Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 47 references

Persistent spin grids with spin-orbit coupled 2D electron gas

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Persistent spin grids make electron spin decay vanish in a 2D electron gas.

desk verdict A solid, honest theory paper: the persistent spin grid is a genuine conceptual extension, with the idealized no-boundary-relaxation assumption as the main caveat rather than a fatal flaw. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06745 v1 pith:ZIMUVDKQ submitted 2025-02-10 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.quant-gashep-lat

A. V. Poshakinskiy This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gashep-lat
keywords persistentspingridspin-orbitcouplingdiffusionWilsonloopZ2classificationDyakonov-Perelrelaxationlateralconfinementtransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that spin diffusion in a two-dimensional electron gas can be greatly slowed by confining the gas to a grid of narrow channels, rather than by tuning spin-orbit parameters to the persistent spin helix condition. In such a grid, spin rotations accumulated along different electron paths cancel provided that a spin circling any grid cell returns to its original orientation. The paper derives a decay rate that vanishes as the channel width goes to zero, names the resulting long-lived patterns persistent spin grids, and classifies them into two topologically distinct classes. If correct, the result offers a route to spin transport in arbitrary directions with minimal spin relaxation, without the stringent parameter matching usually required.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the diffusive spin-diffusion equation with an SO(3) gauge-type field $\Lambda_\alpha$ in the operator $(\partial/\partial r_\alpha - \Lambda_\alpha)^2$, together with the boundary condition that spin current vanishes at the grid edges. Bloch modes of this self-adjoint operator in the periodic grid give real decay-rate bands, and the long-lived modes correspond to minima of the lowest band. The central classifying object is the Wilson loop $R = \mathcal{P}\exp\oint \Lambda_\alpha dr_\alpha$ around a plaquette; $R = 1$ means path-independent spin rotation and hence a persistent spin grid, and the homotopy class of the loop in SO(3) gives the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ distinction between trivial and nontrivial grids.

