pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20021 · v1 · pith:ZLTZCFWXnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Spin Response Properties in Electronically Robust Ferromagnetic Strained CrSiSe₃ Monolayer under External Electric Fields

S. Solihin , Ahmad R. T. Nugraha , Muhammad Aziz Majidi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 03:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords CrSiSe3 monolayerferromagnetic 2D materialstrain engineeringelectric field effectsspin Hall conductivityBerry curvaturemagnon excitationsmagneto-optical Kerr effect
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strained CrSiSe3 monolayer keeps charge properties stable under electric fields up to 0.3 V/Å while spin responses tune non-monotonically.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses first-principles calculations to study a strain-engineered ferromagnetic CrSiSe3 monolayer under out-of-plane electric fields. It establishes that charge-related quantities—the indirect band gap, charge Berry curvature, optical conductivities, and magneto-optical Kerr effect spectra—show little change even at fields as high as 0.3 V/Å. By contrast, spin quantities respond sensitively: gating modulates spin Berry-like curvature and produces non-monotonic growth in spin Hall conductivity, while also altering magnon modes through shifts in Heisenberg exchange. A reader would care because the combination points to a material that could support spintronic devices needing both electronic reliability and controllable spin behavior.

Core claim

For the strained CrSiSe3 monolayer, the intrinsic charge sector including the indirect band gap, charge Berry curvature, optical conductivities, and magneto-optical Kerr effect spectra exhibits exceptional robustness against applied fields up to 0.3 V/Å, while the spin degrees of freedom demonstrate highly sensitive tunability. Electrostatic gating significantly modulates the spin Berry-like curvature, driving a non-monotonic enhancement in the spin Hall conductivity. Furthermore, external fields effectively tune collective magnon excitations by modifying microscopic Heisenberg exchange interactions.

What carries the argument

The differential response of charge and spin sectors to out-of-plane electric fields in the strain-engineered ferromagnetic CrSiSe3 monolayer, obtained from first-principles calculations of Berry curvatures and Heisenberg exchange interactions.

If this is right

  • Electrostatic gating can enhance spin Hall conductivity non-monotonically without disrupting the charge sector.
  • Magnon excitations can be controlled by field-induced changes to Heisenberg exchange interactions.
  • The material supplies a platform for field-effect spintronic devices that combine charge stability with spin tunability.
  • Optical and magneto-optical responses stay consistent across the range of applied fields examined.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The observed charge robustness may allow the monolayer to be stacked with other 2D layers without loss of electronic integrity.
  • The non-monotonic spin Hall response could be used to select specific field values that optimize spin-current output.
  • Comparable strain-plus-field tuning may produce similar charge-spin separation in other chromium-based 2D ferromagnets.

Load-bearing premise

The first-principles calculations accurately reproduce the electronic structure, magnetic exchange interactions, and response functions without significant errors from the exchange-correlation functional or convergence parameters, and the chosen strain and field values are representative of experimentally accessible conditions.

What would settle it

Experimental measurement of spin Hall conductivity versus electric field strength that either confirms or fails to show non-monotonic enhancement up to 0.3 V/Å while the band gap and optical conductivities remain nearly unchanged.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20021 by Ahmad R. T. Nugraha, Muhammad Aziz Majidi, S. Solihin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Optimized geometrical structure of the unstrained CrSiSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spin-polarized band structures and the corresponding total density of states (DOS) of the 2.5% (top row) and 5% (bottom row) strained CrSiSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: One-dimensional distribution profiles of the charge Berry curvature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Frequency-dependent optical conductivity spectra of the strained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Intrinsic spin Hall conductivity (SHC) as a function of Fermi energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Frequency-dependent magneto-optical Kerr rotation ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Magnon dispersion spectra of the strained CrSiSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Integrating two-dimensional van der Waals magnets into field-effect spintronic devices requires robust charge stability and tunable spin responses. In this study, we investigate the electronic, topological, magnonic, and magneto-optical properties of the strain-engineered ferromagnetic $\text{CrSiSe}_3$ monolayer under out-of-plane external electric fields by using first-principles calculations. We find that for this material, the intrinsic charge sector, including the indirect band gap, charge Berry curvature, optical conductivities, and magneto-optical Kerr effect spectra, exhibits exceptional robustness against applied fields up to 0.3 V/$\r{A}$. Conversely, the spin degrees of freedom demonstrate highly sensitive tunability. Electrostatic gating significantly modulates the spin Berry-like curvature, driving a non-monotonic enhancement in the spin Hall conductivity. Furthermore, external fields effectively tune collective magnon excitations by modifying microscopic Heisenberg exchange interactions. Such coexistence of robust charge immunity and flexible spin manipulation establishes the strained $\text{CrSiSe}_3$ monolayer as a promising platform for stable spintronic devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses first-principles DFT calculations to examine the electronic, topological, magnonic, and magneto-optical properties of a strain-engineered ferromagnetic CrSiSe3 monolayer under out-of-plane electric fields. It claims that charge-sector quantities (indirect band gap, charge Berry curvature, optical conductivities, and MOKE spectra) remain robust up to 0.3 V/Å while spin degrees of freedom show sensitive, non-monotonic tunability, including enhancement of spin Hall conductivity, and that magnon excitations can be tuned through field-induced changes in Heisenberg exchange interactions.

