REVIEW 2 cited by
Holistic chemical evaluation reveals pitfalls in reaction prediction models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The prediction of chemical reactions has gained significant interest within the machine learning community in recent years, owing to its complexity and crucial applications in chemistry. However, model evaluation for this task has been mostly limited to simple metrics like top-k accuracy, which obfuscates fine details of a model's limitations. Inspired by progress in other fields, we propose a new assessment scheme that builds on top of current approaches, steering towards a more holistic evaluation. We introduce the following key components for this goal: CHORISO, a curated dataset along with multiple tailored splits to recreate chemically relevant scenarios, and a collection of metrics that provide a holistic view of a model's advantages and limitations. Application of this method to state-of-the-art models reveals important differences on sensitive fronts, especially stereoselectivity and chemical out-of-distribution generalization. Our work paves the way towards robust prediction models that can ultimately accelerate chemical discovery.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Agentic generation of verifiable rules for deterministic, self-expanding reaction classification
Multi-agent LLMs generate and verify 14,073 deterministic reaction rules from 665,901 patents, enabling 97.7% classification of unseen reactions with finer resolution than fixed proprietary systems.
-
Challenging reaction prediction models to generalize to novel chemistry
A Transformer reaction predictor evaluated on document-, author-, time-, and reaction-class splits reveals that in-distribution benchmarks overstate real-world accuracy and that models only partially extrapolate to un...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.