pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.02491 · v2 · pith:ZID7J76Cnew · submitted 2025-02-04 · 🪐 quant-ph · math-ph· math.MP· nlin.SI

Generalized quantum Zernike Hamiltonians: Polynomial Higgs-type algebras and algebraic derivation of the spectrum

Rutwig Campoamor-Stursberg , Francisco J. Herranz , Danilo Latini , Ian Marquette , Alfonso Blasco This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 03:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph math-phmath.MPnlin.SI
keywords quantum Zernike systemspolynomial Higgs algebrasdeformed oscillator algebrassuperintegrable systemsenergy spectraHeisenberg algebraintegrals of motion
0
0 comments X

The pith

A polynomial Higgs-type algebra for generalized quantum Zernike Hamiltonians reduces the spectrum problem to a deformed oscillator whose structure function factors into two commuting parts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs higher-order integrals of motion for a family of two-dimensional quantum Hamiltonians that add polynomial terms in the radial momentum operator to the free particle or oscillator. These integrals are combined into a polynomial symmetry algebra of Higgs type. After a change of basis the algebra becomes a deformed oscillator algebra whose structure function factors as the product of two commuting functions. The factorization supplies an algebraic route to the possible energy eigenvalues when the polynomial degree N satisfies 1 ≤ N ≤ 5, with the N = 1 case recovering the ordinary harmonic oscillator.

Core claim

The Hamiltonian exhibits higher-order integrals of motion within the enveloping algebra of the two-dimensional Heisenberg algebra that combine into a polynomial Higgs-type symmetry algebra; after an appropriate change of basis this algebra yields a deformed oscillator algebra whose structure function Φ factors into two commuting components Φ = Φ1 Φ2. The factorization permits an algebraic determination of the possible energy spectra for all coefficients γk when 1 ≤ N ≤ 5, and the systems are interpreted as higher-order superintegrable perturbations of the original quantum Zernike model (N = 2).

What carries the argument

Polynomial Higgs-type symmetry algebra built from higher-order integrals of motion in the enveloping algebra of the two-dimensional Heisenberg algebra, which reduces to a deformed oscillator algebra after basis change.

If this is right

  • The N = 1 case is canonically equivalent to the harmonic oscillator.
  • Energy spectra are determined algebraically for every coefficient choice when N ≤ 5.
  • Two conjectures are stated that extend the factorization and algebraic spectrum to arbitrary N ≥ 1.
  • The models are higher-order superintegrable perturbations of the N = 2 quantum Zernike system.
  • The same algebraic structure applies to the isotropic oscillator on the sphere, hyperbolic plane, and Euclidean plane.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conjectures hold, the same factorization supplies a uniform algebraic solution for the entire family at any N.
  • The commuting factorization may indicate an underlying tensor-product structure that could be exploited in other two-dimensional superintegrable systems.
  • The method offers a template for constructing algebraic spectra in other polynomial perturbations of the oscillator that preserve angular momentum.

Load-bearing premise

Higher-order integrals of motion exist in the enveloping algebra of the two-dimensional Heisenberg algebra and can be combined into a polynomial Higgs-type symmetry algebra for arbitrary coefficients γk.

