Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Violating Weak Cosmic Censorship in AdS$_3$ via Gedanken Experiment

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A test particle could destroy the horizon of a quantum BTZ black hole, the paper claims, if self-force effects are neglected.

desk verdict The abstract is honest about its caveat, but the title oversells: without self-force/backreaction, this is a necessary-condition check, not a wCCC violation. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05384 v1 pith:ZJP7OFMG submitted 2025-08-07 hep-th gr-qc

Masaya Amo This is my paper
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords weakcosmiccensorshipBTZblackholequantum-correctedgedankenexperimenttestparticleoverspinningAdS3eventhorizon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper attempts to show that the weak cosmic censorship conjecture is not as robust as usually assumed. Working in a rotating three-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime, the author considers a quantum-corrected BTZ black hole at extremality and lets a test particle with large orbital angular momentum fall into it. The claim is that, under this infall, the event horizon can be destroyed, which would violate the conjecture. The paper is careful to state that the violation depends on neglecting the particle's self-force, so the result is a potential counterexample rather than a definitive breakdown of cosmic censorship.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the gedanken experiment of throwing a test particle with large orbital angular momentum into an extremal qBTZ black hole. The key object is the qBTZ solution, a quantum-corrected version of the BTZ black hole, whose parameter space the paper extends. The infalling particle changes the black hole's mass and angular momentum; if the ratio crosses the extremal value, the horizon is destroyed.

What would settle it

Compute the first-order self-force correction to the particle's energy and angular momentum in the qBTZ spacetime and check whether the corrected final parameters still cross the extremality bound; if they do not, the horizon is not destroyed. The paper itself leaves this step as the open question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that an extremal quantum-corrected BTZ (qBTZ) black hole can be pushed into a state with no horizon by capturing a test particle whose orbital angular momentum is large. By extending the parameter range of the qBTZ solution, the author shows that the final mass and angular momentum can cross the extremality bound, so the would-be horizon disappears. Within the test-particle approximation, this is a violation of the weak cosmic censorship conjecture; including self-force effects could prevent the overspinning.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the test particle's gravitational self-force can be neglected; if back-reaction is included, the horizon may remain intact and the violation would not occur.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, the weak cosmic censorship conjecture does not apply to qBTZ solutions in the test-particle limit.
  • The parameter range of qBTZ black holes would expand to include spacetimes that previously were considered forbidden by cosmic censorship.
  • The paper implies that the qBTZ solution should either be removed from the scope of the conjecture or be re-examined with self-force effects included.
  • The tension between quantum corrections and cosmic censorship would become a concrete, calculable issue in three-dimensional gravity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same overspinning mechanism may also work for near-extremal, not only exactly extremal, qBTZ black holes, which would make the potential counterexample less fine-tuned.
  • In a holographic dual, the disappearance of the horizon might match an instability or phase transition in the boundary theory, offering a way to test the claim indirectly.
  • A full self-force calculation in this low-dimensional setting is likely tractable and would settle whether the violation is physical or an artifact of neglecting back-reaction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript (arXiv:2508.05384) claims a potential counterexample to the weak cosmic censorship conjecture (wCCC) in a rotating three-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime with a quantum-corrected BTZ (qBTZ) black hole. The authors extend the qBTZ parameter range and analyze the infall of test particles with large orbital angular momentum into an extremal black hole. They report that, within the test-particle approximation and explicitly neglecting self-force effects, the event horizon can be destroyed, which they interpret as a violation of the wCCC. They conclude that qBTZ should either be excluded from the applicability of wCCC or be reexamined with self-force effects included.

