Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

IE-Bench: Advancing the Measurement of Text-Driven Image Editing for Human Perception Alignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.09927 v1 pith:ZAW3TLKQ submitted 2025-01-17 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords imageeditingtext-drivenie-benchimagesassessmenteditedhuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in text-driven image editing have been significant, yet the task of accurately evaluating these edited images continues to pose a considerable challenge. Different from the assessment of text-driven image generation, text-driven image editing is characterized by simultaneously conditioning on both text and a source image. The edited images often retain an intrinsic connection to the original image, which dynamically change with the semantics of the text. However, previous methods tend to solely focus on text-image alignment or have not aligned with human perception. In this work, we introduce the Text-driven Image Editing Benchmark suite (IE-Bench) to enhance the assessment of text-driven edited images. IE-Bench includes a database contains diverse source images, various editing prompts and the corresponding results different editing methods, and total 3,010 Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) provided by 25 human subjects. Furthermore, we introduce IE-QA, a multi-modality source-aware quality assessment method for text-driven image editing. To the best of our knowledge, IE-Bench offers the first IQA dataset and model tailored for text-driven image editing. Extensive experiments demonstrate IE-QA's superior subjective-alignments on the text-driven image editing task compared with previous metrics. We will make all related data and code available to the public.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DSH-Bench: A Difficulty- and Scenario-Aware Benchmark with Hierarchical Subject Taxonomy for Subject-Driven Text-to-Image Generation

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    DSH-Bench supplies a hierarchical 58-category subject set, difficulty/scenario labels, and a human-aligned SICS metric that exposes systematic failures of 19 subject-driven T2I models.

  2. LMM4Edit: Benchmarking and Evaluating Multimodal Image Editing with LMMs

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A large human-annotated benchmark of AI-edited images (EBench-18K) plus a fine-tuned LMM metric (LMM4Edit) that predicts human preference scores across three dimensions and answers editing-specific questions.

  3. ADIEE: Automatic Dataset Creation and Scorer for Instruction-Guided Image Editing Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An automatically generated training dataset and a fine-tuned LLaVA-NeXT model produce an image editing evaluation scorer that aligns with human preference and serves as a reward model for improving editing models.

Pith tools