pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29899 · v1 · pith:ZM4POJXXnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Quantum (non)equivalence of dual massive p-form gauge theories

Christian Canete , Elden Loomes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 05:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords p-form gauge theoriesBF theoryquantum duality breakingEuler characteristictopological spacetimepath integralmassive gauge fieldsrenormalization counterterms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum duality between dual massive p-form gauge theories is broken by spacetime topology at the quantum level.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that dual massive p-form gauge theories, which are equivalent classically via BF coupling, lose their equivalence when quantized on spacetimes with non-trivial topology. Integrating out one form in the path integral produces determinants that depend on topological invariants, requiring counterterms whose difference is proportional to the Euler characteristic. This breaking is linked to the quantum violation of the massless duality involving longitudinal modes. A sympathetic reader would care because it demonstrates how topology can induce inequivalence in what appear to be dual descriptions, with potential implications for quantum gravity effects via instantons even in flat space.

Core claim

In the BF theory coupling p-forms and (d-p-1)-forms, the path integral quantization leads to determinants after integrating out one form that are sensitive to the topology of spacetime. Counterterms must be introduced to renormalize divergences, and their difference is proportional to the Euler characteristic. This explicitly demonstrates the breaking of the quantum duality of the massive theories on topologically non-trivial backgrounds, which is related to the breaking of the massless duality between the integrated-out form and the longitudinal modes of its partner.

What carries the argument

The one-loop determinants arising from integrating out one of the form fields in the path integral, which encode topological information and lead to Euler-characteristic-dependent counterterms.

If this is right

  • Classical duality is preserved only on topologically trivial spacetimes.
  • The difference in the renormalized effective actions is proportional to the Euler characteristic.
  • The breaking extends to the massless case for the longitudinal modes.
  • Topological fluctuations like gravitational instantons can induce the breaking even in Minkowski space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result suggests that other dualities in gauge theories may be similarly affected by topology at the quantum level.
  • Explicit calculations on manifolds with known topology, such as spheres or tori, could verify the Euler characteristic dependence.
  • This could have consequences for the consistency of dual descriptions in theories involving curved spacetime or quantum gravity.

Load-bearing premise

The path integral computation of the determinants after integrating out the forms requires counterterms whose difference is precisely the Euler characteristic of the spacetime.

What would settle it

Performing the determinant calculation on a specific topologically non-trivial manifold like the four-sphere, where the Euler characteristic is 2, and checking whether the counterterm difference matches that value.

read the original abstract

Gauge theories of massive $p$-forms are connected by various dualities, which hold classically but may be broken at the quantum level. One example is the $BF$ theory of topologically coupled $p$- and $(d-p-1)$-forms in $d$ dimensions, where the coupling between forms results in a manifestly gauge invariant mass term for either form when the other is integrated out classically. We perform the path integral quantisation of this theory; by integrating out one of the forms, the resulting determinants are sensitive to the topology of spacetime, and counterterms must be introduced to renormalise their divergences. We compute these determinants in terms of the topological numbers of spacetime, showing explicitly how the quantum duality of the massive theories is broken on topologically non-trivial backgrounds. This is directly related to the quantum breaking of the massless duality between the form that was integrated out and the longitudinal modes of its partner. In particular, the difference of counterterms is proportional to the Euler characteristic of spacetime. The existence of gravitational instantons suggests that these dualities may be broken even in Minkowski space in the presence of topological fluctuations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper examines quantum (non)equivalence of dual massive p-form gauge theories via BF theory with topological coupling between p- and (d-p-1)-forms in d dimensions. Classically, integrating out one form produces a gauge-invariant mass term for the other. At the quantum level, the path integral yields functional determinants after integrating out one form; these are claimed to be sensitive to spacetime topology, requiring counterterms whose difference is proportional to the Euler characteristic. This explicitly breaks quantum duality on topologically non-trivial backgrounds and is tied to the breaking of massless duality between the integrated-out form and longitudinal modes of its partner. Gravitational instantons are invoked to suggest possible breaking even in Minkowski space.

