Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Probing conventional and new physics at the ESS with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper projects that the intense ESS neutrino beam will turn CEνNS into a leading probe of light scalar and vector mediators and of sterile dipole transitions, with sensitivities several times stronger than current constraints.

desk verdict Solid, honest ESS CEνNS projection paper; the analysis is clean, but the headline sensitivities lean on unvalidated detector thresholds that could erase the claimed leading regions. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12443 v2 pith:ZIRMZBGR submitted 2025-01-21 hep-ph hep-ex

Ayan Chattaraj , Anirban Majumdar , Dimitrios K. Papoulias , Rahul Srivastava This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords coherentelasticneutrino-nucleusscatteringCEνNSEuropeanSpallationSourceneutrinogeneralizedinteractionssteriledipoleportalweakmixingangleneutronrmsradiusneutrinos
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper forecasts what six proposed detectors at the European Spallation Source would observe in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering over three years of running. It argues that the ESS's intense pion-decay-at-rest neutrino beam will sharply tighten current constraints on the weak mixing angle and on nuclear neutron radii, and will for the first time make CEνNS the leading laboratory probe of scalar and vector neutrino generalized interactions in specific mediator-mass windows, as well as of sterile neutral-lepton production through the dipole portal around 10 to 40 MeV. The projections come from a spectral χ² analysis of CsI, Xe, Ge, Si, Ar, and C₃F₈ detectors, including steady-state backgrounds and systematic uncertainties. If the projections are right, the ESS would complement reactor, solar, and dark-matter-detector CEνNS programs and would set the near-term agenda for light-mediator searches.

What carries the argument

The central object is the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS) cross section — a neutrino scattering off the whole nucleus via Z-boson exchange, whose rate grows roughly with the square of the neutron number — extended to scalar, vector, axial-vector, and tensor neutrino generalized interactions and to sterile upscattering channels. The cross sections are folded with Helm form factors, nuclear spin-structure functions, Gaussian energy resolution, and the six detector specifications of Table II, then analyzed with the Poissonian χ² statistic of Eq. (29), which treats signal normalization and background normalization as nuisance parameters.

What would settle it

The projections stand or fall on the detector assumptions of Table II: a direct measurement that the Si detector's effective recoil threshold is above 0.16 keV$_{\rm nr}$ or its steady-state background above 0.04375 counts/keV$_{\rm nr}$/kg/day would invalidate the claimed factor-of-2–3 improvements, because Appendix B shows threshold variation moves the sensitivities by exactly that amount; conversely, ESS data showing the predicted low-recoil excesses in the scalar/vector mediator channels would confirm the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, with three years of data from the six proposed ESS detectors, CEνNS will move from a first-measurement era into a precision era. The paper projects a 1σ determination of the weak mixing angle, sin²θW = 0.239⁺⁰·⁰¹¹₋₀·₀₁₀, first-ever CEνNS-based constraints on the neutron rms radii of silicon and C₃F₈, a roughly 40% improvement over COHERENT for CsI, and scalar/vector NGI constraints that dominate existing bounds for MS > 40 MeV and 25 < MV < 200 MeV. For the sterile dipole portal, the ESS is projected to reach effective magnetic moments near 6–8 × 10⁻¹⁰ μB below 10 MeV and to chart a previously unexplored sterile-neutral-lepton mass region, roughly 10 ≲ mNR ≲ 40 MeV, improving the COHERENT bound by about a factor of five. The paper also finds that ESS data will not be competitive for lepton-unitarity violation or active-sterile oscillation searches.

Load-bearing premise

The projections assume all six proposed ESS detectors will actually run at the very low recoil-energy thresholds and steady-state background levels listed in Table II (0.1–2 keV$_{\rm nr}$, flat 80% efficiency) and that the ESS duty-cycle background factor is handled consistently, since the light-mediator and dipole-portal sensitivities lose factors of 2–3 if thresholds instead sit at 5 keV$_{\rm nr}$, as Appendix B shows.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The combined ESS analysis would give sin²θW ≈ 0.239⁺⁰·⁰¹¹₋₀·₀₁₀, cutting the uncertainty by about 60% relative to COHERENT and about 80% relative to Dresden-II.
  • ESS data would constrain the neutron rms radius of silicon and C₃F₈ for the first time and improve the CsI constraint by roughly 40% over existing COHERENT-based determinations.
  • For scalar and vector B−L interactions, ESS projections would dominate current constraints for MS > 40 MeV and 25 < MV < 200 MeV, regions that cosmology and beam-dump searches leave open.
  • For the sterile dipole portal, ESS would improve the COHERENT bound by about a factor of five and would probe the previously unexplored sterile mass range 10 ≲ mNR ≲ 40 MeV.
  • The paper finds ESS would not be competitive with dedicated oscillation experiments for lepton-unitarity violation or active-sterile oscillations, so those channels should not be the main physics goals of the ESS programme.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the projected gains are driven mainly by the recoil-energy threshold (Appendix B), an editorial inference is that detector R&D toward sub-keV thresholds can buy more sensitivity than increasing detector mass or exposure; lowering the threshold from 5 keV_nr to 1 keV_nr improves the light-vector and dipole sensitivities by factors of 2–3 in the paper's own calculations.
  • If the ESS sensitivities are realized, a future null result in the scalar/vector mediator channels would begin to close parameter space that cosmology and beam-dump searches currently leave open, making CEνNS the primary experimental input to light $U(1)_{B-L}$ and scalar-extension models.
  • The paper's dipole-portal reach is capped at mNR ≲ 50 MeV by the 52.8 MeV endpoint of the ESS beam; extending the same upscattering analysis to a higher-energy source such as DUNE's beam would push the sterile-mass reach upward, a complementarity the paper quantifies for the NGI channels but leaves implicit for the dipole portal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents a comprehensive sensitivity forecast for CEνNS measurements at the European Spallation Source, using six proposed detector technologies (CsI, Xe, Ge, Si, Ar, C3F8) with parameters taken from Ref. [76]. It evaluates the weak mixing angle and neutron rms radius, then explores BSM scenarios: scalar/vector/axial/tensor generalized interactions, lepton unitarity violation, active-sterile oscillations, the sterile dipole portal, and upscattering production of sterile neutral leptons via NGIs. Using a Poisson chi-square with nuisance parameters and mock SM data, it derives 90% C.L. projections for individual and combined detectors. The central claims are that ESS will improve current CEνNS constraints by large factors and provide leading CEνNS-based constraints for scalar NGIs with MS > 40 MeV, vector B−L with 25 < MV < 200 MeV, and the sterile dipole portal for 10 < mNR < 40 MeV, while not being competitive for unitarity or active-sterile oscillations.

Significance. If the projections hold, this is a useful roadmap for the ESS CEνNS program, with broad coverage and detailed appendices. The statistical framework is standard and clearly described, mock data are generated from SM predictions, SM spectra are validated against Ref. [78], and the paper includes individual-detector results and a robustness appendix. The main caveat is that the headline BSM reach depends on detector thresholds and backgrounds taken from a single proposal reference, and some of these inputs are not independently validated.

