 (2018). Appendix A: Derivation of factorization rule The time evolution of the density matrixρ tot on a Markovian embedding of...

work page 2018