Significance. If the reported robustness and tunability are confirmed by adequate numerical validation, the work would be significant for identifying 2D van der Waals magnets suitable for field-effect spintronic devices that require charge stability alongside controllable spin responses. The broad computational survey covering multiple response functions under combined strain and gating is a constructive contribution to the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods and spin-response results] Methods and results sections on Berry curvature and transport: The central claims of charge-sector robustness and non-monotonic spin-Hall tunability (abstract; results on spin Berry-like curvature and spin Hall conductivity) depend on the accuracy of Brillouin-zone integrals for Berry curvatures under finite electric fields. No systematic k-mesh convergence tests, smearing-parameter independence checks, or comparisons against hybrid functionals are reported, nor is the electric-field implementation (sawtooth potential or dipole correction) benchmarked against vacuum thickness or periodic artifacts. Because spin Hall conductivity is known to converge slowly with grid density, this omission directly affects the reliability of the reported distinction between charge immunity and spin tunability.
  2. [Magnonic properties] Section on magnonic properties: The tuning of collective magnon excitations is attributed to modifications of microscopic Heisenberg exchange interactions under the external field. However, the manuscript provides no explicit description of how the electric field is incorporated into the supercell calculations used for exchange-parameter extraction, nor any test for finite-size or boundary-condition artifacts. This information is required to substantiate the magnonic tunability claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and results] Clarify the precise definition and computational implementation of 'spin Berry-like curvature' versus standard spin Berry curvature; the notation appears in the abstract and results but is not defined in the methods.
  2. [Computational methods] Add a table or supplementary section summarizing the k-point meshes, energy cutoffs, and vacuum thicknesses employed for each property calculation, including those performed under applied fields.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract states 'exceptional robustness' and 'highly sensitive tunability'; these qualitative descriptors should be supported by quantitative metrics (e.g., percentage change in gap or conductivity) in the main text or figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive feedback on methodological details. We have carefully considered the comments and will revise the manuscript accordingly to enhance the robustness of our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods and spin-response results] Methods and results sections on Berry curvature and transport: The central claims of charge-sector robustness and non-monotonic spin-Hall tunability (abstract; results on spin Berry-like curvature and spin Hall conductivity) depend on the accuracy of Brillouin-zone integrals for Berry curvatures under finite electric fields. No systematic k-mesh convergence tests, smearing-parameter independence checks, or comparisons against hybrid functionals are reported, nor is the electric-field implementation (sawtooth potential or dipole correction) benchmarked against vacuum thickness or periodic artifacts. Because spin Hall conductivity is known to converge slowly with grid density, this omission directly affects the reliability of the reported distinction between charge immunity and spin tunability.