major comments (2)
  1. [III, Table II, Appendix B] The headline claims in Sec. V — leading scalar/vector NGI constraints for MS > 40 MeV and 25 < MV < 200 MeV, and sterile dipole portal dominance for 10 < mNR < 40 MeV — are driven by the low recoil thresholds in Table II, especially Ar at 0.1 keVnr and Si at 0.16 keVnr. Appendix B shows that threshold variations change light-vector sensitivity by factors of 2–3 and dipole-portal sensitivity by factors of 2–2.5, yet it only varies CsI and Si thresholds and does not present combined-analysis variants. Since these thresholds are taken from Ref. [76] without independent validation, the claim that ESS will 'dominate' or 'lead' in these regions is not yet robust. Please add a threshold-variation study covering Ar and the combined analysis, and qualify the abstract and conclusions accordingly.
  2. [III, Eq. (29), Table II] The note under Table II states that the listed steady-state background rates do not include the 4 × 10^-2 ESS duty-cycle reduction factor, but Section III and Eq. (29) do not state whether this factor is applied to RSSB when computing R_exp and R_th. If the factor is omitted, the effective background is overestimated by a factor of 25, which is conservative but should be stated; if applied inconsistently among detectors, the combined analysis would be distorted. Please clarify the treatment of the duty-cycle factor and quantify its effect on the projected limits.
minor comments (4)
  1. [V] In the conclusions, the sentence reporting the dipole-portal mass range repeats '10 ≲ mNR ≲ 40 MeV' for both electron and muon neutrinos; if this is intentional, the sentence should be simplified, and if not, the intended ranges should be corrected.
  2. [III, Appendix B] The robustness study in Appendix B varies σβ between 1% and 10%, but the text in Sec. III states σβ is fixed to 1% for all detectors; please explain the rationale for the 10% test and ensure the main results are clearly based on the 1% assumption.
  3. [Fig. 7] Figure 7 is dense; the caption mentions blue contours for ESS, but in the printed figure the ESS region may be difficult to distinguish from the other shaded constraints, so increasing the contrast or adding direct labels would improve readability.
  4. [III, IV] The paper does not provide a repository with the event-rate tables or the chi-square code; making these available would improve reproducibility, particularly because detector parameters are taken from an external proposal rather than derived in the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: ESS sensitivity projections are computed from quoted cross sections against mock SM data; benchmark values are inputs, not fitted predictions.

full rationale

This is a sensitivity-forecast paper, not a measurement. The projected limits are obtained by computing event rates from the quoted SM and BSM cross sections (Eqs. (3), (10), (21), (25)) and comparing them, via the Poissonian chi-square of Eq. (29), to mock 'expected' data built from SM CEνNS plus the steady-state backgrounds of Table II. No BSM parameter is fitted to real data and then renamed a prediction. The weak mixing angle best-fit recovery is explicitly acknowledged: the mock expected events are generated at the RGE value sin2θW(q=0)=0.23857, so recovering that value as the best-fit point is a consistency check, not a derived result; the paper's actual claim is the projected 1σ uncertainty, which is computed from the assumed statistics. Formulas for NGIs, sterile dipole portal, and SNL upscattering are quoted in the paper and traced to prior literature, including some works with overlapping authors (e.g., Refs. [34,69–72]); these citations are parameter-free derivations or data analyses, and the load-bearing sensitivity calculation does not reduce to any of them. The detector thresholds, efficiencies, and background rates are inputs adopted from Ref. [76], and Appendix B honestly quantifies their impact; fragile inputs are a correctness risk, not circularity. No self-definitional step, fitted-input-as-prediction step, or author-imported uniqueness claim was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters beyond the model parameters scanned for sensitivity projections. The key imported inputs are the detector and background assumptions from Ref. [76] and the cross-section and structure-function formulas from prior literature.

free parameters (8)
  • sin2θW = 0.23857 (RGE input; mock data generated at this value)
    Free parameter in the chi-square fit; the best-fit value equals the input by construction.
  • Rn (neutron rms radius) = 1.05 Rp (mock input)
    Fitted per detector; mock data are generated at Rn = 1.05 Rp following Ref. [42].
  • gX for X = S, V, A, T = 0 (SM null); contours at 90% C.L.
    New-physics couplings are scanned to build exclusion contours in the (MX, gX) plane.
  • MX for X = S, V, A, T = scanned over 10^-2 to 10^5 MeV
    Mediator mass is the other axis of the NGI sensitivity contours.
  • mu_nu_alpha (effective active-sterile transition magnetic moment) = 0 (SM null)
    Scanned in the sterile dipole portal analysis for electron and muon neutrinos.
  • mNR (sterile neutral lepton mass) = scanned up to about 50 MeV (kinematic limit)
    Mass of the produced sterile state in dipole-portal and NGI upscattering scenarios.
  • sin2(2θ14), sin2(2θ24), Δm² = scanned
    Active-sterile oscillation parameters in the 3+1 scenario.
  • α22 (lepton unitarity parameter) = 1 (SM null); projected limit 1 - α22^2 < 0.14
    The analysis is primarily sensitive to α22; α11 cancels in the summed event rate.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The SM CEνNS cross section of Eq. (3), with Helm form factors and lattice-QCD spin structure functions, is correct.
    Central event-rate prediction; parameters are taken from PDG, lattice QCD [88], and Helm [85].
  • domain assumption Detector specifications, including mass, threshold, resolution, 80% efficiency, and steady-state backgrounds, are adopted from Ref. [76].
    All projections inherit these assumed detector performances; they are not validated in this paper.
  • domain assumption The ESS π-DAR neutrino flux with yield r = 0.3, baseline L = 20 m, and NPOT = 2.8e23 is as given in Ref. [76].
    The flux normalization directly scales all event rates and sensitivities.
  • domain assumption Universal quark couplings (g_u = g_d) and the spin structure functions of Ref. [84] are assumed for axial-vector and tensor NGIs.
    This assumption is required for the CsI and C3F8 spin-dependent sensitivities.
  • domain assumption Two-flavor survival probabilities without matter effects describe short-baseline sterile oscillations.
    Standard approximation for the 20 m baseline of ESS; used in Eq. (19) and Eq. (20).
  • standard math The SNL upscattering cross sections in Eq. (25), taken from Ref. [72], are valid for the mass and coupling ranges considered.
    Adopted without re-derivation; the paper notes they reduce to the NGI cross sections in the mNR to 0 limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing conventional and new physics at the ESS with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZIRMZBGR

@misc{pith2026250112443,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing conventional and new physics at the ESS with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZIRMZBGR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12443}
}
abstract

We explore the potential of the European Spallation Source (ESS) in probing physics within and beyond the Standard Model (SM), based on future measurements of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CE$\nu$NS). We consider two SM physics cases, namely the weak mixing angle and the nuclear radius. Regarding physics beyond the SM, we focus on neutrino generalized interactions (NGIs) and on various aspects of sterile neutrino and sterile neutral lepton phenomenology. For this, we explore the violation of lepton unitarity, active-sterile oscillations as well as interesting upscattering channels such as the sterile dipole portal and the production of sterile neutral leptons via NGIs. The projected ESS sensitivities are estimated by performing a statistical analysis considering the various CE$\nu$NS detectors and expected backgrounds. We find that the enhanced statistics achievable in view of the highly intense ESS neutrino beam, will offer a drastic improvement in the current constraints obtained from existing CE$\nu$NS measurements. Finally, we discuss how the ESS has the potential to provide the leading CE$\nu$NS-based constraints, complementing also further experimental probes and astrophysical observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.12443 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Expected signal and SSB event spectra as a function of the reconstructed nuclear recoil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Projected sensitivity on the weak mixing angle from the combined analysis of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: sin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (23 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Projected sensitivity on the neutron rms radii of different detectors at the ESS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Projected sensitivity in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Projected sensitivities at 90% C.L. for the various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Projected sensitivities at 90% C.L. in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Projected sensitivity on the NU parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Projected 90% C.L. sensitivity regions for sterile neutrino oscillations in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Projected 90% C.L. sensitivity on the sterile dipole portal scenario. The left and right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Projected sensitivity to scalar-mediated SNL production at the future ESS experiment, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Projected sensitivity on the weak mixing angle obtained exploiting different ESS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Projected sensitivities at 90% C.L. in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Sensitivity projections at the 90% C.L. in the (sin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: Projected 90% C.L. exclusion regions in the sterile dipole portal for the individual ESS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20: Projected 90% C.L. limits for the case of the scalar-mediated scenario for SNL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22: Projected 90% C.L. limits on the axial vector-mediated scenario for SNL production via [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24: Projected sensitivity to the determination of weak mixing angle for CsI (left) and Si [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25: Projected sensitivity in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26: Projected sensitivity in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_26.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Flavor specific chiral $U(1)_X$ framework for explaining the ATOMKI anomaly

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A gauged, flavor-specific U(1)_X two-Higgs-doublet model can realize the axial-vector Z' couplings needed to explain the ATOMKI 8Be and 4He anomalies while evading current bounds.

