Thermodynamics in the Sine-Gordon model: the NLIE approach

Arpad Hegedus

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 34 references

Thermodynamics in the Sine-Gordon model: the NLIE approach

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives a single nonlinear integral equation that gives the free-energy density of the sine-Gordon/massive Thirring model at any coupling when a chemical potential is coupled to the topological charge.

desk verdict A genuinely new NLIE for sine-Gordon with chemical potential, with solid but narrow numerical checks; the unproven contour-deformation assumption is the main gap and deserves a closer look before this is the last word. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19200 v1 pith:ZNALFL7S submitted 2025-07-25 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mech

Arpad Hegedus This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mech

keywords sine-GordonmodelmassiveThirringnonlinearintegralequationchemicalpotentialtopologicalchargethermodynamicBetheansatzvertexoperatorexpectationvaluescold-atomiccondensates

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to fill a gap: the thermodynamics of the sine-Gordon model with a chemical potential coupled to its topological charge had so far been described only by the multi-component thermodynamic Bethe ansatz (TBA), whose form changes intricately with the coupling. The paper derives instead a nonlinear integral equation (NLIE) for a single unknown function $Z(\theta)$, valid at any coupling $p$, from which the free-energy density $f=E_0/\beta$ follows directly. The chemical potential enters as an imaginary twist in the equation's source term, and a further extension includes a momentum-conservation term in the thermodynamic potential. The paper verifies the equation against known TBA results in UV and IR limits, and shows how expectation values of currents and vertex operators, the latter relevant to tunnel-coupled cold-atom condensates, are computed in this formalism.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the nonlinear integral equation itself, of the light-cone lattice type, with kernel $G(\theta)$ equal to the logarithmic derivative of the soliton-soliton scattering phase and nonlinearity $L_\pm(\theta)=\ln(1+e^{\pm iZ(\theta)})$. The derivation rests on the Euclidean trick: the free energy in infinite volume equals the ground-state energy in finite volume $\beta$ of the same theory with twisted boundary conditions, and the chemical potential becomes an imaginary twist parameter fixed by the charge renormalization factor $(p+1)/p$. The coupling $p$ appears only in the kernel, which is why one unknown function replaces the many-component TBA. Because the twist is imaginary, $Z$ is not real-analytic and the singularities of $L_\pm$ move off the real axis, forcing the contour parameters $\eta_\pm$ to be kept above a positive minimum; the paper claims this can always be done without introducing extra source terms.

What would settle it

Locate the singularities $\theta_j$ of $L_\pm$ defined by $Z(\theta_j)=2\pi I_j$ on a grid of $\beta$, $\mu$, and $p$; if any point has $\max|\operatorname{Im}\theta_j|\ge\min(p\pi,\pi)$, the contour assumption (3.13) fails and the simple NLIE (3.11) must acquire extra source terms, so the claimed universal free-energy formula is incomplete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the thermodynamics of the sine-Gordon model with a chemical potential $\mu$ coupled to the topological U(1) charge is fully controlled by one nonlinear integral equation, equation (3.11), for a single complex function $Z(\theta)$, valid for every coupling $p$. The chemical potential enters as an imaginary twist in the source term, $Z(\theta)=M\beta\sinh\theta+i\beta\mu+\cdots$; with the solution, the free-energy density is $f=E_0^{(\beta,\mu)}/\beta$, where $E_0$ is computed by (3.4). The same framework extends to a thermodynamic potential containing conserved momentum, giving equation (5.1), and yields linear integral equations for expectation values of charges and currents. The paper verifies the equation in UV limits through effective central charge formulas and in an IR expansion at $p=1/2$ that reproduces TBA results including breather contributions arising from kernel poles.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that for every value of temperature, chemical potential, and coupling, one can choose the contour-shift parameters $\eta_\pm$ so that the integration contours miss all singularities of the functions $L_\pm(\theta)$; if any parameter point forces a contour to cross such a singularity, the simple single-function NLIE would acquire extra source terms and the claimed description would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The same single-function equation yields the free energy, momentum, currents, and vertex-operator expectation values for any coupling $p$, eliminating the need to rewrite the equations at special reflectionless points.
The UV conformal formulas predict an effective central charge $c_{\rm eff}(\mu_0)=1+\frac{6p}{p+1}\frac{\mu_0^2}{\pi^2}$ when $\mu\beta$ is fixed, giving a direct check of the equation against conformal field theory.
In the IR, breather contributions emerge from residues of the kernel evaluated on paired upper and lower half-plane contours, so the NLIE reproduces the full TBA spectrum without introducing strings.
With the momentum term (5.1), the equations generate expectation values of charges and currents through derivatives with respect to the thermodynamic conjugate variables, including a vanishing spatial topological current at zero momentum coupling.
The efficient vertex-operator expectation values supply concrete predictions for coherence factors measured in tunnel-coupled cold-atom condensates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the coupling enters only through the kernel, solving the NLIE on a grid of $(\beta,\mu)$ values should make a full phase diagram of the sine-Gordon model at arbitrary $p$ numerically inexpensive; this is an extension the paper does not itself carry out.
The imaginary-twist mechanism is not specific to sine-Gordon: the same step should produce single-function thermodynamic equations for other integrable quantum field theories whose TBA systems have many coupling-dependent components.
The paper reports that naive higher-spin source terms fail against TBA, which suggests that a generalized Gibbs ensemble extension, if it exists, must place additional conserved charges in the source term in a more subtle analytic form rather than as simple $\sinh(3\theta)$ or $\cosh(3\theta)$ additions.
The IR derivation shows breather contributions arise from contour-pole residues of pairs of exponentials, so the same NLIE is likely a natural starting point for finite-volume and excited-state generalizations of the free energy.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