What would settle it

Etch a square grid into a two-dimensional electron gas and measure the lifetime of a locally excited spin polarization as the channel width is varied while keeping the mean free path fixed: if the lifetime does not grow roughly as $1/w^2$ and no long-lived mode appears near the predicted Wilson-loop condition $\cos\phi = 1$, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that spin relaxation in a two-dimensional electron gas can be suppressed by lateral confinement to a grid of narrow channels, and that in the limit of vanishing channel width certain spin-diffusion modes become decayless. The key condition is that the spin-rotation matrix for diffusion around every grid plaquette, $R = \mathcal{P}\exp\left(\oint \sum_{\alpha=x,y} \Lambda_\alpha dr_\alpha\right)$, equals the identity, meaning a spin returns to its original orientation after circling any cell. Under this condition the square-grid and honeycomb-grid calculations show long-lived modes whose decay rate scales as $\Gamma \propto w^2$, so the lifetime diverges as the channel width $w \to 0$. The paper further shows that loops of the SO(3) rotation group are classified by $\pi_1[\mathrm{SO}(3)] = \mathbb{Z}_2$, giving trivial and nontrivial persistent spin grids that correspond to an even or odd number of full spin rotations per plaquette. Numerical maps of the effective decay rate confirm that minima coincide with the Wilson-loop condition $\cos\phi = 1$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the channel edges themselves do not relax spins and that the channel width remains above the electron mean free path, so the vanishing decay rate as width shrinks is a physical trend rather than a reachable limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Etched or gate-defined grids with appropriately chosen period and spin-orbit constants should show spin lifetimes that exceed those of an unconfined gas by a factor growing roughly as $(\lambda/w)^2$.
  • Persistent spin grids preserve two-dimensional spin diffusion, unlike single wires or dots, so spin packets can be drifted in arbitrary directions with in-plane electric fields.
  • The persistent-grid condition does not require Rashba-Dresselhaus matching, and for symmetric plaquettes it can be met by tuning a single system parameter.
  • The trivial and nontrivial $\mathbb{Z}_2$ classes may show opposite signs in weak (anti)localization corrections, offering an electronic signature of the topological class.
  • The mechanism suggests a solid-state simulator of lattice gauge theories in which the spin texture plays the role of a matter field evolving under a fixed non-Abelian gauge field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the divergence of spin lifetime as $w \to 0$ is a mathematical limit; physically it is bounded by boundary spin relaxation and by the requirement that the channel width exceed the electron mean free path, so the practical gain is finite and likely maximized at widths around the mean free path.
  • Editorial extension: the footnote exception, where persistent grids form even when $R \neq 1$ at half-integer $a/\lambda$ in square grids, hints at a more general graph-theoretic condition based on preserved spin directions at equivalent grid points; the paper does not develop this criterion.
  • Editorial extension: combining grids with gate-controlled spin-orbit parameters could lead to reconfigurable spin-routing networks, a step beyond the fixed-geometry grids analyzed here.
  • Editorial extension: the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ distinction may also appear in spin-noise or Hanle measurements as a phase-sensitive signature, though such experiments are not proposed in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies spin diffusion in a 2D electron gas with linear Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling, confined to a periodic grid of narrow channels. The authors solve the diffusion equation with zero spin-current boundary conditions and show that certain Bloch modes have a decay rate that vanishes as the channel width w tends to zero, forming what they call persistent spin grids. The condition for this behavior is that the Wilson loop R = P exp(∮ Λ·dr) around each plaquette equals the identity, which ensures that all diffusion paths between two points produce the same spin rotation. The paper also gives a Z2 topological classification of such persistent grids via π1[SO(3)] and verifies the predictions numerically for square and honeycomb grids. The abstract concludes that the setup could simulate non-Abelian lattice gauge theories.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a conceptually clean extension of the persistent spin helix idea to genuine two-dimensional transport: spin-orbit parameters far from the SU(2) symmetry point can still yield very long spin lifetimes in all directions by confining the electron gas to a grid. The Wilson-loop criterion and the Z2 classification are elegant and falsifiable, and the numerical solutions of the stated diffusion equation support the w^2 scaling and the correspondence between low decay rates and R=1. The paper also identifies a clear experimental platform (etched quantum wells or patterned gates) and discusses tunability by gate voltages. These strengths make the work of interest to the mesoscopics and spintronics communities, provided the idealizations behind 'persistent' are properly delimited.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eq. (3) and Fig. 2(f)] The central claim that the decay rate vanishes as w→0 and the modes become 'decayless' rests entirely on the boundary condition (3), which sets the normal component of the covariant spin current to zero on ∂G. In realistic etched or gate-defined channel boundaries, spin relaxation at the boundary (through roughness, surface states, or boundary-localized spin-orbit coupling) is expected, and then the lowest decay rate will saturate at a finite value rather than vanish. Because the perimeter-to-area ratio grows as w→0, a finite boundary spin-flip rate could even make the lifetime decrease with shrinking w. The paper states the assumption but does not quantify how a finite boundary relaxation rate modifies the w^2 scaling or the 'divergence' claim. I ask the authors to add a sensitivity analysis, e.g., a partially absorbing boundary condition with a spin-flip parameter, showing at what boundary spin-flip probability the persistent-spin-grid benefit disappears. Without this, the headline 'diverges as the channel width approaches zero' is a statement about an idealization whose practical reach is unclear.
  2. [§2, Eq. (1)] The diffusion equation (1) is valid only when the channel width w is much larger than the electron mean free path ℓ. The paper does not discuss this lower bound, yet the abstract and Fig. 2(f) emphasize the limit w→0. Within the strict regime of validity, w must satisfy ℓ ≪ w ≪ |λ_x,y|, so w→0 is an extrapolation outside the model. This is not fatal if the limiting statement is made precise, but the manuscript should explicitly state the accessible parameter window and quantify the lifetime enhancement at the smallest physical w (limited by ℓ) compared with the unconfined 2D gas. As written, a reader could mistakenly believe the divergence is physically reachable.
  3. [Footnote [41] and §4] Footnote [41] states that persistent spin grids can form even when R ≠ 1, for example in a square grid when a/λx or a/λy is half-integer. This appears to contradict the unqualified statement in §4 that 'for the persistent spin grid to occur, all paths on the grid should yield the same spin rotation' and the criterion R=1. The footnote is also not reconciled with the Z2 classification, which is defined for loops satisfying R=1. This is load-bearing because the paper's main theoretical tool is the R=1 condition. The authors should either absorb the footnote content into the main text as a well-defined exceptional class and state how the topological classification applies there, or explicitly state that the Z2 classification covers only the R=1 case and that the exceptions are outside the classification. As it stands, the reader cannot tell which statement is the paper's actual claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption and text after Eq. (4)] In the second paragraph of 'Spin-diffusion Bloch modes', the text refers to 'Fig. 2(e)' for the scaling curves with w, but the scaling panel is labeled Fig. 2(f) in the caption. Please correct the cross-reference.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that the lifetime 'diverges as the channel width approaches zero' without mentioning the two idealizations discussed above (no boundary spin relaxation and the diffusive validity w≫ℓ). A single qualifying phrase in the abstract would avoid overstating the result.
  3. [§4, Eq. (4)] The notation 'P exp(∮ Λ·dr)' is standard for a path-ordered exponential, but it may be helpful to define the ordering explicitly for readers outside lattice gauge theory, since the Wilson loop concept is central to the paper.
  4. [§4, topological classification] When introducing the Z2 classification, the paper states that trivial loops correspond to an even number of full rotations and nontrivial loops to an odd number. This is correct, but the wording 'integer number of full rotations' is slightly ambiguous because one 'full rotation' (2π) is a nontrivial SO(3) loop while two full rotations are a trivial loop. Consider adding one clarifying sentence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Wilson-loop criterion is checked against, not fitted to, the same diffusion model; the persistent-grid condition is a derived property of the model, and the minor self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The diffusion equation (1) and the no-boundary-flux condition (3) are stated as model inputs with citations to standard and independent prior work; they are not outputs of the paper. The Wilson-loop condition (4) and the persistent-grid criterion R=1 are derived by a path-averaging argument (all paths yielding the same spin rotation), and the numerical decay-rate computations in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 test that criterion against eigenmodes of the same operator rather than fitting any parameter to a target decay rate. The Z2 classification is the standard fundamental-group fact pi1[SO(3)] = Z2 applied to loops defined by Eq. (4), not an author-supplied uniqueness theorem. Footnote [41] explicitly states exceptions where persistent grids form despite R != 1, so the condition is not definitionally equivalent to the conclusion. The remaining self-citations ([31] for the diffusion-equation form and [42] for edge-relaxation scaling) are supporting references accompanied by independent citations ([20], [19], [24]) and do not carry the central claim. The no-boundary-relaxation assumption behind Eq. (3) is a physical idealization that limits practical reach, but that is a robustness/correctness concern, not circularity. Overall score 2 reflects only the presence of minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not introduce new physical entities. It uses standard spin-orbit and geometry parameters as inputs, scanned over ranges rather than fitted to data. The main assumptions are the diffusion equation, the no-boundary-relaxation condition, the quasi-1D edge suppression, and the path-averaging equivalence R=1, with exceptions noted in footnote [41].