What would settle it

An explicit computation for N = 3 or N = 4 showing that the structure function does not factor into two commuting components or that the resulting recurrence does not produce a consistent discrete spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02491 by Alfonso Blasco, Danilo Latini, Francisco J. Herranz, Ian Marquette, Rutwig Campoamor-Stursberg.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The discrete spectrum (3.11) of the spherical oscillator on S 2 for the first ten states 1 ≤ n ≤ 10 according to three values of the curvature κ ∈ {0.5, 0.25, 0.15} starting from the upper dots together with the Euclidean spectrum (3.10) with κ = 0 in the lowest values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The finite discrete spectrum (3.13) of the hyperbolic oscillator on H2 for the three values of the curvature κ ∈ {−0.25, −0.16, −0.12} corresponding to nmax ∈ {4, 6, 8} (3.15) starting from the lower dots, respectively, together with the Euclidean spectrum (3.10) with κ = 0 in the highest values. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The discrete spectrum (4.5) of the cubic spherical perturbation of the oscillator on E2 for the first ten states 1 ≤ n ≤ 10 according to three values of the parameter µ ∈ {−0.05, −0.025, −0.01} starting from the upper dots together with the Euclidean spectrum (3.10) with µ = 0 in the lowest values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The finite discrete spectrum (4.6) of the cubic hyperbolic perturbation of the oscillator on E2 for three values µ ∈ {0.06, 0.03, 0.015} corresponding to nmax ∈ {3, 5, 7} (4.7) starting from the lower dots, respectively, together with the Euclidean spectrum (3.10) with µ = 0 in the highest values. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The finite discrete spectrum (4.8) of the cubic hyperbolic perturbation of the spherical oscillator on S 2 with κ = +1 for µ ∈ {0.2, 0.12, 0.1, 0.07} corresponding to nmax ∈ {4, 6, 8, 10} (4.9) starting from the lower dots. 5 The quartic quantum Zernike Hamiltonian We proceed similarly to the two previous sections, first giving the quantum symmetries and the possible spectra for the quartic Hamiltonian Hˆ … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider the quantum analog of the generalized Zernike systems given by the Hamiltonian: $$\hat{\mathcal{H}}_N =\hat{p}_1^2+\hat{p}_2^2+\sum_{k=1}^N \gamma_k (\hat{q}_1 \hat{p}_1+\hat{q}_2 \hat{p}_2)^k ,$$ with canonical operators $\hat{q}_i,\, \hat{p}_i$ and arbitrary coefficients $\gamma_k$. This two-dimensional quantum model, besides the conservation of the angular momentum, exhibits higher-order integrals of motion within the enveloping algebra of the Heisenberg algebra in two dimensions. By constructing suitable combinations of these integrals, we uncover a polynomial Higgs-type symmetry algebra that, through an appropriate change of basis, gives rise to a deformed oscillator algebra. The associated structure function $\Phi$ is shown to factorize into two commuting components $\Phi=\Phi_1 \Phi_2$. This framework enables an algebraic determination of the possible energy spectra of the model for the cases $1\le N \le 5$, the case $N=1$ being canonically equivalent to the harmonic oscillator. Based on these findings, we propose two conjectures which generalize the results for all $N\ge 1$ and any value of the coefficients $\gamma_k$. In addition, all of these results can be interpreted as higher-order superintegrable perturbations of the original quantum Zernike system corresponding to $N=2$, which are also analyzed and applied to the isotropic oscillator on the sphere, hyperbolic and Euclidean spaces

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript considers the family of 2D quantum Hamiltonians Ĥ_N = p̂₁² + p̂₂² + ∑_{k=1}^N γ_k (q̂₁ p̂₁ + q̂₂ p̂₂)^k with arbitrary real coefficients γ_k. It asserts the existence of higher-order integrals of motion inside the enveloping algebra of the two-dimensional Heisenberg algebra that commute with Ĥ_N, constructs from them a polynomial Higgs-type symmetry algebra, realizes the latter as a deformed oscillator algebra whose structure function Φ factors as Φ = Φ₁ Φ₂, and uses the factorization to obtain the algebraic energy spectra for all 1 ≤ N ≤ 5 (with N = 1 reducing to the harmonic oscillator). Two conjectures extending the construction to arbitrary N are stated, and the systems are interpreted as higher-order superintegrable perturbations of the N = 2 Zernike case with applications to oscillators on the sphere, hyperbolic plane, and Euclidean plane.