You should know this paper: it fills a real gap in the integrable-thermodynamics literature by extending the Destri–de Vega/Klümper-type NLIE to nonzero topological chemical potential. Instead of the many-component TBA, you get one integral equation (3.11) for a single function Z(θ), valid at any coupling, plus clean formulas for energy, momentum, currents, and vertex-operator expectation values. That is genuinely new; the zero-μ case was known, but no one had written the μ-dependent NLIE before.

What the paper does well: the checks are honest and independent. At p=1/2 the NLIE matches TBA numerically to machine precision in the IR, and the UV limits reproduce the CFT effective central charge, both for μ fixed and μβ fixed. The analytic IR expansion to order e^{-2Mβ} is shown in detail and matches TBA, including the breather contributions arising from kernel poles. That is real evidence the equation is not just a guess. The extension to momentum conservation and the formulas for expectation values are also useful, and the connection to cold-atom coherence factors makes the work concrete.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. First, the NLIE is not derived in the text; the author says the imaginary-twist case is an "easy" analogy to the XXZ model and cites [4,11] "without modification." For a paper whose main content is this equation, the derivation should at least be sketched. Second, and more important, the contour-deformation assumption after (3.13) is load-bearing. The paper assumes that for all p, β, μ the singularities of L± can be avoided by choosing η±, so no extra source terms appear. That is plausible, and at p=1 the paper gives an analytic bound, but for general coupling it is not proven and not numerically surveyed—all checks are at p=1/2 and μβ=0.12. The footnote about failed naive higher-spin source terms shows that the analytic structure in the presence of the twist is subtle, which makes this unproven assumption more than a formality. I do not think it invalidates the paper; the checks are strong enough that the equation is probably right. But a referee should ask for either a proof or a decent numerical scan over p and μ.

Citation pattern is fine: the self-citations to [14] and [25] are for specific prior results (charge renormalization, operator formulas) and are appropriate.

Who is this for? Anyone computing finite-temperature sine-Gordon quantities away from μ=0—cold-atom people, random-surfaces method developers, integrability folks. It deserves a serious referee and likely publication after the contour-assumption gap is addressed.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a Destri-de Vega\/Kl\"umper-type nonlinear integral equation (NLIE) for the free energy of the sine-Gordon\/massive Thirring model in the presence of a chemical potential coupled to the topological charge. The central object is a single complex function Z(θ) satisfying Eq. (3.11), from which the free energy and momentum follow via Eqs. (3.4)\u2013(3.5). The paper reports ultraviolet checks against CFT effective central charges, an infrared expansion at p=1/2 matched to TBA through order e^{-2Mβ}, machine-precision numerical agreement with TBA at p=1/2 for a single value of μβ, an extension to a momentum term, and formulas for current and vertex-operator expectation values adapted from earlier work.

