Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.06790 v2 pith:ZITSXTFJ submitted 2022-04-14 cs.CR cs.DC

An Exploratory Study of Attestation Mechanisms for Trusted Execution Environments

classification cs.CR cs.DC
keywords attestationenvironmentsexecutiontrustedwhenadoptionapplicationattackers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Attestation is a fundamental building block to establish trust over software systems. When used in conjunction with trusted execution environments, it guarantees that genuine code is executed even when facing strong attackers, paving the way for adoption in several sensitive application domains. This paper reviews existing remote attestation principles and compares the functionalities of current trusted execution environments as Intel SGX, Arm TrustZone and AMD SEV, as well as emerging RISC-V solutions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Toward a Generalized Defense Across Sparse, Continuous, and Structured Parameter Attacks

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    ParDef defends DNNs against sparse, continuous, and structured parameter attacks via keyed reparameterization, error-correcting quantization, and robust inference, with evaluations on CIFAR and Tiny-ImageNet showing r...