Pith. sign in

REVIEW

OSSOS XX: The Meaning of Kuiper Belt Colors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.01806 v1 pith:Z4LKVN3O submitted 2020-06-02 astro-ph.EP

OSSOS XX: The Meaning of Kuiper Belt Colors

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords objectscolorbeltkboskuipercolorsdynamicallyformed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Observations show that 100-km-class Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) can be divided in (at least) two color groups, hereafter red (R, g-i<1.2) and very red (VR, g-i>1.2), reflecting a difference in their surface composition. This is thought to imply that KBOs formed over a relatively wide range of radial distance, r. The cold classicals at 42<r<47 au are predominantly VR and known Neptune Trojans at r=30 au are mostly R. Intriguingly, however, the dynamically hot KBOs show a mix of R and VR colors and no correlation of color with r. Here we perform migration/instability simulations where the Kuiper belt is populated from an extended planetesimal disk. We find that the color observations can be best understood if R objects formed at r<r* and VR objects at r>r*, with 30<r*<40 au. The proposed transition at 30<r*<40 au would explain why the VR objects in the dynamically hot population have smaller orbital inclinations than the R objects, because the orbital excitation from Neptune weakens for orbits starting beyond 30 au. Possible causes of the R-VR color bimodality are discussed.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.