free parameters (3)
  • Spin-orbit lengths λx, λy (Rashba/Dresselhaus constants α, β)
    Physical spin-orbit parameters varied in the model; persistent grids require commensurate values of a/λx,y. Not fitted to experimental data.
  • Grid period a
    Geometric period of the grid; conditions for R=1 depend on a/λx,y.
  • Grid edge width w
    Taken small compared to λx,y; central scaling Γ ∝ w^2 and divergence in the limit w→0.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Spin diffusion equation (1) with the spin-orbit coupling field (2), neglecting k-cubic Dresselhaus terms.
    Standard semiclassical model for diffusive spin transport; cubic terms assumed small as in prior work [20,23,24].
  • domain assumption No additional spin relaxation at the grid boundaries, giving vanishing spin current at ∂G (Eq. 3).
    Stated in 'Spin diffusion in a grid'; if boundaries relax spins, persistent modes acquire finite decay.
  • domain assumption For w << λx,y, quasi-1D channel confinement suppresses spin relaxation within the edges (Γ ∝ w^2).
    Taken from prior channel results [19,20,24]; used to argue edges do not relax spins and to interpret the w^2 scaling.
  • ad hoc to paper Identical spin rotation on all paths is equivalent to the plaquette Wilson loop R = 1.
    Core criterion for persistent spin grids; footnote [41] notes exceptions where R≠1 still allows persistent grids, so the criterion is sufficient for the studied symmetric cases but not strictly necessary.
  • standard math The fundamental group of SO(3) is Z2.
    Standard topology used to classify the Wilson loops and hence the persistent spin grids.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Persistent spin grids with spin-orbit coupled 2D electron gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZIMUVDKQ

