Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

The paper claims an adaptive protocol for Gaussian-state tomography whose sample complexity depends only on the number of modes and is independent of the state's energy, up to doubly logarithmic factors; if true, this is a doubly exponentia

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A tomography protocol estimates Gaussian states in trace distance with sample complexity independent of energy (up to doubly logarithmic factors), a doubly exponential improvement over prior methods.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection If the proofs hold up, this is a major CV tomography result, but the unreadable body and a genuine calibration concern keep me from endorsing the claims yet. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2508.14979 v1 pith:Z7MSFA3A submitted 2025-08-20 quant-ph

Energy-independent tomography of Gaussian states

Lennart Bittel , Francesco A. Mele , Jens Eisert , Antonio A. Mele This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords Gaussian statescontinuous-variable quantum opticsquantum state tomographysqueezed statestrace distancesample complexityhomodyne detectionquantum metrology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Gaussian states—bosonic states fully described by a displacement vector and a covariance matrix—are the standard objects of continuous-variable quantum information. The paper's central claim is that a full Gaussian state can be estimated to fixed trace-distance accuracy with a number of samples that depends only on the number of modes, up to doubly logarithmic factors, and is essentially independent of the state's mean photon number or energy. If correct, this gives a doubly exponential improvement over earlier guarantees and makes trace-distance state estimation cheaper than direct covariance-matrix estimation, despite covariance estimation being the natural intermediate step. The protocol uses experimentally available tools—a known auxiliary squeezed vacuum, passive Gaussian unitaries, and homodyne detection—arranged adaptively so that the total squeezing decreases as measurement proceeds. The practical stake is that verifying highly squeezed, high-energy states used in metrology and sensing would no longer cost extra samples as the brightness grows.

Core claim

The central claim is an algorithmic one: for any n-mode Gaussian state, the protocol returns an estimate that is ε-close in trace distance—a standard measure of how distinguishable two quantum states are—using a number of state copies that depends polynomially on n and only doubly logarithmically on the energy. The algorithm works by an adaptive loop: it prepares an auxiliary squeezed vacuum, combines it with the target through passive Gaussian unitaries, performs homodyne detection, learns the direction and amount of the target's squeezing from the data, and then applies a unitary that reduces the total squeezing of the system. Iterating this step drives the residual state toward the vacuum

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is adaptive total-squeezing reduction. Total squeezing measures how far a Gaussian state's covariance matrix deviates from the vacuum's, which is largely what carries the state's energy beyond simple displacement. In each round, the protocol estimates the squeezing direction with relatively coarse data, then applies a passive Gaussian unitary—a linear-optics transformation that preserves total photon number—to partially undo the squeezing and bring the state closer to the vacuum. Because the remaining estimation error is controlled by this reduced squeezing, the required sample count stops growing with the initial energy; the auxiliary squeezed vacuum acts as a kno

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the auxiliary squeezed vacuum has known, controllable squeezing, and that the adaptive updates which reduce total squeezing do not require an estimate whose accuracy degrades as the target state's energy grows; if calibration or detector errors scale with squeezing strength, the energy independence collapses.

What would settle it

Run the protocol on single-mode squeezed vacuum states with mean photon number N ranging from about 1 to 10^6, holding target trace distance and failure probability fixed; if the number of homodyne samples grows noticeably with N beyond log-log factors, the central claim is refuted. A complementary check is to analyze the algorithm under a model where the auxiliary squeezing is known only to a relative error that grows with N—the sample bound should remain flat only if the algorithm can be made robust to such calibration drift.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Trace-distance tomography of Gaussian states becomes efficient for bright, highly squeezed states, so metrology and sensing setups can certify their quantum resource without a photon-number-dependent measurement budget.
  • Estimating the full Gaussian state is provably cheaper than estimating its covariance matrix to comparable accuracy, suggesting that direct state-estimation pipelines should outperform two-step covariance-then-reconstruction schemes.
  • The protocol relies only on an auxiliary squeezed vacuum, passive linear-optical unitaries, and homodyne detection, placing it within reach of current continuous-variable platforms.
  • Standard heterodyne tomography now comes with rigorous trace-norm sample-complexity guarantees, upgrading a widely used protocol from heuristic practice to certified estimation.
  • The doubly exponential reduction in sample complexity relative to previous methods moves high-squeezing verification at large photon numbers into a plausible experimental range.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The energy independence suggests a broader principle: adaptive transformations that shrink the parameter of interest—here total squeezing—can erase an apparent dependence on state brightness; the same idea might apply to displacement estimation, channel estimation, or non-Gaussian verification.
  • A direct numerical test is available: benchmark the protocol on single-mode squeezed states with mean photon numbers spanning several orders of magnitude; empirical homodyne sample counts should stay flat up to log-log factors if the theory is correct.
  • Removing the assumption of perfectly known auxiliary squeezing is a natural next step; a calibration-error-tolerant variant might retain only a mild, logarithmic energy dependence.
  • The result may simplify certification of squeezed-state sensors and circuits whose independent verification currently dominates the data budget, since the same protocol can certify the resource and estimate the state in one pass.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript arXiv:2508.14979 (quant-ph), 'Energy-independent tomography of Gaussian states', proposes an adaptive tomography protocol for Gaussian states that uses an auxiliary squeezed vacuum, passive Gaussian unitaries, and homodyne detection. The abstract claims a sample complexity for trace-distance recovery that depends only on the number of modes and not on mean photon number/energy, up to doubly logarithmic factors; a doubly-exponential improvement over existing methods; a surprising statement that Gaussian-state estimation in trace distance is generally more efficient than direct covariance-matrix estimation; and improved sample-complexity bounds for standard heterodyne tomography. As supplied, the body of the manuscript is a corrupted, largely unreadable encoding artifact, and the header identifies arXiv:2508.14975v3 rather than arXiv:2508.14979. I therefore cannot inspect the theorem statements, proofs, constants, or the precise comparison with prior work.

