REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 87 references
Causality and stability of magnetohydrodynamics for an ultrarelativistic locally neutral two-component gas
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper shows that the kinetic-theory-derived magnetohydrodynamics for a locally neutral, non-resistive two-component ultrarelativistic plasma is linearly causal and stable around global equilibrium for any magnetic field strength.
desk verdict The stability analysis of the Kushwah–Denicol MHD theory is genuinely new and mostly sound, but the 'always causal and stable' claim goes beyond what is proven: only perturbations parallel and perpendicular to B are analyzed. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the pair of coupled relaxation equations for the total shear-stress tensor $\pi^{\mu\nu}$ and the relative shear-stress tensor $\delta\pi^{\mu\nu}$, obtained by a 14-moment truncation of the Boltzmann–Vlasov equation, i.e., a closure that keeps only a limited, fixed set of momentum moments. The magnetic field enters through the frequency $\omega_0 = 2|q|B/(5T)$ and through the antisymmetric tensor $b^{\mu\nu}$ built from the field direction; these couple the two shear tensors and are what turns otherwise purely damped nonhydrodynamic modes into oscillatory ones at large $B$. The analytic machinery is the Fourier-space decomposition of all perturbations in the orthonormal basis $\{u_0^\mu, b_0^\mu, \hat{\kappa}_\perp^\mu, \hat{q}^\mu\}$, which decouples the linear system into smaller blocks. From those blocks the paper derives the dispersion relations and analyzes their roots in the limits $k\to 0$ and $k\to\infty$; the positive definiteness of the relaxation coefficients $\Sigma$ and $\Sigma'$ then forces stability, and the bounded root velocities enforce causality.
What would settle it
Solve the full linearized Boltzmann–Vlasov equation for a locally neutral, massless, two-component plasma in a homogeneous magnetic field without the 14-moment truncation and without dropping bulk viscosity and diffusion; if any Fourier mode with $\mathrm{Im}\,\omega<0$ or $|\partial\,\mathrm{Re}\,\omega/\partial k|>1$ appears for any $B$, the claim fails. A cheaper version: add a bulk-viscous relaxation or a diffusion current to the linearized equations (20) and recompute the dispersion relations—an unstable or superluminal root would refute the 'always causal and stable' conclusion.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that the non-resistive magnetohydrodynamics developed in Ref. [64] is linearly causal and stable around global equilibrium for any magnetic field strength. Linearizing about a static equilibrium and decomposing the perturbations in Fourier space, the paper obtains partially decoupled sets of dispersion relations for longitudinal and transverse perturbations; in the small- and large-wavenumber limits all roots have positive imaginary part, and all asymptotic group velocities obey $\lim_{k\to\infty}|\partial\,\mathrm{Re}\,\omega/\partial k|\le 1$. The paper also displays the intermediate-wavenumber behavior numerically. A distinctive consequence is that at large magnetic field the otherwise purely damped nonhydrodynamic shear modes acquire oscillatory real parts, a behavior the traditional Israel–Stewart formalism cannot produce, while the Alfvén mode's damping is suppressed as the field grows. When the theory is truncated to the longitudinal component of the shear-stress tensor, as is common in astrophysical applications, the spectrum reduces to a subset of these modes and the Alfvén modes become non-dissipative; the paper argues this approximation is justified only for sufficiently large $B$, and not in the early heavy-ion collision regime where $B_0/T_0^2\sim 0.2$–$2$.
Load-bearing premise
The argument stands on the untested premise that the truncated kinetic equations it inherits—the 14-moment Boltzmann–Vlasov closure with bulk viscosity and diffusion neglected—faithfully describe the plasma's linear response; if the omitted couplings change the mode structure, the all-field stability and causality results do not transfer to the physical system.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The theory derived in Ref. [64] can be used in numerical simulations of strongly magnetized relativistic plasmas without introducing unstable linear modes or superluminal signal speeds, for any value of the field.
- At large magnetic field, the nonhydrodynamic shear modes become oscillatory, so a measurement or simulation of shear-stress relaxation in a strongly magnetized plasma would distinguish this theory from Israel–Stewart-type equations.
- The Alfvén mode and the transverse-coupled modes become increasingly dissipationless as $B$ grows, making the plasma approach ideal magnetohydrodynamic behavior at large field strength.