  2. New light mediators and the neutrino fog: Implications from XENONnT nuclear recoil data

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Light-mediator couplings are constrained more strongly when they attach to dark matter than to neutrinos, and the neutrinofog in xenon detectors is shifted and deformed under both scenarios.

  3. Probing Standard Model and Beyond with Reactor CE$\nu$NS Data of CONUS+ experiment

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using CONUS+ reactor data, the authors constrain the weak mixing angle, neutrino electromagnetic properties, and light scalar and vector mediators, finding their most notable limit on neutrino millicharge when electro...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

180 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [78]

    Probing neutrino millicharges at the European Spallation Source

    A. Parada and G. Sanchez Garcia, “Probing neutrino millicharges at the European Spallation Source,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 3, (2025) 035012, arXiv:2409.10652 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [76]

    Particle Physics at the European Spallation Source,

    H. Abele et al. , “Particle Physics at the European Spallation Source,” Phys. Rept. 1023 (2023) 1–84, arXiv:2211.10396 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [1]

    Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current,

    D. Z. Freedman, “Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current,” Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 1389–1392

    1974

  4. [2]

    Principles and Applications of a Neutral Current Detector for Neutrino Physics and Astronomy,

    A. Drukier and L. Stodolsky, “Principles and Applications of a Neutral Current Detector for Neutrino Physics and Astronomy,” Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 2295

    1984

  5. [3]

    Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,

    COHERENT Collaboration, D. Akimov et al. , “Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,” Science 357 no. 6356, (2017) 1123–1126, arXiv:1708.01294 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [4]

    Measurement of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT,

    COHERENT Collaboration, D. Akimov et al. , “Measurement of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 8, (2022) 081801, arXiv:2110.07730 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [5]

    First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon,

    COHERENT Collaboration, D. Akimov et al. , “First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 1, (2021) 012002, arXiv:2003.10630 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [6]

    First detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on germanium,

    S. Adamski et al. , “First detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on germanium,” 38 arXiv:2406.13806 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

Show all 180 references
  1. [7]

    Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering from Reactor Antineutrinos,

    J. Colaresi, J. I. Collar, T. W. Hossbach, C. M. Lewis, and K. M. Yocum, “Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering from Reactor Antineutrinos,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 21, (2022) 211802, arXiv:2202.09672 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Novel constraints on neutrino physics beyond the standard model from the CONUS experiment,

    CONUS Collaboration, H. Bonet et al. , “Novel constraints on neutrino physics beyond the standard model from the CONUS experiment,” JHEP 05 (2022) 085, arXiv:2110.02174 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Final CONUS Results on Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at the Brokdorf Reactor,

    CONUS Collaboration, N. Ackermann et al. , “Final CONUS Results on Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at the Brokdorf Reactor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 25, (2024) 251802, arXiv:2401.07684 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [10]

    First observation of reactor antineutrinos by coherent scattering,

    CONUS+ Collaboration, N. Ackermann et al. , “First observation of reactor antineutrinos by coherent scattering,” arXiv:2501.05206 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  5. [11]

    First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT,

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al. , “First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 19, (2024) 191002, arXiv:2408.02877 [nucl-ex]

    2024

  6. [12]

    First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos through Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in PandaX-4T,

    PandaX Collaboration, Z. Bo et al. , “First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos through Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in PandaX-4T,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 19, (2024) 191001, arXiv:2407.10892 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [13]

    First dark matter search results from Coherent CAPTAIN-Mills,

    CCM Collaboration, A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. , “First dark matter search results from Coherent CAPTAIN-Mills,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 1, (2022) 012001, arXiv:2105.14020 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Results of the Engineering Run of the Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Interaction Experiment (CONNIE),

    CONNIE Collaboration, A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. , “Results of the Engineering Run of the Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Interaction Experiment (CONNIE),” JINST 11 no. 07, (2016) P07024, arXiv:1604.01343 [physics.ins-det]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [15]

    First results of the νGeN experiment on coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,

    νGeN Collaboration, I. Alekseev et al. , “First results of the νGeN experiment on coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 5, (2022) L051101, arXiv:2205.04305 [nucl-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Exploring CEνNS with NUCLEUS at the Chooz nuclear power plant,

    NUCLEUS Collaboration, G. Angloher et al. , “Exploring CEνNS with NUCLEUS at the Chooz nuclear power plant,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no. 12, (2019) 1018, arXiv:1905.10258 [physics.ins-det]

    2019

  11. [17]

    Coherent Neutrino Scattering with Low Temperature Bolometers at Chooz Reactor Complex,

    J. Billard et al., “Coherent Neutrino Scattering with Low Temperature Bolometers at Chooz Reactor Complex,” J. Phys. G 44 no. 10, (2017) 105101, arXiv:1612.09035 [physics.ins-det]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Background Studies for the MINER Coherent Neutrino Scattering Reactor Experiment,

    MINER Collaboration, G. Agnolet et al. , “Background Studies for the MINER Coherent Neutrino Scattering Reactor Experiment,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 853 (2017) 53–60, arXiv:1609.02066 [physics.ins-det]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [19]

    The physics potential of a reactor neutrino experiment with Skipper CCDs: Measuring the weak mixing angle,

    G. Fernandez-Moroni, P. A. N. Machado, I. Martinez-Soler, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, D. Rodrigues, and S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, “The physics potential of a reactor neutrino experiment with Skipper CCDs: Measuring the weak mixing angle,” JHEP 03 (2021) 186, arXiv:2009.10741 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Research program towards observation of neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering,

    H. T. Wong, H.-B. Li, J. Li, Q. Yue, and Z.-Y. Zhou, “Research program towards observation of neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 39 (2006) 266–268, arXiv:hep-ex/0511001

    2006 arXiv

  15. [21]

    New Limits on the Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Elastic Scattering Cross Section at the Kuo-Sheng Reactor-Neutrino Laboratory,

    TEXONO Collaboration, S. Karmakar et al. , “New Limits on the Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Elastic Scattering Cross Section at the Kuo-Sheng Reactor-Neutrino Laboratory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 no. 12, (2025) 121802, arXiv:2411.18812 [nucl-ex]

    2025

  16. [22]

    Next Generation E

    As a result, the total number of events is predominantly sensitive to α22, rendering ESS incapable of severely constraining α11. In Fig. 8, we present the ∆ χ2 profile of 1 − α2 22 from the combined analysis of all detectors considered in this study. As for the previously stud...

  17. [23]

    Sensitivity of a Liquid Xenon Detector to Neutrino–Nucleus Coherent Scattering and Neutrino Magnetic Moment from Reactor Neutrinos,

    K. Ni, J. Qi, E. Shockley, and Y. Wei, “Sensitivity of a Liquid Xenon Detector to Neutrino–Nucleus Coherent Scattering and Neutrino Magnetic Moment from Reactor Neutrinos,” Universe 7 no. 3, (2021) 54

    2021

  18. [24]

    Thermodynamic stability of xenon-doped liquid argon detectors,

    E. P. Bernard et al., “Thermodynamic stability of xenon-doped liquid argon detectors,” Phys. Rev. C 108 no. 4, (2023) 045503, arXiv:2209.05435 [physics.ins-det]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Status of the RED-100 experiment,

    D. Y. Akimov et al. , “Status of the RED-100 experiment,” JINST 12 no. 06, (2017) C06018

    2017

  20. [26]

    The RED-100 experiment,

    D. Y. Akimov et al. , “The RED-100 experiment,” JINST 17 no. 11, (2022) T11011, arXiv:2209.15516 [physics.ins-det]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [27]

    First constraints on the coherent elastic scattering of reactor antineutrinos off xenon nuclei,

    D. Y. Akimov et al. , “First constraints on the coherent elastic scattering of reactor antineutrinos off xenon nuclei,” arXiv:2411.18641 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  22. [28]