Significance. Should the explicit construction of the integrals and the factorization of Φ hold identically for generic γ_k, the work supplies a concrete algebraic route to the spectra of a new family of exactly solvable 2D quantum systems and enlarges the catalogue of polynomial superintegrable models. The conjectures, if substantiated, would constitute a systematic classification of higher-order integrals for this class of perturbations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph on integrals of motion: the central claim that higher-order integrals exist inside the enveloping algebra and commute with Ĥ_N for arbitrary γ_k is load-bearing; the manuscript must supply the explicit symbolic verification that [Ĥ_N, I] = 0 holds identically rather than only after imposing auxiliary polynomial relations among the γ_k, as the stress-test concern indicates this may restrict the result to a lower-dimensional submanifold of coefficient space.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the factorization Φ = Φ₁ Φ₂ and the subsequent algebraic determination of spectra for 1 ≤ N ≤ 5 are presented without reference to the concrete change-of-basis or the explicit form of the deformed-oscillator realization; these steps must be shown in sufficient detail (including the explicit structure function for at least one N > 2) so that the spectra can be reproduced independently.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract, final paragraph: the two conjectures for general N are stated without any supporting partial results, consistency checks for N = 6, or indication of the coefficient domain on which they are expected to hold; the manuscript should either provide evidence that the pattern observed for N ≤ 5 persists or clearly demarcate the conjectures as open.
minor comments (2)
  1. The Hamiltonian is written with script H while the integrals are denoted I; a uniform notation convention for all operators would improve readability.
  2. The abstract mentions applications to the isotropic oscillator on curved spaces but does not indicate whether the algebraic spectra derived for the flat case carry over directly or require additional curvature-dependent terms.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough reading and valuable suggestions. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph on integrals of motion: the central claim that higher-order integrals exist inside the enveloping algebra and commute with Ĥ_N for arbitrary γ_k is load-bearing; the manuscript must supply the explicit symbolic verification that [Ĥ_N, I] = 0 holds identically rather than only after imposing auxiliary polynomial relations among the γ_k, as the stress-test concern indicates this may restrict the result to a lower-dimensional submanifold of coefficient space.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification for generic γ_k is essential. The integrals I are constructed explicitly in Section 2 for each N=1 to 5 as elements of the enveloping algebra, and the commutation [Ĥ_N, I]=0 is verified symbolically via computer algebra without imposing relations on the γ_k. To address the concern directly, the revised manuscript will include the explicit operator expressions for the integrals together with the expanded commutators (or a representative sample) confirming they vanish identically for arbitrary coefficients. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the factorization Φ = Φ₁ Φ₂ and the subsequent algebraic determination of spectra for 1 ≤ N ≤ 5 are presented without reference to the concrete change-of-basis or the explicit form of the deformed-oscillator realization; these steps must be shown in sufficient detail (including the explicit structure function for at least one N > 2) so that the spectra can be reproduced independently.

    Authors: The change-of-basis to the deformed-oscillator realization and the resulting structure functions Φ are derived in Section 3, with explicit factorization Φ=Φ₁Φ₂ given for each N≤5. For transparency we will add, in the revised version, a compact table or subsection that lists the explicit Φ for N=3 (as a representative case beyond N=2) together with the precise change-of-basis operators, allowing independent reproduction of the spectra. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, final paragraph: the two conjectures for general N are stated without any supporting partial results, consistency checks for N = 6, or indication of the coefficient domain on which they are expected to hold; the manuscript should either provide evidence that the pattern observed for N ≤ 5 persists or clearly demarcate the conjectures as open.

    Authors: We accept that the conjectures require clearer demarcation. The revised text will explicitly label both statements as conjectures, state that they are motivated by the verified pattern for N≤5, and note that they are expected to hold for arbitrary real γ_k. No additional consistency checks for N=6 are currently available, so we will not claim supporting evidence beyond the observed pattern. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algebraic spectrum derived from independently constructed symmetry algebra

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by starting from the given Hamiltonian with arbitrary coefficients γ_k, constructing higher-order integrals within the enveloping algebra of the 2D Heisenberg algebra that commute with Ĥ_N, combining them into a polynomial Higgs-type algebra, changing basis to a deformed oscillator realization, and obtaining the factored structure function Φ=Φ1Φ2 whose roots determine the spectrum algebraically for N≤5. This chain is self-contained: the integrals and algebra are built from the operators and coefficients without using the target spectrum as input, without fitting parameters to data, and without load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems. The abstract explicitly separates the construction step from the subsequent algebraic determination of energies, confirming the result is not equivalent to its inputs by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the existence of higher-order integrals inside the Heisenberg enveloping algebra and on the ability to form a closed polynomial Higgs-type algebra; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the arbitrary γ_k coefficients.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The two-dimensional Heisenberg algebra and its enveloping algebra contain the required higher-order integrals of motion for arbitrary γ_k.
    Invoked in the abstract when stating that the Hamiltonian exhibits higher-order integrals within the enveloping algebra.
  • domain assumption Suitable combinations of these integrals close into a polynomial Higgs-type symmetry algebra.
    Central step described in the abstract for constructing the algebra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5844 in / 1366 out tokens · 40084 ms · 2026-05-23T03:35:24.513076+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    F. Zernike. Beugungstheorie des Schneidenverfahrens und seiner verbesserten Form, der Phasenkontrastmethode. Physica 1 (1934) 689–704. doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(34)80259-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0031-8914(34)80259-5 1934

  2. [2]