Significance. If the stated results hold, they would be significant: energy-independent sample complexity for Gaussian state tomography would be a striking improvement over existing energy-dependent bounds, and rigorous trace-norm guarantees for heterodyne tomography would place a widely used experimental technique on firmer footing. The proposed operations—squeezed vacuum, passive linear optics, and homodyne detection—are standard, so the protocol is experimentally plausible in a noise-free model. The comparison with covariance-matrix estimation, if established under a fair metric, would be conceptually interesting. However, the significance is conditional: the body is unreadable as supplied, and a central robustness question about calibration error in the auxiliary squeezing is not addressed in any legible part of the paper.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (entire body)] The supplied manuscript text is an unreadable character-encoding artifact; the header identifies arXiv:2508.14975v3 rather than arXiv:2508.14979. None of the theorem statements, proof steps, constants, or bounds are legible. I therefore cannot verify the abstract's central claims—energy-independent sample complexity up to doubly logarithmic factors, the doubly-exponential improvement, or the trace-distance versus covariance-matrix comparison. In particular, I cannot check whether the doubly logarithmic factors hide an energy dependence in the failure probability or in the number of adaptive rounds, or whether the protocol's output is a bona fide Gaussian state estimate with the claimed trace distance. This is a load-bearing verification gap; a clean version is required before the paper can be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract / auxiliary squeezed vacuum step] The energy-independence guarantee hinges on the adaptive use of an auxiliary squeezed vacuum to 'systematically reduce the total squeezing.' The readable text does not state a calibration-error model. If the auxiliary squeezing parameter r_aux is known only to relative error η, then after subtracting the estimated squeezing the residual squeezing is of order ±η r, and the residual mean photon number scales as exp(2η r). The subsequent estimation stage, which the abstract claims is energy-independent, would then be applied to a state whose energy grows with the target state's squeezing. Fixed relative calibration error therefore reintroduces an energy dependence in sample complexity unless the argument explicitly tracks this error. The 'experimentally feasible' claim needs either a calibration-error model with a proof of robustness, or a clear statement of the precision regime in which th
  3. [Abstract / comparison with covariance estimation] The headline statement that 'estimating a Gaussian state in trace distance is generally more efficient than directly estimating its covariance matrix' is not checkable from the abstract: the benchmark 'directly estimating its covariance matrix' is not defined (target error measure, allowed operations, and whether the comparison is made at equal trace-norm precision). Since the body is unreadable, I cannot determine whether the comparison uses a common metric or a fixed conversion between trace distance and covariance error. Please define the comparison precisely in the revised version.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Header / metadata] The header of the supplied full text reads arXiv:2508.14975v3, which is inconsistent with the arXiv:2508.14979 identifier given for the paper. Please verify the correct identifier.
  2. [Abstract / notation] The abstract should state the failure probability / confidence parameter explicitly (e.g., success probability 1−δ) and give the explicit form of the doubly logarithmic factors (which quantities they depend on).
  3. [Abstract / scope] The class of Gaussian states to which the theorem applies (pure vs. mixed, unknown displacement and thermal noise, energy measured as mean photon number vs. squeezing parameter) is not specified in the abstract. A precise statement would help readers gauge the regime of applicability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No substantive circularity found: the algorithm is a constructive estimation protocol rather than a fitted-input prediction.