Significance. If the claimed horizon destruction survives a full self-force/backreaction treatment, it would constitute a significant potential counterexample to wCCC in a quantum-corrected spacetime. The paper's explicit acknowledgment of the self-force caveat is honest, and the qBTZ setting is a concrete, tractable arena for gedanken experiments. However, as presented, the result is a necessary-condition check within a restricted approximation, not an actual wCCC violation. The gap between the title's 'Violating' and the abstract's 'potential counterexample' is substantial and should be addressed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The central claim is explicitly conditional on neglecting self-force ('under certain conditions, such as neglecting the self-force effects'). In standard gedanken-experiment analyses, first-order test-particle absorption can overspin or overcharge a black hole while second-order self-force/backreaction restores the horizon. The manuscript must either include a self-force/backreaction estimate or clearly state that the result is only a necessary-condition check, not a wCCC violation. The title 'Violating WCC' overstates the abstract's 'potential counterexample'.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'extend the parameter range of the qBTZ black hole' is unspecified. It is unclear which parameter is being extended, whether the extension keeps the solution within its domain of validity, and whether this extension is responsible for the apparent horizon destruction. If the extension is performed outside the regime where qBTZ is a valid quantum-corrected solution, the conclusion may be an artifact. The authors should define the extension precisely and justify its physical relevance.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title] The title 'Violating Weak Cosmic Censorship' is stronger than the abstract's 'potential counterexample'. Consider revising to 'A Potential Violation' or 'A Test-Particle Counterexample' to match the actual strength of the claim.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'under certain conditions' is vague. The abstract should state the conditions explicitly: e.g., extremal qBTZ, large orbital angular momentum above some threshold, and the specific parameter extension. It should also clarify that self-force is neglected and that this is not a full physical absorption process.
  3. [Abstract] qBTZ is not defined in the abstract. Provide a reference or a defining equation, and specify whether the analysis is based on classical test-particle geodesics or includes any first-order backreaction beyond the test-particle limit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the analysis is a conditional derivation from the qBTZ metric with an explicit test-particle caveat, not a reduction to its own inputs.

full rationale

The abstract presents a potential counterexample to the weak cosmic censorship conjecture in qBTZ spacetime by extending the parameter range and examining test-particle infall. No fitted parameters, no self-citations, no uniqueness theorems, and no definitional identifications between inputs and outputs appear in the available text. The explicit caveat 'such as neglecting the self-force effects' is a limitation of physical modeling, not a circular step: the derivation apparently starts from the qBTZ metric and the test-particle geodesic approximation and derives a necessary condition for horizon destruction. Whether the approximation is adequate for the wCCC is a substantive physical question, but it is not a question of circularity. Therefore, under the hard rules requiring quoted evidence of a specific reduction, no circular step can be identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract was available, so the ledger lists the structural assumptions implied by the abstract. No numeric free parameters or invented entities can be identified from the abstract alone.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption qBTZ spacetime is a valid, quantum-corrected black hole solution
    The analysis is built on this metric, which is taken from prior literature; the abstract does not derive it.
  • domain assumption Test particles follow geodesics and do not perturb the background (self-force neglected)
    The gedanken experiment treats infalling matter as a test particle; the abstract explicitly lists this as a condition for the result.
  • domain assumption An extremal black hole can be taken as the initial state
    The gedanken experiment starts from an extremal qBTZ black hole, assuming such a state exists and can be prepared.
  • domain assumption The particle can carry arbitrarily large orbital angular momentum
    The claimed horizon destruction requires large orbital angular momentum; no upper bound from quantum or other effects is mentioned in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Violating Weak Cosmic Censorship in AdS$_3$ via Gedanken Experiment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZJP7OFMG

@misc{pith2026250805384,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Violating Weak Cosmic Censorship in AdS$_3$ via Gedanken Experiment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZJP7OFMG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05384}
}
abstract

The weak cosmic censorship conjecture (wCCC) might not be as robust as one would expect. We present a potential counterexample to the wCCC in a rotating three-dimensional anti-de Sitter (AdS$_3$) spacetime. We extend the parameter range of the quantum corrected BTZ (qBTZ) black hole. We examine the infall of test particles with large orbital angular momentum into an extremal black hole. Our findings indicate that, under certain conditions -- such as neglecting the self-force effects -- the event horizon can be destroyed, leading to a violation of the wCCC. The results suggest that this solution should either be excluded from the applicability of the wCCC or should be examined with self-force effects incorporated.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Kerr-de Sitter Black Holes: Quantum Aspects and Cosmic Censorship Conjecture

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Quantum corrections to Kerr-de Sitter black holes prevent over-extremization by test particles, keeping the weak cosmic censorship conjecture intact.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Penrose ,\ 10.1023/A:1016578408204 journal journal Riv

    author author R. Penrose ,\ 10.1023/A:1016578408204 journal journal Riv. Nuovo Cim. \ volume 1 ,\ pages 252 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1023/a:1016578408204 1969

  2. [2]

    Penrose ,\ 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb41447.x journal journal Annals N

    author author R. Penrose ,\ 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb41447.x journal journal Annals N. Y. Acad. Sci. \ volume 224 ,\ pages 125 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 1973

  3. [3]

    Wald ,\ 10.1016/0003-4916(74)90125-0 journal journal Annals Phys

    author author R. Wald ,\ 10.1016/0003-4916(74)90125-0 journal journal Annals Phys. \ volume 82 ,\ pages 548 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(74)90125-0 1974

