Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Brussels Effect and Artificial Intelligence: How EU regulation will impact the global AI market

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.12645 v1 pith:ZKE4ZYSJ submitted 2022-08-23 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords brusselseffectregulationlikelywillfactoregulatorydiffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The European Union is likely to introduce among the first, most stringent, and most comprehensive AI regulatory regimes of the world's major jurisdictions. In this report, we ask whether the EU's upcoming regulation for AI will diffuse globally, producing a so-called "Brussels Effect". Building on and extending Anu Bradford's work, we outline the mechanisms by which such regulatory diffusion may occur. We consider both the possibility that the EU's AI regulation will incentivise changes in products offered in non-EU countries (a de facto Brussels Effect) and the possibility it will influence regulation adopted by other jurisdictions (a de jure Brussels Effect). Focusing on the proposed EU AI Act, we tentatively conclude that both de facto and de jure Brussels effects are likely for parts of the EU regulatory regime. A de facto effect is particularly likely to arise in large US tech companies with AI systems that the AI Act terms "high-risk". We argue that the upcoming regulation might be particularly important in offering the first and most influential operationalisation of what it means to develop and deploy trustworthy or human-centred AI. If the EU regime is likely to see significant diffusion, ensuring it is well-designed becomes a matter of global importance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Red Teaming AI Policy: A Taxonomy of Avoision and the EU AI Act

    cs.CY 2025-06 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A taxonomy of avoision under the EU AI Act, with strategies to escape scope, exploit exemptions, and manipulate risk or operator categories.

  2. From Turing to Tomorrow: The UK's Approach to AI Regulation

    cs.CY 2025-07 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    The UK should establish a flexible, principles-based regulator for frontier AI development, plus defensive measures against biological risks and updated legal frameworks for copyright, discrimination, and AI agents.

Pith tools