full rationale

The legible portions (abstract and fragments) describe a constructive tomography algorithm: prepare an auxiliary squeezed vacuum, apply passive Gaussian unitaries and homodyne measurements, and adaptively reduce total squeezing before estimating the remaining Gaussian state. The main claim is a sample-complexity upper bound in trace distance that is independent of energy up to doubly logarithmic factors. This is not obtained by fitting a parameter to the target state and then renaming the fit as a prediction; no equation in the readable text defines the target quantity in terms of the estimator or imports a uniqueness theorem from self-citations. The auxiliary squeezed vacuum is an operational assumption about available resources, not the object being estimated, so its calibration is an experimental robustness condition rather than a circular reduction. The comparison with covariance-matrix estimation is a statement about different distance measures and does not presuppose the conclusion. Although the bulk of the full text is corrupted in the provided input, which prevents a line-by-line check of every lemma, the available evidence shows no circular step. Concerns about calibration error would fall under correctness/robustness risk, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

Assessment based on the abstract only because the extracted full text is illegible. No free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract. The central guarantee rests on the standard continuous-variable formalism and on the assumed availability of controlled Gaussian operations.

axioms (3)
  • standard math The continuous-variable Gaussian state formalism, where states are fully described by a displacement vector and a covariance matrix.
    Standard background for the paper's object of study; invoked implicitly by the title and abstract.
  • domain assumption Trace distance between quantum states is an operationally meaningful figure of merit and is estimable from copies.
    The abstract claims recovery trace-distance guarantees; the choice of norm is a modeling assumption about what a good estimate is.
  • ad hoc to paper Controlled preparation of an auxiliary squeezed vacuum, passive Gaussian unitaries, and homodyne detection are available with errors that do not reintroduce an energy dependence.
    This is the experimental premise of the algorithm as stated in the abstract; if calibration noise scales with state energy, the energy-independent sample complexity bound is threatened.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Energy-independent tomography of Gaussian states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z7MSFA3A

@misc{pith2026250814979,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Energy-independent tomography of Gaussian states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z7MSFA3A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14979}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The exploration of tomography of bosonic Gaussian states is presumably as old as quantum optics, but only recently, their precise and rigorous study have been moving into the focus of attention, motivated by technological developments. In this work, we present an efficient and experimentally feasible Gaussian state tomography algorithm with provable recovery trace-distance guarantees, whose sample complexity depends only on the number of modes, and - remarkably - is independent of the state's photon number or energy, up to doubly logarithmic factors. Our algorithm yields a doubly-exponential improvement over existing methods, and it employs operations that are readily accessible in experimental settings: the preparation of an auxiliary squeezed vacuum, passive Gaussian unitaries, and homodyne detection. At its core lies an adaptive strategy that systematically reduces the total squeezing of the system, enabling efficient tomography. Quite surprisingly, this proves that estimating a Gaussian state in trace distance is generally more efficient than directly estimating its covariance matrix. Our algorithm is particularly well-suited for applications in quantum metrology and sensing, where highly squeezed - and hence high-energy - states are commonly employed. As a further contribution, we establish improved sample complexity bounds for standard heterodyne tomography, equipping this widely used protocol with rigorous trace-norm guarantees.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Efficient learning of bosonic Gaussian unitaries

    quant-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    We present the first provably efficient algorithm, in both query and time complexity, for learning arbitrary multi-mode bosonic Gaussian unitaries under the energy-constrained diamond distance.

  2. Learning Gaussian optical states with quantum computers

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Quantum computers enable exponentially better scaling in the number of modes n for learning n-mode Gaussian optical states, with polynomially improved energy dependence over continuous-variable classical shadows.

  3. Advances in quantum learning theory with bosonic systems

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A concise review of sample complexities and methods for tomography and learning in continuous-variable quantum systems, with emphasis on Gaussian versus non-Gaussian states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 9 internal anchors

  1. [2]

    Haah , author R

    author author J. Haah , author R. Kothari ,\ and\ author E. Tang ,\ title title Learning quantum Hamiltonians from high-temperature Gibbs states and real-time evolutions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02376-x journal journal Nature Phys. \ volume 20 ,\ pages 1027 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02376-x 2024

  2. [3]

    O'Donnell \ and\ author J

    author author R. O'Donnell \ and\ author J. Wright ,\ title title Efficient Quantum Tomography ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1145/2897518.2897544 booktitle Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing \ ( publisher Association for Computing Machinery ,\ year 2016 )\ pp.\ pages 899--912--899--912 NoStop

    arXiv 2016

  3. [4]