Significance. If substantiated by explicit computation, the result would establish a topological mechanism for quantum violation of classical dualities in massive p-form theories, extending known massless cases via the index theorem on the de Rham complex. The explicit connection of counterterm differences to the Euler characteristic (alternating sum of Betti numbers) would be a concrete, falsifiable prediction with implications for non-perturbative gauge/gravity systems. Use of standard zeta-function or heat-kernel methods for determinants is a methodological strength when details are supplied.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and path-integral computation section] Abstract (and the section on path-integral quantization and determinant evaluation): the central claim that 'we compute these determinants in terms of the topological numbers of spacetime' and that 'the difference of counterterms is proportional to the Euler characteristic' is asserted without supplying an explicit regularization scheme (e.g., zeta-function cutoff or heat-kernel coefficients), operator definitions for the Laplacians on forms, or verification steps that reduce the finite part to topological invariants. This is load-bearing for the duality-breaking conclusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and for identifying the need for greater explicitness in the computational details. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and path-integral computation section] Abstract (and the section on path-integral quantization and determinant evaluation): the central claim that 'we compute these determinants in terms of the topological numbers of spacetime' and that 'the difference of counterterms is proportional to the Euler characteristic' is asserted without supplying an explicit regularization scheme (e.g., zeta-function cutoff or heat-kernel coefficients), operator definitions for the Laplacians on forms, or verification steps that reduce the finite part to topological invariants. This is load-bearing for the duality-breaking conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript would be strengthened by supplying the explicit regularization details that support the topological evaluation of the determinants. In the revised version we will: (i) state that zeta-function regularization is employed for the functional determinants of the Hodge-de Rham Laplacians acting on p-forms and (d-p-1)-forms; (ii) define the operators as Δ_p = dδ + δd on the space of p-forms with the appropriate gauge-fixing; and (iii) outline the steps, via the heat-kernel expansion or the index theorem for the de Rham complex, showing that the difference of the finite parts of the counterterms equals a multiple of the Euler characteristic χ(M). These additions will make the duality-breaking result fully traceable while preserving the existing conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses external index theorems and standard determinant methods

full rationale

The central claim follows from explicit computation of functional determinants after integrating out one form in the BF theory, with topological contributions fixed by the index theorem on the de Rham complex (alternating sum of Betti numbers) and heat-kernel or zeta-function regularization. These are independent external results, not derived from or fitted to the paper's own outputs. The proportionality of counterterm differences to the Euler characteristic is a direct consequence of applying these standard tools to the massive dual theories, without any self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The massless-to-massive extension is logically consistent and does not reduce the result to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of path-integral quantization for these theories and on the assumption that the resulting determinants can be expressed purely in terms of topological invariants after renormalization.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Path integral quantization is applicable to the BF theory of topologically coupled p- and (d-p-1)-forms
    The paper states it performs the path integral quantisation of this theory
  • domain assumption The determinants obtained after integrating out one form are sensitive to spacetime topology and require counterterms whose difference equals the Euler characteristic
    Directly stated in the abstract as the outcome of the computation

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5726 in / 1358 out tokens · 35499 ms · 2026-06-30T05:25:27.242113+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The notoph and its possible interactions

    V . I. Ogievetski ˘ı and I. V . Polubarinov. “The notoph and its possible interactions”.Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.4 (1967), pp. 156–161

    1967

  2. [2]

    Classical direct interstring action

    M. Kalb and P . Ramond. “Classical direct interstring action”.Physical Review D9.8 (1974), pp. 2273– 2284.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.2273

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.2273 1974

  3. [3]

    Supersymmetry, supergravity theories and the dual spinor model

    F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk, and D. Olive. “Supersymmetry, supergravity theories and the dual spinor model”. Nuclear Physics B122.2 (1977), pp. 253–290.DOI:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90206-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90206-1 1977

  4. [4]

    N=4 supergravity coupled toN=4 matter and hidden symmetries

    A. H. Chamseddine. “N=4 supergravity coupled toN=4 matter and hidden symmetries”.Nuclear Physics B185.2 (1981), pp. 403–415.DOI:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90326-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90326-6 1981

  5. [5]

    Kaluza-Klein cosmologies

    P . G. Freund. “Kaluza-Klein cosmologies”.Nuclear Physics B209.1 (1982), pp. 146–156.DOI:10.1016/ 0550-3213(82)90106-7

    1982

  6. [6]