    Physics reach of a low threshold scintillating argon bubble chamber in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering reactor experiments,

    SBC, CEνNS Theory Group at IF-UNAM Collaboration, L. J. Flores et al. , “Physics reach of a low threshold scintillating argon bubble chamber in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering reactor experiments,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 9, (2021) L091301, arXiv:2101.08785 [hep-ex]. 39

    2021 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: Terrestrial and astrophysical applications,

    M. Abdullah et al. , “Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: Terrestrial and astrophysical applications,” arXiv:2203.07361 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  24. [30]

    COHERENT constraints after the COHERENT-2020 quenching factor measurement,

    D. K. Papoulias, “COHERENT constraints after the COHERENT-2020 quenching factor measurement,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 11, (2020) 113004, arXiv:1907.11644 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [31]

    New physics from COHERENT data with an improved quenching factor,

    A. N. Khan and W. Rodejohann, “New physics from COHERENT data with an improved quenching factor,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 11, (2019) 113003, arXiv:1907.12444 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Neutrino, electroweak, and nuclear physics from COHERENT elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering with refined quenching factor,

    M. Cadeddu, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, and Y. Y. Zhang, “Neutrino, electroweak, and nuclear physics from COHERENT elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering with refined quenching factor,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 3, (2020) 033004, arXiv:1908.06045 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Implications of the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) with Liquid Argon,

    O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, O. Sanders, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Implications of the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) with Liquid Argon,” JHEP 05 (2020) 130, arXiv:2003.12050 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 01, 0...

    2020 arXiv

  28. [34]

    New insights into nuclear physics and weak mixing angle using electroweak probes,

    M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, E. Picciau, C. A. Ternes, and Y. Y. Zhang, “New insights into nuclear physics and weak mixing angle using electroweak probes,” Phys. Rev. C 104 no. 6, (2021) 065502, arXiv:2102.06153 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Physics implications of a combined analysis of COHERENT CsI and LAr data,

    V. De Romeri, O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Physics implications of a combined analysis of COHERENT CsI and LAr data,” JHEP 04 (2023) 035, arXiv:2211.11905 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Physics implications of recent Dresden-II reactor data,

    A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, R. Srivastava, and J. W. F. Valle, “Physics implications of recent Dresden-II reactor data,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 9, (2022) 093010, arXiv:2208.13262 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Nuclear neutron radius and weak mixing angle measurements from latest COHERENT CsI and atomic parity violation Cs data,

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, and G. Masia, “Nuclear neutron radius and weak mixing angle measurements from latest COHERENT CsI and atomic parity violation Cs data,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 7, (2023) 683, arXiv:2303.09360 [nucl-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Refined determination of the weak mixing angle at low energy,

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, and C. Giunti, “Refined determination of the weak mixing angle at low energy,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 3, (2024) 033005, arXiv:2405.09416 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [39]

    First measurement of the weak mixing angle in direct detection experiments,

    T. N. Maity and C. Boehm, “First measurement of the weak mixing angle in direct detection experiments,” arXiv:2409.04385 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  34. [40]

    Bounds on new neutrino interactions from the first CEνNS data at direct detection experiments,

    V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, and C. A. Ternes, “Bounds on new neutrino interactions from the first CEνNS data at direct detection experiments,” arXiv:2411.11749 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  35. [41]

    Average CsI neutron density distribution from COHERENT data,

    M. Cadeddu, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, and Y. Y. Zhang, “Average CsI neutron density distribution from COHERENT data,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 7, (2018) 072501, arXiv:1710.02730 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Interplay between nonstandard and nuclear constraints in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering experiments,

    B. C. Canas, E. A. Garces, O. G. Miranda, A. Parada, and G. Sanchez Garcia, “Interplay between nonstandard and nuclear constraints in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering experiments,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 3, (2020) 035012, arXiv:1911.09831 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Determining the nuclear neutron distribution from Coherent Elastic neutrino-Nucleus Scattering: current results and future prospects,

    P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and J. Menendez, “Determining the nuclear neutron distribution from Coherent Elastic neutrino-Nucleus Scattering: current results and future prospects,” JHEP 08 no. 08, (2020) 030, arXiv:2006.08624 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Extraction of neutron density distributions from high-statistics coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering data,

    D. A. Sierra, “Extraction of neutron density distributions from high-statistics coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering data,” Phys. Lett. B 845 (2023) 138140, arXiv:2301.13249 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei,

    J. Barranco, O. G. Miranda, and T. I. Rashba, “Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei,” JHEP 12 (2005) 021, arXiv:hep-ph/0508299

    2005 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Prospects for measuring coherent neutrino-nucleus elastic scattering at a stopped-pion neutrino source,

    K. Scholberg, “Prospects for measuring coherent neutrino-nucleus elastic scattering at a stopped-pion neutrino source,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 033005, arXiv:hep-ex/0511042

    2006 arXiv

  41. [47]

    COHERENT constraints on nonstandard neutrino interactions,

    J. Liao and D. Marfatia, “COHERENT constraints on nonstandard neutrino interactions,” Phys. Lett. B 775 (2017) 54–57, arXiv:1708.04255 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [48]

    General COHERENT constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions,

    C. Giunti, “General COHERENT constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 3, (2020) 035039, arXiv:1909.00466 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [49]

    A Statistical Analysis of the COHERENT Data and Applications to New Physics,

    P. B. Denton and J. Gehrlein, “A Statistical Analysis of the COHERENT Data and Applications to New Physics,” JHEP 04 (2021) 266, arXiv:2008.06062 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [50]

    Novel approach for the study of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,

    A. Galindo-Uribarri, O. G. Miranda, and G. S. Garcia, “Novel approach for the study of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 3, (2022) 033001, arXiv:2011.10230 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [51]

    CP-violating and charged current neutrino nonstandard interactions in CE νNS,

    A. N. Khan, D. W. McKay, and W. Rodejohann, “CP-violating and charged current neutrino nonstandard interactions in CE νNS,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 1, (2021) 015019, arXiv:2104.00425 40 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [52]

    Implications of first neutrino-induced nuclear recoil measurements in direct detection experiments: Probing nonstandard interaction via CE νNS,

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, N. Mishra, and L. Strigari, “Implications of first neutrino-induced nuclear recoil measurements in direct detection experiments: Probing nonstandard interaction via CE νNS,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 5, (2025) 055007, arXiv:2409.02003 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  47. [53]

    Constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions from COHERENT, PandaX-4T and XENONnT,

    G. Li, C.-Q. Song, F.-J. Tang, and J.-H. Yu, “Constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions from COHERENT, PandaX-4T and XENONnT,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 3, (2025) 035002, arXiv:2409.04703 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  48. [54]

    Sensitivity to oscillation with a sterile fourth generation neutrino from ultra-low threshold neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering,

    B. Dutta, Y. Gao, R. Mahapatra, N. Mirabolfathi, L. E. Strigari, and J. W. Walker, “Sensitivity to oscillation with a sterile fourth generation neutrino from ultra-low threshold neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 9, (2016) 093002, arXiv:1511.02834 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [55]

    Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering and new Neutrino Interactions,

    M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, “Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering and new Neutrino Interactions,” JHEP 03 (2017) 097, arXiv:1612.04150 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [56]

    COHERENT analysis of neutrino generalized interactions,

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, and N. Rojas, “COHERENT analysis of neutrino generalized interactions,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 075018, arXiv:1806.07424 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  51. [57]

    CE νNS as a probe of flavored generalized neutrino interactions,

    L. J. Flores, N. Nath, and E. Peinado, “CE νNS as a probe of flavored generalized neutrino interactions,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 5, (2022) 055010, arXiv:2112.05103 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [58]

    Probing neutrino coupling to a light scalar with coherent neutrino scattering,

    Y. Farzan, M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, “Probing neutrino coupling to a light scalar with coherent neutrino scattering,” JHEP 05 (2018) 066, arXiv:1802.05171 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  53. [59]