    Eisert , author D

    author author J. Eisert , author D. Hangleiter , author N. Walk , author I. Roth , author D. Markham , author R. Parekh , author U. Chabaud ,\ and\ author E. Kashefi ,\ title title Quantum certification and benchmarking ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0186-4 journal journal Nature Rev. Phys. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 382 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s42254-020-0186-4 2020

  4. [5]

    Kliesch \ and\ author I

    author author M. Kliesch \ and\ author I. Roth ,\ title title Theory of quantum system certification ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010201 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 010201 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010201 2021

  5. [6]

    author author D. T. \ Smithey , author M. Beck , author M. G. \ Raymer ,\ and\ author A. Faridani ,\ title title Measurement of the wigner distribution and the density matrix of a light mode using optical homodyne tomography: Application to squeezed states and the vacuum ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1244 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ vol...

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1244 1993

  6. [7]

    Leonhardt \ and\ author H

    author author U. Leonhardt \ and\ author H. Paul ,\ title title Measuring the quantum state of light ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6727(94)00007-L journal journal Progr. Quant. Electr. \ volume 19 ,\ pages 89 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/0079-6727(94)00007-l 1995

  7. [8]

    author author A. I. \ Lvovsky \ and\ author M. G. \ Raymer ,\ title title Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.299 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 299 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.299 2009

  8. [9]

    Bartolucci , author P

    author author S. Bartolucci , author P. Birchall , author H. Bombín , author H. Cable , author C. Dawson , author M. Gimeno-Segovia , author E. Johnston , author K. Kieling , author N. Nickerson , author M. Pant , author F. Pastawski , author T. Rudolph ,\ and\ author C. Sparrow ,\ title title Fusion-based quantum computation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s4...

    doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36493-1 2023

  9. [10]

    author author L. S. \ Madsen , author F. Laudenbach , author M. F. \ Askarani , author F. Rortais , author T. Vincent , author J. F. F. \ Bulmer , author F. M. \ Miatto , author L. Neuhaus , author L. G. \ Helt , author M. J. \ Collins , author A. E. \ Lita , author T. Gerrits , author S. W. \ Nam , author V. D. \ Vaidya , author M. Menotti , author I. Dh...

    2022

  10. [11]

    Alexander , author A

    author author K. Alexander , author A. Bahgat , author A. Benyamini , author D. Black , author D. Bonneau , author S. Burgos , author B. Burridge , author G. Campbell , author G. Catalano , author A. Ceballos , author C.-M. \ Chang , author C. Chung , author F. Danesh , author T. Dauer , author M. Davis , author E. Dudley , author P. Er-Xuan , author J. F...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [12]

    author author L. S. \ Madsen , author F. Laudenbach , author M. F. \ Askarani , author F. Rortais , author T. Vincent , author J. F. F. \ Bulmer , author F. M. \ Miatto , author L. Neuhaus , author L. G. \ Helt , author M. J. \ Collins , author A. E. \ Lita , author T. Gerrits , author S. W. \ Nam , author V. D. \ Vaidya , author M. Menotti , author I. Dh...

    2022

  12. [13]

    \ Zhong , author H

    author author H.-S. \ Zhong , author H. Wang , author Y.-H. \ Deng , author M.-C. \ Chen , author L.-C. \ Peng , author Y.-H. \ Luo , author J. Qin , author D. Wu , author X. Ding , author Y. Hu , author P. Hu , author X.-Y. \ Yang , author W.-J. \ Zhang , author H. Li , author Y. Li , author X. Jiang , author L. Gan , author G. Yang , author L. You , aut...

    2020

  13. [14]

    author author F. H. B. \ Somhorst , author R. van der Meer , author M. C. \ Anguita , author R. Schadow , author H. J. \ Snijders , author M. de Goede , author B. Kassenberg , author P. Venderbosch , author C. Taballione , author J. P. \ Epping , author H. H. \ van den Vlekkert , author J. F. F. \ Bulmer , author J. Lugani , author I. A. \ Walmsley , auth...