    Pre-big-bang in string cosmology

    M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano. “Pre-big-bang in string cosmology”.Astroparticle Physics1 (1993), pp. 317–339.DOI:10.1016/0927-6505(93)90017-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0927-6505(93)90017-8 1993

  7. [7]

    String cosmology with a time-dependent antisymmetric tensor potential

    E. J. Copeland, A. Lahiri, and D. Wands. “String cosmology with a time-dependent antisymmetric tensor potential”.Physical Review D51.4 (1995), pp. 1569–1576.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1569

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.1569 1995

  8. [8]

    Inflation driven by a vector field

    L. H. Ford. “Inflation driven by a vector field”.Physical Review D40.4 (1989), pp. 967–972.DOI:10. 1103/PhysRevD.40.967

    1989

  9. [9]

    Vector inflation

    A. Golovnev, V . Mukhanov, and V . Vanchurin. “Vector inflation”.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2008.06 (2008), p. 009.DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/06/009

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/06/009 2008

  10. [10]

    Gravitational waves from p-form inflation

    T. Kobayashi and S. Yokoyama. “Gravitational waves from p-form inflation”.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2009 (2009), p. 004.DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/004

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/004 2009

  11. [11]

    Cosmological implications of Kalb-Ramond-like particles

    C. Capanelli et al. “Cosmological implications of Kalb-Ramond-like particles”.Journal of High Energy Physics2024 (2024), p. 75.DOI:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)075

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2024)075 2024

  12. [12]

    Kalb-Ramond field and gravitational parity violation

    T. Manton and S. Alexander. “Kalb-Ramond field and gravitational parity violation”.Physical Review D110.4 (2024), p. 044067.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.044067

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.044067 2024

  13. [13]

    Horii, T

    Y. Horii, T. Murata, and T. Kobayashi.Ghost-free 2-form fields in cosmology: implications for gravitational parity violation. arXiv:2512.17348 [gr-qc]. (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    On the Kalb-Ramond field with non-minimal coupling to gravity

    A. Hell and I. Obata. “On the Kalb-Ramond field with non-minimal coupling to gravity”.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2026.05 (2026), p. 082.DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/05/082. 19

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/05/082 2026

  15. [15]

    The cosmological constant is probably zero

    S. W. Hawking. “The cosmological constant is probably zero”.Physics Letters B134.6 (1984), pp. 403– 404.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91370-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91370-4 1984

  16. [16]

    The cosmological constant is possibly zero, but the proof is probably wrong

    M. Duff. “The cosmological constant is possibly zero, but the proof is probably wrong”.Physics Letters B226.1-2 (1989), pp. 36–38.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90284-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90284-0 1989

  17. [17]

    Four-forms and the vanishing of the cosmological constant

    M. J. Duncan and L. Gerhard Jensen. “Four-forms and the vanishing of the cosmological constant”. Nuclear Physics, Section B336.1 (1990), pp. 100–114.DOI:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90344-D

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90344-d 1990

  18. [18]

    Quantum fluctuations of a “constant

    A. Aurilia and E. Spallucci. “Quantum fluctuations of a “constant” gauge field”.Physical Review D 69.10 (2004), p. 105004.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.105004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.105004 2004

  19. [19]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn. “CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles”.Physical Review Letters38.25 (1977), pp. 1440–1443.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.1440 1977

  20. [20]

    Dvali.Three-Form Gauging of axion Symmetries and Gravity

    G. Dvali.Three-Form Gauging of axion Symmetries and Gravity. arXiv:hep-th/0507215. (2005)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  21. [21]

    Dvali.Strong-CP with and without gravity

    G. Dvali.Strong-CP with and without gravity. arXiv:2209.14219 [hep-ph]. (2022)

    arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Consistency of the dual formulation of axion solutions to the strong CP problem

    O. Sakhelashvili. “Consistency of the dual formulation of axion solutions to the strong CP problem”. Physical Review D105.8 (2022), p. 085020.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.085020

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.085020 2022

  23. [23]

    Vacuum bubbles nucleation and dark matter production through gauge symmetry rearrangement

    S. Ansoldi, A. Aurilia, and E. Spallucci. “Vacuum bubbles nucleation and dark matter production through gauge symmetry rearrangement”.Physical Review D64.2 (2001), p. 025008.DOI:10.1103/ PhysRevD.64.025008