    Testing large non-standard neutrino interactions with arbitrary mediator mass after COHERENT data,

    P. B. Denton, Y. Farzan, and I. M. Shoemaker, “Testing large non-standard neutrino interactions with arbitrary mediator mass after COHERENT data,” JHEP 07 (2018) 037, arXiv:1804.03660 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  54. [60]

    Non-standard neutrino interactions in U(1)’ model after COHERENT data,

    L. J. Flores, N. Nath, and E. Peinado, “Non-standard neutrino interactions in U(1)’ model after COHERENT data,” JHEP 06 (2020) 045, arXiv:2002.12342 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [61]

    Constraints on light vector mediators through coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering data from COHERENT,

    M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, E. Picciau, and Y. Y. Zhang, “Constraints on light vector mediators through coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering data from COHERENT,” JHEP 01 (2021) 116, arXiv:2008.05022 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  56. [62]

    Probing light vector mediators with coherent scattering at future facilities,

    E. Bertuzzo, G. Grilli di Cortona, and L. M. D. Ramos, “Probing light vector mediators with coherent scattering at future facilities,” JHEP 06 (2022) 075, arXiv:2112.04020 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [63]

    Consequences of the Dresden-II reactor data for the weak mixing angle and new physics,

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, and D. K. Papoulias, “Consequences of the Dresden-II reactor data for the weak mixing angle and new physics,” JHEP 09 (2022) 076, arXiv:2203.02414 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [64]

    Constraining low scale dark hypercharge symmetry at spallation, reactor, and dark matter direct detection experiments,

    A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, H. Prajapati, and R. Srivastava, “Constraining low scale dark hypercharge symmetry at spallation, reactor, and dark matter direct detection experiments,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 7, (2025) 073006, arXiv:2411.04197 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  59. [65]

    Measuring solar neutrino fluxes in direct detection experiments in the presence of light mediators,

    S.-y. Xia, “Measuring solar neutrino fluxes in direct detection experiments in the presence of light mediators,” Nucl. Phys. B 1009 (2024) 116738, arXiv:2410.01167 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [66]

    Clarity through the Neutrino Fog: Constraining New Forces in Dark Matter Detectors,

    P. Blanco-Mas, P. Coloma, G. Herrera, P. Huber, J. Kopp, I. M. Shoemaker, and Z. Tabrizi, “Clarity through the Neutrino Fog: Constraining New Forces in Dark Matter Detectors,” arXiv:2411.14206 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  61. [67]

    Prospects for exploring New Physics in Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,

    J. Billard, J. Johnston, and B. J. Kavanagh, “Prospects for exploring New Physics in Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,” JCAP 11 (2018) 016, arXiv:1805.01798 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [68]

    New physics probes: Atomic parity violation, polarized electron scattering and neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering,

    G. Arcadi, M. Lindner, J. Martins, and F. S. Queiroz, “New physics probes: Atomic parity violation, polarized electron scattering and neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering,” Nucl. Phys. B 959 (2020) 115158, arXiv:1906.04755 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [69]

    Probing light sterile neutrino signatures at reactor and Spallation Neutron Source neutrino experiments,

    T. S. Kosmas, D. K. Papoulias, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Probing light sterile neutrino signatures at reactor and Spallation Neutron Source neutrino experiments,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 6, (2017) 063013, arXiv:1703.00054 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  64. [70]

    Future CEvNS experiments as probes of lepton unitarity and light-sterile neutrinos,

    O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, O. Sanders, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Future CEvNS experiments as probes of lepton unitarity and light-sterile neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 113014, arXiv:2008.02759 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [71]

    Low-energy probes of sterile neutrino transition magnetic moments,

    O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, O. Sanders, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Low-energy probes of sterile neutrino transition magnetic moments,” JHEP 12 (2021) 191, arXiv:2109.09545 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  66. [72]

    COHERENT production of a dark fermion,

    P. M. Candela, V. De Romeri, and D. K. Papoulias, “COHERENT production of a dark fermion,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 5, (2023) 055001, arXiv:2305.03341 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [73]

    Up-scattering 41 production of a sterile fermion at DUNE: complementarity with spallation source and direct detection experiments,

    P. M. Candela, V. De Romeri, P. Melas, D. K. Papoulias, and N. Saoulidou, “Up-scattering 41 production of a sterile fermion at DUNE: complementarity with spallation source and direct detection experiments,” JHEP 10 (2024) 032, arXiv:2404.12476 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  68. [74]

    Impact of the Dresden-II and COHERENT neutrino scattering data on neutrino electromagnetic properties and electroweak physics,

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, C. A. Ternes, and Y. Y. Zhang, “Impact of the Dresden-II and COHERENT neutrino scattering data on neutrino electromagnetic properties and electroweak physics,” JHEP 09 (2022) 164, arXiv:2205.09484 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  69. [75]

    Neutrino electromagnetic properties and sterile dipole portal in light of the first solar CE νNS data,

    V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, C. A. Ternes, and M. T´ ortola, “Neutrino electromagnetic properties and sterile dipole portal in light of the first solar CE νNS data,” arXiv:2412.14991 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  70. [77]

    Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at the European Spallation Source,

    D. Baxter et al. , “Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at the European Spallation Source,” JHEP 02 (2020) 123, arXiv:1911.00762 [physics.ins-det]

    2020 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Constraining nonstandard interactions with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering at the European Spallation Source,

    S. S. Chatterjee, S. Lavignac, O. G. Miranda, and G. Sanchez Garcia, “Constraining nonstandard interactions with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering at the European Spallation Source,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 5, (2023) 055019, arXiv:2208.11771 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Flavor-dependent radiative corrections in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,

    O. Tomalak, P. Machado, V. Pandey, and R. Plestid, “Flavor-dependent radiative corrections in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,” JHEP 02 (2021) 097, arXiv:2011.05960 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, R. L. Workman et al. , “Review of Particle Physics,” PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01

    2022

  74. [82]

    A Model of Leptons,

    S. Weinberg, “A Model of Leptons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1264–1266

    1967

  75. [83]

    Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions,

    A. Salam, “Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions,” Conf. Proc. C 680519 (1968) 367–377

    1968

  76. [84]

    Electroweak Precision Tests of the Standard Model after the Discovery of the Higgs Boson,

    J. Erler and M. Schott, “Electroweak Precision Tests of the Standard Model after the Discovery of the Higgs Boson,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 106 (2019) 68–119, arXiv:1902.05142 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: EFT analysis and nuclear responses,

    M. Hoferichter, J. Men´ endez, and A. Schwenk, “Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: EFT analysis and nuclear responses,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 7, (2020) 074018, arXiv:2007.08529 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Inelastic and elastic scattering of 187-mev electrons from selected even-even nuclei,

    R. H. Helm, “Inelastic and elastic scattering of 187-mev electrons from selected even-even nuclei,” Phys. Rev. 104 (Dec, 1956) 1466–1475

    1956

  79. [87]

    The salient features of charge density distributions of medium and heavy even-even nuclei determined from a systematic analysis of elastic electron scattering form factors,

    J. Friedrich and N. Voegler, “The salient features of charge density distributions of medium and heavy even-even nuclei determined from a systematic analysis of elastic electron scattering form factors,” Nucl. Phys. A 373 (1982) 192–224

    1982

  80. [88]

    Measurement of the Weak Axial-Vector Coupling Constant in the Decay of Free Neutrons Using a Pulsed Cold Neutron Beam,

    B. M ¨arkisch et al. , “Measurement of the Weak Axial-Vector Coupling Constant in the Decay of Free Neutrons Using a Pulsed Cold Neutron Beam,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 no. 24, (2019) 242501, arXiv:1812.04666 [nucl-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Quark contribution to the proton spin from 2+1+1-flavor lattice QCD,

    H.-W. Lin, R. Gupta, B. Yoon, Y.-C. Jang, and T. Bhattacharya, “Quark contribution to the proton spin from 2+1+1-flavor lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 9, (2018) 094512, arXiv:1806.10604 [hep-lat]