    2023

  14. [15]

    Anshu \ and\ author S

    author author A. Anshu \ and\ author S. Arunachalam ,\ title title A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00662-4 journal journal Nature Rev. Phys. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 59 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00662-4 2023

  15. [16]

    author author M. A. \ Nielsen \ and\ author I. L. \ Chuang ,\ @noop title Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address Cambridge ,\ year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  16. [17]

    author author M. M. \ Wilde ,\ @noop title Quantum Information Theory ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.\ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  17. [18]

    Khatri \ and\ author M

    author author S. Khatri \ and\ author M. M. \ Wilde ,\ @noop title Principles of Quantum Communication Theory: A Modern Approach \ ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  18. [19]

    author author C. W. \ Helstrom ,\ @noop title Quantum detection and estimation theory \ ( publisher Academic press, New York, USA ,\ year 1976 ) NoStop

    1976

  19. [20]

    author author A. S. \ Holevo ,\ title title Investigations in the general theory of statistical decisions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1070/RM9856 journal journal Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov \ volume 124 ,\ pages 3 ( year 1976 ) ,\ note (English translation: Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 124:1--140, 1978) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1070/rm9856 1976

  20. [21]

    Cramer , author M

    author author M. Cramer , author M. B. \ Plenio , author S. T. \ Flammia , author R. Somma , author D. Gross , author S. D. \ Bartlett , author O. Landon-Cardinal , author D. Poulin ,\ and\ author Y.-K. \ Liu ,\ title title Efficient quantum state tomography ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1147 journal journal Nature Comm. \ volume 1 ,\ pages 149 ( year ...

    doi:10.1038/ncomms1147 2010

  21. [22]

    author author B. P. \ Lanyon , author C. Maier , author M. Holzäpfel , author T. Baumgratz , author C. Hempel , author P. Jurcevic , author I. Dhand , author A. S. \ Buyskikh , author A. J. \ Daley , author M. Cramer , author M. B. \ Plenio , author R. Blatt ,\ and\ author C. F. \ Roos ,\ title title Efficient tomography of a quantum many-body system ,\ h...

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys4244 2017

  22. [23]

    Grewal , author V

    author author S. Grewal , author V. Iyer , author W. Kretschmer ,\ and\ author D. Liang ,\ title title Efficient learning of quantum states prepared with few non-Clifford gates ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2023 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13409 arXiv:2305.13409 NoStop

    arXiv 2023

  23. [24]

    Leone , author S

    author author L. Leone , author S. Oliviero ,\ and\ author A. Hamma ,\ title title Learning t-doped stabilizer states ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-05-27-1361 journal journal Quantum \ volume 8 ,\ pages 1361 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi:10.22331/q-2024-05-27-1361 2024

  24. [25]

    Hangleiter \ and\ author M

    author author D. Hangleiter \ and\ author M. Gullans ,\ title title Bell sampling from quantum circuits ,\ https://doi.org/0.1103/PhysRevLett.133.020601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 020601 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  25. [26]

    author author F. A. \ Mele , author A. A. \ Mele , author L. Bittel , author J. Eisert , author V. Giovannetti , author L. Lami , author L. Leone ,\ and\ author S. F. E. \ Oliviero ,\ title title Learning quantum states of continuous variable systems ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01431 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 a ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2405....

    arXiv 2024

  26. [27]

    Bittel , author F

    author author L. Bittel , author F. A. \ Mele , author A. A. \ Mele , author S. Tirone ,\ and\ author L. Lami ,\ title title Optimal estimates of trace distance between bosonic Gaussian states and applications to learning ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-06-12-1769 journal journal Quantum \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1769 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    doi:10.22331/q-2025-06-12-1769 2025

  27. [28]

    Fanizza , author N

    author author M. Fanizza , author N. Galke , author J. Lumbreras , author C. Rouzé ,\ and\ author A. Winter ,\ title title Learning finitely correlated states: stability of the spectral reconstruction ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2023 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07516 arXiv:2312.07516 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [29]

    Mele \ and\ author Y

    author author A. Mele \ and\ author Y. Herasymenko ,\ title title Efficient learning of quantum states prepared with few fermionic non-Gaussian gates ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18665 arXiv:2402.18665 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [30]

    Arunachalam , author S

    author author S. Arunachalam , author S. Bravyi , author A. Dutt ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Yoder ,\ title title Optimal algorithms for learning quantum phase states ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2023 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.07851 arXiv:2208.07851 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [31]

    author author V. Iyer ,\ title title Mildly-interacting fermionic unitaries are efficiently learnable ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11318 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11318 arXiv:2504.11318 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [32]

    Austin , author M

    author author S. Austin , author M. E. S. \ Morales ,\ and\ author A. Gorshkov ,\ title title Efficiently learning fermionic unitaries with few non-gaussian gates ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15356 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15356 arXiv:2504.15356 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [34]

    author author D. F. \ C.Rouzé ,\ title title Learning quantum many-body systems from a few copies ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2023 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03333 arXiv:2107.03333 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [35]

    Landau \ and\ author Y

    author author Z. Landau \ and\ author Y. Liu ,\ title title Learning quantum states prepared by shallow circuits in polynomial time ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23618 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23618 arXiv:2410.23618 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [36]