Significance. If correct, the NLIE provides a unified, coupling-independent-form description of sine-Gordon thermodynamics with chemical potential, replacing the complicated multi-component TBA and enabling efficient computation of operator expectation values of experimental relevance. The paper's checks are genuinely independent: the UV CFT limits and the TBA comparison at p=1/2 are not fitted to the NLIE. The machine-precision agreement with TBA in Appendix A is a concrete strength, as is the explicit IR expansion showing how breather contributions arise from kernel poles. However, the significance is conditional on the unproven contour-deformation assumption that underlies the central equation, and the numerical evidence so far covers only a thin slice of parameter space.

major comments (3)

[Section 3, Eq. (3.13)] The existence of η± satisfying (3.13) for all β, μ, and p is assumed but not established. The only analytic bound is for p=1 (Eq. (3.15)), where the kernel vanishes; for general p, max_j |Im θ_j| is determined by the solution Z itself, making (3.13) a self-consistency condition that is not proved to hold. The numerical checks in §4.2 and Appendix A are all at p=1/2 and μβ=0.12 (or decreasing μβ), so they do not probe large μβ or other couplings. If a singularity crosses the integration contour, the NLIE acquires residue source terms and the free-energy formula (3.4) changes; this is a load-bearing premise for the central claim that (3.11) holds at arbitrary coupling.
[Section 3, around Eq. (3.1)] The paper states that the imaginary twist 'does not affect the derivation' and that results from [4,11] can be used 'without modification,' but no derivation is given. The analytic structure is manifestly different: Z is not real-analytic, and the singularities of L± move off the real axis as the paper itself describes. The footnote in §5 reporting that naive higher-spin source extensions fail further indicates that the analytic structure in the presence of the twist is not automatically the naive one. A derivation or at least a careful argument showing that the light-cone lattice derivation of the real-twist NLIE carries over to imaginary twist is needed to support the central equation.
[Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.14)\u2013(5.21)] The operator expectation value formulas are taken from [24,25] and claimed to generalize straightforwardly by replacing the NLIE with (5.1). These formulas involve contour integrals over F± and therefore inherit the unsupported contour-deformation assumption of Major Comment 1. The statement that 'the contours cannot be pushed arbitrarily close to the real axis' is not accompanied by any proof that the choice of η± satisfying (3.13) is possible for the parameter ranges of interest. This limits the claimed applicability of the vertex-operator expectation values, which are the experimentally relevant quantities.

minor comments (4)