    Authors: We agree that providing convergence tests is essential to support the reliability of the spin Hall conductivity calculations, particularly given the slow convergence often observed in such quantities. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection or appendix detailing the k-mesh convergence for both charge and spin Berry curvatures, showing that the key features, including the non-monotonic behavior in spin Hall conductivity, remain stable beyond a certain grid density. We will also report the smearing parameters used and demonstrate their independence by varying them within a reasonable range. For the electric field implementation, we will include benchmarks with increased vacuum thickness to confirm the absence of periodic artifacts. Regarding hybrid functionals, we note that our calculations employ the PBE functional, which has been validated for similar 2D magnetic systems in the literature; however, to address this point, we will perform additional calculations with a hybrid functional on a smaller k-grid for selected field strengths and include the comparison in the revision. These additions will reinforce the distinction between the robust charge sector and the tunable spin responses. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Magnonic properties] Section on magnonic properties: The tuning of collective magnon excitations is attributed to modifications of microscopic Heisenberg exchange interactions under the external field. However, the manuscript provides no explicit description of how the electric field is incorporated into the supercell calculations used for exchange-parameter extraction, nor any test for finite-size or boundary-condition artifacts. This information is required to substantiate the magnonic tunability claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for more explicit methodological details on the magnon calculations. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the methods section to describe precisely how the out-of-plane electric field is incorporated into the supercell calculations for extracting the Heisenberg exchange parameters, including the specific implementation (e.g., via a sawtooth potential with dipole corrections). Additionally, we will present tests for finite-size effects by comparing exchange parameters obtained from different supercell sizes and discuss boundary conditions to ensure the reported tunability of magnon excitations is not affected by artifacts. This will provide the necessary substantiation for the claims regarding field-induced modifications to magnonic properties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in standard first-principles DFT survey

full rationale

The paper reports direct outputs from DFT calculations (band gaps, charge and spin Berry curvatures, optical conductivities, MOKE spectra, spin Hall conductivity, and magnon spectra) on a strained CrSiSe3 monolayer under out-of-plane electric fields. These quantities are computed quantities, not fitted parameters or quantities defined in terms of themselves. No equations or steps reduce the target results to the inputs by construction, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central claims, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The derivation chain is self-contained as a computational materials study whose results stand or fall on the validity of the underlying DFT implementation rather than on internal redefinition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard density-functional theory approximations whose accuracy for this material is not independently verified in the provided abstract; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Density functional theory with a chosen exchange-correlation functional accurately describes the electronic band structure, Berry curvatures, and Heisenberg exchange interactions in the strained CrSiSe3 monolayer.
    Invoked implicitly by the use of first-principles calculations for all reported properties.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5736 in / 1406 out tokens · 34638 ms · 2026-05-20T03:46:06.647434+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We perform first-principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) using the Quantum ESPRESSO package... Wannier-interpolated tight-binding Hamiltonian... intrinsic spin Hall conductivity (SHC) is evaluated within the independent-particle approximation using the Kubo-Greenwood formalism

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. G. Park, K. Zhang, H. Cheong, J. H. Kim, C. A. Belvin, D. Hsieh, H. Ning, N. Gedik, 2D van der Waals magnets: From fundamental physics to applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.doi:10.1103/2pff-xy6n

    work page doi:10.1103/2pff-xy6n

  2. [2]

    Hwang, H

    E. Hwang, H. Hong, Y . Lee, Y . Joo, S. Yer, S. Cho, H. Yang, Van der Waals materials for energy-efficient electronic devices, Nat. Rev. Mater. 11 (2026) 1–20.doi:10.1038/s41578-025-00886-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-025-00886-z 2026

  3. [3]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, A. Castro Neto, 2D ma- terials and van der Waals heterostructures, Science 353 (2016) aac9439. doi:10.1126/science.aac9439

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aac9439 2016

  4. [4]

    Q. Chen, Y . Wei, P.-B. Zhai, Y .-J. Gong, Van der Waals gap engineering in 2D materials for energy storage and conversion, Rare Met. 43 (2024) 6125–6143.doi:10.1007/s12598-024-02817-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s12598-024-02817-3 2024

  5. [5]

    T. Ding, X. Jiang, J. Quan, R. Wang, M. Li, C. Lan, W. Ma, M. Zhu, Re- cent progress in two-dimensional van der Waals heterojunctions for flex- ible energy storage applications, Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 8 (2025) 324.doi:10.1007/s42114-025-01410-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s42114-025-01410-1 2025

  6. [6]

    Sundararajan, D

    K. Sundararajan, D. K. de Wal, S. Alvarruiz, C. A. Cordero-Silis, M. Ah- madi, M. H. Guimar˜aes, B. J. van Wees, Toward two-dimensional van der Waals magnon transport devices: WTe 2 electrodes for efficient magnon spin injection and detection, ACS Nano 19 (2025) 38716–38723.doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c14307

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c14307 2025

  7. [7]

    G. Chen, S. Qi, J. Liu, D. Chen, J. Wang, S. Yan, Y . Zhang, S. Cao, M. Lu, S. Tian, et al., Electrically switchable van der Waals magnon valves, Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 6279.doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26523-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26523-1 2021