- The longitudinal-only shear approximation, used in some astrophysical plasma codes, reproduces only a subset of the full spectrum and misses the damping of Alfvén waves; it is reliable only when $B$ is large compared with $T^2$, not in the early heavy-ion collision regime.
Reading between the lines
- Beyond the paper, an analytic Routh–Hurwitz check of the full dispersion polynomials would settle whether causality and stability hold at every intermediate wavenumber, not just in the asymptotic limits plus numerical plots.
- The linear result strongly suggests the linearized equations form a mathematically well-posed initial-value problem, but nonlinear well-posedness and shock stability are separate questions the paper leaves open.
- The predicted oscillatory shear relaxation at large $B$ could be looked for in kinetic-theory simulations of quark-gluon plasma or in laboratory plasma analogues, though the paper itself does not propose such a test.
- The comparison with the longitudinal approximation implies that accretion-disk simulations that keep only longitudinal shear may underestimate dissipation from Alfvén modes whenever $B$ is not asymptotically large; a perturbative inclusion of the transverse modes would quantify the error.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper analyzes the linear stability and causality of the second-order relativistic magnetohydrodynamic theory derived in Refs. [64,65] for a locally neutral, non-resistive, two-component plasma of massless particles. The authors linearize the coupled conservation, Maxwell, and shear-stress equations around global equilibrium, decompose Fourier-space perturbations in an orthonormal basis adapted to the background magnetic field, and derive dispersion relations for perturbations parallel (κ⊥=0) and perpendicular (κb=0) to the field. They compute small- and large-wavenumber asymptotic expansions, plot intermediate-wavenumber modes, and find stable, subluminal spectra that include oscillatory nonhydrodynamic modes at large magnetic field, in contrast to Israel-Stewart theory. They also study a simplified 'longitudinal shear-stress' truncation used in astrophysics and discuss its range of validity. The paper concludes that the formulation is always linearly causal and stable for any magnetic field.
Significance. If the analysis were complete, this would be a useful and timely result: it would certify the kinetic-theory-based second-order MHD of Ref. [64] as linearly stable and causal without fitting parameters, and it identifies qualitative differences from Israel-Stewart theory that are relevant for heavy-ion and astrophysical plasmas. The paper is explicit about the mode structure, gives analytic dispersion relations and asymptotic expansions, and makes a practically useful comparison with the longitudinal approximation. The main caveat is that the universal conclusion is stronger than the evidence: only two propagation directions are solved, and some transverse modes are analyzed only numerically. For that reason the result, as stated, is not yet fully established, although the gap appears fixable.
major comments (3)
- [Sec. IV and Sec. VI] The claim in Sec. VI that the formulation 'was shown to be always causal and stable in the linear regime' is not supported for perturbations at arbitrary angle to the magnetic field. Section IV A restricts to κ⊥=0 and Section IV B to κb=0; the full linear system in Eqs. (42) and (44) contains both κb and κ⊥ and is never solved at general angle. Because the background field defines a preferred direction, stability of the parallel and perpendicular sectors does not imply stability of oblique modes. The authors should either analyze the general-angle dispersion relation (for example, using Routh-Hurwitz conditions in k^2 for the determinant of the coupled system) or explicitly qualify the conclusion to perturbations parallel and perpendicular to the background magnetic field.
- [Sec. IV B, Eq. (57b)] Three transverse modes are excluded from the analytic large-wavenumber analysis with the statement that they have 'rather intricate analytical form and thus were omitted here,' yet the causality criterion in Eq. (45) is an asymptotic condition and the stability claim is made for all positive Σ, Σ′ and all B. The plotted curves in Fig. 3 sample specific temperatures, magnetic fields, and relaxation coefficients, so they do not prove the asymptotic bound or positivity of imaginary parts in general. The authors should provide analytic large-k expansions (or rigorous bounds) for the omitted roots of Eq. (57b), or state which part of the conclusion relies on numerical exploration.
- [Sec. IV, Eqs. (50) and (57)] Even within the two parallel and perpendicular sectors, the stability analysis at intermediate wavenumbers is largely numerical. The paper gives small-k and large-k asymptotics and then plots roots for selected parameter values; it does not give a general algebraic argument (e.g., Routh-Hurwitz applied to the dispersion polynomials as functions of k^2) that all modes have positive imaginary part for every k>0 and every positive Σ, Σ′. Thus the phrasing 'always causal and stable' overstates the proof content, even before the oblique-direction gap is considered.
minor comments (4)
- [Eqs. (28) and (30)] The last term of the shear-stress decomposition is printed as ∆̃π_{kq}(κ̂⊥^μ q̂^ν + κ̂⊥^μ q̂^ν); the second factor should presumably be κ̂⊥^ν q̂^μ to make the combination symmetric.