    2001

  24. [24]

    Dark matter from dark energy in q-theory

    F. R. Klinkhamer and G. E. Volovik. “Dark matter from dark energy in q-theory”.JETP Letters105.2 (2017), pp. 74–77.DOI:10.1134/S0021364017020011

    work page doi:10.1134/s0021364017020011 2017

  25. [25]

    Emergent dark matter

    C. Canete and A. Kobakhidze. “Emergent dark matter”.Physics Letters B879 (2026), p. 140632.DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140632

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140632 2026

  26. [26]

    Supergravity in theory in 11 dimensions

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, and J. Scherk. “Supergravity in theory in 11 dimensions”.Physics Letters B76.4 (1978), pp. 409–412.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90894-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90894-8 1978

  27. [27]

    Dynamics of dimensional reduction

    P . G. Freund and M. A. Rubin. “Dynamics of dimensional reduction”.Physics Letters B97.2 (1980), pp. 233–235.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90590-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90590-0 1980

  28. [28]

    Effective field theory from quantized strings

    E. Fradkin and A. Tseytlin. “Effective field theory from quantized strings”.Physics Letters B158.4 (1985), pp. 316–322.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91190-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91190-6 1985

  29. [29]

    String and M-theory cosmological solutions with Ramond forms

    A. Lukas, B. A. Ovrut, and D. Waldram. “String and M-theory cosmological solutions with Ramond forms”.Nuclear Physics B495.1-2 (1997), pp. 365–399.DOI:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00194-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00194-6 1997

  30. [30]

    The secret long range force in quantum field theories with instantons

    M. Lüscher. “The secret long range force in quantum field theories with instantons”.Physics Letters B 78.4 (1978), pp. 465–467.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90487-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90487-2 1978

  31. [31]

    The U(1) problem and the Higgs mechanism in two and four dimensions

    A. Aurilia, Y. Takahashi, and P . K. Townsend. “The U(1) problem and the Higgs mechanism in two and four dimensions”.Physics Letters B95.2 (1980), pp. 265–268.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90484- 0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90484- 1980

  32. [32]

    Modeling the glueball spectrum by a closed bosonic membrane

    G. Gabadadze. “Modeling the glueball spectrum by a closed bosonic membrane”.Physical Review D 58.9 (1998), p. 094015.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.094015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.094015 1998

  33. [33]

    Electroweakη w meson

    G. Dvali, A. Kobakhidze, and O. Sakhelashvili. “Electroweakη w meson”.Physical Review D111.11 (2025), p. 113002.DOI:10.1103/mxdm-wb1p

    work page doi:10.1103/mxdm-wb1p 2025

  34. [34]

    η w-meson from topological properties of the elec- troweak vacuum

    G. Dvali, A. Kobakhidze, and O. Sakhelashvili. “η w-meson from topological properties of the elec- troweak vacuum”.Physical Review D112.9 (2025), p. 093006.DOI:10.1103/jc2g-q3nh

    work page doi:10.1103/jc2g-q3nh 2025

  35. [35]

    S. E. Hjelmeland and U. Lindström.Duality for the Non-Specialist. arXiv:hep-th/9705122. (1997)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  36. [36]

    Quantum inequivalence of different field representations

    M. Duff and P . Van Nieuwenhuizen. “Quantum inequivalence of different field representations”. Physics Letters B94.2 (1980), pp. 179–182.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90852-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90852-7 1980

  37. [37]

    Quantum equivalence of different field representations

    W. Siegel. “Quantum equivalence of different field representations”.Physics Letters B103.2 (1981), pp. 107–109.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90680-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90680-8 1981

  38. [38]

    Energy-momentum tensors, supercurrents, (super)traces, and quantum equiva- lence

    M. Grisaru et al. “Energy-momentum tensors, supercurrents, (super)traces, and quantum equiva- lence”.Nuclear Physics B247.1 (1984), pp. 157–189.DOI:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90377-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90377-8 1984

  39. [39]

    Quantization of the classically equivalent theories in the superspace of simple supergravity and quantum equivalence

