Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Hubble distancing: Focusing on distance measurements in cosmology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.11567 v2 pith:ZD7ETX2Q submitted 2021-12-21 astro-ph.CO hep-ph

Hubble distancing: Focusing on distance measurements in cosmology

classification astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords distancecosmologyhubblemeasurementsconstantdistancesfocusingladder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

The Hubble-Lemaitre tension is currently one of the most important questions in cosmology. Most of the focus so far has been on reconciling the Hubble constant value inferred from detailed cosmic microwave background measurement with that from the local distance ladder. This emphasis on one number -- namely $H_0$ -- misses the fact that the tension fundamentally arises from disagreements of distance measurements. To be successful, a proposed cosmological model must accurately fit these distances rather than simply infer a given value of $H_0$. Using the newly developed likelihood package `distanceladder', which integrates the local distance ladder into MontePython, we show that focusing on $H_0$ at the expense of distances can lead to the spurious detection of new physics in models which change late-time cosmology. As such, we encourage the observational cosmology community to make their actual distance measurements broadly available to model builders instead of simply quoting their derived Hubble constant values.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.