[Section 4.2, after Eq. (4.20)] The text gives the breather mass at p=1/2 as mB1 = 2M sinh(π/4); this contradicts Eq. (4.6), which gives 2M sin(π/4) = √2 M. Please correct the typo.
[Section 3, Eq. (3.1)] The term 'w p+1/p' is ambiguous; it should read w (p+1)/p.
[Abstract and Introduction] The name of the NLIE is given inconsistently as 'Kl\"umper-Batchelor-Pearce-Destri-de Vega' in the abstract and 'Kl\"umper-Pearce-Destri-de Vega' in the introduction; please harmonize.
[Section 2, after Eq. (2.4)] There is a stray period after the matrix equation; also, the γ5 matrix is printed with -1 and 1 on the diagonal, which is a valid Euclidean convention but should be stated explicitly for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the NLIE (3.11)-(3.4) is not equivalent to its inputs; it is derived from non-self NLIE references and checked against independent TBA and UV/IR benchmarks.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The NLIE (3.1) is taken from the non-self references [4,11] for a real twist; the new content is the identification of the imaginary twist via (3.8)-(3.10), where the only input from the author's own prior work is the charge-normalization factor Q_cont^(L)=(p+1)/p Q from [14]. That factor is a separately derived lattice result, not the free-energy density being predicted, so it is not circular under the review rules. The resulting equations are tested against independent data: the UV limits (4.1)-(4.2) use the standard plateau/dilogarithm argument and known twisted CFT central charge, and the IR computation in Section 4.2 is explicitly compared with the TBA equations (4.3), with no fitting of the NLIE to the TBA output. The momentum extension (5.1) and the expectation-value formulas are either direct generalizations of [4,11,24,25] or are checked numerically against the TBA. The load-bearing analyticity assumption after (3.13), that eta+/- can always be chosen to avoid the singularities of L±, is a genuine unsupported technical assumption and a correctness risk, but it is not a circularity: the NLIE does not define the singularity locations through the quantities it is used to predict, and the assumption is not used to fit the final answers. The self-citations [14,25] occur, but they are not the sole support for the central claim and they are not equivalent to the claimed result; hence no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; M, β, μ, λ, p, and η± are physical or technical inputs. The paper introduces no new entities. The load-bearing assumptions are the imported NLIE derivation and the analytic-continuation assumptions about contour deformations and the charge normalization.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Coleman equivalence of sine-Gordon and massive Thirring models
Section 2, Eq. (2.5); the paper works in the fermionic language throughout, and the NLIE is derived for the Thirring model with coupling relation β^2/(8π-β^2)=p.
domain assumption The Euclidean trick (mirror rotation) relates free energy density to the ground state energy of the twisted model in finite volume β
Section 2, Eqs. (2.20)-(2.22); assumes the model is gapped and uses x-τ exchange symmetry to identify the partition functions.
domain assumption The light-cone lattice approach of [13] yields the NLIE (3.1) for the twisted massive Thirring model, and the imaginary twist does not modify the derivation
Section 3, before Eq. (3.1); the equation is imported from [4,11] and the author states 'existing results from the literature can be applied to our setup without modification'.
domain assumption The charge renormalization factor Q_L^cont = (p+1)/p Q from [14]
Section 3, Eqs. (3.8)-(3.10); this fixes the twist parameter iµβ and is a self-cited result from the author's previous work.
ad hoc to paper For all β, μ, p, contour parameters η± can be chosen satisfying (3.13), so no extra source terms are needed
Section 3, after Eq. (3.13); the author states 'one can assume, that at any values of the parameters β and µ, it is possible to escape from these singularities'.
domain assumption The vertex operator expectation value formulas (5.14)-(5.21) generalize from [24,25] with the NLIE (5.1)
Section 5.1; the formula is quoted from prior work and the paper states it 'can be straightforwardly generalized', but no derivation is given.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermodynamics in the Sine-Gordon model: the NLIE approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZNALFL7S

@misc{pith2026250719200,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermodynamics in the Sine-Gordon model: the NLIE approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZNALFL7S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19200}
}

read the original abstract

In this paper we derive Kl\"umper-Batchelor-Pearce-Destri-de Vega type nonlinear integral equations for describing the thermodynamics in the sine-Gordon model, when a chemical potential coupled to the topological charge is also present in the theory. The equations are valid at any value of the coupling constant and are particularly useful for computing the expectation values of local operators and some currents as functions of the temperature and the chemical potential. The equations are also extended to the case, when an extra term corresponding to the momentum conservation, is added to the thermodynamic potential. The benefits of this description are twofold. On the one hand, it can serve as an appropriate testing ground for other promising theoretical methods, like the method of random surfaces. On the other hand, the efficient computation of vertex operator expectation values, allows one to provide useful theoretical data, for the experimentally measurable coherence factors of a tunnel-coupled cold atomic condensate system.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

[14]

Lattice approach to finite volume form-factors of the Massive Thirring/Sine-Gordon model

´A. Heged´ us, “Lattice approach to finite volume form-factors of the Massive Thirring (Sine-Gordon) model,” JHEP 08 (2017), 059 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2017)059 [arXiv:1705.00319 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[25]

Finite volume expectation values in the sine-Gordon model

´A. Heged´ us, “Finite volume expectation values in the sine-Gordon model,” JHEP 01 (2020), 122 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)122 [arXiv:1909.08467 [hep- th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2020
[1]