    I. Buchbinder and S. Kuzenko. “Quantization of the classically equivalent theories in the superspace of simple supergravity and quantum equivalence”.Nuclear Physics B308.1 (1988), pp. 162–190.DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90047-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90047-8 1988

  40. [40]

    Plasmons, Gauge Invariance, and Mass

    P . W. Anderson. “Plasmons, Gauge Invariance, and Mass”.Physical Review130.1 (1963), pp. 439–442. DOI:10.1103/PhysRev.130.439

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.130.439 1963

  41. [41]

    Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons

    F. Englert and R. Brout. “Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons”.Physical Review Letters13 (1964), pp. 321–323.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321. 20

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.321 1964

  42. [42]

    Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons

    P . W. Higgs. “Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons”.Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964). Ed. by J. C. Taylor, pp. 508–509.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.508 1964

  43. [43]

    Topological field theory

    D. Birmingham. “Topological field theory”.Physics Reports209.4-5 (1991), pp. 129–340.DOI:10.1016/ 0370-1573(91)90117-5

    1991

  44. [44]

    InducedB∧Fterm and photon mass generation in 3+1 dimension

    M. Leblanc et al. “InducedB∧Fterm and photon mass generation in 3+1 dimension”.International Journal of Modern Physics A09.27 (1994), pp. 4717–4726.DOI:10.1142/S0217751X94001886

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x94001886 1994

  45. [45]

    Two-dimensional BF model quantized in the axial gauge

    S. Emery et al. “Two-dimensional BF model quantized in the axial gauge”.Il Nuovo Cimento A111.11 (1998), pp. 1321–1335.DOI:10.1007/BF03545798

    work page doi:10.1007/bf03545798 1998

  46. [46]

    Quantum Equivalence of Massive Antisymmet- ric Tensor Field Models in Curved Space

    I. L. Buchbinder, E. N. Kirillova, and N. G. Pletnev. “Quantum Equivalence of Massive Antisymmet- ric Tensor Field Models in Curved Space”.Physical Review D78.8 (2008), p. 084024.DOI:10.1103/ PhysRevD.78.084024

    2008

  47. [47]

    Effective actions for dual massive (super) p-forms

    S. M. Kuzenko and K. Turner. “Effective actions for dual massive (super) p-forms”.Journal of High Energy Physics2021.1 (2021), p. 40.DOI:10.1007/JHEP01(2021)040

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2021)040 2021

  48. [48]

    Asymptotically flat self-dual solutions to euclidean gravity

    T. Eguchi and A. J. Hanson. “Asymptotically flat self-dual solutions to euclidean gravity”.Physics Letters B74.3 (1978), pp. 249–251.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90566-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90566-x 1978

  49. [49]

    Self-dual solutions to euclidean gravity

    T. Eguchi and A. J. Hanson. “Self-dual solutions to euclidean gravity”.Annals of Physics120.1 (1979), pp. 82–106.DOI:10.1016/0003-4916(79)90282-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(79)90282-3 1979

  50. [50]

    Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang. “Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields”.Physical Review D12.12 (1975), pp. 3845–3857.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.12.3845

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.12.3845 1975

  51. [51]

    Dirac monopole without strings: Monopole harmonics

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang. “Dirac monopole without strings: Monopole harmonics”.Nuclear Physics B 107.3 (1976), pp. 365–380.DOI:10.1016/0550-3213(76)90143-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(76)90143-7 1976

  52. [52]

    Bott and L

    R. Bott and L. W. Tu.Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology. Vol. 82. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. New York, NY: Springer, 1982.DOI:10.1007/978-1-4757-3951-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3951-0 1982

  53. [53]

    Spontaneous dynamical breaking of gauge symmetry in dual models

    E. Cremmer and J. Scherk. “Spontaneous dynamical breaking of gauge symmetry in dual models”. Nuclear Physics B72.1 (1974), pp. 117–124.DOI:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90224-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90224-7 1974

  54. [54]

    Topological mass generation in (3+1)-dimensions

    T. J. Allen, M. J. Bowick, and A. Lahiri. “Topological mass generation in (3+1)-dimensions”.Modern Physics Letters A06.07 (1991), pp. 559–571.DOI:10.1142/S0217732391000580

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732391000580 1991

  55. [55]