@misc{pith2026250206745,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Persistent spin grids with spin-orbit coupled 2D electron gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZIMUVDKQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06745}
}
abstract

We consider the diffusive spin dynamics of a 2D electron gas with spin-orbit coupling confined within a grid of narrow channels. We show that the lifetime of certain spin distributions in such grids greatly exceeds that in an unconfined 2D electron gas and diverges as the channel width approaches zero. Such persistent spin grids occur if the electron spin orientation remains invariant after diffusion around the grid plaquette. We establish a topological $\mathbb{Z}_2$ classification for persistent spin grids and speculate that the setup can be used to simulate non-Abelian lattice gauge theories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06745 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a,b,c) Spin diffusion in a square grid as compared to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) The decay rate of the most long-lived spin-diffusion Bloch mode in a square grid with the period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Spin direction change upon the diffusion around a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    Spatiotempo- ral spin fluctuations caused by spin-orbit-coupled Brow- nian motion,

    A. V. Poshakinskiy and S. A. Tarasenko, “Spatiotempo- ral spin fluctuations caused by spin-orbit-coupled Brow- nian motion,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 045308 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [42]

    Enhancing Spin Diffusion in GaAs Quantum Wells: The Role of Electron Density and Channel Width

    B. W. Grobecker, A. V. Poshakinskiy, S. Anghel, T. Mano, G. Yusa, and M. Betz, “Enhancing spin diffu- sion in gaas quantum wells: The role of electron density and channel width,” (2024), arXiv:2501.08023

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [41]

    Such situation happens in the square grid if a/λx or a/λy is half-integer

    In some specific cases, the persistent spin grid can be formed despite R ̸= 1, if there exists a spin direction that is preserved or inverted upon the spin transfer to all points of the grid that are equivalent to the chosen starting point. Such situation happens in the square grid if a/λx or a/λy is half-integer. In generic grids, this re- quires fine tu...

    work page

  4. [1]

    Spin relaxation of conduction electrons in noncentrosymmetric semiconduc- tors,

    M. I. D’yakonov and V. I. Perel’, “Spin relaxation of conduction electrons in noncentrosymmetric semiconduc- tors,” Fiz. Tverd. Tela 13, 3581 (1971), [Sov. Phys. Solid State 13, 3023 (1972)]

    work page 1971

  5. [2]

    Spin re- laxation of conduction electrons in noncentrosymmet- ric semiconductors,

    M. I. D’yakonov and V. Yu. Kachorovskii, “Spin re- laxation of conduction electrons in noncentrosymmet- ric semiconductors,” Fiz. Tekh. Poluprovodn. 20, 178 (1986), [Sov. Phys. Semicond. 20, 110 (1986)]

    work page 1986

  6. [3]

    Interplay of Rashba/Dresselhaus spin splittings probed by photogal- vanic spectroscopy — A review,

    S. D. Ganichev and L. E. Golub, “Interplay of Rashba/Dresselhaus spin splittings probed by photogal- vanic spectroscopy — A review,” phys. status solidi (b) 251, 1801 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [4]

    Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures,

    G. Dresselhaus, “Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures,” Phys. Rev. 100, 580 (1955)

    work page 1955

  8. [5]

    Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy,

    Yu. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, “Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy,” Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 39, 66 (1984), [JETP Lett. 39, 78 (1984)]

    work page 1984

Show all 47 references
  1. [6]

    Exact SU(2) Symmetry and Persistent Spin Helix in a Spin- Orbit Coupled System,

    B. A. Bernevig, J. Orenstein, and S.-C. Zhang, “Exact SU(2) Symmetry and Persistent Spin Helix in a Spin- Orbit Coupled System,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 236601 (2006)

    2006

  2. [7]