  8. [8]

    J. F. Sierra, J. Fabian, R. K. Kawakami, S. Roche, S. O. Valenzuela, Van der Waals heterostructures for spintronics and opto-spintronics, Nat. Nan- otechnol. 16 (2021) 856–868.doi:10.1038/s41565-021-00936-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-021-00936-x 2021

  9. [9]

    Roche, B

    S. Roche, B. van Wees, K. Garello, S. O. Valenzuela, Spintronics with two-dimensional materials and van der Waals heterostructures, 2D Mater. 11 (2024) 043001.doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ad64e2

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ad64e2 2024

  10. [10]

    E. C. Ahn, 2D materials for spintronic devices, npj 2D Mater. Appl. 4 (2020) 17.doi:10.1038/s41699-020-0152-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41699-020-0152-0 2020

  11. [11]

    A. Mook, J. Henk, I. Mertig, Magnon waveguide with nanoscale confine- ment constructed from topological magnon insulators, Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015) 174409.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.174409

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.174409 2015

  12. [12]

    Q. Wang, G. Csaba, R. Verba, A. V . Chumak, P. Pirro, Nanoscale magnonic networks, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21 (2024) 040503.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.21.040503

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    K. Wang, K. Ren, Y . Hou, Y . Cheng, G. Zhang, Magnon–phonon cou- pling: from fundamental physics to applications, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 (2023) 21802–21815.doi:10.1039/D3CP02683C

    work page doi:10.1039/d3cp02683c 2023

  14. [14]

    A. V . Chumak, V . I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys. 11 (2015) 453–461.doi:10.1038/nphys3347

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3347 2015

  15. [15]

    F. Zhu, L. Zhang, X. Wang, F. J. Dos Santos, J. Song, T. Mueller, K. Schmalzl, W. F. Schmidt, A. Ivanov, J. T. Park, et al., Topologi- cal magnon insulators in two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnets CrSiTe3 and CrGeTe3: Toward intrinsic gap-tunability, Sci. Adv. 7 (2021) eabi7532.doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi7532

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi7532 2021

  16. [16]

    L. Chen, C. Mao, J.-H. Chung, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, X. Wang, N. Murai, B. Gao, O. Delaire, P. Dai, Anisotropic magnon damping by zero-temperature quantum fluctuations in ferromagnetic CrGeTe 3, Nat. Commun. 13 (2022) 4037.doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31612-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31612-w 2022

  17. [17]

    K. Wang, X. Xu, Y . Cheng, M. Zhang, J.-S. Wang, H. Wang, G. Zhang, Magnon-magnon interaction and magnon relaxation time in a ferromag- netic Cr 2Ge2Te6 monolayer, Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020) 235434.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.235434

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.235434 2020

  18. [18]

    Z. Shen, X. Fan, D. Yang, Y . Gong, S. Ma, N. Guo, Y . Hu, E. Benassi, W. Lau, First-principles study the single-layer transition metal trihalide CrXSe3 (X=Sn, Ge, Si) as monolayer ferromagnetic semiconductor, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32 (2020) 085801.doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ ab462a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ 2020

  19. [19]

    W. Yu, Y . Zhang, W. Luo, X. Zhang, Y . Wu, R. Li, W.-B. Zhang, The magnetic properties in two-dimensional Cr 2X2Y6 (X=Ge, Si; Y=Te, Se) modulated by strain and electric field, Phys. B 697 (2025) 416721. doi:10.1016/j.physb.2024.416721

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physb.2024.416721 2025

  20. [20]

    I. A. Tasiu, M. P. Islam, M. K. Prity, N. M. Tasniya, D. Samar, A. U. Mariya, H. Zhou, J.-W. Gao, Spintronics technology: A comprehensive review of materials, applications, and future trends, J. Sci.: Adv. Mater. Devices 11 (2025) 101087.doi:10.1016/j.jsamd.2025.101087. 9

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jsamd.2025.101087 2025

  21. [21]

    H. Liu, Z. Huang, X. Chen, X. Qi, Strain-adjustable spintronics with ro- bust polarity in Janus FeClS, J. Appl. Phys. 137 (2025) 154302.doi: 10.1063/5.0260705

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0260705 2025

  22. [22]