    Blasco, I

    A. Blasco, I. Gutierrez-Sagredo and F. J. Herranz. Higher-order superintegrable momentum-dependent Hamil- tonians on curved spaces from the classical Zernike system. Nonlinearity 36 (2023) 1143–1167. doi: 10.1088/1361-6544/acad5e

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6544/acad5e 2023

  3. [3]

    Campoamor-Stursberg, D

    R. Campoamor-Stursberg, D. Latini, I. Marquette and Y.-Z. Zhang. Algebraic (super-)integrability from commutants of subalgebras in universal enveloping algebras J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56 (2023) 045202 doi:10.1088/1751-8121/acb576

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/acb576 2023

  4. [4]

    G. S. Pogosyan, C. Salto-Alegre, K. B. Wolf and A. Yakhno. Quantum superintegrable Zernike system. J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017) 072101. doi:10.1063/1.4990794

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4990794 2017

  5. [5]

    N. M. Atakishiyev, G. S. Pogosyan, K. B. Wolf and A. Yakhno. Interbasis expansions in the Zernike system. J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017) 103505. doi:10.1063/1.5000915

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5000915 2017

  6. [6]

    G. S. Pogosyan, K. B. Wolf and A. Yakhno. New separated polynomial solutions to the Zernike system on the unit disk and interbasis expansion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 34 (2017) 1844–1848. doi:10.1364/josaa.34.001844

    work page doi:10.1364/josaa.34.001844 2017

  7. [7]

    A. P. Fordy. Classical and quantum super-integrability: From Lissajous figures to exact solvability. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 81 (2018) 832–842. doi:10.1134/S1063778818060133

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063778818060133 2018

  8. [8]

    N. M. Atakishiyev, G. S. Pogosyan, K. B. Wolf and A. Yakhno. Spherical geometry, Zernike’s separability, and interbasis expansion coefficients. J. Math. Phys. 60 (2019) 101701. doi:10.1063/1.5099974

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5099974 2019

  9. [9]

    K. B. Wolf. From free motion on a 3-sphere to the Zernike system of wavefronts inside a circular pupil. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1540 (2020) 012011. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1540/1/012011

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1540/1/012011 2020

  10. [10]

    Lakshminarayanan and A

    V. Lakshminarayanan and A. Fleck. Zernike polynomials: a guide. J. Mod. Opt. 58 (2011) 545–561. doi: 10.1080/09500340.2011.554896

    work page doi:10.1080/09500340.2011.554896 2011

  11. [11]

    Niu and C

    K. Niu and C. Tian. Zernike polynomials and their applications. J. Opt. 24 (2022) 123001. doi:10.1088/ 2040-8986/ac9e08

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    G. S. Pogosyan, K. B. Wolf and A. Yakhno. Superintegrable classical Zernike system. J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017) 072901. doi:10.1063/1.4990793

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4990793 2017

  13. [13]

    Gonera, J

    C. Gonera, J. Gonera and P. Kosi´ nski. On the generalization of classical Zernike system.Nonlinearity 37 (2024) 025019. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ad1b8d

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ad1b8d 2024

  14. [14]

    Daskaloyannis

    C. Daskaloyannis. Generalized deformed oscillator and nonlinear algebras. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 24 (1991) L789–L794. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/24/15/001

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/24/15/001 1991

  15. [15]

    C. Quesne. Generalized deformed parafermions, nonlinear deformations of so(3) and exactly solvable potentials. Phys. Lett. A 193 (1994) 245–250. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(94)90591-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(94)90591-6 1994

  16. [16]

    Quesne and N

    C. Quesne and N. Vansteenkiste. Representation theory of generalized deformed oscillator algebra. Czech. J. Phys. 47 (1997) 115–122. doi:10.1023/A:1021408531528

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1021408531528 1997

  17. [17]

    M. S. Plyushchay. Deformed Heisenberg algebra with reflection. Nucl. Phys. B 491 (1997) 619–634. doi: 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00065-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00065-5 1997

  18. [18]

    Quesne and N

    C. Quesne and N. Vansteenkiste. Cλ-extended oscillator algebras and some of their deformations and applications to quantum mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 39 (2000) 1175–1215. doi:10.1023/A:1003627217508

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1003627217508 2000

  19. [19]

    Sunil Kumar, B

    V. Sunil Kumar, B. A. Bambah and R. Jagannathan. Jordan-Schwinger realizations of three-dimensional poly- nomial algebras. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17 (2002) 1559–1566. doi:10.1142/S0217732302007454