  4. [4]

    author author V. E. \ Hubeny ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.064013 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 59 ,\ pages 064013 ( year 1999 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9808043 arXiv:gr-qc/9808043 NoStop

    arXiv 1999

  5. [5]

    Jacobson \ and\ author T

    author author T. Jacobson \ and\ author T. P. \ Sotiriou ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.141101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 103 ,\ pages 141101 ( year 2009 ) ,\ note [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 103, 209903 (2009)] ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.4146 arXiv:0907.4146 [gr-qc] NoStop

    arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Gao \ and\ author Y

    author author S. Gao \ and\ author Y. Zhang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.044028 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 87 ,\ pages 044028 ( year 2013 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.2631 arXiv:1211.2631 [gr-qc] NoStop

    arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    Black holes die hard: can one spin-up a black hole past extremality?

    author author M. Bouhmadi-Lopez , author V. Cardoso , author A. Nerozzi , \ and\ author J. V. \ Rocha ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.084051 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 81 ,\ pages 084051 ( year 2010 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4295 arXiv:1003.4295 [gr-qc] NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    author author J. V. \ Rocha \ and\ author R. Santarelli ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.064065 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 89 ,\ pages 064065 ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.4840 arXiv:1402.4840 [gr-qc] NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    author author K. S. \ Revelar \ and\ author I. Vega ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.064010 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 96 ,\ pages 064010 ( year 2017 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07190 arXiv:1706.07190 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2017 arXiv

  2. [10]

    An , author J

    author author J. An , author J. Shan , author H. Zhang , \ and\ author S. Zhao ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104007 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 97 ,\ pages 104007 ( year 2018 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04310 arXiv:1711.04310 [hep-th] NoStop

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Zhang \ and\ author S

    author author Y. Zhang \ and\ author S. Gao ,\ 10.1142/S0218271814500448 journal journal Int. J. Mod. Phys. D \ volume 23 ,\ pages 1450044 ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.2027 arXiv:1309.2027 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2014 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Jiang \ and\ author M

    author author J. Jiang \ and\ author M. Zhang ,\ 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138433 journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volume 849 ,\ pages 138433 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.16417 arXiv:2312.16417 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2023

  5. [13]

    author author G. E. A. \ Matsas \ and\ author A. R. R. \ da Silva ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.181301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 99 ,\ pages 181301 ( year 2007 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3198 arXiv:0706.3198 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2007 arXiv

  6. [14]

    author author G. E. A. \ Matsas , author M. Richartz , author A. Saa , author A. R. R. \ da Silva , \ and\ author D. A. T. \ Vanzella ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.101502 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 79 ,\ pages 101502 ( year 2009 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1077 arXiv:09...

    2009 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Richartz \ and\ author A

    author author M. Richartz \ and\ author A. Saa ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.104021 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 84 ,\ pages 104021 ( year 2011 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.3364 arXiv:1109.3364 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2011 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Izumi , author T

    author author K. Izumi , author T. Noumi , \ and\ author D. Yoshida ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.044008 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 110 ,\ pages 044008 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11488 arXiv:2403.11488 [hep-th] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Gregory \ and\ author R

    author author R. Gregory \ and\ author R. Laflamme ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2837 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 70 ,\ pages 2837 ( year 1993 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9301052 arXiv:hep-th/9301052 NoStop

    1993 arXiv

  10. [18]

    author author G. T. \ Horowitz , author J. E. \ Santos , \ and\ author B. Way ,\ 10.1088/0264-9381/33/19/195007 journal journal Class. Quant. Grav. \ volume 33 ,\ pages 195007 ( year 2016 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.06465 arXiv:1604.06465 [hep-th] NoStop

    2016 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Crisford \ and\ author J

    author author T. Crisford \ and\ author J. E. \ Santos ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.181101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 118 ,\ pages 181101 ( year 2017 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.05490 arXiv:1702.05490 [hep-th] NoStop

    2017 arXiv

  12. [20]

    author author F. C. \ Eperon , author B. Ganchev , \ and\ author J. E. \ Santos ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.041502 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 101 ,\ pages 041502 ( year 2020 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.11257 arXiv:1906.11257 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Hod ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.024016 journal journal Phys

    author author S. Hod ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.024016 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 66 ,\ pages 024016 ( year 2002 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0205005 arXiv:gr-qc/0205005 NoStop