    Nondiffusive Spin Dynamics in a Two-Dimensional Electron Gas,

    C. P. Weber, J. Orenstein, B. A. Bernevig, S.-C. Zhang, J. Stephens, and D. D. Awschalom, “Nondiffusive Spin Dynamics in a Two-Dimensional Electron Gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 076604 (2007)

    2007

  3. [8]

    Emer- gence of the persistent spin helix in semiconductor quan- tum wells,

    J. D. Koralek, C. P. Weber, J. Orenstein, B. A. Bernevig, S.-C. Zhang, S. Mack, and D. D. Awschalom, “Emer- gence of the persistent spin helix in semiconductor quan- tum wells,” Nature (London) 458, 610 (2009)

    2009

  4. [9]

    Anisotropic spin diffusion in a semicon- ductor quantum well,

    V. N. Gridnev, “Anisotropic spin diffusion in a semicon- ductor quantum well,” JETP Lett. 76, 502 (2002)

    2002

  5. [10]

    Direct mapping of the formation of a persistent spin helix,

    M. P. Walser, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, and G. Salis, “Direct mapping of the formation of a persistent spin helix,” Nat. Physics 8, 757 (2012)

    2012

  6. [11]

    Direct imag- ing of gate-controlled persistent spin helix state in a modulation-doped GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well,

    J. Ishihara, Y. Ohno, and H. Ohno, “Direct imag- ing of gate-controlled persistent spin helix state in a modulation-doped GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well,” Appl. Phys. Express 7, 013001 (2014)

    2014

  7. [12]

    Spatiotemporal spin dynamics of two- dimensional electron gas with ballistic motion in persis- tent spin helix state,

    J. Ishihara, T. Suzuki, G. Kitazawa, T. Mori, Y. Ohno, and K. Miyajima, “Spatiotemporal spin dynamics of two- dimensional electron gas with ballistic motion in persis- tent spin helix state,” Phys. Rev. B 105, 144412 (2022)

    2022

  8. [13]

    Imprinting spa- tial helicity structure of vector vortex beam on spin tex- ture in semiconductors,

    J. Ishihara, T. Mori, T. Suzuki, S. Sato, K. Morita, M. Kohda, Y. Ohno, and K. Miyajima, “Imprinting spa- tial helicity structure of vector vortex beam on spin tex- ture in semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 126701 (2023)

    2023

  9. [14]

    Current- controlled spin precession of quasistationary electrons in a cubic spin-orbit field,

    P. Altmann, F. G. G. Hernandez, G. J. Ferreira, M. Ko- hda, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, and G. Salis, “Current- controlled spin precession of quasistationary electrons in a cubic spin-orbit field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 196802 (2016)

    2016

  10. [15]

    Physics and application of persistent spin helix state in semiconductor heterostruc- tures,

    M. Kohda and G. Salis, “Physics and application of persistent spin helix state in semiconductor heterostruc- tures,” Semicond. Sci. and Technol. 32, 073002 (2017)

    2017

  11. [16]

    Field control of anisotropic spin transport and spin helix 6 dynamics in a modulation-doped GaAs quantum well,

    S. Anghel, F. Passmann, A. Singh, C. Ruppert, A. V. Poshakinskiy, S. A. Tarasenko, J. N. Moore, G. Yusa, T. Mano, T. Noda, X. Li, A. D. Bristow, and M. Betz, “Field control of anisotropic spin transport and spin helix 6 dynamics in a modulation-doped GaAs quantum well,” Phys. ...

    2018

  12. [17]

    Dynamical formation and active control of persistent spin helices in III-V and II-VI quantum wells,

    F Passmann, S Anghel, C Ruppert, A D Bristow, A V Poshakinskiy, S A Tarasenko, and M Betz, “Dynamical formation and active control of persistent spin helices in III-V and II-VI quantum wells,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 34, 093002 (2019)

    2019

  13. [18]

    Anisotropic expansion of drift- ing spin helices in gaas quantum wells,

    S. Anghel, A. V. Poshakinskiy, K. Schiller, F. Pass- mann, C. Ruppert, S. A. Tarasenko, G. Yusa, T. Mano, T. Noda, and M. Betz, “Anisotropic expansion of drift- ing spin helices in gaas quantum wells,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 035429 (2021)

    2021

  14. [19]