- [Sec. VI] The concluding paragraph attributes the analyzed theory to Ref. [65], while the rest of the paper consistently refers to Ref. [64] as the derivation used; this citation should be corrected.
- [Fig. 6] The text says 'The black stars denote the mode...', but the figure legend shows a black curve labeled 'Longitudinal limit'; the wording should be aligned with the actual plot.
- [Sec. IV] Several dispersion relations and asymptotic expansions are quoted without derivation, e.g., Eqs. (50), (52), (53), (57), (59), and (60); an appendix or supplementary file with the algebraic steps would make the analysis easier to verify.
Circularity Check
No circularity: the stability analysis computes new properties of equations inherited from the authors' prior work.
full rationale
The paper's central claim is that the second-order magnetohydrodynamic equations derived in Ref. [64] are linearly causal and stable around global equilibrium. That claim is not presupposed by the paper: the equations under test (Eqs. (11a)-(11b), linearized in Sec. III) are taken explicitly from the prior kinetic-theory derivation, and the stability and causality criteria are external to the derivation, namely positive imaginary parts of the modes and asymptotic group velocities bounded by the speed of light (Eq. (45)). No transport coefficient is fitted to force the conclusion; the results rely only on the positivity of Sigma and Sigma-prime and hold for arbitrary magnetic field. The self-citations [64,65,75] supply the model, the moment truncation, and the Fourier-space basis, but the property 'always causal and stable' is a new computation not assumed in those references. Thus the derivation chain does not reduce to its inputs by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The restriction of the explicit dispersion relation analysis to parallel (kappa_perp = 0) and perpendicular (kappa_b = 0) perturbations, while the conclusions claim unrestricted validity, is a proof-completeness issue rather than circularity.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (6)
- domain assumption The relaxation equations for the total and relative shear-stress tensors (Eqs. 11a-11b), from the 14-moment truncation of the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation in Ref. [64], close the system correctly.
- domain assumption The plasma is non-resistive, locally neutral, ultrarelativistic with P0 = epsilon0/3, and bulk viscous pressure and diffusion currents vanish identically.
- domain assumption Linear causality and stability for a static background imply the same for a moving background, per the theorem of Ref. [76].
- domain assumption The transport coefficients Sigma and Sigma' are positive definite for all allowed cross sections.
- standard math The asymptotic group velocity condition (Eq. 45) is a sufficient condition for causality of the linear modes.
- ad hoc to paper The three transverse modes of Eq. (57b) that lack analytic large-k forms remain stable and subluminal at intermediate wavenumbers for all positive Sigma, Sigma' and all B, as suggested by the numerics in Fig. 3.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Causality and stability of magnetohydrodynamics for an ultrarelativistic locally neutral two-component gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZKJIWOLW
@misc{pith2026250510397,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Causality and stability of magnetohydrodynamics for an ultrarelativistic locally neutral two-component gas},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZKJIWOLW}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10397}
}
read the original abstract
We investigate the causality and stability of the relativistic theory of magnetohydrodynamics derived in Phys. Rev. D 109, 096021 (2024) to describe a locally neutral two-component plasma of massless particles. We show that this formalism is linearly causal and stable around global equilibrium, for any value of the magnetic field and discuss its qualitative differences to the traditional Israel-Stewart formalism in the linear regime. Finally, we compare this framework with the magnetohydrodynamic model used in the study of astrophysical plasmas, in which only the longitudinal component of the shear-stress tensor is considered. We discuss the domain of applicability of this type of framework in the context of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions.