    2002 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Hod ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.121101 journal journal Phys

    author author S. Hod ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.121101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 121101 ( year 2008 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.3873 arXiv:0805.3873 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2008 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Barausse , author V

    author author E. Barausse , author V. Cardoso , \ and\ author G. Khanna ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.261102 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 261102 ( year 2010 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.5159 arXiv:1008.5159 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2010 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Isoyama , author N

    author author S. Isoyama , author N. Sago , \ and\ author T. Tanaka ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.124024 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 84 ,\ pages 124024 ( year 2011 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.6207 arXiv:1108.6207 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2011 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Zimmerman , author I

    author author P. Zimmerman , author I. Vega , author E. Poisson , \ and\ author R. Haas ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.041501 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 87 ,\ pages 041501 ( year 2013 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.3889 arXiv:1211.3889 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2013 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Colleoni \ and\ author L

    author author M. Colleoni \ and\ author L. Barack ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.104024 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 91 ,\ pages 104024 ( year 2015 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.07330 arXiv:1501.07330 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Colleoni , author L

    author author M. Colleoni , author L. Barack , author A. G. \ Shah , \ and\ author M. van de Meent ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084044 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 92 ,\ pages 084044 ( year 2015 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.04031 arXiv:1508.04031 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Sorce \ and\ author R

    author author J. Sorce \ and\ author R. M. \ Wald ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.104014 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 96 ,\ pages 104014 ( year 2017 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.05862 arXiv:1707.05862 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Iyer \ and\ author R

    author author V. Iyer \ and\ author R. M. \ Wald ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.846 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 50 ,\ pages 846 ( year 1994 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9403028 arXiv:gr-qc/9403028 NoStop

    1994 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Iyer \ and\ author R

    author author V. Iyer \ and\ author R. M. \ Wald ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.4430 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 52 ,\ pages 4430 ( year 1995 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9503052 arXiv:gr-qc/9503052 NoStop

    1995 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Gao \ and\ author R

    author author S. Gao \ and\ author R. M. \ Wald ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.084020 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 64 ,\ pages 084020 ( year 2001 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0106071 arXiv:gr-qc/0106071 NoStop

    2001 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Hollands \ and\ author R

    author author S. Hollands \ and\ author R. M. \ Wald ,\ 10.1007/s00220-012-1638-1 journal journal Commun. Math. Phys. \ volume 321 ,\ pages 629 ( year 2013 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.0463 arXiv:1201.0463 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2013 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Yoshida \ and\ author K

    author author D. Yoshida \ and\ author K. Yoshimura ,\ 10.1088/1361-6382/add787 journal journal Class. Quant. Grav. \ volume 42 ,\ pages 115008 ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19535 arXiv:2411.19535 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Banados , author C

    author author M. Banados , author C. Teitelboim , \ and\ author J. Zanelli ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1849 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 69 ,\ pages 1849 ( year 1992 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9204099 arXiv:hep-th/9204099 NoStop

    1992 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Banados , author M

    author author M. Banados , author M. Henneaux , author C. Teitelboim , \ and\ author J. Zanelli ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.1506 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 48 ,\ pages 1506 ( year 1993 ) ,\ note [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 88, 069902 (2013)] ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/930201...

    1993 arXiv

  28. [36]

    author author J. M. \ Maldacena ,\ 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 journal journal Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 231 ( year 1998 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9711200 arXiv:hep-th/9711200 NoStop

    1998 arXiv

  29. [37]

    author author J. V. \ Rocha \ and\ author V. Cardoso ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.104037 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 83 ,\ pages 104037 ( year 2011 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.4352 arXiv:1102.4352 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2011 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Emparan , author G

    author author R. Emparan , author G. T. \ Horowitz , \ and\ author R. C. \ Myers ,\ 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/021 journal journal JHEP \ volume 01 ,\ pages 021 ( year 2000 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9912135 arXiv:hep-th/9912135 NoStop

    2000 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Emparan , author A

    author author R. Emparan , author A. Fabbri , \ and\ author N. Kaloper ,\ 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/043 journal journal JHEP \ volume 08 ,\ pages 043 ( year 2002 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0206155 arXiv:hep-th/0206155 NoStop

    2002 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Emparan , author A

    author author R. Emparan , author A. M. \ Frassino , \ and\ author B. Way ,\ 10.1007/JHEP11(2020)137 journal journal JHEP \ volume 11 ,\ pages 137 ( year 2020 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15999 arXiv:2007.15999 [hep-th] NoStop

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    author author A. M. \ Frassino , author J. F. \ Pedraza , author A. Svesko , \ and\ author M. R. \ Visser ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.161501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 130 ,\ pages 161501 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.14055 arXiv:2212.14055 [hep-th] NoStop

