REVIEW 3 cited by
Box constrained $\ell_1$ optimization in random linear systems -- finite dimensions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Our companion work \cite{Stojnicl1BnBxasymldp} considers random under-determined linear systems with box-constrained sparse solutions and provides an asymptotic analysis of a couple of modified $\ell_1$ heuristics adjusted to handle such systems (we refer to these modifications of the standard $\ell_1$ as binary and box $\ell_1$). Our earlier work \cite{StojnicISIT2010binary} established that the binary $\ell_1$ does exhibit the so-called phase-transition phenomenon (basically the same phenomenon well-known through earlier considerations to be a key feature of the standard $\ell_1$, see, e.g. \cite{DonohoPol,DonohoUnsigned,StojnicCSetam09,StojnicUpper10}). Moreover, in \cite{StojnicISIT2010binary}, we determined the precise location of the co-called phase-transition (PT) curve. On the other hand, in \cite{Stojnicl1BnBxasymldp} we provide a much deeper understanding of the PTs and do so through a large deviations principles (LDP) type of analysis. In this paper we complement the results of \cite{Stojnicl1BnBxasymldp} by leaving the asymptotic regime naturally assumed in the PT and LDP considerations aside and instead working in a finite dimensional setting. Along the same lines, we provide for both, the binary and the box $\ell_1$, precise finite dimensional analyses and essentially determine their ultimate statistical performance characterizations. On top of that, we explain how the results created here can be utilized in the asymptotic setting, considered in \cite{Stojnicl1BnBxasymldp}, as well. Finally, for the completeness, we also present a collection of results obtained through numerical simulations and observe that they are in a massive agreement with our theoretical calculations.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Controlled Loosening-up (CLuP) -- achieving exact MIMO ML in polynomial time
CLuP, an iterative convex optimization algorithm, is claimed to achieve MIMO ML detection performance in polynomial time, but the claim rests on heuristic random duality arguments and an empirical iteration count.
-
Complexity analysis of the Controlled Loosening-up (CLuP) algorithm
Using Random Duality Theory, the paper argues that the CLuP algorithm reaches near-optimal MIMO ML detection in a small, dimension-independent number of quadratic-programming iterations.
-
Starting CLuP with polytope relaxation
CLuP-plt, a CLuP detector variant that starts from a box-constrained least-squares solution, reaches near-ML error rates within three to five iterations in the tested MIMO settings.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.