    Progressive suppression of spin relaxation in two-dimensional channels of finite width,

    A. A. Kiselev and K. W. Kim, “Progressive suppression of spin relaxation in two-dimensional channels of finite width,” Phys. Rev. B 61, 13115 (2000)

    2000

  15. [20]

    Waveguide diffu- sion modes and slowdown of D’yakonov–Perel’ spin re- laxation in narrow two-dimensional semiconductor chan- nels,

    A. G. Mal’shukov and K. A. Chao, “Waveguide diffu- sion modes and slowdown of D’yakonov–Perel’ spin re- laxation in narrow two-dimensional semiconductor chan- nels,” Phys. Rev. B 61, R2413 (2000)

    2000

  16. [21]

    Spin-orbit coupling effects on quantum transport in lateral semiconductor dots,

    I. L. Aleiner and Vladimir I. Fal’ko, “Spin-orbit coupling effects on quantum transport in lateral semiconductor dots,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 256801 (2001)

    2001

  17. [22]

    Dimensionally constrained D’yakonov–Perel’ spin relaxation in n-InGaAs channels: transition from 2D to 1D,

    A. W. Holleitner, V. Sih, R. C. Myers, A. C. Gos- sard, and D. D. Awschalom, “Dimensionally constrained D’yakonov–Perel’ spin relaxation in n-InGaAs channels: transition from 2D to 1D,” New J. Phys. 9, 342 (2007)

    2007

  18. [23]

    Suppressed decay of a laterally confined persistent spin helix,

    P. Altmann, M. P. Walser, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, and G. Salis, “Suppressed decay of a laterally confined persistent spin helix,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 201306 (2014)

    2014

  19. [24]

    Transition of a two-dimensional spin mode to a helical state by lateral confinement,

    P. Altmann, M. Kohda, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, and G. Salis, “Transition of a two-dimensional spin mode to a helical state by lateral confinement,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 235304 (2015)

    2015

  20. [25]

    Diffusive spin transport in narrow two- dimensional-electron-gas channels,

    F. Eberle, D. Schuh, D. Bougeard, D. Weiss, and M. Ciorga, “Diffusive spin transport in narrow two- dimensional-electron-gas channels,” Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 014010 (2021)

    2021

  21. [26]

    Kinetics of spin re- laxation in quantum wires and channels: Boundary spin echo and formation of a persistent spin helix,

    V. A. Slipko and Y. V. Pershin, “Kinetics of spin re- laxation in quantum wires and channels: Boundary spin echo and formation of a persistent spin helix,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 155306 (2011)

    2011

  22. [27]

    Direction dependence of spin relaxation in confined two-dimensional systems,

    P. Wenk and S. Kettemann, “Direction dependence of spin relaxation in confined two-dimensional systems,” Phys. Rev. B 83, 115301 (2011)

    2011

  23. [28]

    Spin helices in GaAs quantum wells: Interplay of electron density, spin dif- fusion, and spin lifetime,

    S. Anghel, A. V. Poshakinskiy, K. Schiller, G. Yusa, T. Mano, T. Noda, and M. Betz, “Spin helices in GaAs quantum wells: Interplay of electron density, spin dif- fusion, and spin lifetime,” J. Appl. Phys. 132, 054301 (2022)

    2022

  24. [29]

    Diffusion of inhomogeneous spin distri- bution in a magnetic field parallel to interfaces of a III-V semiconductor quantum well,

    V. A. Froltsov, “Diffusion of inhomogeneous spin distri- bution in a magnetic field parallel to interfaces of a III-V semiconductor quantum well,” Phys. Rev. B 64, 045311 (2001)

    2001

  25. [30]

    Spin polarization in bi- ased Rashba-Dresselhaus two-dimensional electron sys- tems,

    P. Kleinert and V. V. Bryksin, “Spin polarization in bi- ased Rashba-Dresselhaus two-dimensional electron sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. B 76, 205326 (2007)

    2007

  26. [32]

    Spin drift and diffusion in one- and two- subband helical systems,

    G. J. Ferreira, F. G. G. Hernandez, P. Altmann, and G. Salis, “Spin drift and diffusion in one- and two- subband helical systems,” Phys. Rev. B 95, 125119 (2017)

