Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Probability Tools for Sequential Random Projection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.14026 v3 pith:ZHY3H4MD submitted 2024-02-16 math.ST cs.DScs.ITcs.NAmath.ITmath.NAmath.PRstat.MLstat.TH

classification math.STcs.DScs.ITcs.NAmath.ITmath.NAmath.PRstat.MLstat.TH
keywords sequentialrandomanalysisprocessprojectionboundprobabilitystopped
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce the first probabilistic framework tailored for sequential random projection, an approach rooted in the challenges of sequential decision-making under uncertainty. The analysis is complicated by the sequential dependence and high-dimensional nature of random variables, a byproduct of the adaptive mechanisms inherent in sequential decision processes. Our work features a novel construction of a stopped process, facilitating the analysis of a sequence of concentration events that are interconnected in a sequential manner. By employing the method of mixtures within a self-normalized process, derived from the stopped process, we achieve a desired non-asymptotic probability bound. This bound represents a non-trivial martingale extension of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma, marking a pioneering contribution to the literature on random projection and sequential analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improving statistical learning methods via features selection without replacement sampling and random projection

    q-bio.QM 2025-05 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A routine feature-selection and random-subspace pipeline for brain cancer classification reports a 96% score, but the paper's own tables show 93.8% and the method is a known technique.

Pith tools