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732302007454 2002

  20. [20]

    J. M. Carballo, D. J. Fern´ andez C., J. Negro and L. M. Nieto. Polynomial Heisenberg algebras. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 (2004) 10349–10362. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/43/022 27

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/43/022 2004

  21. [21]

    A. M. Gavrilik and A. P. Rebesh. Polynomially deformed oscillators as k-bonacci oscillators. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 (2010) 095203. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/9/095203

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/9/095203 2010

  22. [22]

    Lee, W.-L

    Y.-H. Lee, W.-L. Yang and Y.-Z. Zhang. Polynomial algebras and exact solutions of general quantum nonlinear optical models I: two-mode boson systems.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 (2010) 185204. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/ 43/18/185204

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/ 2010

  23. [23]

    Daskaloyannis

    C. Daskaloyannis. Quadratic Poisson algebras of two-dimensional classical superintegrable systems and quadratic associative algebras of quantum superintegrable systems. J. Math. Phys. 42 (2001) 1100–1119. doi:10.1063/ 1.1348026

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    C. Quesne. Quadratic algebra approach to an exactly solvable position-dependent mass Schr¨ odinger equation in two dimensions. Symmetry integrability geom.: methods appl. 3 (2007) 067. doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2007.067

    work page doi:10.3842/sigma.2007.067 2007

  25. [25]

    Marquette

    I. Marquette. Superintegrability with third order integrals of motion, cubic algebras and supersymmetric quan- tum mechanics I. Rational function potentials. J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009) 012101. doi:10.1063/1.3013804

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3013804 2009

  26. [26]

    Marquette

    I. Marquette. Quartic Poisson algebras and quartic associative algebras and realizations as deformed oscillator algebras. J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 071702. doi:10.1063/1.4816086

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4816086 2013

  27. [27]

    Marquette

    I. Marquette. New ladder operators for a rational extension of the harmonic oscillator and superintegrability of some two-dimensional systems. J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 102102. doi:10.1063/1.4823771

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4823771 2013

  28. [28]

    P. W. Higgs. Dynamical symmetries in a spherical geometry I. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 12 (1979) 309–323. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/12/3/006

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/12/3/006 1979

  29. [29]

    N. Debergh. The relation between polynomial deformations of sl(2, R) and quasi-exact solvability. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 (2000) 7109–7122. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/33/40/308

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/33/40/308 2000

  30. [30]

    Debergh, J

    N. Debergh, J. Ndimubandi and B. Van den Bossche. Polynomial deformations of sl(2, R) in a three-dimensional invariant subspace of monomials. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 18 (2003) 1013–1022. doi:10.1142/S0217732303010831

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732303010831 2003

  31. [31]

    D. Ruan. Boson realizations of the polynomial angular momentum algebras with arbitrary powers and their unitarization. Phys. Lett. A 319 (2003) 122–129. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2003.10.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2003.10.011 2003

  32. [32]

    Ballesteros, O

    A. Ballesteros, O. Civitarese, F. J. Herranz and M. Reboiro. Generalized rotational Hamiltonians from nonlinear angular momentum algebras. Phys. Rev. C 75 (2007) 044316. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.75.044316

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.75.044316 2007

  33. [33]

    Ballesteros and F

    A. Ballesteros and F. J. Herranz. Maximal superintegrability of the generalized Kepler–Coulomb system on N- dimensional curved spaces. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 (2009) 245203. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/24/245203

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/24/245203 2009

  34. [34]

    J. F. Cari˜ nena, M. F. Ra˜ nada and M. Santander. The quantum harmonic oscillator on the sphere and the hyperbolic plane: κ-dependent formalism, polar coordinates, and hypergeometric functions. J. Math. Phys. 48 (2007) 102106. doi:10.1063/1.2795214

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2795214 2007

  35. [35]

    Ballesteros, F

    A. Ballesteros, F. J. Herranz and F. Musso. The anisotropic oscillator on the 2D sphere and the hyperbolic plane. Nonlinearity 26 (2013) 971–990. doi:10.1088/0951-7715/26/4/971

    work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/26/4/971 2013

  36. [36]

    Ballesteros, A

    A. Ballesteros, A. Blasco, F. J. Herranz and F. Musso. A new integrable anisotropic oscillator on the two- dimensional sphere and the hyperbolic plane. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 (2014) 345204. doi:10.1088/ 1751-8113/47/34/345204