    \ Kim , author I

    author author H.-S. \ Kim , author I. H. \ Kim ,\ and\ author D. Ranard ,\ title title Learning state preparation circuits for quantum phases of matter ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23544 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23544 arXiv:2410.23544 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [37]

    author author J. E. \ L. Bittel , A. A. Mele \ and\ author L. Leone ,\ title title Optimal trace-distance bounds for free-fermionic states: Testing and improved tomography ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17953 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17953 arXiv:2409.17953 NoStop

    arXiv 2024

  36. [38]

    Fanizza , author C

    author author M. Fanizza , author C. Rouzé ,\ and\ author D. S. \ França ,\ title title Efficient Hamiltonian, structure and trace distance learning of Gaussian states ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03163 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03163 arXiv:2411.03163 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [39]

    author author A. S. \ Holevo ,\ title title On estimates of trace-norm distance between quantum G aussian states ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11400 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 a ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11400 arXiv:2408.11400 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [40]

    Gandhari , author V

    author author S. Gandhari , author V. V. \ Albert , author T. Gerrits , author J. M. \ Taylor ,\ and\ author M. J. \ Gullans ,\ title title Precision bounds on continuous-variable state tomography using classical shadows ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2022 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05149 arXiv:2211.05149 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [41]

    Becker , author N

    author author S. Becker , author N. Datta , author L. Lami ,\ and\ author C. Rouz\' e ,\ title title Classical shadow tomography for continuous variables quantum systems ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2024.3357972 journal journal IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory \ volume 70 ,\ pages 3427 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [42]

    Oh , author S

    author author C. Oh , author S. Chen , author Y. Wong , author S. Zhou , author H.-Y. \ Huang , author J. A. H. \ Nielsen , author Z.-H. \ Liu , author J. S. \ Neergaard-Nielsen , author U. L. \ A. , author L. Jiang ,\ and\ author J. Preskill ,\ title title Entanglement-enabled advantage for learning a bosonic random displacement channel ,\ @noop journal ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [43]

    \ Liu , author R

    author author Z.-H. \ Liu , author R. Brunel , author E. E. B. \ Østergaard , author O. Cordero , author S. Chen , author Y. Wong , author J. A. H. \ Nielsen , author A. B. \ Bregnsbo , author S. Zhou , author H.-Y. \ Huang , author C. Oh , author L. Jiang , author J. Preskill , author J. S. \ Neergaard-Nielsen ,\ and\ author U. L. \ Andersen ,\ title tit...

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [44]

    Coroi \ and\ author C

    author author E. Coroi \ and\ author C. Oh ,\ title title Exponential advantage in continuous-variable quantum state learning ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17633 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17633 arXiv:2501.17633 NoStop

    arXiv 2025

  43. [45]

    Fawzi , author A

    author author O. Fawzi , author A. Oufkir ,\ and\ author R. Salzmann ,\ title title Optimal fidelity estimation from binary measurements for discrete and continuous variable systems ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04189 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04189 arXiv:2409.04189 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [46]

    Efficient Learning of Continuous-Variable Quantum States

    author author Y.-D. \ Wu , author Y. Zhu , author G. Chiribella ,\ and\ author N. Liu ,\ title title Efficient learning of continuous-variable quantum states ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05097 arXiv:2303.05097 NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [47]

    Möbus , author A

    author author T. Möbus , author A. Bluhm , author M. C. \ Caro , author A. H. \ Werner ,\ and\ author C. Rouzé ,\ title title Dissipation-enabled bosonic Hamiltonian learning via new information-propagation bounds ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15026 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2023 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15026 arXiv:2307.15026 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  46. [48]

    An efficient quantum state verification framework and its application to bosonic systems

    author author V. Upreti \ and\ author U. Chabaud ,\ title title An efficient quantum state verification framework and its application to bosonic systems ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04688 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04688 arXiv:2411.04688 NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [49]

    Zhao , author P

    author author X. Zhao , author P. Liao , author F. A. \ Mele , author U. Chabaud ,\ and\ author Q. Zhuang ,\ title title Complexity of quantum tomography from genuine non-Gaussian entanglement ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01609 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01609 arXiv:2411.01609 NoStop

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [50]

    author author A. Serafini ,\ https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1201/9781315118727 title Quantum continuous variables: A primer of theoretical methods \ ( publisher CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, USA ,\ year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1201/9781315118727 2017

  49. [51]

    Weedbrook , author S

    author author C. Weedbrook , author S. Pirandola , author R. Garc\' a-Patr\'on , author N. J. \ Cerf , author T. C. \ Ralph , author J. H. \ Shapiro ,\ and\ author S. Lloyd ,\ title title Gaussian quantum information ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 621 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.621 2012