    Dieny, I

    B. Dieny, I. L. Prejbeanu, K. Garello, P. Gambardella, P. Freitas, R. Lehn- dorff, W. Raberg, U. Ebels, S. O. Demokritov, J. Akerman, et al., Opportu- nities and challenges for spintronics in the microelectronics industry, Nat. Electron. 3 (2020) 446–459.doi:10.1038/s41928-020-0461-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41928-020-0461-5 2020

  23. [23]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, et al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21 (2009) 395502. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 2009

  24. [24]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approxi- mation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865–3868.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

  25. [25]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 085117.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085117

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.085117 2013

  26. [26]

    M. J. Van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Verstraete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, G.-M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Comput. Phys. Commun. 226 (2018) 39–54.doi:10.1016/j.cpc. 2018.01.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc 2018

  27. [27]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT- D) for the 94 elements H-Pu, J. Chem. Phys. 132 (2010) 154104.doi: 10.1063/1.3382344

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3382344 2010

  28. [28]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y . Savrasov, C. Humphreys, A. P. Sut- ton, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel ox- ide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B 57 (1998) 1505.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.57.1505

    work page 1998

  29. [29]

    Li, K.-Q

    Q. Li, K.-Q. Chen, L.-M. Tang, Large valley splitting in van der Waals heterostructures with type-iii band alignment, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 (2020) 014064.doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.014064

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.13.014064 2020

  30. [30]

    H. J. Monkhorst, J. D. Pack, Special points for brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13 (1976) 5188.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 1976

  31. [31]

    N. T. Hung, A. R. T. Nugraha, R. Saito, Quantum ESPRESSO course for solid-state physics, Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2022.doi:10.1201/ 9781003290964

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 32(16):165902, jan 2020

    G. Pizzi, V . Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´eranton, M. Gib- ertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, et al., Wannier90 as a com- munity code: new features and applications, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32 (2020) 165902.doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ab51ff

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ab51ff 2020

  33. [33]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 1959–2007.doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.82.1959

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    X. Wang, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, Ab initio calculation of the anomalous Hall conductivity by Wannier interpolation, Phys. Rev. B 74 (19) (2006) 195118.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.195118

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.195118 2006

  35. [35]

    J. R. Yates, X. Wang, D. Vanderbilt, I. Souza, Spectral and fermi surface properties from Wannier interpolation, Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 195121. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.195121

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.195121 2007

  36. [36]

    F. R. Pratama, M. S. Ukhtary, R. Saito, Circular dichroism and faraday and kerr rotation in two-dimensional materials with intrinsic Hall con- ductivities, Phys. Rev. B 101 (2020) 045426.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB. 101.045426

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb 2020

  37. [37]

    J. M. Adhidewata, R. W. M. Komalig, M. S. Ukhtary, A. R. T. Nugraha, B. E. Gunara, E. H. Hasdeo, Trigonal warping effects on optical properties of anomalous Hall materials, Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) 155415.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.155415

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.155415 2023

  38. [38]

    D. A. Greenwood, The Boltzmann equation in the theory of electrical conduction in metals, Proc. Phys. Soc. 71 (1958) 585–596.doi:10. 1088/0370-1328/71/4/306

    work page 1958

  39. [39]

    J. Qiao, J. Zhou, Z. Yuan, W. Zhao, Calculation of intrinsic spin Hall conductivity by Wannier interpolation, Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 214402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.214402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.214402 2018

  40. [40]

    J. H. Ryoo, C.-H. Park, I. Souza, Computation of intrinsic spin Hall con- ductivities from first principles using maximally localized Wannier func- tions, Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019) 235113.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99. 235113

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99 2019

  41. [41]

    G.-Y . Guo, S. Murakami, T.-W. Chen, N. Nagaosa, Intrinsic spin Hall ef- fect in platinum: First-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 096401.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.096401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.096401 2008

  42. [42]

    X. He, N. Helbig, M. J. Verstraete, E. Bousquet, TB2J: A Python package for computing magnetic interaction parameters, Comput. Phys. Commun. 264 (2021) 107938.doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107938

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107938 2021

  43. [43]

    Szilva, M

    A. Szilva, M. Costa, A. Bergman, L. Szunyogh, L. Nordstr ¨om, O. Eriks- son, Interatomic exchange interactions for finite-temperature magnetism and nonequilibrium spin dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 127204. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.127204

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.127204 2013

  44. [44]

    Supplementary data of CrSiSe 3 Monolayer,https://github.com/ solihinn17/topo-magnonics. 10

    work page