Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.06135 v1 pith:ZJKU5QV7 submitted 2018-12-14 cs.LG cs.CYstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CYstat.ML
keywords fairnessgroupindividualbiasincreasingmitigationpost-processingprevious
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Whereas previous post-processing approaches for increasing the fairness of predictions of biased classifiers address only group fairness, we propose a method for increasing both individual and group fairness. Our novel framework includes an individual bias detector used to prioritize data samples in a bias mitigation algorithm aiming to improve the group fairness measure of disparate impact. We show superior performance to previous work in the combination of classification accuracy, individual fairness and group fairness on several real-world datasets in applications such as credit, employment, and criminal justice.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. General Post-Processing Framework for Fairness Adjustment of Machine Learning Models

    cs.LG 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A post-hoc fairness adjuster trained on a black-box model's predictions and a fairness penalty matches adversarial debiasing's fairness-accuracy tradeoff on Adult, COMPAS, and German credit data.

Pith tools