REVIEW 2 cited by
Magnetogenesis in Cyclical Universe
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We propose a simple solution to the magnetogenesis problem based on cyclic cosmology. It is demonstrated that magnetic fields, of sufficient strengths to account for the present observational bounds, can be created in the contracting phase preceding the beginning of the current cosmological cycle. The basic assumption of this model is that the Universe enters a contraction phase essentially empty, characterized by small seed electric fields. In this framework, there is no need for any new theoretical additions to explain magnetogenesis, such as new scalar fields or non-minimal couplings between curvature, scalar fields and the electromagnetic sector. Moreover, the proposed model is general in the sense that it does not assume any specific modified gravity theory to enable the cosmological bounce. When compared to the inflationary magnetogenesis paradigm, the proposed model also has the advantage of not leading to the backreaction and strong coupling problems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Influence of the Vacuum Polarization Effect on the Motion of Charged Particles in the Magnetic Field around a Schwarzschild Black Hole
If vacuum polarization non-minimally couples magnetic fields to gravity, charged particle trajectories around Schwarzschild black holes can shift from unbound to bound, especially near the horizon.
-
Reheating chiral dynamos with spin-0 and massive spin-1 torsions via chiral asymmetry
Adding a constant torsion trace to the chiral dynamo equation produces exponential magnetic growth with a sign set by torsion chirality, but the supporting equations and headline field strengths are not reliable.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.