Kl¨ umper and M

A. Kl¨ umper and M. T. Batchelor and P A Pearce, ”Central charges of the 6- and 19-vertex models with twisted boundary conditions”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 24 (1991) 3111-3133. doi:10.1088/0305- 4470/24/13/025

doi:10.1088/0305- 1991
[2]

New thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations without strings,

C. Destri and H. J. de Vega, “New thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations without strings,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992), 2313-2317 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2313

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2313 1992
[3]

Thermodynamics of the Anisotropic Spin-1/2 Heisenberg Chain and Related Quantum Chains

A. Kl¨ umper, “Thermodynamics of the Anisotropic Spin-1/2 Heisenberg Chain and Related Quantum Chains,” Z. Phys. B 91 (1993), 507 doi:10.1007/BF01316831 [arXiv:cond-mat/9306019 [cond-mat]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1993
[4]

Unified approach to thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz and finite size corrections for lattice models and field theories,

C. Destri and H. J. De Vega, “Unified approach to thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz and finite size corrections for lattice models and field theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 438 (1995), 413-454 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)00547-R [arXiv:hep- th/9407117 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1995
[5]

Bethe-ansatz quantum sine-Gordon thermodynamics. The specific heat,

M. Fowler and X. Zotos, “Bethe-ansatz quantum sine-Gordon thermodynamics. The specific heat,” Phys. Rev. B25 (1982) 5806

work page 1982
[6]

Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz and generalised hydrodynamics in the sine-Gordon model,

B. C. Nagy, G. Tak´ acs and M. Kormos, “Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz and generalised hydrodynamics in the sine-Gordon model,” SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) no.6, 145 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.6.145 [arXiv:2312.03909 [cond-mat.str- el]]

arXiv 2024

Show all 34 references

[7]

Fabian H. L. Essler, Holger Frahm, Frank G¨ ohmann, Andreas Kl¨ umper, and Vladimir E. Korepin. The One-Dimensional Hubbard Model . Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2005. online ISBN: 9780511534843. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511534843

2005 doi
[8]

One-Dimensional Anisotropic Heisenberg Model at Finite Temperatures,

M. Takahashi and M. Suzuki, “One-Dimensional Anisotropic Heisenberg Model at Finite Temperatures,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 48 (1972), 2187-2209 doi:10.1143/PTP.48.2187

1972 doi
[9]

The Quantum Sine-Gordon Equation as the Massive Thirring Model,

S. Coleman, “The Quantum Sine-Gordon Equation as the Massive Thirring Model,” Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 2088

1975
[10]

Sine-Gordon not equal to massive Thirring, and related heresies,

T. R. Klassen and E. Melzer, “Sine-Gordon not equal to massive Thirring, and related heresies,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 8 (1993), 4131-4174 doi:10.1142/S0217751X93001703 [arXiv:hep-th/9206114 [hep-th]]. 22

1993 arXiv
[11]

Finite volume spectrum of Sine-Gordon model and its restric- tions,

G. Feverati, “Finite volume spectrum of Sine-Gordon model and its restric- tions,” [arXiv:hep-th/0001172 [hep-th]]

arXiv
[12]

Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz in Relativistic Models. Scaling Three State Potts and Lee-yang Models,

A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz in Relativistic Models. Scaling Three State Potts and Lee-yang Models,” Nucl. Phys. B 342 (1990), 695-720 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90333-9

1990 doi
[13]

Light-cone lattice approach to fermionic theories in 2D,

C. Destri and H.J. de Vega, “Light-cone lattice approach to fermionic theories in 2D,” Nucl. Phys. B290 (1987) 363-391

1987
[15]

On the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations for reflectionless ADE scattering theories,

A. B. Zamolodchikov, “On the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations for reflectionless ADE scattering theories,” Phys. Lett. B 253 (1991), 391-394 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91737-G

1991 doi
[16]

Factorized s Matrices in Two- Dimensions as the Exact Solutions of Certain Relativistic Quantum Field Mod- els,

A. B. Zamolodchikov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Factorized s Matrices in Two- Dimensions as the Exact Solutions of Certain Relativistic Quantum Field Mod- els,” Annals Phys. 120 (1979), 253-291 doi:10.1016/0003-4916(79)90391-9