    2018 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Handbook of basic atomic spectroscopic data

    NIST Physical Measurement Laboratory, “Handbook of basic atomic spectroscopic data.” https://www.nist.gov/pml/handbook-basic-atomic-spectroscopic-data

  83. [91]

    SCF Hartree-Fock results for elements with two open shells and the elements francium to nobelium,

    J. B. Mann, “SCF Hartree-Fock results for elements with two open shells and the elements francium to nobelium,” Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 12 (1973) 1–86

    1973

  84. [92]

    Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update,

    I. Angeli and K. P. Marinova, “Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update,” Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 99 no. 1, (2013) 69–95

    2013

  85. [93]

    Light vector mediators at direct detection experiments,

    V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, and C. A. Ternes, “Light vector mediators at direct detection experiments,” JHEP 05 (2024) 165, arXiv:2402.05506 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Study of Non-standard Neutrino Interactions in Future Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Experiments,

    M. F. Mustamin and M. Demirci, “Study of Non-standard Neutrino Interactions in Future Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Experiments,” Braz. J. Phys. 51 no. 3, (2021) 813–819

    2021

  87. [95]

    Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments,

    D. G. Cerde˜ no, M. Fairbairn, T. Jubb, P. A. N. Machado, A. C. Vincent, and C. Bœhm, “Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments,” JHEP 05 (2016) 118, arXiv:1604.01025 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 048 (2016)]

    2016 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Tensorial NSI and Unparticle physics in neutrino scattering,

    J. Barranco, A. Bolanos, E. A. Garces, O. G. Miranda, and T. I. Rashba, “Tensorial NSI and Unparticle physics in neutrino scattering,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27 (2012) 1250147, 42 arXiv:1108.1220 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Tools for model-independent bounds in direct dark matter searches,

    M. Cirelli, E. Del Nobile, and P. Panci, “Tools for model-independent bounds in direct dark matter searches,” JCAP 10 (2013) 019, arXiv:1307.5955 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Probing Light New Mediators on Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,

    M. Demirci and M. F. Mustamin, “Probing Light New Mediators on Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,” in Beyond Standard Model: From Theory to Experiment . 2021

    2021

  91. [99]

    The Theory of Direct Dark Matter Detection: A Guide to Computations,

    E. Del Nobile, “The Theory of Direct Dark Matter Detection: A Guide to Computations,” Lecture Notes in Physics 1 (5, 2022) XVI, 250, arXiv:2104.12785 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  92. [100]

    µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?,

    P. Minkowski, “ µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?,” Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421–428

    1977

  93. [101]

    Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, “Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912

    1980

  94. [102]

    Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos,

    T. Yanagida, “Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 64 (1980) 1103

    1980

  95. [103]

    Neutrino Mass Problem and Gauge Hierarchy,

    M. Magg and C. Wetterich, “Neutrino Mass Problem and Gauge Hierarchy,” Phys. Lett. B 94 (1980) 61–64

    1980

  96. [104]

    Neutrino Mass and Baryon Number Nonconservation in Superstring Models,

    R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino Mass and Baryon Number Nonconservation in Superstring Models,” Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 1642

    1986

  97. [105]

    Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons,

    R. Foot, H. Lew, X. G. He, and G. C. Joshi, “Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons,” Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 441

    1989

  98. [106]

    Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the observation of ¯νe appearance in a ¯νµ beam,

    LSND Collaboration, A. Aguilar et al. , “Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the observation of ¯νe appearance in a ¯νµ beam,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 112007, arXiv:hep-ex/0104049

    2001 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Improved Search for ¯νµ → ¯νe Oscillations in the MiniBooNE Experiment,

    MiniBooNE Collaboration, A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. , “Improved Search for ¯νµ → ¯νe Oscillations in the MiniBooNE Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 161801, arXiv:1303.2588 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Improved sensitivities of ESS νSB from a two-detector fit,

    F. Capozzi, C. Giunti, and C. A. Ternes, “Improved sensitivities of ESS νSB from a two-detector fit,” JHEP 04 (2023) 130, arXiv:2302.07154 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories,

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories,” Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227

    1980

  102. [110]

    On the description of nonunitary neutrino mixing,

    F. J. Escrihuela, D. V. Forero, O. G. Miranda, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “On the description of nonunitary neutrino mixing,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 5, (2015) 053009, arXiv:1503.08879 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 93, 119905 (2016)]

    2015 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Leptonic neutral-current probes in a short-distance DUNE-like setup,

    S. Centelles Chuli´ a, O. G. Miranda, and J. W. F. Valle, “Leptonic neutral-current probes in a short-distance DUNE-like setup,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 11, (2024) 115007, arXiv:2402.00114 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Muon Capture Constraints on Sterile Neutrino Properties,

    D. McKeen and M. Pospelov, “Muon Capture Constraints on Sterile Neutrino Properties,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 113018, arXiv:1011.3046 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Producing a new Fermion in Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering: from Neutrino Mass to Dark Matter,

    V. Brdar, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, “Producing a new Fermion in Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering: from Neutrino Mass to Dark Matter,” JHEP 12 (2018) 024, arXiv:1810.03626 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Constraints on light singlet fermion interactions from coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,

    W.-F. Chang and J. Liao, “Constraints on light singlet fermion interactions from coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 7, (2020) 075004, arXiv:2002.10275 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Constraints on general neutrino interactions with exotic fermion from neutrino-electron scattering experiments,

    Z. Chen, T. Li, and J. Liao, “Constraints on general neutrino interactions with exotic fermion from neutrino-electron scattering experiments,” JHEP 05 (2021) 131, arXiv:2102.09784 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Limits on neutrino mixing with new heavy particles,

    E. Nardi, E. Roulet, and D. Tommasini, “Limits on neutrino mixing with new heavy particles,” Phys. Lett. B 327 (1994) 319–326, arXiv:hep-ph/9402224

    1994 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles,

    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, “Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 28 (1962) 870–880

    1962

  110. [118]

    Lepton Mixing and Neutrino Oscillations,

    S. M. Bilenky and B. Pontecorvo, “Lepton Mixing and Neutrino Oscillations,” Phys. Rept. 41 (1978) 225–261

    1978

  111. [119]

    Global constraints on heavy neutrino mixing,

    E. Fernandez-Martinez, J. Hernandez-Garcia, and J. Lopez-Pavon, “Global constraints on heavy neutrino mixing,” JHEP 08 (2016) 033, arXiv:1605.08774 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Probing CP violation with non-unitary mixing in long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments: DUNE as a case study,

    F. J. Escrihuela, D. V. Forero, O. G. Miranda, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Probing CP violation with non-unitary mixing in long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments: DUNE as a case study,” New J. Phys. 19 no. 9, (2017) 093005, arXiv:1612.07377 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Neutrino Decay and Spontaneous Violation of Lepton Number,

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino Decay and Spontaneous Violation of Lepton Number,” Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 774

    1982

  114. [122]

    Type-I Seesaw with eV-Scale Neutrinos,

    G. C. Branco, J. T. Penedo, P. M. F. Pereira, M. N. Rebelo, and J. I. Silva-Marcos, “Type-I Seesaw with eV-Scale Neutrinos,” JHEP 07 (2020) 164, arXiv:1912.05875 [hep-ph]. 43

    2020 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Interaction between four half spin particles and the decay of the µ meson,

    L. Michel, “Interaction between four half spin particles and the decay of the µ meson,” Proc. Phys. Soc. A 63 (1950) 514–531

    1950

  116. [124]

    Theory of µ-Meson Decay with the Hypothesis of Nonconservation of Parity,

    C. Bouchiat and L. Michel, “Theory of µ-Meson Decay with the Hypothesis of Nonconservation of Parity,” Phys. Rev. 106 (1957) 170–172

    1957

  117. [125]

    Neutrino electromagnetic properties and the weak mixing angle at the LHC Forward Physics Facility,