  50. [53]

    Schnabel , author N

    author author R. Schnabel , author N. Mavalvala , author D. E. \ McClelland ,\ and\ author P. K. \ Lam ,\ title title Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1122 journal journal Nature Comm. \ volume 1 ,\ pages 121 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms1122 2010

  51. [54]

    author author T. L. S. \ Collaboration ,\ title title Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.177 journal journal Nature Phot. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 613 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.177 2013

  52. [55]

    Zhang , author M

    author author J. Zhang , author M. Um , author D. Lv , author J.-N. \ Zhang , author L.-M. \ Duan ,\ and\ author K. Kim ,\ title title Noon states of nine quantized vibrations in two radial modes of a trapped ion ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.160502 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 160502 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.160502 2018

  53. [56]

    Meyer , author M

    author author V. Meyer , author M. A. \ Rowe , author D. Kielpinski , author C. A. \ Sackett , author W. M. \ Itano , author C. Monroe ,\ and\ author D. J. \ Wineland ,\ title title Experimental demonstration of entanglement-enhanced rotation angle estimation using trapped ions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5870 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5870 2001

  54. [57]

    McCormick , author J

    author author K. McCormick , author J. Keller , author S. Burd , author D. Wineland , author A. Wilson ,\ and\ author D. Leibfried ,\ title title Quantum-enhanced sensing of a single-ion mechanical oscillator ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1421-y journal journal Nature \ volume 572 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1421-y 2019

  55. [58]

    author author H. Q. \ Nguyen , author I. Derkach , author A. A. E. \ Hajomer , author H.-M. \ Chin , author A. nag Oruganti , author U. L. \ Andersen , author V. Usenko ,\ and\ author T. Gehring ,\ title title Digital reconstruction of squeezed light for quantum information processing ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07666 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [59]

    Renner ,\ title Security of quantum key distribution ,\ @noop Ph.D

    author author R. Renner ,\ title Security of quantum key distribution ,\ @noop Ph.D. thesis ,\ school ETH Zurich ( year 2005 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0512258 arXiv:quant-ph/0512258 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  57. [60]

    Lloyd \ and\ author S

    author author S. Lloyd \ and\ author S. L. \ Braunstein ,\ title title Quantum computation over continuous variables ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1784 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 82 ,\ pages 1784 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1784 1999

  58. [61]

    Gottesman , author A

    author author D. Gottesman , author A. Kitaev ,\ and\ author J. Preskill ,\ title title Encoding a qubit in an oscillator ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012310 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 64 ,\ pages 012310 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physreva.64.012310 2001

  59. [62]

    author author N. C. \ Menicucci , author P. van Loock , author M. Gu , author C. Weedbrook , author T. C. \ Ralph ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Universal quantum computation with continuous-variable cluster states ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.110501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 97 ,\ pages 110501 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.110501 2006

  60. [63]

    Mirrahimi , author Z

    author author M. Mirrahimi , author Z. Leghtas , author V. V. \ Albert , author S. Touzard , author R. J. \ Schoelkopf , author L. Jiang ,\ and\ author M. H. \ Devoret ,\ title title Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/045014 journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 16 ,...

    doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/045014 2014

  61. [64]

    Ofek , author A

    author author N. Ofek , author A. Petrenko , author R. Heeres , author P. Reinhold , author Z. Leghtas , author B. Vlastakis , author Y. Liu , author L. Frunzio , author S. Girvin , author L. Jiang , author M. Mirrahimi , author M. Devoret ,\ and\ author R. Schoelkopf ,\ title title Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in supercon...

    doi:10.1038/nature18949 2016

  62. [65]

    author author M. H. \ Michael , author M. Silveri , author R. T. \ Brierley , author V. V. \ Albert , author J. Salmilehto , author L. Jiang ,\ and\ author S. M. \ Girvin ,\ title title New class of quantum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.031006 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 6 ,\ pages 031006 ( year ...