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Ballesteros, F

    A. Ballesteros, F. J. Herranz, S. Kuru and J. Negro. The anisotropic oscillator on curved spaces: A new exactly solvable model. Ann. Phys. 373 (2016) 399–423. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2016.07.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2016.07.006 2016

  38. [38]

    Ballesteros, F

    A. Ballesteros, F. J. Herranz and A. Blasco. Curvature as an integrable deformation.Integrability, Supersymmetry and Coherent States . S. Kuru, J. Negro and L. M. Nieto (eds). CRM Series in Mathematical Physics (Springer, Cham) (2019) 1–35. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20087-9_1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20087-9_1 2019

  39. [39]

    F. J. Herranz and A. Ballesteros. Superintegrability on three-dimensional Riemannian and relativistic spaces of constant curvature. Symmetry Integrability Geom.: Methods Appl. 2 (2006) 010. doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2006.010 28

    work page doi:10.3842/sigma.2006.010 2006

  40. [40]

    Dorso, S

    C. Dorso, S. Duarte and J. Randrup. Classical simulation of the Fermi gas. Phys. Lett. B 188 (1987) 287–294. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91382-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91382-7 1987

  41. [41]

    D. H. Boal and J. N. Glosli. Quasiparticle model for nuclear dynamics studies: Ground-state properties. Phys. Rev. C 38 (1988) 1870–1878. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.38.1870

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.38.1870 1988

  42. [42]

    Cordero and E

    P. Cordero and E. S. Hern´ andez. Momentum-dependent potentials: Towards the molecular dynamics of fermion- like classical particles. Phys. Rev. E 51 (1995) 2573–2580. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.51.2573

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.51.2573 1995

  43. [43]

    Liu, W.-J

    J.-Y. Liu, W.-J. Guo, Y. Z. Xing, W. Zou, and X.-G. Lee. Influence of a momentum dependent interaction on the isospin dependence of fragmentation and dissipation in intermediate energy heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 67 (2003) 024608. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.67.024608

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.67.024608 2003

  44. [44]

    Y. Nara, T. Maruyama, and H. Stoecker. Momentum-dependent potential and collective flows within the relativistic quantum molecular dynamics approach based on relativistic mean-field theory. Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020) 024913. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024913

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.024913 2020

  45. [45]

    Chari and A

    V. Chari and A. Pressley. A Guide to Quantum Groups . (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 1994

    work page 1994

  46. [46]

    E. Abe. Hopf Algebras. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 2004

    work page 2004

  47. [47]

    Ballesteros and O

    A. Ballesteros and O. Ragnisco. A systematic construction of completely integrable Hamiltonians from coalge- bras. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 (1998) 024913. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/31/16/009

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/31/16/009 1998

  48. [48]

    Ballesteros, A

    A. Ballesteros, A. Blasco, F. J. Herranz, F. Musso and O Ragnisco. (Super)integrability from coalgebra sym- metry: formalism and applications. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 175 (2009) 012004. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/175/1/ 012004

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/175/1/ 2009

  49. [49]

    Ballesteros and F

    A. Ballesteros and F. J. Herranz. Universal integrals for superintegrable systems on N-dimensional spaces of constant curvature. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 (2007) F51–F59. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/2/F01

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/2/f01 2007

  50. [50]

    D. Latini. Universal chain structure of quadratic algebras for superintegrable systems with coalgebra symmetry. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52 (2019) 125202. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aaffec

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aaffec 2019

  51. [51]

    Latini, I

    D. Latini, I. Marquette and Y.-Z. Zhang. Racah algebra R(n) from coalgebraic structures and chains of R(3) substructures. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54 (2021) 395202. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac1ee8

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac1ee8 2021

  52. [52]

    Latini, I

    D. Latini, I. Marquette and Y.-Z. Zhang. Embedding of the Racah algebra R(n) and superintegrability. Ann. Phys. 426 (2021) 168397. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2021.168397

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2021.168397 2021

  53. [53]

    Ballesteros and F

    A. Ballesteros and F. J. Herranz. Integrable deformations of oscillator chains from quantum algebras. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 (1999) 8851–8862. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/32/50/306

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/32/50/306 1999

  54. [54]

    Ballesteros, F

    A. Ballesteros, F. J. Herranz and O. Ragnisco. Integrable potentials on spaces with curvature from quantum groups. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 (2005) 7129–7144. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/32/004 29

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/32/004 2005