Figures
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[64]
A. K. Panda, A. Dash, R. Biswas, and V. Roy, in 65th DAE BRNS Symposium on nuclear physics (2022)
work page 2022
-
[65]
Shear Viscosity of hadronic matter at finite temperature and magnetic field
R. Ghosh and N. Haque, Phys. Rev. D 105, 114029 (2022), arXiv:2204.01639 [hep-ph]
work page Pith review arXiv 2022
-
[1]
+ ∆πµν] =O(∆2)≈ 0, (18) where ∆µν 0 =gµν−uµ 0uν 0 is the projection operator onto the 3-space orthogonal to uµ 0 and Ξµν 0 = ∆µν 0 +bµ 0bν 0 is the projection operator onto the 2-space orthogonal to uµ 0 and bµ
-
[2]
(19) where we have defined the linearized comoving time derivative D0≡uµ 0∂µ as well as the linearized spatial derivative ∇µ 0≡ ∆µν 0 ∂ν
The linearized Maxwell’s equation for the Hodge dual become, ∂µ∆˚Fµν =uν 0∂µ(bµ 0∆B +B0∆bµ) +B0bµ 0∇0 µ∆uν−B0bν 0∇0 µ∆uµ−bν 0D0∆B−B0D0∆bν =O(∆2)≈ 0. (19) where we have defined the linearized comoving time derivative D0≡uµ 0∂µ as well as the linearized spatial derivative ∇µ 0≡ ∆µν 0 ∂ν. Finally, the equations of motion for the total and relative shear-stre...
-
[3]
+ ∆˜πbq (ˆqµbν 0 + ˆqνbµ
-
[4]
(30) An analogous expression can be written for the relative shear-stress tensor
+ ∆˜πkq (ˆκµ ⊥ˆqν + ˆκµ ⊥ˆqν). (30) An analogous expression can be written for the relative shear-stress tensor. B. Projected equations The next step is to project the linearized magneto-fluid-dynamical equations in Fourier space in terms of the basis introduced in the previous subsection. First, we express all the linearized equations, i.e., Eqs. (18)–(2...
-
[5]
(31d) 6 Equations (31a) and (31b) are 4-vectors and can be decomposed with respect to our basis
∆ ˜δπ µν +ω0bλµ 0 ∆˜πν λ = 0. (31d) 6 Equations (31a) and (31b) are 4-vectors and can be decomposed with respect to our basis. In practice, this task is performed by contracting them with uµ b0 µ, ˆκµ,⊥ and ˆqµ. The Maxwell’s equation for the Hodge dual then become, κ⊥∆˜bk +κb ∆ ˜B B0 = 0, (32a) Ω∆ ˜B B0 −κ⊥∆˜uk = 0, (32b) Ω∆˜bk +κb∆˜uk = 0, (32c) Ω∆˜bq +...
-
[6]
(34b) • bµbν (iΩ + Σ0) ∆˜πbb = 8 15iε0 2 3κb∆˜ub− 1 3κ⊥∆˜uk , (35a) (iΩ + Σ′
∆ ˜δπkk +ω0∆˜πkq = 0. (34b) • bµbν (iΩ + Σ0) ∆˜πbb = 8 15iε0 2 3κb∆˜ub− 1 3κ⊥∆˜uk , (35a) (iΩ + Σ′
Show all 87 references
-
[7]
(35b) • bµˆκν,⊥ (iΩ + Σ0) ∆˜πbk + ω0 2 ∆ ˜δπbq = 4 15iε0 (κ⊥∆˜ub +κb∆˜uk), (36a) (iΩ + Σ′
∆ ˜δπbb = 0. (35b) • bµˆκν,⊥ (iΩ + Σ0) ∆˜πbk + ω0 2 ∆ ˜δπbq = 4 15iε0 (κ⊥∆˜ub +κb∆˜uk), (36a) (iΩ + Σ′
-
[8]
(36b) • ˆqµˆκν,⊥ (iΩ + Σ0) ∆˜πkq− ω0 2 ∆ ˜δπbb + 2∆ ˜δπkk = 4 15iε0κ⊥∆˜uq, (37a) (iΩ + Σ′
∆ ˜δπbk + ω0 2 ∆˜πbq = 0. (36b) • ˆqµˆκν,⊥ (iΩ + Σ0) ∆˜πkq− ω0 2 ∆ ˜δπbb + 2∆ ˜δπkk = 4 15iε0κ⊥∆˜uq, (37a) (iΩ + Σ′
-
[9]
(37b) • ˆqµbν (iΩ + Σ0) ∆˜πbq− ω0 2 ∆ ˜δπbk = 4 15iε0κb∆˜uq, (38a) (iΩ + Σ0) ∆ ˜δπbq− ω0 2 ∆˜πbk = 0
∆ ˜δπkq− ω0 2 (∆˜πbb + 2∆˜πkk) = 0. (37b) • ˆqµbν (iΩ + Σ0) ∆˜πbq− ω0 2 ∆ ˜δπbk = 4 15iε0κb∆˜uq, (38a) (iΩ + Σ0) ∆ ˜δπbq− ω0 2 ∆˜πbk = 0. (38b) We remark that the equation for ∆πkq couples with ∆δπbb and ∆δπkk via the term ∆δπbb + 2∆δπkk (analogously, the equation for ∆δπkq co...