    2017

  27. [33]

    Colloquium: Persistent spin textures in semiconductor nanostructures,

    J. Schliemann, “Colloquium: Persistent spin textures in semiconductor nanostructures,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 011001 (2017)

    2017

  28. [34]

    Gauge invariance and cur- rent algebra in nonrelativistic many-body theory,

    J. Fr¨ ohlich and U. M. Studer, “Gauge invariance and cur- rent algebra in nonrelativistic many-body theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 733 (1993)

    1993

  29. [35]

    Non- Abelian gauge field theory of the spin-orbit interaction and a perfect spin filter,

    N. Hatano, R. Shirasaki, and H. Nakamura, “Non- Abelian gauge field theory of the spin-orbit interaction and a perfect spin filter,” Phys. Rev. A75, 032107 (2007)

    2007

  30. [36]

    Non-Abelian spin-orbit gauge: Persistent spin helix and quantum square ring,

    S.-H. Chen and C.-R. Chang, “Non-Abelian spin-orbit gauge: Persistent spin helix and quantum square ring,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 045324 (2008)

    2008

  31. [37]

    Spin precession due to a non-abelian spin-orbit gauge field,

    J.-S. Yang, X.-G. He, S.-H. Chen, and C.-R. Chang, “Spin precession due to a non-abelian spin-orbit gauge field,” Phys. Rev. B 78, 085312 (2008)

    2008

  32. [38]

    Equilibrium spin currents: Non-Abelian gauge invariance and color diamagnetism in condensed matter,

    I. V. Tokatly, “Equilibrium spin currents: Non-Abelian gauge invariance and color diamagnetism in condensed matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 106601 (2008)

    2008

  33. [39]

    Gauge theory ap- proach for diffusive and precessional spin dynamics in a two-dimensional electron gas,

    I. V. Tokatly and E. Y. Sherman, “Gauge theory ap- proach for diffusive and precessional spin dynamics in a two-dimensional electron gas,” Ann. Physics 325, 1104 (2010)

    2010

  34. [40]

    The effective diffusion coefficient on the square grid can be estimated as Deff = Da/(2a − w)

  35. [43]

    Stretchable persistent spin helices in GaAs quantum wells,

    F. Dettwiler, J. Fu, S. Mack, P. J. Weigele, J. C. Egues, D. D. Awschalom, and D. M. Zumb¨ uhl, “Stretchable persistent spin helices in GaAs quantum wells,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 031010 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Gate control of the spin mobil- ity through the modification of the spin-orbit interaction in two-dimensional systems,

    M. Luengo-Kovac, F. C. D. Moraes, G. J. Ferreira, A. S. L. Ribeiro, G. M. Gusev, A. K. Bakarov, V. Sih, and F. G. G. Hernandez, “Gate control of the spin mobil- ity through the modification of the spin-orbit interaction in two-dimensional systems,” Phys. Rev. B 95, 245315 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    Direct imprinting of arbitrary spin textures using programmable structured light in a semiconductor two-dimensional elec- tron gas,

    K. Kikuchi, J. Ishihara, M. Hiyama, S. Yamamoto, Y. Ohno, T. Mori, K. Miyajima, and M. Kohda, “Direct imprinting of arbitrary spin textures using programmable structured light in a semiconductor two-dimensional elec- tron gas,” (2024), arXiv:2411.10963

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Lifetime of spin-orbit induced spin textures in a semiconductor heterostructure probed by quantum cor- rections to conductivity,

    T. Saito, T. Nishimura, J.-Y. Yoon, J. K¨ olzer, D. Iizasa, M. Kammermeier, T. Sch¨ apers, J. Nitta, and M. Ko- hda, “Lifetime of spin-orbit induced spin textures in a semiconductor heterostructure probed by quantum cor- rections to conductivity,” Phys. Rev. Research 4, 043217 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Persistent spin helix manipula- tion by optical doping of a CdTe quantum well,

    F. Passmann, S. Anghel, T. Tischler, A. V. Poshakinskiy, S. A. Tarasenko, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtowicz, A. D. Bristow, and M. Betz, “Persistent spin helix manipula- tion by optical doping of a CdTe quantum well,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 201413 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.