    R. Mammen Abraham, S. Foroughi-Abari, F. Kling, and Y.-D. Tsai, “Neutrino electromagnetic properties and the weak mixing angle at the LHC Forward Physics Facility,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 1, (2025) 015029, arXiv:2301.10254 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Review of particle physics,

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al. , “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 3, (2024) 030001

    2024

  119. [127]

    Novel neutrino-floor and dark matter searches with deformed shell model calculations,

    D. K. Papoulias, R. Sahu, T. S. Kosmas, V. K. B. Kota, and B. Nayak, “Novel neutrino-floor and dark matter searches with deformed shell model calculations,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018 (2018) 6031362, arXiv:1804.11319 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Elastic and inelastic scattering of neutrinos and weakly interacting massive particles on nuclei,

    R. Sahu, D. K. Papoulias, V. K. B. Kota, and T. S. Kosmas, “Elastic and inelastic scattering of neutrinos and weakly interacting massive particles on nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C 102 no. 3, (2020) 035501, arXiv:2004.04055 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS) event rates for Ge, Zn, and Si detector materials,

    T. S. Kosmas, V. K. B. Kota, D. K. Papoulias, and R. Sahu, “Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS) event rates for Ge, Zn, and Si detector materials,” Phys. Rev. C 104 no. 6, (2021) 064618, arXiv:2111.08488 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Nuclear charge and magnetization density distribution parameters from elastic electron scattering,

    H. De Vries, C. W. De Jager, and C. De Vries, “Nuclear charge and magnetization density distribution parameters from elastic electron scattering,” Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 36 (1987) 495–536

    1987

  123. [131]

    Neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering as a probe of neutron density distributions,

    K. Patton, J. Engel, G. C. McLaughlin, and N. Schunck, “Neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering as a probe of neutron density distributions,” Phys. Rev. C 86 (2012) 024612, arXiv:1207.0693 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Standard and Nonstandard Neutrino-Nucleus Reactions Cross Sections and Event Rates to Neutrino Detection Experiments,

    D. K. Papoulias and T. S. Kosmas, “Standard and Nonstandard Neutrino-Nucleus Reactions Cross Sections and Event Rates to Neutrino Detection Experiments,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015 (2015) 763648, arXiv:1502.02928 [nucl-th]

    2015 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Constraining nuclear physics parameters with current and future COHERENT data,

    D. K. Papoulias, T. S. Kosmas, R. Sahu, V. K. B. Kota, and M. Hota, “Constraining nuclear physics parameters with current and future COHERENT data,” Phys. Lett. B 800 (2020) 135133, arXiv:1903.03722 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Probing light mediators and (g − 2)µ through detection of coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering at COHERENT,

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, E. Picciau, C. A. Ternes, and Y. Y. Zhang, “Probing light mediators and (g − 2)µ through detection of coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering at COHERENT,” JHEP 05 (2022) 109, arXiv:2202.11002 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Bounds on new physics with data of the Dresden-II reactor experiment and COHERENT,

    P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, L. Larizgoitia, F. Monrabal, and S. Palomares-Ruiz, “Bounds on new physics with data of the Dresden-II reactor experiment and COHERENT,” JHEP 05 (2022) 037, arXiv:2202.10829 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Constraints on additional Z bosons derived from neutrino - electron scattering measurements,

    CHARM-II Collaboration, P. Vilain et al. , “Constraints on additional Z bosons derived from neutrino - electron scattering measurements,” Phys. Lett. B 332 (1994) 465–470

    1994

  129. [137]

    Constraints on Dark Photon from Neutrino-Electron Scattering Experiments,

    S. Bilmis, I. Turan, T. M. Aliev, M. Deniz, L. Singh, and H. T. Wong, “Constraints on Dark Photon from Neutrino-Electron Scattering Experiments,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 3, (2015) 033009, arXiv:1502.07763 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Implications of first LZ and XENONnT results: A comparative study of neutrino properties and light mediators,

    S. K. A., A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, H. Prajapati, and R. Srivastava, “Implications of first LZ and XENONnT results: A comparative study of neutrino properties and light mediators,” Phys. Lett. B 839 (2023) 137742, arXiv:2208.06415 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Constraints on New Physics in Electron g − 2 from a Search for Invisible Decays of a Scalar, Pseudoscalar, Vector, and Axial Vector,

    NA64 Collaboration, Y. M. Andreev et al. , “Constraints on New Physics in Electron g − 2 from a Search for Invisible Decays of a Scalar, Pseudoscalar, Vector, and Axial Vector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 21, (2021) 211802, arXiv:2102.01885 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Search for a New B-L Z’ Gauge Boson with the NA64 Experiment at CERN,

    NA64 Collaboration, Y. M. Andreev et al. , “Search for a New B-L Z’ Gauge Boson with the NA64 Experiment at CERN,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 16, (2022) 161801, arXiv:2207.09979 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions,

    CHARM Collaboration, F. Bergsma et al. , “Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions,” Phys. Lett. B 157 (1985) 458–462

    1985

  134. [142]

    Constraints on sub-GeV hidden sector gauge bosons from a search for heavy neutrino decays,

    S. N. Gninenko, “Constraints on sub-GeV hidden sector gauge bosons from a search for heavy neutrino decays,” Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 244–248, arXiv:1204.3583 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Search for invisible decays of sub-GeV dark photons in missing-energy events at the CERN SPS,

    NA64 Collaboration, D. Banerjee et al. , “Search for invisible decays of sub-GeV dark photons in missing-energy events at the CERN SPS,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 no. 1, (2017) 011802, 44 arXiv:1610.02988 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Improved limits on a hypothetical X(16.7) boson and a dark photon decaying into e+e− pairs,

    NA64 Collaboration, D. Banerjee et al. , “Improved limits on a hypothetical X(16.7) boson and a dark photon decaying into e+e− pairs,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 7, (2020) 071101, arXiv:1912.11389 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Search for Light Dark Matter with NA64 at CERN,

    NA64 Collaboration, Y. M. Andreev et al. , “Search for Light Dark Matter with NA64 at CERN,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 16, (2023) 161801, arXiv:2307.02404 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Search for heavy neutrinos mixing with tau neutrinos,

    NOMAD Collaboration, P. Astier et al. , “Search for heavy neutrinos mixing with tau neutrinos,” Phys. Lett. B 506 (2001) 27–38, arXiv:hep-ex/0101041

    2001 arXiv

  139. [147]

    A Search for Short Lived Axions in an Electron Beam Dump Experiment,

    E. M. Riordan et al. , “A Search for Short Lived Axions in an Electron Beam Dump Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 755

    1987

  140. [148]

    New Fixed-Target Experiments to Search for Dark Gauge Forces,

    J. D. Bjorken, R. Essig, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, “New Fixed-Target Experiments to Search for Dark Gauge Forces,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 075018, arXiv:0906.0580 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Search for Neutral Metastable Penetrating Particles Produced in the SLAC Beam Dump,

    J. D. Bjorken, S. Ecklund, W. R. Nelson, A. Abashian, C. Church, B. Lu, L. W. Mo, T. A. Nunamaker, and P. Rassmann, “Search for Neutral Metastable Penetrating Particles Produced in the SLAC Beam Dump,” Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 3375

    1988

  142. [150]

    New Limits on Hidden Photons from Past Electron Beam Dumps,

    S. Andreas, C. Niebuhr, and A. Ringwald, “New Limits on Hidden Photons from Past Electron Beam Dumps,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095019, arXiv:1209.6083 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  143. [151]

    A Search for Shortlived Particles Produced in an Electron Beam Dump,

    A. Bross, M. Crisler, S. H. Pordes, J. Volk, S. Errede, and J. Wrbanek, “A Search for Shortlived Particles Produced in an Electron Beam Dump,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 2942–2945

    1991

  144. [152]

    Search for Neutral Particles in Electron Beam Dump Experiment,

    A. Konaka et al. , “Search for Neutral Particles in Electron Beam Dump Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 659

    1986

  145. [153]