2021
- [10]
-
[11]
Kiuchi, P
K. Kiuchi, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D92, 124034 (2015), arXiv:1509.09205 [astro-ph.HE]
2015 arXiv
-
[12]
R. C. Duncan and C. Thompson, Astrophys. J. Lett. 392, L9 (1992). 19
1992
- [13]
-
[14]
Skokov, A
V. Skokov, A. Y. Illarionov, and V. Toneev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 5925 (2009), arXiv:0907.1396 [nucl-th]
2009 arXiv
-
[15]
Voronyuk, V
V. Voronyuk, V. D. Toneev, W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya, V. P. Konchakovski, and S. A. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C 83, 054911 (2011), arXiv:1103.4239 [nucl-th]
2011 arXiv
-
[16]
Deng and X.-G
W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044907 (2012), arXiv:1201.5108 [nucl-th]
2012 arXiv
-
[17]
Bzdak and V
A. Bzdak and V. Skokov, Phys. Lett. B 710, 171 (2012), arXiv:1111.1949 [hep-ph]
2012 arXiv
-
[18]
Bloczynski, X.-G
J. Bloczynski, X.-G. Huang, X. Zhang, and J. Liao, Phys. Lett. B 718, 1529 (2013), arXiv:1209.6594 [nucl-th]
2013 arXiv
- [19]
-
[20]
Yan and X.-G
L. Yan and X.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 107, 094028 (2023), arXiv:2104.00831 [nucl-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[21]
Z. Wang, J. Zhao, C. Greiner, Z. Xu, and P. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. C 105, L041901 (2022), arXiv:2110.14302 [hep-ph]
2022 arXiv
-
[22]
D. H. Rischke, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 52, 197 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0305030
2004 arXiv
-
[23]
V. A. Miransky and I. A. Shovkovy, Phys. Rept. 576, 1 (2015), arXiv:1503.00732 [hep-ph]
2015 arXiv
- [24]
-
[25]
Hattori and X.-G
K. Hattori and X.-G. Huang, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 26 (2017), arXiv:1609.00747 [nucl-th]
2017 arXiv
-
[26]
D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, S. A. Voloshin, and G. Wang, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 88, 1 (2016), arXiv:1511.04050 [hep-ph]
2016 arXiv
-
[27]
D. E. Kharzeev and J. Liao, Nature Rev. Phys. 3, 55 (2021), arXiv:2102.06623 [hep-ph]
2021 arXiv
-
[28]
M. I. Abdulhamid et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. X 14, 011028 (2024), arXiv:2304.03430 [nucl-ex]
2024
-
[29]
Dubla, U
A. Dubla, U. G¨ ursoy, and R. Snellings, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, 2050324 (2020), arXiv:2009.09727 [hep-ph]
2020 arXiv
-
[30]
Hattori, M
K. Hattori, M. Hongo, and X.-G. Huang, Symmetry 14, 1851 (2022)
2022
-
[31]
Tuchin, Adv
K. Tuchin, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013, 490495 (2013), arXiv:1301.0099 [hep-ph]
2013 arXiv
-
[32]
Li, X.-l
H. Li, X.-l. Sheng, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 94, 044903 (2016), arXiv:1602.02223 [nucl-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[33]
S. Pu, V. Roy, L. Rezzolla, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074022 (2016), arXiv:1602.04953 [nucl-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[34]
Zheng and S.-Q
H.-J. Zheng and S.-Q. Feng, (2025), arXiv:2503.20307 [nucl-th]
2025
-
[35]
V. Roy, S. Pu, L. Rezzolla, and D. Rischke, Phys. Lett. B 750, 45 (2015), arXiv:1506.06620 [nucl-th]
2015 arXiv
-
[36]
Hongo, Y
M. Hongo, Y. Hirono, and T. Hirano, Phys. Lett. B 775, 266 (2017), arXiv:1309.2823 [nucl-th]
2017 arXiv
-
[37]
Inghirami, L
G. Inghirami, L. Del Zanna, A. Beraudo, M. H. Moghaddam, F. Becattini, and M. Bleicher, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 659 (2016), arXiv:1609.03042 [hep-ph]
