Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

SensePOLAR: Word sense aware interpretability for pre-trained contextual word embeddings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.04704 v1 pith:ZASGKI36 submitted 2023-01-11 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords wordembeddingscontextualapproachesawareinterpretabilitypolarwords
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Adding interpretability to word embeddings represents an area of active research in text representation. Recent work has explored thepotential of embedding words via so-called polar dimensions (e.g. good vs. bad, correct vs. wrong). Examples of such recent approaches include SemAxis, POLAR, FrameAxis, and BiImp. Although these approaches provide interpretable dimensions for words, they have not been designed to deal with polysemy, i.e. they can not easily distinguish between different senses of words. To address this limitation, we present SensePOLAR, an extension of the original POLAR framework that enables word-sense aware interpretability for pre-trained contextual word embeddings. The resulting interpretable word embeddings achieve a level of performance that is comparable to original contextual word embeddings across a variety of natural language processing tasks including the GLUE and SQuAD benchmarks. Our work removes a fundamental limitation of existing approaches by offering users sense aware interpretations for contextual word embeddings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interpretable Syntactic Representations Enable Hierarchical Word Vectors

    cs.CL 2024-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A linear projection of Word2Vec and GloVe embeddings onto eight part-of-speech axes yields compact interpretable vectors, and combining them with the original vectors gives small gains on a few downstream tasks.

  2. Why you shouldn't fully trust ChatGPT: A synthesis of this AI tool's error rates across disciplines and the software engineering lifecycle

    cs.SE 2025-04 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A multivocal literature review finds ChatGPT's reported error rates range from single digits to over 80 percent depending on domain and task, yet its synthesized ranges are not backed by a released dataset.

Pith tools