1979 doi
[17]

Emergent hydrody- namics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium,

O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon and T. Yoshimura, “Emergent hydrody- namics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. X 6 (2016) no.4, 041065 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041065 [arXiv:1605.07331 [cond- mat.stat-mech]]

2016 arXiv
[18]

Lecture notes on Generalised Hydrodynamics,

B. Doyon, “Lecture notes on Generalised Hydrodynamics,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 18 (2020), 1 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.18 [arXiv:1912.08496 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

2020 arXiv
[20]

Hidden Grass- mann structure in the XXZ model,

H. Boos, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, F. Smirnov and Y. Takeyama, “Hidden Grass- mann structure in the XXZ model,” Commun. Math. Phys.272 (2007), 263-281 doi:10.1007/s00220-007-0202-x [arXiv:hep-th/0606280 [hep-th]]

2007 arXiv
[21]

Hidden Grass- mann Structure in the XXZ Model II: Creation Operators,

H. Boos, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, F. Smirnov and Y. Takeyama, “Hidden Grass- mann Structure in the XXZ Model II: Creation Operators,” Commun. Math. Phys. 286 (2009), 875-932 doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0617-z [arXiv:0801.1176 [hep-th]]. 23

2009 arXiv
[22]

Hidden Grassmann Structure in the XXZ Model III: Introducing Matsubara direction,

M. Jimbo, T. Miwa and F. Smirnov, “Hidden Grassmann Structure in the XXZ Model III: Introducing Matsubara direction,” J. Phys. A 42 (2009), 304018 doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/30/304018 [arXiv:0811.0439 [math-ph]]

2009 arXiv
[23]

Hidden Grassmann Structure in the XXZ Model IV: CFT limit,

H. Boos, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa and F. Smirnov, “Hidden Grassmann Structure in the XXZ Model IV: CFT limit,” Commun. Math. Phys. 299 (2010), 825-866 doi:10.1007/s00220-010-1051-6 [arXiv:0911.3731 [hep-th]]

2010 arXiv
[24]

Hidden Grassmann structure in the XXZ model V: Sine-Gordon model,

M. Jimbo, T. Miwa and F. Smirnov, “Hidden Grassmann structure in the XXZ model V: Sine-Gordon model,” Lett. Math. Phys. 96 (2011), 325-365 doi:10.1007/s11005-010-0438-9 [arXiv:1007.0556 [hep-th]]

2011 arXiv
[26]

Mass scale in the sine-Gordon model and its reductions,

A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Mass scale in the sine-Gordon model and its reductions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10 (1995), 1125-1150 doi:10.1142/S0217751X9500053X

1995 doi
[27]

Sine- Gordon model at finite temperature: The method of random surfaces,

M. T´ oth, J. H. Pixley, D. Sz´ asz-Schagrin, G. Tak´ acs and M. Kormos, “Sine- Gordon model at finite temperature: The method of random surfaces,” Phys. Rev. B 111 (2025) no.15, 155112 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.155112 [arXiv:2408.08828 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

2025 arXiv
[28]

The k folded sine-Gordon model in finite volume,

Z. Bajnok, L. Palla, G. Takacs and F. Wagner, “The k folded sine-Gordon model in finite volume,” Nucl. Phys. B 587 (2000), 585-618 doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(00)00441-7 [arXiv:hep-th/0004181 [hep-th]]

2000 arXiv
[29]

TBA, NLO Luscher correction, and double wrapping in twisted AdS/CFT,

C. Ahn, Z. Bajnok, D. Bombardelli and R. I. Nepomechie, “TBA, NLO Luscher correction, and double wrapping in twisted AdS/CFT,” JHEP 12 (2011), 059 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2011)059 [arXiv:1108.4914 [hep-th]]

2011 arXiv
[30]

Solving topological defects via fusion,

Z. Bajnok and Z. Simon, “Solving topological defects via fusion,” Nucl. Phys. B 802 (2008), 307-329 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.04.003 [arXiv:0712.4292 [hep-th]]

2008 arXiv
[31]

Nonlinear integral equation and fi- nite volume spectrum of minimal models perturbed by ϕ(1,3),