    New Exclusion Limits for Dark Gauge Forces from Beam-Dump Data,

    J. Blumlein and J. Brunner, “New Exclusion Limits for Dark Gauge Forces from Beam-Dump Data,” Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 155–159, arXiv:1104.2747 [hep-ex]

    2011 arXiv

  146. [154]

    New Exclusion Limits on Dark Gauge Forces from Proton Bremsstrahlung in Beam-Dump Data,

    J. Bl ¨umlein and J. Brunner, “New Exclusion Limits on Dark Gauge Forces from Proton Bremsstrahlung in Beam-Dump Data,” Phys. Lett. B 731 (2014) 320–326, arXiv:1311.3870 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Search for a New Gauge Boson in Electron-Nucleus Fixed-Target Scattering by the APEX Experiment,

    APEX Collaboration, S. Abrahamyan et al. , “Search for a New Gauge Boson in Electron-Nucleus Fixed-Target Scattering by the APEX Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 191804, arXiv:1108.2750 [hep-ex]

    2011 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Search for a Dark Photon in e+e− Collisions at BaBar,

    BaBar Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al. , “Search for a Dark Photon in e+e− Collisions at BaBar,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 no. 20, (2014) 201801, arXiv:1406.2980 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Search for Invisible Decays of a Dark Photon Produced in e+e− Collisions at BaBar,

    BaBar Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al. , “Search for Invisible Decays of a Dark Photon Produced in e+e− Collisions at BaBar,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 13, (2017) 131804, arXiv:1702.03327 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Search for A′ → µ+µ− Decays,

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al. , “Search for A′ → µ+µ− Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 no. 4, (2020) 041801, arXiv:1910.06926 [hep-ex]

    2020

  151. [159]

    Serendipity in dark photon searches,

    P. Ilten, Y. Soreq, M. Williams, and W. Xue, “Serendipity in dark photon searches,” JHEP 06 (2018) 004, arXiv:1801.04847 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Axial vectors in DarkCast,

    C. Baruch, P. Ilten, Y. Soreq, and M. Williams, “Axial vectors in DarkCast,” JHEP 11 (2022) 124, arXiv:2206.08563 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Cosmological implications of gauged U(1) B−L on ∆N ef fin the CMB and BBN,

    H. Esseili and G. D. Kribs, “Cosmological implications of gauged U(1) B−L on ∆N ef fin the CMB and BBN,” JCAP 05 (2024) 110, arXiv:2308.07955 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  154. [162]

    N ef fconstraints on light mediators coupled to neutrinos: the dilution-resistant effect,

    S.-P. Li and X.-J. Xu, “N ef fconstraints on light mediators coupled to neutrinos: the dilution-resistant effect,” JHEP 10 (2023) 012, arXiv:2307.13967 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  155. [163]

    Neff at CMB challenges U(1)X light gauge boson scenarios,

    D. K. Ghosh, P. Ghosh, S. Jeesun, and R. Srivastava, “Neff at CMB challenges U(1)X light gauge boson scenarios,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 7, (2024) 075032, arXiv:2404.10077 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Constraining the Self-Interacting Neutrino Interpretation of the Hubble Tension,

    N. Blinov, K. J. Kelly, G. Z. Krnjaic, and S. D. McDermott, “Constraining the Self-Interacting Neutrino Interpretation of the Hubble Tension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 no. 19, (2019) 191102, arXiv:1905.02727 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  157. [165]

    Astrophysical constraints on nonstandard coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering,

    A. M. Suliga and I. Tamborra, “Astrophysical constraints on nonstandard coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 8, (2021) 083002, arXiv:2010.14545 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  158. [166]

    Nonunitary neutrino mixing in short and long-baseline experiments,

    D. V. Forero, C. Giunti, C. A. Ternes, and M. Tortola, “Nonunitary neutrino mixing in short and long-baseline experiments,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 7, (2021) 075030, arXiv:2103.01998 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  159. [167]

    The Short-Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab,

    P. A. Machado, O. Palamara, and D. W. Schmitz, “The Short-Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 (2019) 363–387, arXiv:1903.04608 [hep-ex]. 45

    2019 arXiv

  160. [168]

    Gallium Anomaly: critical view from the global picture of νe and νe disappearance,

    C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, C. A. Ternes, O. Tyagi, and Z. Xin, “Gallium Anomaly: critical view from the global picture of νe and νe disappearance,” JHEP 10 (2022) 164, arXiv:2209.00916 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  161. [169]

    The Neutrino Magnetic Moment Portal: Cosmology, Astrophysics, and Direct Detection,

    V. Brdar, A. Greljo, J. Kopp, and T. Opferkuch, “The Neutrino Magnetic Moment Portal: Cosmology, Astrophysics, and Direct Detection,” JCAP 01 (2021) 039, arXiv:2007.15563 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  162. [170]

    Luminous solar neutrinos I: Dipole portals,

    R. Plestid, “Luminous solar neutrinos I: Dipole portals,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 075027, arXiv:2010.04193 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  163. [171]

    Double-Cascade Events from New Physics in Icecube,

    P. Coloma, P. A. N. Machado, I. Martinez-Soler, and I. M. Shoemaker, “Double-Cascade Events from New Physics in Icecube,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 20, (2017) 201804, arXiv:1707.08573 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  164. [172]

    Dipole Portal to Heavy Neutral Leptons,

    G. Magill, R. Plestid, M. Pospelov, and Y.-D. Tsai, “Dipole Portal to Heavy Neutral Leptons,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 11, (2018) 115015, arXiv:1803.03262 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  165. [173]

    The NOMAD experiment at the CERN SPS,

    NOMAD Collaboration, J. Altegoer et al. , “The NOMAD experiment at the CERN SPS,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 404 (1998) 96–128

    1998

  166. [174]

    Limits on the magnetic moment of sterile neutrino and two photon neutrino decay,

    S. N. Gninenko and N. V. Krasnikov, “Limits on the magnetic moment of sterile neutrino and two photon neutrino decay,” Phys. Lett. B 450 (1999) 165–172, arXiv:hep-ph/9808370

    1999 arXiv

  167. [175]

    Dipole-coupled heavy-neutral-lepton explanations of the MiniBooNE excess including constraints from MINERvA data,

    N. W. Kamp, M. Hostert, A. Schneider, S. Vergani, C. A. Arg ¨uelles, J. M. Conrad, M. H. Shaevitz, and M. A. Uchida, “Dipole-coupled heavy-neutral-lepton explanations of the MiniBooNE excess including constraints from MINERvA data,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 5, (2023) 055009, arXiv...

    2023 arXiv

  168. [176]

    Search for heavy neutrinos with the T2K near detector ND280,

    T2K Collaboration, K. Abe et al. , “Search for heavy neutrinos with the T2K near detector ND280,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 5, (2019) 052006, arXiv:1902.07598 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  169. [177]

    Constraints and Sensitivities for Dipole-Portal Heavy Neutral Leptons from ND280 and its Upgrade,

    M.-S. Liu, N. Kamp, and C. A. Arg ¨uelles, “Constraints and Sensitivities for Dipole-Portal Heavy Neutral Leptons from ND280 and its Upgrade,” arXiv:2412.15051 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  170. [178]

    Luminous solar neutrinos: The notebooks

    R. Plestid, “Luminous solar neutrinos: The notebooks.” https://github.com/ryanplestid/luminous-solar-nu, 2020

    2020

  171. [179]

    Neutrino portals, terrestrial upscattering, and atmospheric neutrinos,

    R. A. Gustafson, R. Plestid, and I. M. Shoemaker, “Neutrino portals, terrestrial upscattering, and atmospheric neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 9, (2022) 095037, arXiv:2205.02234 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  172. [180]

    Probing the sterile neutrino dipole portal with SN1987A and low-energy supernovae,

    G. Chauhan, S. Horiuchi, P. Huber, and I. M. Shoemaker, “Probing the sterile neutrino dipole portal with SN1987A and low-energy supernovae,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 1, (2024) 015007, arXiv:2402.01624 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.