2016 arXiv
-
[38]
Inghirami, M
G. Inghirami, M. Mace, Y. Hirono, L. Del Zanna, D. E. Kharzeev, and M. Bleicher, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 293 (2020), arXiv:1908.07605 [hep-ph]
2020 arXiv
-
[39]
Hattori, S
K. Hattori, S. Li, D. Satow, and H.-U. Yee, Phys. Rev. D 95, 076008 (2017), arXiv:1610.06839 [hep-ph]
2017 arXiv
-
[40]
Hattori and D
K. Hattori and D. Satow, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114032 (2016), arXiv:1610.06818 [hep-ph]
2016 arXiv
-
[41]
Hattori, K
K. Hattori, K. Fukushima, H.-U. Yee, and Y. Yin, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 289-290, 273 (2017), arXiv:1611.00500 [hep-ph]
2017 arXiv
-
[42]
Hattori, X.-G
K. Hattori, X.-G. Huang, D. H. Rischke, and D. Satow, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094009 (2017), arXiv:1708.00515 [hep-ph]
2017 arXiv
-
[43]
Li and H.-U
S. Li and H.-U. Yee, Phys. Rev. D 97, 056024 (2018), arXiv:1707.00795 [hep-ph]
2018 arXiv
-
[44]
D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa, Nucl. Phys. A 803, 227 (2008), arXiv:0711.0950 [hep-ph]
2008 arXiv
-
[45]
Gursoy, D
U. Gursoy, D. Kharzeev, and K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. C 89, 054905 (2014), arXiv:1401.3805 [hep-ph]
2014 arXiv
-
[46]
D. T. Son and P. Surowka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 191601 (2009), arXiv:0906.5044 [hep-th]
2009 arXiv
-
[47]
Ammon, S
M. Ammon, S. Grieninger, J. Hernandez, M. Kaminski, R. Koirala, J. Leiber, and J. Wu, JHEP 04, 078 (2021), arXiv:2012.09183 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[48]
Fukushima, D
K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074033 (2008), arXiv:0808.3382 [hep-ph]
2008 arXiv
-
[49]
Siddique, R.-j
I. Siddique, R.-j. Wang, S. Pu, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 99, 114029 (2019), arXiv:1904.01807 [hep-ph]
2019 arXiv
-
[50]
R.-j. Wang, P. Copinger, and S. Pu, Nucl. Phys. A 1005, 121869 (2021), arXiv:2004.06408 [hep-ph]
2021 arXiv
- [51]
-
[52]
Brandenburg, K
A. Brandenburg, K. Enqvist, and P. Olesen, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1291 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9602031
1996 arXiv
-
[53]
Dolag, K., Bartelmann, M., and Lesch, H., A&A 387, 383 (2002)
2002
-
[54]
A. M. Anile, Relativistic Fluids and Magneto-fluids: With Applications in Astrophysics and Plasma Physics , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1990)
1990
-
[55]
M. A. Prieto, J. A. Fernandez-Ontiveros, S. Markoff, D. Espada, and O. Gonzalez-Martin, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 457, 3801 (2016), arXiv:1508.02302 [astro-ph.GA]
2016 arXiv
-
[56]
M. A. Abramowicz and P. C. Fragile, Living Rev. Rel. 16, 1 (2013), arXiv:1104.5499 [astro-ph.HE]
2013 arXiv
-
[57]
G. S. Denicol, X.-G. Huang, E. Moln´ ar, G. M. Monteiro, H. Niemi, J. Noronha, D. H. Rischke, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 98, 076009 (2018), arXiv:1804.05210 [nucl-th]
2018 arXiv
-
[58]
G. S. Denicol, E. Moln´ ar, H. Niemi, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 99, 056017 (2019), arXiv:1902.01699 [nucl-th]
2019 arXiv
-
[59]
J. Dey, S. Satapathy, A. Mishra, S. Paul, and S. Ghosh, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 30, 2150044 (2021), arXiv:1908.04335 [hep-ph]
2021 arXiv
-
[60]