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    author author C. V. \ Johnson \ and\ author R. Nazario ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.106004 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 110 ,\ pages 106004 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12212 arXiv:2310.12212 [hep-th] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    author author A. M. \ Frassino , author J. F. \ Pedraza , author A. Svesko , \ and\ author M. R. \ Visser ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.124040 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 109 ,\ pages 124040 ( year 2024 a ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12220 arXiv:2310.12220 [hep-th] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    author author S. A. \ Hosseini Mansoori , author J. F. \ Pedraza , \ and\ author M. Rafiee ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.024012 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 111 ,\ pages 024012 ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13063 arXiv:2403.13063 [hep-th] NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    \ Wu \ and\ author S.-W

    author author S.-P. \ Wu \ and\ author S.-W. \ Wei ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.024054 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 110 ,\ pages 024054 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14167 arXiv:2403.14167 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    \ Xu , author P.-P

    author author Z.-M. \ Xu , author P.-P. \ Zhang , author B. Wu , \ and\ author X. Zhang ,\ 10.1007/JHEP12(2024)181 journal journal JHEP \ volume 12 ,\ pages 181 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08241 arXiv:2407.08241 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    author author A. M. \ Frassino , author J. V. \ Rocha , \ and\ author A. P. \ Sanna ,\ 10.1007/JHEP07(2024)226 journal journal JHEP \ volume 07 ,\ pages 226 ( year 2024 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04597 arXiv:2405.04597 [hep-th] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    author author A. M. \ Frassino , author R. A. \ Hennigar , author J. F. \ Pedraza , \ and\ author A. Svesko ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.181501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 181501 ( year 2024 c ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17860 arXiv:2406.17860 [hep-...

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Cvetic , author G

    author author M. Cvetic , author G. W. \ Gibbons , author D. Kubiznak , \ and\ author C. N. \ Pope ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.024037 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 84 ,\ pages 024037 ( year 2011 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.2888 arXiv:1012.2888 [hep-th] NoStop

    2011 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Gregory \ and\ author A

    author author R. Gregory \ and\ author A. Scoins ,\ 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.071 journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volume 796 ,\ pages 191 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09660 arXiv:1904.09660 [hep-th] NoStop

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Altamirano , author D

    author author N. Altamirano , author D. Kubiznak , author R. B. \ Mann , \ and\ author Z. Sherkatghanad ,\ 10.3390/galaxies2010089 journal journal Galaxies \ volume 2 ,\ pages 89 ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.2586 arXiv:1401.2586 [hep-th] NoStop

    2014 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Amo , author A

    author author M. Amo , author A. M. \ Frassino , \ and\ author R. A. \ Hennigar ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.241401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 241401 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03011 arXiv:2307.03011 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    author author J. F. \ Plebanski \ and\ author M. Demianski ,\ 10.1016/0003-4916(76)90240-2 journal journal Annals Phys. \ volume 98 ,\ pages 98 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    1976 doi

  46. [54]

    Emparan:2020znc )

    note We do not discuss the case with =0 separately since it is obtained as a limit x_1 0 of the case with either = 1 (see Ref. Emparan:2020znc ). Stop

  47. [55]

    Bueno , author R

    author author P. Bueno , author R. Emparan , \ and\ author Q. Llorens ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.044012 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 106 ,\ pages 044012 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13421 arXiv:2204.13421 [hep-th] NoStop

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Frassino:2024fin to facilitate comparison, which differs from that in Ref

    note We adopt the same notation for the three-dimensional coordinates as in Ref. Frassino:2024fin to facilitate comparison, which differs from that in Ref. Emparan:2020znc . Stop

  49. [57]

    Feng , author H

    author author Y. Feng , author H. Ma , author R. B. \ Mann , author Y. Xue , \ and\ author M. Zhang ,\ 10.1007/JHEP08(2024)184 journal journal JHEP \ volume 08 ,\ pages 184 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07192 arXiv:2404.07192 [hep-th] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Climent , author R

    author author A. Climent , author R. Emparan , \ and\ author R. A. \ Hennigar ,\ 10.1007/JHEP08(2024)150 journal journal JHEP \ volume 08 ,\ pages 150 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15148 arXiv:2404.15148 [hep-th] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Bhattacharya , author R

    author author D. Bhattacharya , author R. A. \ Hennigar , author R. B. \ Mann , \ and\ author M. Zhang ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19941 arXiv:2506.19941 [hep-th] NoStop

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.