    An introduction toL 2 cohomology

    X. Dai. “An introduction toL 2 cohomology”.Cambridge University Press(2011)

    2011

  56. [56]

    Hidden ghosts

    W. Siegel. “Hidden ghosts”.Physics Letters B93.1 (1980), pp. 170–172.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(80) 90119-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80 1980

  57. [57]

    The geometrical approach to antisymmetric tensor field theory

    Y. Obukhov. “The geometrical approach to antisymmetric tensor field theory”.Physics Letters B109.3 (1982), pp. 195–199.DOI:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90752-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90752-3 1982

  58. [58]

    New gravitational index theorems and super theorems

    S. M. Christensen and M. J. Duff. “New gravitational index theorems and super theorems”.Nuclear Physics B154.2 (1979), pp. 301–342.DOI:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90516-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90516-9 1979

  59. [59]

    Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking. “Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity”. Physical Review D15.10 (1977), pp. 2752–2756.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2752 1977

  60. [60]

    Hausel, E

    T. Hausel, E. Hunsicker, and R. Mazzeo.Hodge cohomology of gravitational instantons. arXiv:math/0207169 [math.DG]. (2003)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  61. [61]

    Kobakhidze and E

    A. Kobakhidze and E. Loomes.Electromagnetic instantons and asymmetric Hawking radiation of black holes. arXiv:2604.02841 [hep-th]. (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Geometric Interpretation of Schwarzschild Instantons

    G. Etesi and T. Hausel. “Geometric Interpretation of Schwarzschild Instantons”.Journal of Geometry and Physics37.1-2 (2001), pp. 126–136.DOI:10.1016/S0393-0440(00)00040-1

    work page doi:10.1016/s0393-0440(00)00040-1 2001

  63. [63]

    Gravitational instantons

    S. W. Hawking. “Gravitational instantons”.Physics Letters A60.2 (1977), pp. 81–83.DOI:10 . 1016 / 0375-9601(77)90386-3

    1977

  64. [64]

    Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant

    L. Dyson, M. Kleban, and L. Susskind. “Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant”.Journal of High Energy Physics2002.10 (2002), pp. 011–011.DOI:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/10/011

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/10/011 2002

  65. [65]

    Witten.Quantum Gravity In De Sitter Space

    E. Witten.Quantum Gravity In De Sitter Space. arXiv:hep-th/0106109. (2001)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  66. [66]

    Reheating in three-form inflation

    A. De Felice, K. Karwan, and P . Wongjun. “Reheating in three-form inflation”.Physical Review D86.10 (2012), p. 103526.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.103526

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.103526 2012

  67. [67]

    Three-form inflation and non-Gaussianity

    D. J. Mulryne, J. Noller, and N. J. Nunes. “Three-form inflation and non-Gaussianity”.Journal of Cos- mology and Astroparticle Physics2012.12 (2012), pp. 016–016.DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/016

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/016 2012

  68. [68]

    Hint to supersymmetry from the GR vacuum

    G. Dvali, A. Kobakhidze, and O. Sakhelashvili. “Hint to supersymmetry from the GR vacuum”.Phys. Rev. D110 (8 2024), p. 086008.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.086008. 21

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.086008 2024

  69. [69]

    Ball and Y

    A. Ball and Y. T. A. Law.Dynamical Edge Modes in p-form Gauge Theories. arXiv:2411.02555 [hep-th]. (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Essential self-adjointness of powers of generators of hyperbolic equations

    P . R. Chernoff. “Essential self-adjointness of powers of generators of hyperbolic equations”.Journal of Functional Analysis12.4 (1973), pp. 401–414.DOI:10.1016/0022-1236(73)90003-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-1236(73)90003-7 1973

  71. [71]

    L 2-Cohomology of Hyperkähler Quotients

    N. Hitchin. “L 2-Cohomology of Hyperkähler Quotients”.Communications in Mathematical Physics 211.1 (2000), pp. 153–165.DOI:10.1007/s002200050806

    work page doi:10.1007/s002200050806 2000

  72. [72]

    A Special Stokes’s Theorem for Complete Riemannian Manifolds

    M. P . Gaffney. “A Special Stokes’s Theorem for Complete Riemannian Manifolds”.Annals of Mathe- matics60.1 (1954), pp. 140–145. 22

    1954