Z. Chen, C. Greiner, A. Huang, and Z. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 101, 056020 (2020), arXiv:1910.13721 [hep-ph]
2020 arXiv
-
[61]
A. Dash, S. Samanta, J. Dey, U. Gangopadhyaya, S. Ghosh, and V. Roy, Phys. Rev. D 102, 016016 (2020), arXiv:2002.08781 [nucl-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[62]
Singh, M
B. Singh, M. Kurian, S. Mazumder, H. Mishra, V. Chandra, and S. K. Das, (2020), arXiv:2004.11092 [hep-ph]
2020 arXiv
-
[63]
A. K. Panda, A. Dash, R. Biswas, and V. Roy, JHEP 03, 216 (2021), arXiv:2011.01606 [nucl-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[66]
Critelli, S
R. Critelli, S. I. Finazzo, M. Zaniboni, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 90, 066006 (2014), arXiv:1406.6019 [hep-th]. 20
2014 arXiv
-
[67]
S. I. Finazzo, R. Critelli, R. Rougemont, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054020 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 019903 (2017)], arXiv:1605.06061 [hep-ph]
2016 arXiv
-
[68]
W. Li, S. Lin, and J. Mei, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114014 (2018), arXiv:1809.02178 [hep-th]
2018 arXiv
-
[69]
Fukushima and A
K. Fukushima and A. Okutsu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054016 (2022), arXiv:2106.07968 [hep-ph]
2022 arXiv
-
[70]
Israel, Annals Phys 118, 228 (1979)
W. Israel, Annals Phys 118, 228 (1979)
1979
-
[71]
G. S. Denicol and D. H. Rischke, Microscopic Foundations of Relativistic Fluid Dynamics (2021)
2021
-
[72]
Cercignani and G
C. Cercignani and G. M. Kremer, The Relativistic Boltzmann Equation: Theory and Applications (Springer, 2002)
2002
-
[73]
Kushwah and G
K. Kushwah and G. S. Denicol, Phys. Rev. D 109, 096021 (2024), arXiv:2402.01597 [nucl-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[74]
Kushwah and G
K. Kushwah and G. S. Denicol, EPJ Web Conf. 296, 03004 (2024)
2024
-
[75]
Biswas, A
R. Biswas, A. Dash, N. Haque, S. Pu, and V. Roy, JHEP 10, 171 (2020), arXiv:2007.05431 [nucl-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[76]
Biswas, A
R. Biswas, A. Dash, N. Haque, and V. Roy, Springer Proc. Phys. 277, 449 (2022)
2022
-
[77]
Dionysopoulou, D
K. Dionysopoulou, D. Alic, C. Palenzuela, L. Rezzolla, and B. Giacomazzo, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044020 (2013), arXiv:1208.3487 [gr-qc]
2013 arXiv
-
[78]
Chandra, C
M. Chandra, C. F. Gammie, F. Foucart, and E. Quataert, Astrophys. J. 810, 162 (2015), arXiv:1508.00878 [astro-ph.HE]
2015 arXiv
-
[79]
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics (Pergamon; Addison-Wesley, London, U.K.; Reading, U.S.A., 1959)
1959
-
[80]
G. F. R. Ellis, Cargese Lect. Phys. 6, 1 (1973)
1973
-
[81]
Gedalin, Phys
M. Gedalin, Phys. Rev. E 47, 4354 (1993)
1993
-
[82]
J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley & Sons, 2012)
2012
-
[83]
G. S. Denicol, E. Moln´ ar, H. Niemi, and D. H. Rischke, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 170 (2012), arXiv:1206.1554 [nucl-th]
2012 arXiv
-
[84]
C. V. Brito and G. S. Denicol, Phys. Rev. D 102, 116009 (2020), arXiv:2007.16141 [nucl-th]
2020 arXiv
- [85]
-
[86]
Foucart, M
F. Foucart, M. Chandra, C. F. Gammie, and E. Quataert, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456, 1332–1345 (2015)
2015
-
[87]
Cordeiro, E
I. Cordeiro, E. Speranza, K. Ingles, F. S. Bemfica, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 091401 (2024), arXiv:2312.09970 [astro-ph.HE]
2024 arXiv
Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.