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.031006 2016

  63. [66]

    Guillaud \ and\ author M

    author author J. Guillaud \ and\ author M. Mirrahimi ,\ title title Repetition cat qubits for fault-tolerant quantum computation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.9.041053 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 9 ,\ pages 041053 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041053 2019

  64. [67]

    author author A. S. \ Holevo \ and\ author R. F. \ Werner ,\ title title Evaluating capacities of bosonic G aussian channels ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.032312 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 63 ,\ pages 032312 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physreva.63.032312 2001

  65. [68]

    author author M. M. \ Wolf , author D. P \'e rez-Garc \' a ,\ and\ author G. Giedke ,\ title title Quantum capacities of bosonic channels ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.130501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 98 ,\ pages 130501 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.130501 2007

  66. [69]

    Takeoka , author S

    author author M. Takeoka , author S. Guha ,\ and\ author M. M. \ Wilde ,\ title title Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6235 journal journal Nature Comm. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 5235 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/ncomms6235 2014

  67. [70]

    Pirandola , author R

    author author S. Pirandola , author R. Laurenza , author C. Ottaviani ,\ and\ author L. Banchi ,\ title title Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15043 journal journal Nature Comm. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 15043 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/ncomms15043 2017

  68. [71]

    author author F. A. \ Mele , author L. Lami ,\ and\ author V. Giovannetti ,\ title title Restoring quantum communication efficiency over high loss optical fibers ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.180501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 129 ,\ pages 180501 ( year 2022 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.180501 2022

  69. [72]

    author author F. A. \ Mele , author L. Lami ,\ and\ author V. Giovannetti ,\ title title Maximum tolerable excess noise in continuous-variable quantum key distribution and improved lower bound on two-way capacities ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-024-01595-9 journal journal Nature Phot. \ volume 19 ,\ pages 329–334 ( year 2025 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01595-9 2025

  70. [73]

    author author F. A. \ Mele , author F. Salek , author V. Giovannetti ,\ and\ author L. Lami ,\ title title Quantum communication on the bosonic loss-dephasing channel ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.110.012460 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 110 ,\ pages 012460 ( year 2024 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012460 2024

  71. [74]

    author author F. A. \ Mele , author L. Lami ,\ and\ author V. Giovannetti ,\ title title Quantum optical communication in the presence of strong attenuation noise ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042437 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 106 ,\ pages 042437 ( year 2022 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.042437 2022

  72. [75]

    author author F. A. \ Mele , author G. D. \ Palma , author M. Fanizza , author V. Giovannetti ,\ and\ author L. Lami ,\ title title Optical fibres with memory effects and their quantum communication capacities ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2023 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.17066 arXiv:2309.17066 NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  73. [76]

    Hangleiter \ and\ author J

    author author D. Hangleiter \ and\ author J. Eisert ,\ title title Computational advantage of quantum random sampling ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.035001 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 95 ,\ pages 035001 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.035001 2023

  74. [77]

    author author Y. S. \ Teo , author K. Park , author S. Shin , author H. Jeong ,\ and\ author P. Marek ,\ title title Highly accurate Gaussian process tomography with geometrical sets of coherent states ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14177 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2020 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14177 arXiv:2012.14177 NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  75. [78]

    Esposito , author F

    author author M. Esposito , author F. Benatti , author R. Floreanini , author S. Olivares , author F. Randi , author K. Titimbo , author M. Pividori , author F. Novelli , author F. Cilento , author F. Parmigiani ,\ and\ author D. Fausti ,\ title title Pulsed homodyne Gaussian quantum tomography with low detection efficiency ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1367...

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/043004 2014

  76. [79]

    author author C. Kumar \ and\ author Arvind ,\ title title Estimation of the Wigner distribution of single-mode Gaussian states: A comparative study ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.105.042419 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 105 ,\ pages 042419 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.105.042419 2022

  77. [80]

    High-rate Generation and State Tomography of Non-Gaussian Quantum States for Ultra-fast Clock Frequency Quantum Processors

    author author A. Kawasaki , author R. Ide , author H. Brunel , author T. Suzuki , author R. Nehra , author K. Nakashima , author T. Kashiwazaki , author A. Inoue , author T. Umeki , author F. China , author M. Yabuno , author S. Miki , author H. Terai , author T. Yamashima , author A. Sakaguchi , author K. Takase , author M. Endo , author W. Asavanant ,\ ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  78. [81]

    Řeháček , author Y

    author author J. Řeháček , author Y. S. \ Teo , author Z. Hradil ,\ and\ author S. Wallentowitz ,\ title title Surmounting intrinsic quantum-measurement uncertainties in Gaussian-state tomography with quadrature squeezing ,\ https://doi.org/12289 journal journal Sc. Rep. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 12289 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  79. [82]

    King , author K

    author author R. King , author K. Wan ,\ and\ author J. R. \ McClean ,\ title title Exponential learning advantages with conjugate states and minimal quantum memory ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/prxquantum.5.040301 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 5 ,\ pages 040301 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.040301 2024

  80. [83]

    author author A. Montanaro ,\ title title Learning stabilizer states by Bell sampling ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.04012 journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2017 b ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.04012 arXiv:1707.04012 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.