G. Feverati, F. Ravanini and G. Takacs, “Nonlinear integral equation and fi- nite volume spectrum of minimal models perturbed by ϕ(1,3),” Nucl. Phys. B 570 (2000), 615-643 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00771-3 [arXiv:hep-th/9909031 [hep-th]]

2000 arXiv
[32]

Excited state Destri-De Vega equation for Sine-Gordon and restricted Sine-Gordon mod- els,

D. Fioravanti, A. Mariottini, E. Quattrini and F. Ravanini, “Excited state Destri-De Vega equation for Sine-Gordon and restricted Sine-Gordon mod- els,” Phys. Lett. B 390 (1997), 243-251 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01409-8 [arXiv:hep-th/9608091 [hep-th]]. 24

1997 arXiv
[33]

Massless integrable quantum field theories and mass- less scattering in (1+1)-dimensions,

P. Fendley and H. Saleur, “Massless integrable quantum field theories and mass- less scattering in (1+1)-dimensions,” [arXiv:hep-th/9310058 [hep-th]]

arXiv
[34]

Non-equilibrium coherence dynamics in one-dimensional Bose gases,

S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, B. Fischer, T. Schumm and J. Schmiedmayer, “Non-equilibrium coherence dynamics in one-dimensional Bose gases,” Nature 449 (2007) no.7160, 324-327 doi:10.1038/nature06149

2007 doi
[35]

Projective phase measurements in one-dimensional Bose gases,

Y. D. van Nieuwkerk, J. Schmiedmayer, F. H. L. Essler, “Projective phase measurements in one-dimensional Bose gases,” SciPost Phys.5 (2018) no.5, 046 https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.5.5.046 [arXiv: arXiv:1806.02626 [cond- mat.str-el]]. 25

2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [14]

Lattice approach to finite volume form-factors of the Massive Thirring/Sine-Gordon model

´A. Heged´ us, “Lattice approach to finite volume form-factors of the Massive Thirring (Sine-Gordon) model,” JHEP 08 (2017), 059 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2017)059 [arXiv:1705.00319 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017

[2] [25]

Finite volume expectation values in the sine-Gordon model

´A. Heged´ us, “Finite volume expectation values in the sine-Gordon model,” JHEP 01 (2020), 122 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)122 [arXiv:1909.08467 [hep- th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2020

[3] [1]

Kl¨ umper and M

A. Kl¨ umper and M. T. Batchelor and P A Pearce, ”Central charges of the 6- and 19-vertex models with twisted boundary conditions”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 24 (1991) 3111-3133. doi:10.1088/0305- 4470/24/13/025

doi:10.1088/0305- 1991

[4] [2]

New thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations without strings,

C. Destri and H. J. de Vega, “New thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations without strings,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992), 2313-2317 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2313

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2313 1992

[5] [3]

Thermodynamics of the Anisotropic Spin-1/2 Heisenberg Chain and Related Quantum Chains

A. Kl¨ umper, “Thermodynamics of the Anisotropic Spin-1/2 Heisenberg Chain and Related Quantum Chains,” Z. Phys. B 91 (1993), 507 doi:10.1007/BF01316831 [arXiv:cond-mat/9306019 [cond-mat]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1993

[6] [4]

Unified approach to thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz and finite size corrections for lattice models and field theories,

C. Destri and H. J. De Vega, “Unified approach to thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz and finite size corrections for lattice models and field theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 438 (1995), 413-454 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)00547-R [arXiv:hep- th/9407117 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1995

[7] [5]

Bethe-ansatz quantum sine-Gordon thermodynamics. The specific heat,

M. Fowler and X. Zotos, “Bethe-ansatz quantum sine-Gordon thermodynamics. The specific heat,” Phys. Rev. B25 (1982) 5806

work page 1982

[8] [6]

Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz and generalised hydrodynamics in the sine-Gordon model,

B. C. Nagy, G. Tak´ acs and M. Kormos, “Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz and generalised hydrodynamics in the sine-Gordon model,” SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) no.6, 145 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.6.145 [arXiv:2312.03909 [cond-mat.str- el]]

arXiv 2024